Sunteți pe pagina 1din 11

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)

Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014


ISSN: 2349-8862

Experimental Investigation Of Forced Circulation Solar Air Heater


Along With Integrated Solar Collector And Phase Change Material
(Paraffin Wax)

Mr. Kaushal Kishore


M.Tech student

Prof. J. N. Mahto
Prof. R. S. Prasad

Prof. (Dr.) S. C. Roy

Assistant Professor in Department of Mechanical


engineering, BIT Sindri

HOD and Professor

Abstract: Latent heat thermal energy storage is one of


the most efficient ways to store the thermal energy for
heating air by energy received from the sun. This project is
investigation and analysis of thermal energy storage
incorporating with phase change materials (PCM) and
integrated solar collector plate for use in solar air heater.
The integrated collector storage (ICS) concept is applicable
as direction in increasing the economic feasibility and more
attractive for space heating, cooling in domestic, agricultural
and industrial applications in buildings, solar applications,
off-peak energy storage, and heat exchanger improvements.
It focuses mostly on applications involving a reduction of
electric power consumption. A system of this combines
collection and storage of thermal energy in a single unit.
Compared with the other conventional domestic air heating
system, the integrated collector heating system has the more
advantage of simplicity, both in erection and in operation.
The thermal performance of this solar air heater with phase
change material and integrated collector plate are more than
conventional type because large surface area for heat
transfer is obtained. When the sun ray falls on the solar
collector plate, the panel or surface area is responsible for
the amount of heat storage. This heat energy is transferred
with the help of aluminium fins to the stored paraffin wax
which is used as a latent heat storage system. In this project
reflector plate with stand and paraffin wax is used. The
latent heat storage capacity of paraffin wax is more. So that
the amount of heat energy is increased with the help of this
reflector. Due to this more amount of heat energy the
difference of inlet air temperature and outlet air temperature
is more, so that high temperature of hot air is obtained and
efficiency of collector plate is increased. This improved
collector efficiency by reducing heat loss to the environment,
and help achieve an overall efficiency, which accosts of
pumping loss for moving air through the collector.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Solar energy developed as a means of cheap energy for


Drying grains, fruits, vegetables, tea, and building heating,
www.ijsres.com

space heating, drying for industrial & agriculture purposes.


The increasing need for renewable energy sources, specifically
solar energy, requires that research be conducted to improve
the efficiency of solar systems. Energy storage is not only
plays an important role in conservation the energy but also
improves the performance and reliability of wide range of
energy systems. Solar air heater is a simple device to heat air
by utilizing solar energy. Such heater is implemented in many
applications which require low temperature below 60C. Solar
air heating (solar collector) is a renewable heating technology
and provides heat using solar energy. With fuel costs and other
factors, solar air heater is getting more attention. The
performance of SAH depends on a number of factors. There
are many advantages of solar air heater systems. Firstly, they
are simple to maintain and design. After the set-up cost, a
solar air heater system has no fuel expenditure. There is less
leakage and corrosion when compared to the systems that use
liquid. It is also an eco-friendly system which has zero
greenhouse gas emissions. It is really cost effective and simple
way to get 75% more power from any ordinary solar panel.
Modern air heater design, focused mainly on improves
conductive heat transfer and absorber plate temperature. Most
of the time a solar panel is working well below peak power,
and when the sun is lower in the sky, early morning and late
afternoon. The light levels are just not so enough. To boost the
sun light level so introduce a mirror or reflector plate to reflect
more Solar irradiation onto the solar collector plate. This is
probably one of the cheapest and easiest ways to boost the
power of a small solar collector plate. The greatest limitations
to increasing the use of conventional collectors are their
relatively low average efficiency and high investment cost.
For this reason, significant research on improving the
efficiency of collector plate has been carried out. It indicate
that the greatest theoretical improvements to the collector
efficiency can be achieved by utilizing internal fins in the
collector plates, reflective surface and phase change material
(paraffin wax). Phase change materials (PCM) are Latent
heat storage materials. The thermal energy transfer occurs
when a material changes from solid to liquid, or liquid to
solid. Initially, these solidliquid PCMs perform like
conventional storage materials; their temperature rises as they
Page 50

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862
absorb heat. Unlike conventional (sensible) storage materials,
PCM absorbs and release heat at a nearly constant
temperature. They store 514 times more heat per unit volume
than sensible storage materials such as water etc.

II.

precisely across a wide scale. However, in this test


measurement range was limited to 1.5-4 m/s.
A flow straightener (Triangular) was used at the inlet and
outlet, to guarantee uniform flow into the solar collector. A
pyranometer measuring short wave radiation was connected at
the same slope to as the collector to read solar radiation flux
(W/m2) on the inclined surface.
A hot wire anemometer was installed, and its reading was
taken at several locations across the perpendicular plane to the
flow direction so that an average velocity is measured. This
measurement is used to determine the air flow rate across the
unit.
Reading were obtained for two inlet air temperature
values and two outlet air temperature values, in addition to six
reading of the temperature of the absorber plate at different
location along the length and across the width. These ten
reading were taken by the use of J-Type thermocouple. The
thermocouples were connected to 6-channel thermocouple
amplifier. In addition, another J-type thermocouple was
connected to measure the ambient air temperature. The
pyranometer output reading was converted into a heat flux
using the calibration relation (1mV=129.31W/
as per
specification).
Once the unit was connected, it was left to run for about 2
days before the measurements were taken, in order to
overcome the initial transient effects and to confirm reliable
operation of the unit. Then, the experiment was run at steady
state for a period of 9 days at PG Hostel B.I.T, Sindri.

