Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
OThH1.pdf
Microwave Photonics
Jianping Yao
Microwave Photonics Research Laboratory
School of Information Technology and Engineering
University of Ottawa
Outline
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Outline
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
2 neff = o
PD
TLS
PC
EOM
2 n eff =min
2 n eff =max
PD
1
mi ma
n
mi
n
ma
5
TLS
1 ~ 5
PC
EOM
RF
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Outline
90
60
30
150
180
Example of
beam squint
with electrical
phase shift
technique
3
4
150
-120
120
3
4
-30
-90
90
-60
60
30
150
Example of beam
squint-free pattern with
0 true-time delay
180
-30
-150
-120
-90
-60
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
4
3
1
Difficulty: to write the FBGs with very small spacing, especially for the first delay line.
H. Zmuda, R. A. Soref, P. Payson, S. Johns, and E. N. Toughlian, Photonic beamformer for phased array
antennas using a fiber grating prism, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 9, pp. 241243, Feb. 1997.
Y. Liu, J. P. Yao and J. Yang, "Wideband true-time-delay unit for phased array antenna using discrete-chirped
fiber Bragg grating prism," Optics Communications, vol. 207, pp. 177-187, June 2002.
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
150
y = -29.417x + 45682
2
100
R = 0.9961
y = -24.052x + 37347
50
R = 0.9956
0
-50
-100
y = -18.801x + 29198
2
R = 0.9989
y = -13.714x + 21297
2
-150
1548
R = 0.999
1550
1552
1554
1556
1558
Wavelength (nm)
Y. Liu and J. P. Yao "Wideband true time-delay beamformer employing a tunable chirped fiber grating prism," OSA Applied Optics,
vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 2273-2277, May 2003.
The difficulty in implementing this system is the fabrication of the 4
chirped gratings. The chirped gratings were fabricated using our
grating tuning techniques: chirped gratings can be obtained from
uniform gratings.
J. P. Yao, J. Yang and Y. Liu, "Continuous true-time-delay beamforming employing a multiwavelength tunable fiber laser
source," IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 14, no.5, pp. 687 -689, May 2002.
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Y. Liu, J. Yang and J. P. Yao, "Continuous true-time-delay beamforming for phased array antenna using a tunable chirped fiber
grating delay line," IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1172 -1174, August 2002.
Applications
1.
Radar
BS
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Outline
-10 dB
-20 dB
-30 dB
-40 dB
-50 dB
2 GHz
8 GHz
16 GHz
N 1
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
R1
R2
R3
R4
Rn
Modulator
RF
PD
Output
Modulator
Optical
Source
b0
1x2
Coupler
RF Input
b1
RF Output
10
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
LD 1
A
W
G
EOPM
LD 2
2x1
Coupler
PD
RF
Input
After
Dispersive Device
After
Photodetector
Group
Delay
D=
LCFBG 2 (+)
RF
Output
Amplitude
>0
0
DC
0 + m
0 m
D=
<0
Group
Delay
PC 1
PC 2
Output
TLS
PD
PolM
PMF - based
eleltrical
delay line
RF port
optical
VNA
10
H (f) (dB)
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-5
10 15 20 25 30 35
f (GHz)
11
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
10
-20
-30
-10
-20
-30
-40
0
-40
10
10
0
MSR: 11.6 dB
3dB-bandwidth:
1.4 GHz
MSR:
21.5 dB
-10
H(f) (dB)
H(f) (dB)
-10
10
3dB-bandwidth:
1.1 GHz
3dB-bandwidth:
1.1 GHz
MSR:
11.6 dB
H(f) (dB)
-20
f (GHz)
-40
0
10
3-dB bandwidth:
1.4 GHz
MSR: 24 dB
-10
-20
-30
-30
f (GHz)
-40
0
10
10
f (GHz)
f (GHz)
Q. Wang and J. P. Yao, "Multi-tap photonic microwave filters with arbitrary positive and negative coefficients using a
polarization modulator and an optical polarizer," IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, accepted
ESA
f LO
Power
combiner
f S + f LO
Load
Phase
Modulator
Multiwavelength
Laser source
Photodetector
PC
-30
-40
fS=3GHz
-50
-20
power (dBm)
-40
-30
fLO-fS
-60
-50
-50
fS+fLO
11.8GHz
-60
f1+f2
11.8GHz
-70
-80
2fLO-fS
2fS
-90
2fLO
-60
-100
-110
2fS+fLO
2fLO-2fS
3fS+fLO
-70
3fS
-40
-120
-130
-140
-70
-80
-80
-50
-60
fLO =8.8GHz
-10
Power (dBm)
H(f) (dB)
...
