Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Technological Sciences
RESEARCH PAPER
The coordinates of the marked points of joints and the changes of foot force in the human walk motion are obtained with systems of motion image acquisition and force measuring. The effects of kinematics and dynamics on the human lower limb in
different loads (0, 10, 20, 30 kg) and walking speeds (0.8, 1.3, 1.7 m/s) have been investigated using the human dynamics
model,. The results were as follows. First, with the increasing load, the dorsiflexion angle of ankle joint increased during the
procedure of toe-off, the range of motion of the knee joint decreased, the flexion angle of the hip joint increased, and oppositely, the extension angle of the hip joint decreased. Second, with the increasing speed, the range of motion of the ankle joint,
the maximum flexion angle of the knee joint, the flexion angle, extension angle of the hip joint and the range of motion of hip
joint increased. Finally, the torque and power of the ankle joint, the knee joint and the hip joint increased with the increasing
speed and load. The results can provide an important basis for the mechanism design of lower limb power-assisted exoskeleton.
walking gait, dynamical model, motion analysis, load walking
Citation:
Han Y L, Wang X S. The biomechanical study of lower limb during human walking. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 983991, doi: 10.1007/s11431-011-4318-z
www.springerlink.com
984
Han Y L, et al.
source.
1
1.1
Figure 2
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Han Y L, et al.
(5)
(6)
The joint forces, the joint torque and the power of right
hip are shown as
FRhip = mRthigh aRthigh mRthigh g FRknee ,
(7)
(8)
(9)
Figure 3
985
Figure 4 A series of walking graphs in a complete gait cycle. The supporting phase of the cycle is about 61%, which includes the procedure of heel strike,
foot flat, mid-stance, heel-off and toe-off. The swing phase of the cycle is about 39%, which includes the procedure of toe-off, mid-swing, heel strike.
986
Han Y L, et al.
Figure 5 The angles of joints at different walking speeds. (a) The angles
of ankle joint; (b) the angles of knee joint; (c) the angles of hip joint.
Han Y L, et al.
987
Table 1
Symbol
AA1
KA1
HA1
HA2
TA1
TK1
TH1
PA1
PK1
PK2
PH1
Name
Maximum ankle angle
Maximum knee angle
Maximum hip flexion angle
Maximum hip extension angle
Maximum ankle torque
Maximum knee torque
Maximum hip torque
Maximum ankle power
Minimum knee power during the early phase of support
Maximum knee power during the middle phase of support
Maximum hip power
Table 2 The joint angle valves of key points at different walking speeds
(average valve and deviation value)
Conditions
AA1 (Degree)
KA1 (Degree)
HA1 (Degree)
HA2 (Degree)
0.8 m/s
9.64(2.08)
62.27(4.58)
17.82(5.08)
22.42(5.24)
Walking speeds
1.3 m/s
12.71(2.11)
66.53(4.62)
18.71(5.13)
25.17(5.26)
1.7 m/s
14.19(2.14)
69.05(4.65)
20.93(5.17)
25.66(5.26)
Table 3 The joint power and torques at different speeds (average valves
and deviation values), and the increasing range at other speed while taking
the speed of 0.8 m/s as reference
Conditions
TA1 (N m/kg)
TK1 (N m/kg)
TH1 (N m/kg)
PA1 (W/kg)
PK1 (W/kg)
PK2 (W/kg)
PH1 (W/kg)
0.8 m/s
1.22(0.03)
0.41(0.02)
1.12(0.06)
1.60(0.11)
0.91(0.09)
0.59(0.09)
1.13(0.14)
Walking speeds
1.3 m/s
1.7 m/s
1.44(0.06) 18%
1.51(0.08) 23%
0.63(0.05) 53%
0.69(0.06) 68%
1.26(0.06) 12%
1.38(0.07) 14%
1.72(0.12) 7%
1.91(0.15) 19%
1.36(0.12) 49%
1.50(0.14) 64%
0.67(0.11) 13%
0.73(0.11) 23%
1.27(0.16) 12%
1.45(0.20) 28%
988
Han Y L, et al.
