Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
E,XHIBIT B
ANSWER
Plaintiffs,
-against-
Defendants
x
DAFENDANTS, the City of New York ("City"), the New York City
Council ("City Council"), and MELISSA MARK-VIVER|IO, in her official capacity
Speaker
as
of the New York City Council, by their attorney ZACHARY lV, CARTR,
Corporation Counsel for the City of New York, as and for their answer to the Complaint,
state upon information and belief:
l,
insofar as they allege or purporl to allege that Plaintiffs have a valid clairn or claims
against Dofendants, insof'ar as Plaintiffs allege that they are entitled to the reliel'sought
herein, and insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on the part of Detendants; except deny
kriowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set
forth in paragraph o'1" of the Complaint as to Plaintiffs' states of mind and intent in
commencing this action, and as to the relief sought by Plaintiffs,
2,
3.
solely of legal argument for which no response is warranled, however to the xtent that
rcsponse is required Defendants deny the allegations containeel
Complaint insofar as they allege or purport to allege that Plaintift's have a valid claim or
claims against Defendants, and insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on the part of
Defendants; and deny that the allegations set forth
completely and accurrately describc New York Civil Practice Law and Rules ("CPLR")
3001 referred to therein, and respectfully refer the Court to CPLR $ 3001 f'or the f'ull text
and true meaning thereofl
4,
solely of legal argument for which no response is warranted, howgver to the extent that
response is required Defendants deny the allegations contained
in paragraph "4"
o1the
Complaint insofar as they allege or purport to allege that Plaintiffs have a valid claim or
claims against Defendants, ancl insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on the part of
Defendants.
5,
insofar as they allegc or purport to allege that Plaintiffs have a valid claim or claims
gainst Dei-endants, and insofar as they allege any wongdoing on the part of Defendants,
except aclmit that Venue for tliis action lies in this Court.
6,
7,
8.
o'8'o
and
respectflrlly refer the Court to Local Law 152 of 2013 for the full text and true meaning
thereof.
9.
10.
11.
in
paragraph
"ll" of the
Complaint accurately and completely describe the New York City Council,
and
respectfully refer the Court to thc New York City Charter ("City Charter"), and the New
ancl duties
thereof; and additionally respeclfully refer the Court to the Municipal llome Rule Law
for the fulI text and true rneaning thereof
l?.,
in
paragraph
consist solely of legal argument f'or whish no response is warranted, however to the
-t
extent that a response is requirecl Defenclants cleny the allegations contained in paragraph
as they allege
valicl clairn or claims against Defbndants, and insof'ar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part of Delendants.
13,
14,
ool
3'o
of the Complaint,
consist solely of legal argument for which no response is wanantecl, however to the
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
o'14"
as they allege
valid claim or claims against Dsfcndants, and insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on
thc part of Defendants.
15.
16,
"l5"
of the Complaint,
consist solely of legal argument for which no respgnse is warrantecl, however to the
extent that a response is required Def'endants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
'016"
of the Complaint insofar as they allege or purport to allege that Plaintiffs have a
valid clain or claims against Defendants, and insofar as they allege any wrongcloing on
the parl of Defendants; and cleny that the allegations set f'orth in paragraph'016" of the
Complaint completely ancl accurately clesmibe the case cited therein, and respectf'urlly
refer the Court to the case for the full texl and true meaning thereof,
-4-
17.
consist solely of legal argrmrent for which no response is warranted, however lo the
extent that a response is recluired Defendants deny the allegations sontained in paragraph
oolTo'
as they allege
valid claim or claims against Defendants, ancl insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part ol'Defbnclants; and deny that the allegations set f'orth in paragraph
"lT" of the
to
and
true meaning thereof; nnd f'urther deny the allegations set forth in paragraph *17" of the
Complaint to the xtent that they allege or purport to allege that Chapter 5 ref'erenced
therein constitutes a local law; and further deny the allegations set fbrth in paragraph
"
7" of the Complaint to the extent that they allege or purport to allege that the Historical
allegations set f'orth in paragraph "77" of the Complaint to the extenl that they allege or
purport to allege that a "chapter" of the "A.dministrative Code" comprises a "single local
18.