LITERATURE REVIEW

O. V. Ekechukwu. et.al [1] they proposed designs and


performance technique of a flat plate solar energy air heating
collectors for low temperature. The design and construction of
solar air heating collectors at critical to overall performance
for either active or passive solar energy.
Gawlik Keith .et.al[2] they developed an unglazed,
transparent-plate solar air heater for heating air directly. The
collector temperature was low, relative to systems that
recalculate the air. They used low cost materials like plastic to
reduce the cost of solar air heater.
Jaurker AR et.al[3] They studied the heat transfer and
friction characteristics of collector plate in solar air heater. At
low flow rates the solar air heater with roughness elements
gives better performance. At high flow rate, the smooth duct
solar air heater had better efficiency.
Cemil Yamal. et.al[4] They were investigate theoretically
the effect of different system operating conditions like types of
air heater, different design parameters and different weather
condition on a solar air heater. They used Runge-Kutta
method to solve the energy balance equations numerically
with double-pass solar air heater under the same operating
conditions.
E. Zambolin. .et.al [5] were developed a glazed flat plate
collector usually present a metal absorber in a flat rectangular
housing. The glass covers on the upper surface and the
insulation on the other sides. The solar energy absorbed by the
plate is transferred to the liquid flowing within the collector
plate.
Ljiljana T. Kostic. et.al [6] they proposed the influence of
reflectance from flat plate solar radiation concentrators made
of Al sheet. With the increase of solar radiation intensity
concentration factor and total daily thermal energy generated
by Thermal collector with concentrators increase.

IV.

The reading was taken for first three days in one mass
flow rate (0.015 Kg/s) and for next three days in second mass
flow rate (0.020 Kg/s) and same for next three days in third
mass flow rate (0.025 Kg/s).Observation was taken from 6:00
am to 5:00 am next day with one hour interval, for 24 hour
(Day and night).
The obtain data with corresponding date are given in
below mentioned tables
Time
(hr)

Tamb
( )

III.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Figure 1: experimental Set up


The solar collector along with its inlet and outlet ducts
was installed at an angle of 20.58 south to the horizontal. A
centrifugal air blower was attached to the inlet and placed with
a voltage regulator so that the inlet air flow rate can be varied

OBSERVATION AND CALCULATION

Inlet
Temp.
( )

Outlet
Temp.
( )

Absorber plate temperature


( )

Solar
Irradiation
(W/m2)

Ti1

Ti2

To1

To2

TP1

TP2

TP3

TP4

TP5

TP6

06

22

23

23

30

30

27

28

33

34

36

36

07

28

30

30

38

39

34

36

35

38

42

44

437.551

08

31

32

32

43

44

36

38

40

44

47

49

621.1712

09

37

39

38

49

50

42

44

46

48

52

55

723.3261

10

40

42

43

53

53

47

49

50

52

55

59

772.4639

11

42

45

44

55

56

48

50

52

54

58

61

839.7051

12
13

45
46

44
46

43
45

57
60

58
60

47
49

50
52

54
56

58
60

60
64

63
66

895.3084
969.0151

14

45

44

45

58

58

49

51

55

59

64

64

906.9463

15

44

46

45

52

52

49

50

55

58

62

58

808.6707

16

40

45

45

48

48

49

54

56

58

60

54

716.8606

17

39

43

42

46

46

46

49

52

56

60

52

622.4643

18

38

40

39

45

45

43

46

50

54

57

51

453.0682

www.ijsres.com

Page 51

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862
19

35

36

37

44

44

41

44

47

50

52

50

20

32

32

34

43

43

38

40

42

46

50

49

21

29

30

32

43

43

36

38

41

44

48

49

22

28

30

30

42

42

34

37

40

42

45

48

23
00

28
27

28
27

30
28

42
42

42
42

34
32

36
34

39
37

39
40

44
44

48
48

01

26

27

27

41

41

31

33

35

38

40

47

02
03
04

25
23
23

26
25
24

27
24
22

36
32
29

36
33
29

31
28
26

31
30
29

35
30
31

36
34
33

38
36
36

42
38
35

0
0
0

22

23

22

27

27

26

29

33

36

37

33

05

23

27

28

27

38

37

33

35

37

37

40

44

00

25

25

26

34

34

32

34

35

36

38

40

01

25

25

25

31

31

32

33

34

35

37

37

02

24

24

24

30

30

31

32

33

34

35

37

0
0

03

24

24

23

30

31

32

33

34

34

36

04

23

23

24

29

29

30

31

32

33

34

36

05

22

22

23

28

28

27

30

32

33

34

34

Observation Table1: First Day Mass flow rate (1) =0.015


kg/s
Time
(hr)

Tamb

Absorber plate temperature


( )

Solar
Irradiation
(W/m2)

TP1
30
33
41
45
47
47
51
50

TP2
33
35
45
45
49
50
52
54

TP3
34
36
52
46
52
53
54
57

TP4
37
40
56
50
55
56
56
60

TP5
39
44
50
55
59
60
60
63

TP6
37
46
54
60
60
62
64
66

0
456.481
647.0332
652.2056
794.4466
944.4462
824.317
944.4462

Time
(hr)

Tamb
( )

22
28
32
38

Inlet
Temp.
( )
Ti1
Ti2
23
22
28
29
32
33
38
39

Outlet
Temp.
( )
To1
To2
30
30
39
39
45
45
51
51

06
07
08
09

Absorber plate temperature


( )

Solar
Irradiation
(W/m2)

