Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
TARAPADA BHAWAN
Any visiting comrades who desire to stay at
union rest room at Tarapada Bhawan may apply in
advance through Division/Circle Secretaries to CHQ
and avail the benefits.
Sunday Time : 30.12.07
BHARTIYA POST 21 FEBRUARY, 2008
A Historical, Landmark Judgment
GDS are covered under Gratuity ACT, 1972
The Widow of a deceased GDS official namely as Gramin Dak Sewak (Conduct and Employment)
Sri Ram Murti has recorded a great victory in the Court Rules, 2001 regulate the payment of gratuity to the
of law, which has a significant, and far reaching positive workman and, the Gratuity Act would not be
impact on the question of payment of Gratuity to the applicable. Accordingly, gratuity has to be paid to them
entirety of Gramin Dak Sevaks in the Department of in accordance with the EDA Rules. Therefore, the view
Posts. It is more or less identical to 1977 Rajammas taken by the Controlling Authority or the Appellate
case as if the ED employees are holders of civil post. Authority accepting the workman respondent as an
On the death of her husband who was working employee under the Act is absolutely incorrect.
as a GDS in Hoshiarpur Division in Punjab Circle, Learned counsel has further submitted that under the
Smt.Sham Dulari filed a case before the Controlling EDA Rules, the workman respondent has already been
Authority appointed under the Payment of Gratuity Act, paid the gratuity amounting to Rs.16,520/- and no
1972 claimed a sum of Rs.57,692/- as gratuity for the further gratuity is payable as the provisions of the
period of service rendered by her husband (18 years 9 Gratuity Act do not apply to the instant case.
months and 25 days), which was far greater than the We have thoughtfully considered the
amount being paid to the GDS by the Department of submissions made by learned counsel for the
Posts at present under the Gramin Dak Sewak petitioner- department and regret our inability to accept
(Conduct and Employment) Rules, 2001. the same because the definition of expression
The Department negated the claim that the 'employee' in Section 2 (e) has to be read with Section
GDS are covered by the EDA Rules 1964, which are 5 and 14 of the Gratuity Act. The aforementioned
now known as Gramin Dak Sewak (Conduct and provisions of Section 2 (e), 5 and 14 are extracted
Employment) Rules, 2001 that regulate the payment below for faclity of reference: -
of gratuity to them and, the Gratuity Act 1972 would "2 Definitions.- In this Act unless the context otherwise
not be applicable to them. Under the above Rules the requires, (e) "employee" means any person (other
retired GDS official has already been paid the gratuity than an apprentice) employed on wages, (* * *) in any
amounting to Rs.16,520/- and as such no further establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port,
gratuity is payable as the provisions of the Gratuity railway, company or shop, to do any skilled, semi-
Act which do not apply to the instant case. skilled, or unskilled, manual, supervisory, technical
The Controlling Authority cum Asst. Labour or clerical work, whether the terms of such employment
commissioner (C) Chandigarh rejected the argument are express or implied, (and whether or not such person
of the Department of Posts and ordered payment of is employed in a managerial or administrative capacity,
another Rs.12,286/- with interest @ 10% w.e.f. but does not include any such person who holds a
25.12.2001to the widow over and above the gratuity post under the Central Government or a State
amount paid to her by the Department of Posts. Government and is governed by any other Act or by
The Department of Posts appealed against the any rules providing for payment of gratuity.
order to the Appellate Authority of Gratuity Act. The 5. Power to exempt.- [(1)] The appropriate
Appellate Authority cum Regional Labour Government may, by notification, and subject to such
commissioner also held and confirmed the decision conditions as may, be specified in the notification,
of the earlier orders with the following: exempt any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield,
Order plantation, port, railway company or shop to which
In view of the above findings, this Appellate Authority this Act applies from the operation of the provisions of
after affording the opportunities to the parties hereby this Act if, in the opinion of the appropriate Government,
confirmed the decision dated 21.8.2003 of the ld. the employees in such establishment, factory, mine,
Controlling Authority-cum-Asstt. Labour oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop are
Commissioner (C) Chandigarh." in receipt of gratuity or pensionary benefits not less
Mr M.S.Guglani, learned counsel for the favourable than the benefits conferred under this Act.]