in
paragraph
"18" of
Air Act
the
ref'effed to
19.
consist solely of legal argumenl tbr which no response is wanantecl, however to the
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
0019"
of the Complaint insofar as they allege or purport to allege that Plaintils have a
valicl claim or claims against Defendants, and insof'ar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part of'Defendants; and deny that the allegations set forth in paragraph'019" of thc
Complaint completely and accurately describe the purpose of the Clean Indoor Air Act
referred to therein, and respectfuily tefer the Court to the Clean lucloor Air Act and its
legislative history for the full texts and true meanings thereof; and frther deny the
allegations set forth in paragraph
"l9"
purport 1o allege that the Legislative Finclings referrccl to therein are part of
the
Administrativ Code, and respectfully refer the Court to the Administrative Code for the
20.
in
paragraph
"20" of the
Complaint
consist solely of legal argument for which no response is warranted, however to the
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations oontained in paragraph
0020"
valid claim or claims against Defcndants, and insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part of Defendants; and deny that the allegations set forth in paragraph "20" of the
ancl
Administrative Code {j17-503 referred to therein, and respectfully refer the Court to the
Clean Indoor
Air ct
and Administrative Corle $17-503 for the full texts an<l true
meanings thereof,
21,
in
paragrapli o'21"
of
the
Complaint con:pletely and accurately describe the Clean Indoor Air Act refened to
6-
and
22.
consist solely
extent that a response is required Def'endants deny the allegations contained in patagrapl,
o'22" o'the Complaint insof'ar as they allege or purport 1o allege that Plaintiffs have
valid olaim or caims against Defendants, and insof'ar as they allege any lvrongdoing on
the part of'Defenclants; ancl cleny that the allcgations set forth in paragraph "22" of the
Complaint completely and accurately describe the Clean Indcor Air AcT, its legislative
history and Administrative Code $17-503 referred to therein, anci respectfully refer the
Court to the Clean Indoor Air Act, its legislative history and Administrativs Code $17503 fcrr the full texts and true meanings thereof,
23.
consist solely
in
paragraph
*23" of tlre
Complaint
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
"23'o
ef the Complaint insofar as they allege or purport to altege that Plaintiffs have
valid claim or claims against l)efbndants, ancl insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part of Defendants; and deny that the allegations set forth in paragraph o'23" of the
to
and
24,
consist solely
-7
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
as they allege
valid claim or claims against Defendants, and insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part of Defendants; and deny that the allegations set forth in paragraph o'24" of the
Complaint completely and accurately describe the Clean Indoor Air Act and the Smoke
I'ree
Air
Act and the Smoke Free Air Act fbr the flll texts and true meanings thereof
25.
Air Act
ref'ened to
therein, and respectfully refer the Cou to the Smoke -ree Air Act for the f'ull text and
true meaning thereol'.
26,
27,
in
paragraph o'27"
of
the
Complaint completely and accurately describe the purpose of the Smoke F'ree Air Act
referred to therein, and respectfully ref'er the Court to the legislative history of the Smoke
Free
28,
consist solely
the
extent that a response is required Defendanls deny the ailegations oontained in paragraph
as they allege
valid claim or claims against Defendants, and insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the parl of Defendants; ancl deny that the allegations set lbrth in paragtaph "28" of the
-8-
Air Act
rel'ened to
therein, and respectfully refer the Court to the Smoke Free Air Act fol the full text
ancl
29.
the
Complaint completely anl acourately describe the DOHMH Bulletin refenecl to therein,
and respeetfully refer the Court to the DOIIMH Bulletin for the full text and true
rneaning thereof',
30,
in paragraph
o*30"
of
the
ancl
respectl'ully refsr the Court to the testimony for the full text ancl true meaning thereof,
31.