TP1
26
33
37
43

TP2
28
34
38
43

TP3
30
36
40
47

TP4
30
38
41
49

TP5
31
40
44
52

TP6
35
44
50
56

0
468.5854
609.5333
678.0676

10
11
12
13

40
43
45
46

40
43
45
46

41
44
46
46

52
55
55
56

52
55
56
56

45
48
50
50

47
50
54
53

49
53
56
58

50
57
60
61

54
58
62
62

57
60
61
61

793.1535
825.481
904.3601
984.5323

14
15

46
45

45
46

45
47

55
52

55
52

49
51

51
56

55
60

58
60

61
63

60
57

939.2738
894.0153

06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13

25
29
34
39
41
42
45
46

Inlet
Temp.
( )
Ti1
Ti2
25
26
29
29
35
37
40
41
42
43
43
43
46
47
47
46

16

44

45

46

49

49

50

52

56

58

60

54

696.171

14
15
16
17

47
47
44
41

48
46
45
42

47
47
46
44

60
56
52
48

60
56
52
48

51
51
50
48

55
55
52
50

58
59
57
54

62
61
60
57

63
63
62
60

66
62
58
54

837.1189
787.9811
648.3262
468.5854

17
18
19

42
39
38

42
42
40

42
41
39

45
43
42

45
43
42

46
45
43

50
47
40

53
50
46

57
55
54

61
58
57

50
48
47

667.7228
556.5162
0

18
19
20
21
22
23

36
33
31
30
29
29

37
35
33
32
31
30

38
36
34
33
31
31

46
44
43
43
42
41

46
44
43
43
42
42

42
40
38
37
35
35

44
42
41
40
38
40

47
46
45
44
43
41

52
50
46
45
45
42

54
52
50
50
47
43

52
50
49
49
48
47

325.0513
0
0
0
0
0

20
21

36
34

37
34

38
35

42
41

42
41

42
39

44
41

48
45

50
48

55
48

47
46

0
0

22
23
00

32
31
29

32
32
30

33
32
30

41
40
40

45
40
40

37
36
34

38
38
35

40
40
38

44
42
42

48
46
45

50
45
45

0
0
0

00
01
02

28
26
25

30
28
27

29
29
28

41
39
34

43
39
34

33
33
32

36
35
35

40
38
37

42
41
39

44
43
40

47
45
40

0
0
0

01

29

30

30

39

39

34

32

34

37

40

44

03
04
05

25
24
24

27
24
23

27
23
24

32
29
28

32
29
28

31
27
28

35
30
30

36
34
34

38
37
34

39
37
36

38
35
34

0
0
0

02
03
04
05

28
24
22
22

29
24
25
24

29
25
25
23

35
31
30
29

35
32
30
29

33
29
29
27

33
30
30
28

36
32
30
30

39
34
34
33

40
37
35
35

40
37
35
34

0
0
0
0

( )

Outle
Temp.
( )
To1
To2
31
31
40
41
48
48
54
54
54
55
56
56
58
58
60
61

Observation Table3: Third Day Mass flow rate (1) =0.015


kg/s

Observation Table2: Second Day Mass flow rate (1) =0.015


kg/s
Time
(hr)

Tamb
( )

Inlet
Temp.
( )

Outlet
Temp.
( )

Absorber plate temperature


( )

Solar
Irradiation
(W/m2)

Ti1

Ti2

To1

To2

TP1

TP2

TP3

TP4

TP5

TP6

Observation Table4: Fourth Day Mass flow rate (2) =020


kg/s
Time
(hr)

Tamb
( )

Inlet
Temp.
( )

Outlet
Temp. ( )

Absorber plate temperature


( )

Solar
Irradiation
(W/m2)

Ti1

Ti2

To1

To2

TP1

TP2

TP3

TP4

TP5

TP6

06

23

25

24

32

32

28

29

31

31

32

28

06

23

24

25

29

30

35

35

35

35

37

38

07

29

29

29

37

37

33

31

34

36

38

33

517.7232

07

25

24

26

30

30

33

34

35

35

35

36

511.2577

08

31

33

32

44

44

36

36

37

39

44

36

675.4814

09

36

38

37

50

50

41

41

44

47

50

41

723.3261

10

37

41

40

54

54

44

45

47

53

56

44

802.2052

11

39

43

42

56

56

46

49

52

56

58

46

869.4464

08

29

30

28

42

42

35

33

34

35

40

40

636.6884

09

32

31

33

46

46

37

38

40

44

43

44

773.757

10

36

36

37

51

53

41

42

46

50

52

57

838.412

11

40

42

42

56

56

46

43

54

56

58

62

928.929

12
13

42
43

44
45

43
46

52
51

52
51

47
50

50
53

55
56

57
58

58
61

47
50

892.7222
930.2221

12

44

46

44

59

59

51

54

57

60

63

65

869.4464

14
15

43
43

46
43

45
43

48
48

48
48

49
47

52
53

55
56

58
59

60
61

49
47

903.067
842.2913

13

45

46

45

59

60

56

60

63

64

65

65

878.4981

16

39

39

39

44

44

43

52

55

58

60

43

772.4639

17

38

38

38

43

43

42

50

54

56

59

42

658.6711

18

37

37

37

42

42

41

48

50

52

55

41

495.7405

19

36

37

36

41

41

40

44

46

50

52

40

20

35

35

36

40

41

40

43

45

46

50

40

14

45

44

43

53

53

54

56

58

60

62

59

852.6361

15

43

42

43

48

48

52

55

57

59

61

54

710.3951

16

42

42

41

47

48

49

53

55

58

60

53

569.4472

17

39

40

41

46

46

45

47

51

54

56

52

464.7061

21

35

35

33

40

40

37

40

42

44

48

37

18

36

37

38

46

46

42

44

48

50

53

52

441.4303

22

32

33

34

40

40

38

40

42

45

47

38

19

33

33

35

45

45

39

40

44

48

51

52

23

31

33

33

39

39

37

39

40

44

47

37

20

30

30

31

45

45

36

38

41

44

46

48

00

29

30

31

39

39

35

36

39

42

44

35

21

29

30

29

43

43

34

36

38

41

42

44

01

28

29

30

36

36

34

36

38

40

41

34

22

27

28

28

41

42

34

35

37

38

41

47

02

26

28

28

32

32

32

34

37

39

40

32

www.ijsres.com

Page 52

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862
03

25

26

27

31

31

31

31

34

35

37

31

04

25

26

25

30

30

29

30

33

35

37

29

05

25

26

24

29

29

28

29

31

34

36

28

Time
(hr)

Observation Table5: Fifth Day Mass flow rate (2) =0.020


kg/s
Time
(hr)

Tamb
( )

06
07

25
30

Inlet
Temp.
( )
Ti1
Ti2
27
26
30
29

Outlet
Temp. ( )

Absorber plate temperature


( )

Solar
Irradiation
(W/m2)

08
09

35
38

37
40

38
41

47
50

47
50

42
45

43
45

43
47

44
49

46
52

52
55

669.0159
755.6536

10
11

39
39

42
45

44
46

52
56

52
56

48
50

51
52

52
54

55
58

58
60

57
61

833.2396
921.1704

12

40

45

44

55

55

48

50

55

58

60

60

914.7049

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

40
41
41
38
35
34
34
33
30

45
42
41
38
36
35
34
32
32

46
42
41
38
36
35
34
34
32

53
48
46
43
41
41
41
40
40

53
48
46
43
41
41
41
40
40

50
46
45
42
40
39
38
38
36

54
55
54
55
50
46
40
39
39

56
57
56
57
52
48
42
40
38

60
61
58
58
55
49
44
40
40

62
63
60
60
58
52
47
42
42

58
53
51
48
46
46
46
45
45

958.6703
909.5325
855.2223
703.9296
582.3782
503.4991
0
0
0

22
23

29
28

30
30

30
29

39
39

39
39

34
33

37
35

37
36

39
36

41
39

44
44

0
0

00
01
02

28
26
25

29
28
28

30
28
27

38
34
31

38
34
31

34
32
31

34
33
33

36
35
36

38
37
40

40
40
41

43
39
36

0
0
0

03
04
05

25
24
24

26
26
24

26
26
24

30
29
29

30
30
29

30
30
28

30
30
30

33
31
30

34
33
33

35
36
35

35
35
34

0
0
0

To1
34
39

To2
34
39

TP1
30
33

TP2
32
34

TP3
34
36

TP4
37
38

TP5
37
40

TP6
39
44

0
517.7232

Observation Table6: Sixth Day Mass flow rate (2) =0.020


kg/s
Time
(hr)