petitioner has submitted that an employee has been (2) The appropriate Government may, by notification
defined in Section 2(e) of the Gratuity Act and it does and subject to such conditions as may be specified in
not cover any such person who is governed by some the notification, exempt any employee or class of
other rules of the department. According to the learned employees employed in any establishment, factory,
counsel, the EDA Rules 1964 which are now known mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop
BHARTIYA POST 22 FEBRUARY, 2008
to which this Act applies from the operation of the 4. In Rule 4 of the Rules it is provided that the
provisions of this Act, if, in the opinion of the appropriate employees shall not be entitled to any pension. . Rule
Government, such employee or class of employees are 5 relates to leave. Rule 6 deals with the termination of
in receipt of gratuity or pensionary benefits nor less services. Rule 7 prescribes nature of penalties that
favourable than the benefits conferred under this Act.] can be imposed. Rule 8 prescribes the procedure for
[(3) A notification issued under sub section (1) or imposing a penalty. Rule 8-A specifies the cases in
sub section (2) may be issued retrospectively a date which the provisions of Rule 8 would not be applicable."
not earlier than the date of commencement of this We are further of the view that the scheme of
Act, but no such notification shall be issued so as to the Gratuity Act indicates that it is not applicable to
prejudicially affect the interest of any person.] cases where any other rule or statute is more beneficial
14. Act to override other enactments, etc.- The than the Gratuity Act. For the aforementioned
provisions of this Act or any rule made thereunder shall proposition, reliance may be placed on a judgment of
have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent the Supreme Court in the case of E.I.D. Parry (I)
therewith contained in any enactment other than this Limited v. G. Onkar Murthy, (2001) 4 SCC 68. The
Act or in any instrument or contract having effect by converse would also be true that in cases where the
virtue of any enactment other than this Act." Gratuity Act is more beneficial than the Rules,
According to the definition of expression Regulations or any statute then the Gratuity Act would
employee, any person who is employed on wages in apply. It is evident that Section 5 of the Gratuity Act
any establishment, factory, mine etc., who may be expressly requires an order of exemption in favour of
performing the duty of a skilled, semi-skilled, or any organistion exempting it from the operation of the
unskilled, supervisory, technical or duties of clerical Gratuity Act in respect of any establishment etc. to
nature, has been included in the expression' which this Act applies. Section 5 further lays down
employee'. However, the expression 'employee' is not that the declaration is given in cases where the gratuity
to /include a person who holds a post under the Central or pensionary benefits are not less favourable then
Government or State Government and is governed by the benefits conferred under this Act. A perusal of
any other Act or by any Rules providing for payment Section 14 makes it obvious that the provisions of the
of gratuity. The respondent- workman is not governed Act and the Rules framed there under ought to have
by Central Civl Services (Classification, Control and the effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent
Appeal) Rules, 1965, as has been expressly held by therewith contained in any enactment other than this
Hon'ble Supreme Court in para 3 of the judgment in Act. This non-obstante clause also excludes the
Kameshwar Parshad's case (supra). It has further been application of any other rules. The aforementioned view
held that the Extra Departmental Agent are entitled to is fully supported by a judgment of the Supreme Court
the protection of Article 311 (2) of the Constitution in the case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Dharam
and they are governed by separate set of Rules, Parkash Sharma and other, (1998) 7 SCC 221. The
namely, the EDA Rules. Therefore, it does not follow short question which was considered by their lordships
that the Extra Departmental Agent hold a post under was, whether an employee of the Municipal
the Central Government for the purposes of pension Corporation, Delhi was entitled to payment of gratuity
and gratuity. In other words, within the meaning of under the Gratuity Act when the Corporation itself had
Section 2 (e) of the Gratuity Act, the respondent- adopted the provisions of Central Civil Service (Pension)
workman cannot held to have held a post under the Rules, 1972, which provide both for payment of pension
Central Government for the purposes of pension and as well as of gratuity. The Hon'ble Supreme Court rejected
gratuity. Para 3 and 4of the judgment is extracted the argument of the Corporation, namely, that when the
below for the facility of reference: Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972, provide a
"3. The Extra Departmental Agents are government package by itself, which has been applied to the