Complaint completely and accurately describe the testimony refened to therein, and
respectfblly refer thc Court to the testimony for the full text and true meaning thereof
32.
Complaint completely and accurately describe the testimony refened to therein, and
respectfully refer the Court to the testimony for the full text anci true neaning thereof,
33.
in paragraph "33" of
the
ancl
respectfully refer the Corut to the testimony lor the full text and true meaning thereof.
34,
in
"34" of
the
ancl
paragraph
respectf'ully refer the Court to the testimony fbr the full text and true meaning thereof
35,
in
paragraph
"35" of
the
Complaint completely and accurately describe the lestimony ref'ened to therein, and
respectlirlly refbr the Court to the testimony for the full text and true meaning thereof,
36.
in
paragraph
"36" of
the
Complaint completely and accurately describe the testinrony rcfened to therein, and
respectf'ully refer tlte Court fo the testimony for thc f'ull text and true meaning thereof,
37,
insofar as they allege that Intro 256, or Looal Law 47 of 2AA2, was enacted on December
18,2A02,
38,
in
"38" of
the
Air Act, or
the
paragraph
arnendments thereto, ancl respectfr"rlly refer lhe Court to the Local Law 47 of 2AAZ fbr the
consist solely
39.
40.
extent that a responss is required Def'endants deny the allegations contained irr paragraph
0040"
f the Complaint insolar as They allege or purport to allege that Plaintiffs have
valid claim or claims against Defnclants, and insofr as they allege any wrongclong on
the part of Defenclants; and deny that the allegations set fbrth in paragraph "40" of the
Complaint completely and accurately describe thc local law and administrative code
provisions ref'erred to therein, and respectfully lefer the Court to the local law and
administrative code provisions refened to therein fbr the full texts allcl true meanings
- 10-
thereof; and deny the allegations set f'orth in paragraph "40" of the Complaint to the
extcnt that they allege that Chapter 5 [of 'l'itle 17] is a locallaw,
41.
in
paragraph 0041"
of thc Complaint
consist solely of legal argument for which no response is warrantecl, however to the
extent that a response is required Defendants deny fhe allegations contained in paragraph
as they allege
42,
consist solely
in
paragraph
"42" of thc
Complaint
thc
extent that a responsc is required Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
'042"
of the Complaint insofar as they allege or purport to allege that Plaintiffs have a
valid claim or claims against Defendants, and insofr as they allege any wrongcloing on
the parl of Defendants; and dcny that the allegations set forth in paragraph '042" of the
Complaint completely and accurately describe the Docision and Order of the Courl datecl
rei'er
the Court to the Decision and Order for the f'ull text and true meaning thercof,
43.
in
paragraph ,,43"
of the
Complaint completely and accurately describe the cornmittee hearing and the Local Law
ref'ened to therein, and respectfully ref'er the Court to the hezuing transcript ancl to th
Local [,aw lbr the full lexts and true mezurings thereol],
44.
trutlr of the allegations set forth in paragraph'044" ef the Complainl as to the relationship
ll
of Audrey Silk to NYC C,L,A.S,H,, except aclmit that an individual icientified as Audrey
Silk provided testimony abouT the then-proposed Local [,aw 152 of 2013,
45.
consist solely
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
"45" of the Complaint insofar as they allege or purport to allege that Plaintifs have
valid claim or claims against Def'endants, and insof'ar as they allege any wongdoing on
the part of Defendarts; and cleny that the allegations set forth in paragraph "45" of the
Complaint completely and accrrately desoribe the testimony reflenecl to therein, and
respectfully refer the Court to the testimony for the full text and trus meaning thereof,
46,
<;onsist solely
the
extent that a response is requirecl Defendants deny the allegations contained in palagraph
'046" of the Complaint insofar as they allege or purpolt to allege that Plaintif have
valid claim or claims against Defendants, ancl insofar as they allege any wrongcloing on
the part of Defenclants; and deny that the allegations set forth in paragraph "46" of the
Complaint; and cleny that the allegations set fbrth in paragrapt^ ('46"
c:f
the Cclmplaint
completely and accurately describe the testimony referred to therein, and respectfully
refer the Court to the testimony for the full text and true meaning thcreofl
47.