Tamb
( )

22
26

Inlet
Temp.
( )
Ti1
Ti2
23
22
27
28

06
07

To1
27
35

To2
27
36

TP1
26
32

TP2
26
34

TP3
28
36

TP4
30
38

TP5
31
39

TP6
31
40

0
489.275

08

31

31

31

40

41

35

36

37

39

43

45

659.9642

09

35

36

35

44

45

39

41

43

44

46

49

806.0845

10
11

40
43

41
43

42
44

49
53

50
52

46
48

45
49

45
51

48
56

50
56

54
56

820.3086
927.6359

12
13

44
45

44
45

45
46

54
55

55
55

49
50

50
52

53
55

55
58

57
60

59
59

931.5152
939.2738

14
15

45
45

45
45

45
45

54
52

54
52

49
49

50
50

54
52

57
55

58
58

58
56

897.8946
800.9121

16

43

44

44

48

48

48

49

53

55

57

52

564.2748

17

41

41

41

45

45

45

46

49

51

55

49

504.7922

18

39

39

39

43

43

43

48

48

50

52

47

450.482

19

37

38

38

41

41

42

46

47

49

51

45

20

37

38

38

40

40

42

43

45

48

50

44

21

36

37

37

Outlet
Temp. ( )

40

40

Absorber plate temperature


( )

41

41

43

44

48

44

Solar
Irradiation
(W/m2)

Tamb
( )

Inlet
Temp.
( )
Ti1
Ti2

Outlet
Temp. ( )

Absorber plate temperature


( )

Solar
Irradiation
(W/m2)

To1

To2

TP1

TP2

TP3

TP4

TP5

TP6

06

23

23

23

26

27

27

27

28

29

30

27

07

27

28

29

34

34

33

36

36

38

39

33

463.413

08

30

30

31

37

37

35

37

39

40

43

35

610.8264

09

35

36

37

44

46

41

42

44

46

48

41

679.3607

10
11

41
42

41
42

41
42

48
50

48
50

45
46

49
50

50
53

52
56

54
58

45
46

764.7053
839.7051

12
13
14
15

43
44
44
45

43
44
45
45

43
44
45
45

52
53
51
48

52
53
51
48

47
48
49
49

52
53
51
50

54
54
53
52

58
59
56
55

59
60
58
57

47
48
49
49

894.0153
904.3601
840.9982
798.3259

16

41

41

41

45

46

45

48

50

52

55

45

706.5158

17

37

37

37

41

41

41

47

49

51

54

41

640.5677

18
19

36
34

36
34

36
34

40
40

40
40

40
38

46
43

47
45

49
47

52
50

40
38

546.1714
0

20
21

34
33

34
33

34
33

39
39

39
39

38
37

39
37

41
38

45
40

46
42

38
37

0
0

22

33

33

33

38

38

37

34

36

38

40

37

23

31

31

31

38

38

35

33

35

37

39

35

00
01

30
28

31
28

31
29

36
33

36
33

35
33

34
33

37
35

37
36

39
38

35
33

0
0

02

25

26

26

30

30

30

30

33

36

37

30

03

24

24

24

30

31

28

29

30

32

34

28

04

24

24

23

27

28

27

28

29

31

33

27

05

22

23

22

26

27

26

27

27

29

30

26

Observation Table8: Eighth Day Mass flow rate (3) =0.025


kg/s
Time
(hr)

Tamb
( )

Ti1

Ti2

To1

To2

TP1

TP2

TP3

TP4

TP5

TP6

06

22

23

22

25

25

26

26

27

28

30

29

07

28

29

30

35

35

34

32

36

38

38

39

528.068

08

33

34

36

41

41

40

41

41

42

46

45

566.861

09

37

38

39

45

45

43

42

44

47

50

49

662.5504

10
11

40
41

40
42

40
42

48
50

48
53

44
46

45
51

47
52

50
55

53
57

52
57

809.9638
921.1704

12

42

43

43

53

53

47

52

54

58

60

57

918.5842

13
14
15

42
43
43

44
43
43

44
43
43

53
50
46

53
50
46

48
47
47

54
53
52

57
54
55

60
56
58

62
59
61

57
54
50

956.0841
895.3084
781.5156

16

40

40

40

43

43

44

51

56

58

60

47

581.0851

17

39

40

39

41

41

43

45

49

50

53

45

528.068

18

35

35

36

39

39

40

42

46

48

50

43

463.413

19

32

32

33

39

39

37

41

44

45

46

43

20

31

32

33

38

38

37

38

40

42

44

42

21

31

32

33

38

38

37

38

39

40

42

42

22

30

30

31

37

37

35

37

39

40

43

41

23

28

29

30

36

36

34

34

36

38

40

40

00
01
02

27
26
25

28
27
25

28
28
27

33
31
30

33
31
30

32
32
31

33
33
33

36
34
33

38
35
36

39
37
36

37
35
34

0
0
0

03
04

24
23

25
24

26
24

29
28

30
28

30
28

30
30

31
31

32
33

34
32

34
32

0
0

22

36

37

37

39

39

41

39

40

43

47

43

23

34

35

35

39

39

39

36

39

41

42

43

00
01

32
29

33
30

33
30

38
35

38
35

37
34

36
35

37
36

40
38

41
40

42
39

0
0

02

28

29

29

33

33

33

33

34

36

38

37

03

26

27

27

31

31

31

32

34

35

36

35

04

25

25

25

30

30

29

30

32

33

34

34

05

24

24

25

29

29

29

30

31

33

34

33

Observation Table7: Seventh Day Mass flow rate (3) =0.025


kg/s
www.ijsres.com

Inlet
Temp.
( )