servants holding a civil post and are entitled to the employees of the Corporation then the provisions of
protection of Article 311(2) of the Constitution (See: Gratuity Act were not applicable and held as under: -
Supdt. of Post Offices v. P.K. Rajamma).They are "We have examined carefully the provisions of
governed by separate set of rules, viz., the Posts and the Pension Rules as well as the provisions of the
Telegraphs Extra Departmental Agents (Conduct and Payment of Gratuity Act. The Payment of Gratuity
Service) Rules, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act being a special provision for payment of gratuity,
Rules").The Central Civil Services (Classification, unless there is any provision therein which excludes
Control and Appeal) Rules are not applicable to this its applicability to an employee who is otherwise
category of employees in view of the notification dated governed by the provisions of the Pension Rules, it is
28.1.1957 issued by the Government of India under not possible for us to hold that the respondent is not
Rule 3 (3) of the said Rules. entitled to the gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity
BHARTIYA POST 23 FEBRUARY, 2008
Act. The only provision which was pointed out is the consideration because of the view expressed by the
definition of "employee" in Section 2(e) which excludes Hon'ble Supreme court in Dharam Parkash Sharma's
the employees of the Central Government and State case (supra). In that case also Central Civil Service
Governments receiving pension and gratuity under the (Pension) Rules, 1972 were adopted by the Municipal
Pension Rules but not an employee of the MCD. The Corporation, yet the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that
MCD employee, therefore, would be entitled to the the Gratuity Act would apply in view of Section 5 read
payment of gratuity provided for under the Payment of with Section 14 of the Gratuity Act. Therefore, we have
Gratuity Act. The mere fact that the gratuity is provided no hesitation in rejecting the argument raised on behalf
for under the Pension Rules will not disentitle him to
of the petitioner- department.
get the payment of gratuity under the Payment of
For the reasons aforementioned, this petition
Gratuity Act. In view of the overriding provisions
contained in Section 14 of the Payment of Gratuity fails and the same is dismissed.
Act, the provision for gratuity under the Pension Rules Accordingly, we direct that the respondent-
will have no effect. Possibly for this reason, Section 5 workman be paid her dues within a period of one month
of the Payment of Gratuity Act has conferred authority from today, failing which the annum from the date, the
on the appropriate Government to exempt any amount became due till the date of actual payment.
establishment from the operation of the provisions of The office is directed to send a copy of 'this
the Act, if in its opinion the employees of such order to the respondent- workman for information and
establishment are in receipt of gratuity or pensionary further necessary action.
benefits not less favourable than the benefits conferred The Department subsequently went on SLP in
under this Act. Admittedly, MCD has not taken any the Supreme Court as usual. The Honorable Supreme
steps to invoke the power of the Central Government Court also dismissed the SLP on 7.12.2007.
under Section 5 of the Payment of Gratuity Act. In the Therefore the Government now has no other
aforesaid premises, we are of the considered opinion alternate except to pay the gratuity to the widow of
that the employees of the MCD would be entitled to the deceased GDS as per the Gratuity Act, 1972,
the payment of gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity which states that Gratuity is a lump sum payment
Act notwithstanding the fact that the provisions of the made by the employer as a mark of recognition of the
Pension Rules have been made applicable to them for
service rendered by the employee when he retires or
the purpose of determining the pension. Needless to
leaves service. According to this Act the Gratuity is
mention that the employees cannot claim gratuity
payable @ 15 days wages for every year of completed
available under the Pension Rules."
service or part thereof in excess of six months. In case
The aforementioned observation in fact squarely
of seasonal establishment, gratuity is payable @ 7
apply to the facts of the present case. There is no
days wages for each season. Wages will include basic
declaration under Section 5 exempting the application
and D.A. The daily wages in respect of piece rated
of the Gratuity Act to Extra Departmental Agents.
employees are to be computed on the average of the
Moreover, the EDA Rules, are not more beneficial than
total wages received by an employee for a period of
the benefits which are available to the respondent-
three months. The maximum amount of Gratuity
workman under the Gratuity Act. Such a declaration
payable is Rs. 3.5 lakhs.
could not have been given by the competent authority
This is a landmark Judgment and the three
exempting the Extra Departmental Agents from the
lakhs of Gramin Dak Sevaks stand benefited
operation of the provisions of the Gratuity Act.
immensely.