consist solely
in
para.graph '047"
ef the Cornplaint
extent that a respcrnse is requircd Defbnclants deny the allegations containecl in paragraph
"47" of the Complaint insofar as they allege or purport to allege that Plaintiffs have
-12-
valid clajm clr claims against l)cfendants, and insofar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part
o[
in paragraph "47" of
the
Complaint; and deny that the allegations set forth in paragraph "4T' of the Complaint
completely and accurately describe the testimony referred to therein,
ancT
respectfully
refer the Court to the testimony fbr thc full text and true meaning thereof.
48.
the
Complaint completely and aocurately de'scribe the testirnony refcred to therein, and
respectfully refer the Court to the testimony fbr the full text and true meaning thereof
49.
Complaint completely and accurately dcscribe the Committee Reports refned to therein,
and respectfully refer the Court to the Committee Reports for the full texts and true
meanings thereof.
50,
in paragraph "50" of
the
Complaint completely and accurately desuibe the Health Committee amcndments to the
proposed Local Law 152 of 2013 ref.elrecl to therein, and respectfully refer the Court to
the Health Committee arnendments for the full texts ancl l,rue nreanings lhceof
51,
in
paragraph
"510'of
of
2013,
the
and
respectfblly ref'er the Court to Local Law I 52 of 2013 for the full text and true meaning
thereof
52.
13 -
of
2013,
the
and
respeotl'ully ref'er the Court to l,ocal Law 152 ol'2013 llor the
full text
thereof,
53,
in
paragraph
consist solely oll legal argument for which no response is warranted, however to the
extert that a response is required Defendants cleny the allegations contained in paragraph
o'53"
of the Complaint insof'ar as they allege or pnrport to allege that Plaintif's have a
valid claim or claims against Defendants, and insol'ar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part of Def'endants,
54,
55.
in
ancl
respectfully relbr the Cou't to Administrative Code 17-503 for the llr-rll texr and true
meaning thereof.
consist solely
56'
57.
58.
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations containecl in paragraph
oo5ll"
of'the Cclmplaint insofar as they allege or purport to allege that Plaintills have
valicl clairn or claims against Delbndants, nnd insofar as thcy allege any wrongdoing on
the part of Defendantsl and deny that the allegatious set forlh in paragraph "58" of the
Complaint completely and accurately desuibe the l,egislative findings for Local Law 152
-14-
therein, and respectfully refer the Court to the Legislalive findings for
the Local Law fbr the full text and true meaning thereof.
59,
60.
consist solely ofl legal argument for whish no response is wanantecl, however to the
extent that a response is required Def'endants deny the allegations oontained in paragraph
c.rr
as they allege
the part of Def'endants; ancl deny that the allegations set forth in paragraph 0060" of the
Complaint completely ancl accurately desuibe Local [,aw 152 of 2013 and Chapter 5 of
Title
17
of the Administrative Code referred to therein, and respectfully re{'er the Court to
C<cle
florthe full
61,
consist solely
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations containccl in paragraph
o'61"
of the Complaint insofar as they allege or purport to allege that Plaintifs have
valid ciaim or claims against Defendants, ancl insofar as they allege any w<lngcloing on
the part of'Delndants; and deny that the allegations set forth in paragraph o'61" of'the
Complaint completely ancl accurately desoribe l,ocal Law 152 of 2013 and Chapter 5 of
Local Law 152 of 2013 and Chapter 5 of Title 17 of the Administrative Code for the full
lexts ancl trus meanings thereol
15 -
62.
consist solely
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
o'62"
of the Complaint insofar as they allege or puqport to allege that Plaintiffs have
valid claim or clairns against Defenclants, and insofhr as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part of Defendants; ancl deny that the allegations set fbrth in paragraph "62'o ol the
Complaint completely and accurately describe the Reports of the l"lealth Committee
referrcd to therein, and respectfirlly refer the Court to Local Law 1 52 of 2013 and Reports
of the Flealth Committee ftir
63.