Outlet
Temp. ( )

Absorber plate temperature


( )

Solar
Irradiation
(W/m2)

Page 53

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862
05

23

23

23

26

26

27

28

30

32

31

30

Observation Table9: Ninth Day Mass flow rate (3) =0.025


kg/s
Sample Calculation: for second Reading of third day
Data from: Reading
= 25 C
I = 5.95 mv = (3.95 129.31)
= 511.25 W/m2
= 25 C
V= 1.5 m/s
= 30 C
= 1.175 Kg/m3
= 27.5C
Data from: (Data Hand book by Domkundwar &
Domkundwar)
= 1.205 Kg/
= 1.165 Kg/
= 1.167 Kg/
= 1.120 Kg/
= 1.6120
/s
= 0.02647 W/m K
Pr
= 0.699
Cp
= 1005 J/Kg K
Geometrical Data:
Cross-section Area of duct ( ) = (w d) = (0.300.03) =
0.009
Perimeter of duct = 2(0.30+0.03) = 0.66 m
Panel Area (AP ) = ( l w ) = (2 0.30) = 0.6 m2
Equivalent Diameter ( ) =
= 0.05454 m
Hydraulic Radius ( ) =
= 0.013636 m
ASSUMPTION:
Mass flow rate (1) of air is taken on average temperature
of flowing air stream at 38.94 C.
Mass flow rate (2) of air is taken on average temperature
of flowing air stream at 38.51 C.
Mass flow rate (3) of air is taken on average temperature
of flowing air stream at 37.16 C.
CALCULATION:
1. Mass flow rate (1) =
V AC) = 0.015 Kg/s
2. Mass flow rate (2) =
V AC) = 0.020 Kg/s
3. Mass flow rate (3) =
V AC) = 0.025 Kg/s
4. Reynolds number (
=
==
=
5075.434
5. Friction Factor ( )
=
=

= 0.038387

6. Nusselt Number (Nu) =


=

8.2366 W/m k
Efficiency

()
=

DAY 1
Nu
f
0.03793
17.40431
0.038686 16.43478

H
8.294172
8.068529

08
09
10

4872.321
4713.989
4615.267

0.038877
0.039281
0.039543

16.19992
15.71759
15.41371

8.012027
7.891648
7.814381

11
12
13
14

4567.994
4525.847
4520.616
4525.847

0.039698
0.039787
0.039712
0.039787

15.23626
15.13627
15.33441
15.13627

7.768983
7.742631
7.794074
7.742631

15

4539.636

0.039612

15.33441

7.794074

16

4615.267

0.039543

15.41371

7.814381

17

4628.191

0.039508

15.45363

7.824499

18
19
20
21

4688.786
4817.027
4879.294
4907.392

0.039421
0.039016
0.038869
0.038791

15.61401
16.03215
16.22141
16.30591

7.851713
7.971321
8.017112
8.037553

22
23
00

4950.145
4950.145
4971.804

0.038686
0.038686
0.038634

16.43478
16.43478
16.49992

8.068529
8.068529
8.084162

01

4993.652

0.038581

16.56548

8.09893

02

5075.434

0.038387

16.81001

8.158435

03

5236.559

0.038018

17.28755

8.267847

04

5236.559

0.038018

17.28755

8.267847

05

5276.239

0.03793

17.40431

8.294172

Table 1: Calculated values of Reynolds number, friction


factor, Nusselt number and Convective heat transfer
coefficient for mass flow rate 1
DAY 2
Time(hrs.)

Re

=
= 24.572%

www.ijsres.com

Nu

06

5075.434

0.038387

16.81001

8.158435

07

4907.392

0.038791

16.30591

8.037553

08

4768.388

0.039141

15.88399

7.933838

09

4628.191

0.039508

15.45363

7.824499

10
11
12
13
14
15

4596.017
4567.994
4525.847
4520.616
4487.864
4487.864

0.039595
0.039698
0.039787
0.039712
0.039893
0.039893

15035416
15.23626
15.13627
15.33441
15.01778
15.01778

7.79912
7.768983
7.742631
7.794074
7.711343
7.711343

16

4539.636

0.039612

15.33441

7.794074

17
18

4596.017
4775.276

0.039595
0.039122

15.35416
15.9051

7.79912
7.93916

0.038981

16.07 428

7.981808

20

4830.893
4872.321

0.038877

16.19992

8.012027

21

4886.288

0.0338843

16.24215

8.022207

22
23
00
01

4907.392
4907.392
4950.145
4993.652

0.038791
0.038791
0.038686
0.038581

16.30591
16.30591
16.43478
16.56548

8.037553
8.037553
8.068529
8.09893

02

5075.434

0.038387

16.81001

8.158435

19

=16.81001
7. Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient (h) =

8.

06
07

Re
5276.239
4950.145

Time(hrs.)

Page 54

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862
03

5075.434

0.038387

16.81001

8.158435

04

5228.695

0.038036

17.26436

8.262616

05

5228.695

0.038036

17.26436

8.262616

Table 2: Calculated values of Reynolds number, friction


factor, Nusselt number and Convective heat transfer
coefficient for mass flow rate 1
DAY 3
Time(hrs.)

Re

06
07

03

6888.826

0.034997

21.91741

10.43668

04

6971.593

0.034874

22.13868

10.59543

05

6971.593

0.034874

22.13868

10.59543

Table 4: Calculated values of Reynolds number, friction


factor, Nusselt number and Convective heat transfer
coefficient for mass flow rate 2
DAY 5
Time(hrs.)
06
07