Therefore, on principle as well as on precedents, we
The NFPE has immediately taken it up with
have reached the conclusion that the view taken by
the Government of India by writing to the Honourable
the Controlling Authority as well as Appellate Authority
Prime Minister of India for immediate extension of the
are not open to any attack in law and it does not furnish
benefit of the Judgment to all Gramin Dak Sevaks
any opportunity to interfere with the same. Therefore,
without any delay by making necessary changes in
we are inclined to uphold the order dated August 21,
the Rules, since the retiring GDS every day shall not
2003 (P-3) passed by the Controlling Authority and
be losing the benefit. Similarly, it is hold that the GDS
the order dated January 5, 2006 (P-6) passed by the
Union (CHQ) has spent to money engage lawyer to
Appellate Authority.
defend the case in supreme Court. Our hearty
The argument of the learned counsel that the
congratulations.
respondent workman is not covered by the definition
Let us sincerely ensure all efforts to make the judgment
of expression 'employee' as used in Section 2 (e) of
applicable to all the GDS officials. G/S
the Gratuity Act does not require any detailed
BHARTIYA POST 24 FEBRUARY, 2008
AN INTERACTION WITH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATORS
A meeting of Postal System Adminisrators the postal Assistants. No specific attendance be
organised by the Chennai City North Division System fixed and signing attendance at Head Quarters
Managers on 22.12.2007 was addressed by and attend fault at other thereafter offices should
Comrades K. Ragavendran [SG NFPE]; K. V. not be insisted.
Sridharan [GS P3]; Santosh Kumar [C/S Postal 6. Until, it is declared as promotional cadre, a sum
Accounts]; P/ Mohan [D/S P3 Chennai North]; and of Rs. 1000/- shall be granted as Spl Allowance/
S. Ragupathy [Former D/S P3 Chennai North]. Com. incentive to Systems Managers.
J. Srivenkatesh Circle Vice President P3 chaired the 7. Duties & Responsibilities should be properly
meeting. framed and it should be uniform in all Circles.
A detailed memorandum on many problems 8. Trainers Allowance should be granted the
faced by them including the basic issue of higher Systems Mangers who import training at various
pay scales handed over to the leaders after the same levels.
was explained by Comrades Dinesh and Senthil 9. Health insurance scheme to be introduced.
Kumar. System Administrators from several divisions 10. Providing Training in Advance Technology to the
of Tamilnadu interacted with the leaders on many Systems Managers.
issues connected to their problems. In nutshell, the systems managers of Tamilnadu Circle
The following issues were focussed and who met on 22.12.07 have given valuable suggestions
discussed at length in the meeting. about their job and for their better service conditions.
1. Maintenance of a selection panel list at regional Besides they dealt at length about the problems
level for System Managers and the whimsical confronting on computerisation. The General
approach of officers either to add or delete should Secretary and Secretary General, NFPE also
be thwarted. participated the discussions and interacted and
2. Augmenting more System Managers by fixing informed that the problems of Systems Managers has
suitable work norms based on the number of already been included in the P3 charter of demands.
systems handled. They have also explained that all efforts were taken
3. Payment of Road Mileage Allowance without any by them effectively in focusing the issues pertaining
mileage restriction. Actual fuel expenses on to Systems Manager for providing higher pay scale
conveyance should be reimbursed while deputing before the Six Pay Commission. They assured that
to other stations for attending fault. they will leave no stone unturned in mitigating the
4. Uniformity in payment of mobile phone recharge bills. genuine problems of the Systems Managers who are
A minimum of Rs. 500/- talk value should be ensured. part and parcel of P3 and its movement.
5. Treating the System Manger as equal to field The organisers of the meeting Com. Dinesh &
officer and make it as a promotional cadre for Com. Senthil deserve all appreciations.
¼i`"B 31 dk 'ks"k½
ns; ,d leku gks] lkFk gh eksckby Qksu fn, tk, WELL DONE CHAUDHARY
dk;Z o ftEesnkjh;ksa dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k tk,A The following is the excerpts from the letter
16- 2002&03 ls iM+s O;fDrxr nkoksa tSls vks-Vh-,-] Vh- received from Com. A. C. Chaudhary, Divisional
Secretary, Bardoli Division in Gujarat Circle.
,-] esfMdy bR;kfn ds fy, i;kZIr QaM fn;k tk,A
"Our Bardoli division has 132 members in
17- vkj-ih-,y-vkbZ- O;kikj ds fy, ,l-ih-,e-@ch-ih- Group 'C ' cadre out of 157 staff. There are 94
,e- dks bulasfVo dk rRdky Hkqrku fd;k tk,A subscribers to Bhartiya Post from our division which
18- lHkh ,l-ch- 'kk[kkvksa esa dEI;qVj ij feyus okyk ,l- the highest of any other division of Gujarat."
ch- HkÙkk fn;k tk,A We record our sincere appreciation to Com.