consist solely
The
in
paragraph '06-J"
resporlse
of the complaint
is wanantecl, however to
the
extent that a response is requirecl Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
'063"
as they allege
valid claim or claims against Defendants, and insofhr as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part of Defendants; and deny that the allegations set forth in paragraph 0,63', of the
Complaint completely and accurately describe the Reports of the Health Cornmittee
ref'ensd to therein, and respectfully refer the Court to Local Law 1 52 of 2A13 ancl Reports
of the Health committee flor the fi.ll text and true meaning thereof,
consist solely
64.
65,
66'
in
paragraph
extent that a response is required Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph
16 -
as they allege
valid clairn or claims against Def'endants, and insof ar as they allege any wrongdoing on
the part of Def'endants; exccpt ceny the aliegations set fbrth in the last sentencc of
paragraph
"66" of th Complaint,
67,
68,
69.
(169"
of
the
Complaint, Defendants repeat and reallege the responses set fo*h in each and every
paragraph of the Answer, as
if fully
70.
71.
72.
to fbrm a belief
allegations set fodh in paragraph "T?- of the Complaint as to Plaintitl's' states of mincl
and inteut in ommencing this proceeding, and as to the relicf sourght by Plaintiffs,
73.
the
Cornplaint, Defendants repeat and reallege the responses set forth in each and every
paragraph of the Answer, as
74,
75.
76,
-t7-
to form a belief
o:1
mind
and intent in comnencing this proceeding, and as to the relief sought by Plaintiff's,
77,
Iti
response
Complaint, Defendants repeat and reallege the responses set fbrth in each and every
paragraph of the Answer, as
if fully
set
fofth herein.
78,
79,
80,
against Defendants, insofar as Plaintitl's allege that they are entitlcd to the reiief'sought
herein, and insofar as they allege any wongdoing on the part of Defendants; except deny
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegalions set
forth in paragraph '080" of the Complaint as to Plaintif's' states of mind ancl intent in
commening this action, and as to the relief sr.rught by Plaintifl's,
81.
82.
I-ocal Law 152 of 2013 is valid and enfbrceable, and does not
- l8
Dated:
ZACHARY W. CARTER
Corporation Counsel of the
City of New York
Attomey for Defendants
100 Church Street, Room 5-167
By:
l--,-i.
r)
SHERRILL KURLAND
Senior Counsel
TO:
ED\ryARD A. P ALT7.IK, ESQ.
JOSHPE LAV/ CROUP LI,P
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
1040 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 1101
New York, New York 10018
Phone: (646)820-6701
Faxt (212) 313-9478
E-Mail: epaltzik@joshpelaw.com
- t9
"
*.r\_
VERIT'ICATION
penalties
of perjury,
have been duly designatcd as Acting Corporation Counsel of the City of New
York and, as suoh, I am an officer of the City of New York, a Defendant in the within action, I
have read the foregoing Answer to Defendants' Complaint in NYC-C.L,ALIL" et al.
v$ty
of
New York.pt, al,, New York County Index Nunrber 15272312014 and know the contents thereof;
the same are true to my knowledge except as to those matters therein alleged upon information
and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true,
The reason why this verification is not made by the City of New York is that it is
based upon
information obtained from various departments of the city government, from statements made to
me by ce$ain ofhces or agents of the City of New York, and from statements, af'fidavits, or
affinnations of' other persons,
DATET)
[,
NIJ)
ESQ.
CITY
ZACHARY W, CARTER
Corporaion Counsel of the Clty of New York
Attorney r Defendants
100 Church'5t,, Room 5-167
New York, N,Y, 10007
Of Counsel: SI'IERRILL KURLANI)
Tel: (212) 356-26A5
LM Na,20l4-010967
Due and timely servce is hereby admitted.
New York, N.
, 200
Esq
Attorney