Re
6919.632
6619.417

f
0.034951
0.035475

Nu
21.99986
21.28678

H
10.56631
10.36632

08
09
10
11

6581.081
6441.191
6413.357
6348.693

0.035575
0.035703
0.035751
0.035858

21.08678
20.70494
20.62863
20.45092

10.36632
10.28119
10.26344
10.22161

Nu

5276.239

0.03793

17.40431

8.294172

5075.434

0.038387

16.81001

8.158435

08

4907.392

0.038791

16.30591

8.037553

09
10

4879.294
4775.276

0.038869
0.039122

16.22141
15.9051

8.017112
7.93916

12

6205 .674

0.036135

20.32579

10.19215

13
14

6102.569
6102.569

0.036286
0.036286

19.76877
19.76877

10.06082
10.06082

15
16

6102.569
6348.693

0.036286
0.035858

19.76877
20.45092

10.06082
10.22161

17
18
19

6258.545
6413.357
6441.191

0.035812
0.035751
0.035703

20.20214
20.62863
20.70494

10.16302
10.26344
10.28119

20

6450.331

0.035688

20.72997

10.28688

21

6450.331

0.035688

20.72997

10.28688

22

6477.911

0.03 5643

20.80543

10.30353

23

6581.081

0.035575

21.08678

10.36632

00
01

6619.417
6667.971

0.035475
0.035337

21.28678
21.32259

10.36632
10.4189

11

4615.267

0.039543

15.41371

7.814381

12

4539.636

0.039612

15.33441

7.794074

13
14
15
16
17

4525.847
4525.847
4560.616
4567.994
4628.191

0.039787
0.039787
0.039368
0.039698
0.039508

15.13627
15.13627
15.61514
15.23626
15.45363

7.742631
7.742631
7.865618
7.768983
7.824499

18

4775.276

0.039122

15.9051

7.93916

19
20

4830.893
4886.288

0.038981

16.07 428

0.0338843

16.24215

7.981808
8.022207

21
22
23
00
01

4907.392
4971.804
4971.804
5075.434
5075.434

0.038791
0.038634
0.038634
0.038387
0.038387

16.30591
16.49992
16.49992
16.81001
16.81001

8.037553
8.084162
8.084162
8.158435
8.158435

02

6858.292

0.035043

21.83554

10.53263

02

5228.695

0.038036

17.26436

8.262616

03

6899.064

0.034982

21.94482

10.55637

03
04

5228.695
5236.559

0.038036
0.038018

17.26436
17.28755

8.262616
8.267847

04
05

6899.064
6899.064

0.034982
0.034982

21.94482
21.94482

10.55637
10.55637

05

5276.239

0.03793

17.40431

8.294172

Table 3: Calculated values of Reynolds number, friction


factor, Nusselt number and Convective heat transfer
coefficient for mass flow rate 1
DAY 4
f

DAY 6
Time(hrs.)

Time(hrs.)
Re

Table 5: Calculated values of Reynolds number, friction


factor, Nusselt number and Convective heat transfer
coefficient for mass flow rate 2

Nu

06

Re
6899.064

f
0.034982

Nu
21.94482

H
10.55637

07
08

6629.071
6450.331

0.035399
0.035688

21.11715
20.72997

10.39539
10.28688

09
10

6258.545
6348.693

0.035812
0.035858

20.20214
20.45092

10.16302
10.22161

11
12

6348.693
6303.296

0.035858
0.036104

20.45092
20.05566

10.22161
10.12849

13

6303.296

0.036104

20.05566

10.12849

14
15

6231.997
6231.997

0.036058
0.036058

20.12864
20.12864

10.14571
10.14571

16

6258.545

0.035812

20.20214

10.16302

17

6450.331

0.035688

20.72997

10.28688

18

6487.155

0.035628

20.83071

10.30975

19
20
21

6487.155
6496.427
6629.071

0.035628
0.035612

20.83071
20.85604
21.11715

10.30975
10.31483
10.39539

22

6619.417

0.035399
0.035475

21.28678

10.36632

23

6667.971

0.035337

21.32259

10.41891

00

6667.971

0.035337

21.32259

10.41891

21.83554

10.53263

06

6971.593

0.034874

22.13868

10.59543

07

6667.971

0.035337

21.32259

10.4189

08

6477.911

0.035643

20.80543

10.30353

09
10
11

6258.545
6303.296
6102.569

0.035812
0.036104
0.036286

20.20214
20.05566
19.76877

10.16302
10.12849
10.06082

12
13

6060.108
6042.987

0.036363
0.036394

19.65014
19.60223

10.03242
10.02071

14
15

6042.987
6060.108

0.036394
0.036363

19.60223
19.65014

10.02071
10.03242

16

6170.921

0.036165

19.95914

10.10574

17

6205 .674

0.036135

20.32579

10.19215

18

6348.693

0.035858

20.45092

10.22161

19

6258.545

0.035812

20.20214

10.16302

20

6441.191

0.035703

20.70494

10.28119

21

6487.155

0.035628

20.83071

10.30975

22

6477.911

0.035643

20.80543

10.30353

23
00

6581.081
6619.417

0.035575
0.035475

21.08678
21.28678

10.36632
10.36632

01

6619.417

0.035475

21.28678

10.36632

02

6667.971

0.035337

21.32259

10.4189

www.ijsres.com

01
6858.292

0.035043

Page 55

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862
06

8793.732

0.032601

26.18161

12.78042

07
08

8459.057
8250.242

0.032965
0.033203

25.38328
25.45724

12.61051
12.49804

10.43668

09

8040.094

0.033351

24.92367

12.38415

10.43668

10

7702.867

0.033869

24.05821

12.18901

11

7746.187

0.033814

24.17004

12.21421

12

7681.388

0.033897

24.00269

12.17651

13

7617.664

0.033979

23.83767

12.13934

14

7617.664

0.033979

23.83767

12.13934

15

7585.881

0.034021

23.75521

12.12053

16

7702.867

0.033869

24.05821

12.18901

17

8085.863

0.033396

25.04024

12.40947

18

8108.944

0.033369

25.09895

12.42154

19

8132.156

0.033341

25.15794

12.43505

20

8132.156

0.033341

25.15794

12.43505

02
03

6899.064
6899.064

0.034982
0.034982

21.94482
21.94482

10.55637
10.55637

04

6888.826

0.034997

21.91741

05

6888.826

0.034997

21.91741

Table 6 : Calculated values of Reynolds number, friction


factor, Nusselt number and Convective heat transfer
coefficient for mass flow rate 2
DAY 7
Time(hrs.)
Re