Choudhary and his team. Let Bardoli division be an
19- lHkh vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fy, ,-,e-,Q-vkbZ- ¼,lksfl,'ku example for others. I trust he will enhance the 132
vkWQ eq;qP;qvy QUM bUMLVªh½ ijh{kk ds fy, Qhl members upto 150 in the ensuing verification and
dk fjQaM gksA reach 120 subscribers to Bhartiya Post.
Well done Comrade! You deserve all
20- cksul iz.kkyh dk iwuZoyksdu vkSj 60 fnolh; lhek
appreciations.
dks gVk;k tk,A
BHARTIYA POST 25 FEBRUARY, 2008
GOVERNMENT ORDERS
l Interest at 8% for 2007-08 for GPF/CPF/New cadre may be made in the following order of preference:
Pension System. 1. Against vacancies arising under 90% quota:
It is announced for general information that a) From amongst JAO Part-II examination
during the year 2007-2008, accumulations at the credit qualified candidates working whether in
of subscribers to the General Provident Fund and other O/o DA(P) or in other offices of
similar funds shall continue to carry interest at the Department of Posts in that circle
rate of 8% (Eight per cent) per annum. This rate will b) In case, of non-availability of the above
be in force during the financial year beginning on 1-4- category, from amongst Sr. Accountants
2007. The funds concerned are : with minimum three years of regular
1. The General Provident Fund (Central Services). service in the grade, as per prescribed
2. The Contributory Provident Fund (India). procedure.
3. The All India Services Provident Fund. 2. Against vacancies arising under 10% quota:
4. The State Railway Provident Fund. From amongst Sr. Accountants with 3 years of
5. The General Provident Fund (Defence Services). regular service in the grade as per prescribed
6. The Indian Ordance Department Provident Fund. proceedure.
7. The Indian Ordance Factories Workmen's Above procedure may be adopted while making
Provident Fund. such arrangements against reserved vacancies also.
8. The Indian Naval Dockyard Workmen's Provident While locally officiating as JAO, both JAO Part-II
Fund. examination qualified candidates, as also Sr.
9. The Defence Services Officers' Provident Fund. Accountants will be entitled for grade pay subject to
10. The Armed Forces Personnel Provident Fund. restrictions under FR 35. All other terms and
11. New Pension System (Defined Contribution conditions, restriction and duration of vacancies
Pension Scheme). against which local officiating arrangements are made,
2. Ordered that the Resolution be published in would continue to apply.
Gazette of India. This will take effect from the date of issue of
G.I.,M.F., Resolution No. F.No. 5(1)-B(PD)2007, dated the orders.
17-10-2007 The receipt of this letter may please be
l Rate of interest for purchase of acknowledged.
conveyances during 2007-2008 No.3(3)/99/PA-Admn.I/245 to 288 Dated 07-07-2006
The undersigned is directed to state that the l Treatment of strike period in respect of
rates of interest for advances sanctioned to the Gramin Dak Sevaks.
Government servants for purchase of conveyances This has reference to D.O. letter No. 8-27/97-
during 2007-2008 i.e., from 1st April, 2007 to 31st SR (Pt.) dated 23.06.1998 from Member (D) and letter
March, 2008 will continue to be at the same level as No.8-1/2001-SR dated 7-2-2001, from Director (SR)
for 2006-2007, as under : whereby orders were issued that Rule 19 (now rule 23
Rate of interest of the GDS Rules, 2001) may be invoked for GDS
per annum participating in the strike only in cases of incitement,
(i) Advance for purchase of Bicycle 5.5% instances of violence and sabotage etc., on the
(ii) Advance for purchase of conveyance 8% analogy of FR 17A for Departmental employees. It was
other than motor car (viz. motor cycle, also mentioned that principle of 'no work no pay' is to
scotter, etc.) be followed and the strike period cannot be adjusted
by grant of leave. In this connection, it is further being
(iii) Advance for purchase of motor car 11.5%
clarified that although the strike period cannot be
G.I.,M.F., O.M. No. F.No. 5(2)-B(PD)2007, Dated 17- regularized by grant of leave.