...
10
-90
-90
10
15
Frequency (GHz)
(a)
20
25
-100
0
8
10
12
frequency (GHz)
14
(b)
16
18
20
-100
8
10
12
Frequency (GHz)
14
16
18
20
(c)
(a) Filter frequency response, (b) mixing output without filtering, (c) mixing output with filtering.
F. Zeng and J. P. Yao, "All-optical microwave mixing and bandpass filtering in a radio-over-fiber link," IEEE Photonics
Technology Letters, vol. 17, no 4, April 2005
12
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Outline
Photodetector
f1
RF output
f2
P = E1 (t ) + E2 (t ) = P1 + P2 + 2 P1 P2 cos[2( f1 f 2 )t + (1 2 )]
2
where Es (t) and EL (t) are the two input signals and
f = f f is the RF frequency.
RF
13
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
RF Signal
Coherent lasers
E1 = A1cos(1 t)
FWHM
frequency jitter
E2 = A2cos(2 t + 2)
Photodetector Output
+ 2
terms
L. Goldberg, H. F. Taylor, J. F. Weller and D. M. Bloom, "Microwave signal generation with injection locked laser
diodes," Electron Lett., vol. 19, pp. 491-493, 1983.
14
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Nd:YAG
Mixer
Nd:YAG
Loop
Filter
PD
Frequency
synthesiser
Optical output
K. J. Williams, "6-34 GHz offset phase locking of Nd: YAG 1319 nm nonplanar ring lasers," Electron. Lett.,
vol. 24, pp. 1242-1243, 1989.
Optical path
Electrical path
Loop filter
~ Offset generator
Block diagram of a heterodyne optical injection phase-lock loop. When the components in the dotted box is removed, the
system becomes a homodyne optical injection phase-lock loop.
A. C. Bordonaalli, C. Walton and A. J. Seeds, "High-performance phase locking of wide linewidth semiconductor lasers by
combined use of optical injection locking and optical phase-lock loop," J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 328-342,
Feb. 1999.
15
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Output
signal
1, 2
Slave
Externalcavity Laser
RF Signal
Master
External-cavity
Laser
Discriminator-Locked Lasers
Free-running Lasers
FWHM
about
~10s Hz
Photodetector
RF signal at 1- 2
Amp
Splitter
free running
with discriminator
-40.0
RF output [dBm]
Active
Low-pass
Filter
-50.0
-60.0
-70.0
-80.0
11.224 GHz
-90.0
Frequency Discriminator
11.1
11.15
11.2
11.25
Frequency [GHz]
11.3
11.35
April 14/03
H. Rideout, J. Seregelyi, S. Paquet, and J. P. Yao, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 18, no. 22, pp. 23442346, November 2006.
Saturable Absorber
Coupler 2
Pump LD
EDF
Pump Multiplexer
OSA
Circulator 2
Coupler 1
Circulator 1
PC 2
Isolator
Wavelength
Selector
Laser spectrum
analyser
Oscilloscope
Dual-wavelength single-longitudinal
mode fiber ring laser.