06

07

8807.079

8446.482

Nu

0.032587

26.85125

0.032979

25.95171

12.78708

12.60376

08
09

8238.279
8040.094

0.033217
0.033351

25.42698
24.92367

12.49158
12.38415

21

8178.983

0.033286

25.27679

12.46089

10

7789.997

0.033759

24.28294

12.23965

22

8178.983

0.033286

25.27679

12.46089

11

7681.388

0.033897

24.00269

12.17651

23

8238.279

0.033217

25.42698

12.49158

12

7617.664

0.033979

23.83767

12.13934
00

8250.242

0.033203

25.45724

12.49804

01
02

8396.552
8649.542

0.033035
0.032755

25.82624
26.45967

12.57692
12.70831

03
04

8688.394
8688.394

0.032714
0.032714

26.55644
26.55644

12.72776
12.72776

05

8807.079

0.032587

26.85125

12.78708

13

7585.881

0.034021

23.75521

12.12053

14

7585.881

0.034021

23.75521

12.12053

15

7585.881

0.034021

23.75521

12.12053

16

7681.388

0.033897

24.00269

12.17651

17

7702.867

0.033869

24.05821

12.18901

18

7856.649

0.033675

24.45432

12.27828

19

8085.863

0.033396

25.04024

12.40947

20

8085.863

0.033396

25.04024

12.40947

21

8108.944

0.033369

25.09895

12.42154

22

8108.944

0.033369

25.09895

12.42154

Table 8: Calculated values of Reynolds number, friction


factor, Nusselt number and Convective heat transfer
coefficient for mass flow rate 3
DAY 9
Time(hrs.)
Re

Nu

06

8807.079

0.032587

26.85125

12.78708

07

8396.552

0.033035

25.82624

12.57692

08

8178.983

0.033286

25.27679

12.46089

09
10

8085.863
7789.997

0.033396
0.033759

25.04024
24.28294

12.40947
12.23965

11

7702.867

0.033869

24.05821

12.18901

12

7746.187

0.033814

24.17004

12.21421

23

8132.156

0.033341

25.15794

12.43505

13

7746.187

0.033814

24.17004

12.21421

00

8226.351

0.033231

25.39681

12.48513

14

7681.388

0.033897

24.00269

12.17651

15

7681.388

0.033897

24.00269

12.17651

01

8347.209

0.033091

25.70202

12.55035

02

8396.552

0.033035

25.82624

12.57692

16

7789.997

0.033759

24.28294

12.23965

03

8446.482

0.032979

25.95171

12.60376

17
18

7856.649
8040.094

0.033675
0.033351

24.45432
24.92367

12.27828
12.38415

04

8649.542

0.032755

26.45967

12.70831

19

8226.351

0.033231

25.39681

12.48513

20

8238.279

0.033217

25.42698

12.49158

21

8238.279

0.033217

25.42698

12.49158

22

8250.242

0.033203

25.45724

12.49804

23

8396.552

0.033035

25.82624

12.57692

00

8459.057

0.032965

25.38328

12.61051

01

8446.482

0.032979

25.95171

12.60376

02

8649.542

0.032755

26.45967

12.70831

05

8688.394

0.032714

26.55644

12.72776

Table 7: Calculated values of Reynolds number, friction


factor, Nusselt number and Convective heat transfer
coefficient for mass flow rate 3
DAY 8
Time(hrs.)

Re

Nu

www.ijsres.com

Page 56

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862
03

8688.394

0.032714

26.55644

12.72776

04

8793.732

0.032601

26.18161

12.78042

05

8793.732

0.032601

26.18161

12.78042

Table 9: Calculated values of Reynolds number, friction


factor, Nusselt number and Convective heat transfer
coefficient for mass flow rate 3
Tim
e
(hrs
.)
07

DAY
1

(%)
44.50

DAY
2
(%)
46.78

DAY
3

(%)
24.57

DAY
4

(%)
64.34

DAY
5

(%)
50.14

DAY
6

(%)
55.00

08

40.44

45.62

33.54

63.20

48.35

47.56

09

39.07

49.11

42.21

61.75

55.57

42.11

10

34.96

40.32

44.20

50.68

52.19

37.18

11

32.16

33.25

39.89

46.66

48.16

35.45

12

35.07

37.33

40.45

39.82

39.40

38.45

13

36.94

33.91

40.03

34.03

25.20

31.44

14

38.78

39.76

34.62

35.66

15.76

24.86

15

31.06

35.07

26.52

29.04

15.90

21.54

16

16.64

31.00

25.37

21.65

21.68

23.79

17

13.11

30.83

33.79

16.30

25.42

28.76

18

24.95

52.17

42.68

13.54

33.78

36.59

Av
g

32.13

39.60

35.66

39.72

35.76

35.23

DAY
7

(%)
53.4
9
55.5
2
48.0
5
43.3
9
38.3
7
42.7
0
43.4
6
43.1
3
41.8
2
40.8
1
33.1
8
37.1
8
43.4
3

DAY
8
(%)
40.66

DAY
9

(%)
31.71

41.13

42.47

43.14

39.50

39.70

37.48

37.40

36.36

39.81

41.02

41.67

41.60

37.34

37.41

23.60

26.79

22.22

21.61

27.78

35.68

30.66

54.21

35.42

37.15

Table No 10: Calculated values of Collector Efficiency in day


time for mass flow rate 1 (0.015 Kg/s)
Local measured data of global solar radiation incident on
inclined surface and meteorological data (Temperature) on
nine days are obtained by direct measurement at B.I.T.Sindri
campus (latitude). The hourly variation of solar intensity (I)
and ambient temperature (T a) for the testing days are shown in
figures 2 and 3 respectively.

Figure 2: Hourly variation of solar radiation in all run days.

www.ijsres.com

Figure 3: Ambient air temperature in all run days.


From the fig. 2 it is seen that for the fourth day, the solar
radiation increases to maximum value of 984.53 W/m2 at 1
pm. similar behavior have been observed during all run days.
From the fig. 3 ambient temperature exhibits the same
behavior as the solar radiation. However, they achieve their
maximum values of 47 C at 3 pm, and having minimum value
of 22C in morning at 5 am, during the period of
experimentation. Daily average values of solar radiation and
ambient temperature are obtained as 730.48W/m2 and
33.75C, respectively.

Figure 4: Outlet temperature Vs. Time for run days


As from the fig. 12 it is observed that the outlet
temperature of the system decreases with the increase in mass
flow rate of the air. For, mass flow rate(1), maximum outlet
temperature is 60.5 C, at 12 pm of second day and minimum
outlet temperature is 27C,at 6am in first day. For, mass flow
rate(2), maximum outlet temperature is 56 C, at 11am of
third day and minimum outlet temperature is 29C,at 5 am in
second day. Similarly for mass flow rate(3), maximum outlet
temperature is 55 C, at 1 pm of first day and minimum outlet
temperature is 25C,at 5 am in third day. So, it may concluded
that the outlet temperature increases with the decrease in mass
flow rate of air or vice versa.