10-2007 It will not attract the following disabilities of any
l Local officiating arrangement in JAO GDS :-
cadre. (i) Unless, it is specifically ordered by the competent
The matter regarding simplifying the existing authority after show cause notice on account of
instructions on making local officiating arrangement incitement, violence and sobotage, the strike
in JAO cadre was under consideration of this office. In period would not result in to break in service.
supersession of all the existing instructions, it has (ii) The strike period would not adversely affect the
been decided that local officiating arrangements in JAO counting of service for payment of severance
BHARTIYA POST 26 FEBRUARY, 2008
allowance at the time of discharge from machine by PMRO is not possible at the time of
employment. renewal of licence in view of reorganization of PMRO
(iii) The strike period would not cause any delay for and entrusting the work of maintaining and operation
their absorption against Group 'D' posts which is of hardware to postal machine assistants redesigned
done on the seniority basis. as postal assistants to examine the electronic franking
(iv) The strike period would not adversely affect the machines.
eligibility of GDS to take the exam to Group 'C' The matter has been examined and it has been
Cadre (Postal Assistant/Sorting Assistant). decided to dispense with the requirement of technical
2. This issues with the approval of competent examination of more than 10 years old franking
authority. machines and production of fitness certificate from
No.22-2/2004-GDS Dated 13.12.2007 PMRO at the time of renewal of licences. However,
l Renewal of licences for use of franking DY(PM)/SPM/PRI/PA etc. assigned with the
machines which are more than 10 years old. supervision of such machines may certify that the FM
Franking machines on completion of 10 years is in proper working order or replacement of base or
of life are required to be technically examined by anything else is required. Beside above, procedure
PMRO at the time of each renewal of licence as per prescribed for renewal of licences will continue to be
instructions contained in para 37 of 'The instructions followed. This may kindly be brought into the notice of
for licencing and use of franking machines' circulated all concerned for necessary action.
vide Dte's letter no. 41-13/95-PO dated 08-04-1996. Receipt of this letter may kindly be
Some Circles have pointed out that technical acknowledged.
examination of more than 10 years old franking No.9-3/2007-PO Dated 31.12.2007
ORISSA CWC MEETING
The CWC Meeting was started just at sharp 11 the problems relating to Group - C employees. The
AM on dated 07-12-2007 at Youth Hostel Gopalpur. interactions with the CWC members on various issues
All the CWC members participated and Com. by the General Secretary were quite remarkable.
Sibananda Dash, Asst. Circle Secretary, Com. The open Session of the CWC Meeting was
Jaydeep Chakraborty Divisional Secretary made nice held at Berahampur HO premises on 09th Dec. 2007.
arrangements for the accommodation staying of the Com. Alli Pattanaik, sate CPI (M) leader, Sri Ramesh
comrades there in Youth Hostel & Holiday Home at Ch. Chayu Pattanaik, MLA , Berahampur, Sri A.N.
Gopalpur. The arrangements of food for the comrades Nanda IPS, Chief PMG, Com. R.C. Mishra C/S AIPEU
were marvellous. Our General Secretary attended the Gr - C com. R.N. Dhal C/S AIRMS EU R-III, Com. D.B.
CWC meeting on 8th night and addressed the Mohanty C/S AIPEU postmen & Gr - D attended the
deliberation till 4 'O' Clock, late night, discussing all open session and addressed the gathering. Com. K.C.
Patnayak, President of the Circle Union presided over
No increase in Retirement Age - the meeting. Com. Jaydeep Chakraborty, Secretary
Government Reception committee gave the vote of thanks.
Government today denied that there is any poroposal All the CWC members, divisional secretaries
to increase the retirement of the Central Government attended the Open Session and there was gathering
Employees. of around three hundred comrades in the above open
Following is the text of the Press Statement session.
issued by the Department of Personnel & Training, -R.C. Mishra, Circle Secretary, Orissa.
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and
Pensions on 01.01.08, to clarify that there is no
proposal before the Government regarding raising the
The Bhartia Post provides
retirement age of Central Government employees
from 60 years to 62 years :
food for thought.
"Atention of the Government has been drawn to It costs Rs. 5/- only per copy.
reports appearing in some sections of the media
regarding raising the retirement age of Central Are you a subscriber to the
Government employees from 60 to 62 years. In order
to put at rest all such speculations, it is clarified Bhartia Post?
that there is no such proposal before the Government.