Beating signal
16
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Photonic Generation of Microwave Signal Using a DualWavelength Single-Longitudinal-Mode Fiber Ring Laser
FBG1
90%
EDFA
10%
OSA
PD
Circulator
FBG2
ESA
Isolator
PC
SOA
Wavelength (nm)
MZM
EDFA
DC bias
PA
25km SSMF
Optical
Electrical
+2
+4
4
-20
-50
dBm, 10dB/division
-40
-50
-60
+4
local
remote
-60
10
20
30
40
1542.45
1542.65
1542.85
1543.05
1543.25
-30
-40
-70
-50
1542.25
-80
-90
1542.45
1542.65
1542.85
1543.05
1543.25
-100
-110
-70
-40
-60
1542.25
Carrier is removed
by the FBG filter
+2
-40
-30
-30
ESA
-20
-50
FBG transmission
spectrum
OSA
PD
dBm, 10dB/division
4 3 2 1 0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
FBG filter
MW
source
dBm, 10dB/division
TLS
-10
10 dB/division
PC
-120
49.9999 49.9999 49.9999 49.9999 49.9999 49.9999
5834
6034
6234
6434
6634
6834
50
17
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Outline
Reference: The merging of the wireless and fiber worlds by Dalma Novak
18
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
1 2 3
1 2 3
4 5 6
19
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
= 900
0 +
G. H. Smith, D. Novak, Z. Ahmed, Overcoming chromatic-dispersion effects in fiber-wireless systems incorporating external
modulators, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1410 1415, Aug 1997.
-10
a)
-20
-30
1552.5
Experimental
Theoretical
1553
(nm)
1553.5
1553
(nm)
1553.5
1553
(nm)
1553.5
0
-5
b)
-10
1552.5
0
-10
Optical Power
(dBm)
1552.5
-20
-40
-60
1552.5
1553
(nm)
1553.5
c)
-20
20
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Emitted
Power
Bluetooth
802.11 b/g
Cordless phones
Microwave ovens
802.11a
-41.3
dBm/MHz
1. 1.
2. 3.
5.
10.
Advantages of UWB:
FCC regulation on UWB (approved in 2002):
1. Bandwidth greater than 500 MHz or
fractional bandwidth greater than 20%
2. The unlicensed bandwidth: 3.1-10.6 GHz
3. Maximum power density: -41.3 dBm/MHz
1.
2.
3.
Carrier free, without the need for frequency mixers and local oscillators
2.
3.
4.
21
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Why UWB-over-fiber?
By wireless transmission, UWB signals are only limited to a short distance
of a few meters. UWB-over-fiber technology can provide a very promising
solution to integrate local UWB environment into fixed wired networks or
wireless wide-area infrastructures.
s(t ) = exp( t 2 2 )
S ( ) = exp( 2 )
Gaussian monocycle:
ds dt
j S ( )
Gaussian doublet:
Gaussian
d s dt
2 S ( )
monocycle
doublet
Waveform
t (ps)
t (ps)
t (ps)
Spectrum
f (GHz)
f (GHz)
f (GHz)
22
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Data Sequence
Antenna
EOPM
LD
PD
SMF Link
PC
Central Station
Access Point
-20
10
Frequency (GHz)
15
-50
FCC Mask for Indoor Comm.
-0.2
-0.3
-40
-60
Power (dBm)
63 ps
-60
2
Amplitude (mV)
Power (dBn)
-0.1
20
13.5 GHz
Amplitude (V)
-40
-30
0
-2
-4
10.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
1.61
GHz
13.5 GHz
1.99
GHz
-80
40 ps
-6
-80
-70
-90
-8
-0.4
0
100
200
300
time (ps)
400
500
-100
0
5
10
Frequency (GHz)
-10
0
15
100
200
300
time (ps)
400
-100
0
500
5
10
Frequency (GHz)
15
(a) Waveform of the Gaussian doublet pulse, and (b) power spectrum of the shaped 13.5 Gb/s PBRS 27-1 signal obtained at the
end of the fiber link (point B in Fig. 1). Dashed line: FCC spectral mask for indoor applications.
F. Zeng and J. P. Yao, "An approach to ultrawideband pulse generation and distribution over optical fiber," IEEE
Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 823-825, March 2006.
P
t
UFBG
Pump
TLD
OA
Probe
NLF
PD
Circulator
UWB Pulse
Output
a
23
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Experimental Results
10
Amplitude (mv)
Amplitude (mv)
10
5
0
-5
-10
0
-10
200
time (ps)
400
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
5
0
-5
-10
0.2
0.1
1556.3
1556.5
1556.7
Wavelength (nm)
1556.9
200
time (ps)
400
200
time (ps)
400
10
Amplitude (mv)
Amplitude (mv)
0.7
Amplitude Reflectivity
0
-5
10
0.8
5
0
-5
-10
200
time (ps)
400
F. Zeng and J. P. Yao, "Ultrawideband impulse radio signal generation using a high-speed electrooptic phase modulator
and a fiber-Bragg-grating-based frequency discriminator," IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. 20622064, October 2006.