Page 57

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862

Figure 5: Variation of mean temperature of absorber plate


and air stream for test day 1 of mass flow rate 0.015 Kg/s

Figure 8: variation of efficiency with Mass flow rate


It is shown from fig. 8 that the air heater efficiency is
strongly depends on mass flow rate; it increases with
increasing mass flow rate (). Increasing the mass flow rate
causes a consequent increase of the time average
instantaneous collector efficiency. Average efficiency of the
collector are 35.79 %, 36.91 %, and 38.66%, on three different
mass flow rate (i.e. 1= 0.015 Kg/s, 2=0.020 Kg/s, and 3=
0.025 Kg/s) of air respectively.

Figure 6: Variation of mean temperature of absorber plate


and air stream for test day 1 of mass flow rate 0.020 Kg/s

Figure 9: Variation of Nusselt number with Reynolds number

Figure 7: Variation of mean temperature of absorber plate


and air stream for test day 1 of mass flow rate 0.025 Kg/s
From fig. 5, 6 and 7 it is seen that the average temperature
difference is maximum for mass flow rate of 0.015 Kg/s and it
is minimum for mass flow rate of 0.025 Kg/s. So, it is
concluded that as the mass flow rate of air increases, the mean
temperature difference of absorber plate and air stream
decreases.

www.ijsres.com

Figure 10: Variation of Nusselt number with Reynolds number

Page 58

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862

Figure 11: Variation of Nusselt number with Reynolds number


Fig. 9, 10 and 11 show the variation of Nusselt number
with Reynolds number As, per the graphs it is seen that
Nusselt number is minimum (15.01778), when the Reynolds
number is minimum (4487.864) and it is maximum (26.8125),
when the Reynolds number is maximum (8807.079).So, it may
concluded that the heat transfer decreases as the mass flow
rate and Reynolds number increases.

Figure 14: variation of Convective heat transfer coefficient


with respect to Reynolds number for mass flow rate of
0.025Kg/s.
Fig. 12, 13, and 14 illustrate the variation of convective
heat transfer coefficient with Reynolds number. It is seen that
convective heat transfer coefficient is maximum
(12.7708W/m2 k), when the mass flow rate(0.025 Kg/s) and
Reynolds number (8807.079).It may concluded that the heat
transfer decreases by increasing the mass flow rate. As the
mass flow rate increases, the temperature difference between
absorber plate and air stream increases, so higher the absorber
plate temperature. Higher the plate temperature leads to
increase the air viscosity. The increase in air viscosity affects
the wall shear stress and decrease the local Reynolds number
as well which cause an increase in thermal boundary layer
thickness, and results in decreasing the convective heat
transfer coefficient.

Figure 12: Variation of convective heat transfer coefficient


with respect to Reynolds number for mass flow rate of 0.015
Kg/s.

Figure 13: variation of Convective heat transfer coefficient


with respect to Reynolds number for mass flow rate of
0.020Kg/s.

www.ijsres.com

Figure 15: Variation of Friction factor with Reynolds number


for mass flow rate of 1
Fig. 15, 16 and 17 shows the variation of friction factor
with Reynolds number. Friction factor attain the maximum
value, when the mass flow rate is minimum (0.015 Kg/s) and
Reynolds number is also minimum (4487.864). Same as it
attain minimum value, when mass flow rate (0.025 Kg/s) at
maximum Reynolds number (8807.079). So, it may conclude
that as the mass low rate and Reynolds number increases the
friction factor decreases, this is due more turbulence of
flowing fluid less the skin friction.

Page 59

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies (IJSRES)


Volume 1 Issue 4, October 2014
ISSN: 2349-8862

Air mass flow rate and solar radiation are predominant


factor which affect the performance of air heater.
Increasing the mass flow rate causes a consequent
decrease of air and plate temperatures.
This air heater is capable to produce hot air consistently
for 24 hours, the average temperature rise of 9.60 C, 7.19
C and 5.61 C, for all three different mass flow rate of air
respectively, from the atmospheric air temperature.
Increasing the mass flow rate causes a consequent
increase of the time average instantaneous collector
efficiency. Average efficiency of the collector are 35.79
%, 36.903 %, and 38.66%, on three different mass flow
rate (i.e. 1= 0.015 Kg/s, 2=0.020 Kg/s, and 3= 0.025
Kg/s) of air respectively.

Figure 16: Variation of Friction factor with Reynolds number


for mass flow rate of 2
REFERENCES

Figure 17: Variation of Friction factor with Reynolds number


for mass flow rate of 3
V.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the experimental results obtained for nine


run days on three different mass flow rate of air, for force
convection solar air heating system with phase change
material (Paraffin wax) energy storage, manufactured and
tested in B.I.T.Sindri, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India, the
following conclusion can be drawn.
Air and plate temperature in general increases along the
air heater.

www.ijsres.com

[1] Ekechukwua O. V., Norton B. Review of solar-energy


drying systems III: low temperature air-heating solar
collectors for crop drying applications Energy
Conversion & Management 40 (1999) 657-667.
[2] Keith Gawlik, Craig Christensen, Charles Kutscher.A
numerical and experimental investigation of lowconductivity unglazed, transpired solar air heaters. J Sol
Energy Eng 2005;127:1535.
[3] AR Jaurker, JS Saini, BK Gandhi. Heat transfer and
friction characteristics of rectangular solar air heater duct
using rib-grooved artificial roughness. Sol Energy
2006;80:895907.
[4] Cemil YamalI, Ismail Solmus Theoretical investigation of
a humidification dehumidification desalination system
configured by a double-pass flat plate solar air heater
Desalination 205 (2007) 163177.
[5] Zambolin E., Del Col D. Experimental analysis of
thermal performance of flat plate and evacuated tube solar
collectors in stationary standard and daily conditions
Solar Energy 84 (2010) 13821396.
[6] Kostic Ljiljana T., Pavlovic Tomislav M., Pavlovic Zoran
T. Influence of reflectance from flat aluminum
concentrators on energy efficiency of PV/Thermal
collector Applied Energy 87 (2010) 410416.

Page 60

S-ar putea să vă placă și