Table 4 The joint angle valves of key points under different loads (average valves and deviation values)
Conditions
Different loads
0 kg
10 kg
20 kg
30 kg
AA1
13.21(2.11)
13.33(2.12)
14.05(2.15)
15.83(2.20)
KA1
66.52(4.58)
66.31(4.57)
66.61(4.58)
63.56(4.55)
HA1
HA2
25.27(5.23)
29.03(5.25)
31.54(5.27)
31.58(5.27)
Figure 9 The joint torques under different loads (The longitudinal axis in
the graph shows the results of the joint torque after standardization of the
mass of the tester). (a) The joint torques of ankle joint; (b) the joint torques
of knee joint; (c) the joint torques of hip joint.
Figure 8 The angles of joint under different loads. (a) The angles of
ankle joint; (b) the angles of knee joint; (c) the angles of hip joint.
Han Y L, et al.
989
Table 5 The valves of joint power and torques of key points under different loads (average valve and deviation value), and the increasing range
under other load while taking the load of 0 kg as reference
Conditions
TA1
TK1
TH1
PA1
PK1
PK2
PH1
Different loads
0 kg
10 kg
20 kg
1.46(0.06) 1.74(0.08) 19% 2.06(0.11) 41%
0.83(0.06) 1.28(0.07) 54% 1.39(0.08) 67%
1.13(0.06) 1.46(0.07) 29% 1.60(0.09) 41%
1.95(0.14) 2.43(0.17) 24% 2.47(0.17) 28%
1.14(0.10) 1.42(0.11) 24% 1.87(0.13) 64%
0.74(0.11) 1.08(0.14) 45% 0.91(0.13) 22%
1.28(0.16) 1.32(0.16) 3% 1.54(0.17) 14%
30 kg
2.17(0.11) 48%
1.59(0.09) 91%
1.82(0.11) 61%
2.97(0.19) 52%
1.97(0.13) 72%
0.96(0.13) 29%
1.74(0.19) 35%
3.1
990
Han Y L, et al.
It is indicated from the Figures 5(b) and 8(b) that the angle
variation of the knee joint was 0 to 70. The maximum
flexion angle of the knee joint appeared in the early stage of
the swing phase. As shown in Figures 6(b) and 9(b), there
were positive and negative values in the joint torque of knee
joint, indicating the need of a bi-directional actuator. It is
indicated from the power of the knee joint in Figures 7(b)
and 10(b) that the power of the knee joint walking in flatland was negative. The main function of the knee joint,
which plays as passive role, is to control and buffer. And
the function is similar to the damper. Based on several
similar researches, a magneto-rheological damper was selected by MIT in the design of the knee joint [16]. As the
experiment shows, the effect of power-assisted walking in
flatland can be realized. Although there were no experimental research on climbing slope and stairs in this lab, the
Figure 11 The angles and power of ankle joint at three different speeds,
in which the fast walking speed was 1.7 m/s, the normal walking speed was
1.3 m/s, and the slow walking speed was 0.8 m/s. Line segments 1 and 2
were the step of plantar flexion. They started from the beginning of heel
strike to the end of foot flat. Line segments 2 and 3 were the steps of dorsiflexion. They started from the beginning of foot flat to the end of
mid-stance. Line segments 3 and 4 were the steps of the powered plantarflexion.
It is can be drawn from Figures 5(c) and 8(c) that the curve
of angle of the hip joint is similar to a sine wave. The
variation range of angles of the hip joint in the walking is
from 30 to 40. As Figures 6(c) and 9(c) show, there are
positive values and negative values in the joint torque of the
hip joint, which indicates the need of a bi-directional actuator. Negative extension torque is required in early stage as
the hip supports the load on the leg. Hip torque is positive in
late stage and early swing as the hip propels the leg forward
during swing. In late swing, the torque turns to negative as
the hip decelerates the leg prior to heel-strike. As shown in
Figures 7 and 10, there are positive work and negative work
of the joint power of hip joint in walking. And in the supporting phase, the body is pushed forward by the energy
which is released during toe-off phase. The two peak power
values appear respectively at the time of heel-strike and
toe-off. As the average power is positive, the hip joint plays
an important role in the human walking motion. An active
actuator is needed for the hip joint when the hip joint of
exoskeleton is designed.
Han Y L, et al.
Conclusions
991
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17