2.
Time delay
x(t )
IM
2 x(t )
+1
-1
x (t )
x (t 2 )
x (t )
x(t )
Gaussian
monocycle
+
y (t )
y (t )
J. P. Yao, F. Zeng, and Q. Wang, "Photonic generation of Ultra-Wideband signals," IEEE Journal of Lightwave
Technology, vol. 25, no.11, November 2007.
24
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Amplitude (mV)
6
48 ps
3
0
-3
-6
200
400
600
800
1000
Time (ps)
Power (dBm)
-50
-60
-70
UWB monocycle generation based on a two-tap photonic microwave delayline filter using an SOA. PC: polarization controller, IM: intensity modulator,
EDFA: erbium-doped fiber amplifier, ISO: isolator, SOA: semiconductor
optical amplifier, VOA: variable optical attenuator, AMP: amplifier.
-80
0
10
12
14
Frequency (GHz)
LD1
PC
Gaussian
doublet
Polarizer
combiner
LD2
Time delay
device
PolM
PC
PD
y
Polarizer
LD3
45o
PC
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.6
0.2
0
0.4
-0.5
-0.5
Amplitude (a.u)
Amplitude (a.u)
Amplitude (a.u)
Amplitude (a.u)
0
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-150
-100
-50
0
Time (ps))
50
= 20 ps
100
150
200
-1
-200
-0.4
-0.6
-1
-200
0.2
-0.2
-150
-100
-50
0
Time (ps))
50
= 60 ps
100
150
200
-1
-200
-0.8
-150
-100
-50
0
Time (ps))
50
= 100 ps
100
150
200
-1
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
Time (ps))
50
100
150
200
= 140 ps
Comparison of an ideal doublet and a doublet generated by using a microwave delay-line filter; solid line: ideal
doublet, circles: doublet generated using the microwave delay-line filter.
25
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
0.00025
0.007
0.006
Power (mW)
(a)
Power (mW)
0.00020
0.00015
0.00010
(b)
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.00005
0.001
0.000
0.00000
(a)
1554
1554
1556
1558
1560
1556
1562
1558
1560
1562
Wavelength (nm)
Wavelength (nm)
0.009
0.008
-40
(c)
185ps
0.006
Power (dBm)
Amplitude (mV)
0.007
0.005
0.004
0.003
(d)
-50
-60
-70
0.002
-80
0.001
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Time (ps)
0.00020
0.00015
0.00010
14
(f)
0.005
45 ps
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.00005
0.001
0.00000
0.000
-0.00005
1554
1556
1558
1560
Wavelength (nm)
12
0.006
0.00025
Amplitude (mV)
Power (mW)
10
0.007
0.00030
(e)
0.008
0.00035
(b)
Frequency (GHz)
0.00040
1562
1564
200
400
600
800
Time (ps)
Outline
26
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Photonics ADC
fR
fS
x(nTS )
q (nTS )
y (nTS )
x(t )
Advantages:
1. Modern mode lock laser can produce high-frequency (>10
GHz) periodic sequence of optical pulses with timing jitter
significantly below that of electronic circuitry.
2. The sampling process can be made to be highly linear with
negligible back-coupling between optical sampling pulses
and the electrical signal being sampled.
H. F. Taylor, An electrooptic analog-to-digital converter, Proc. IEEE. vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1524-1525, Oct. 1975.
27
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Advantages:
1. Linear in complexity:
each additional bit of
resolution requires an
addition MZ
interferometer.
2. Decoupling of the
analog sampled signal
from the optical
sampling signal.
Drawback:
A limitation of this
approach is that each
additional bit of
resolution
requires a doubling of
the length of the MZ
modulator.
10
11
11
11
00
11
01
11
00
01
00
10
00
00
11
00
quantized s ()
11
10
comparator
output
intensity (au)
28
OFC/NFOEC 2008
OThH1.pdf
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
NSERC
29