Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Related Articles
Can flexibility help you float?
Phys. Fluids 24, 101701 (2012)
Characterization of large-scale interface deformation arising from electrostatic modification of the contact angle
of pinned contact lines
J. Appl. Phys. 112, 064913 (2012)
Segmented waves in a reaction-diffusion-convection system
Chaos 22, 037109 (2012)
Ion-selective Marangoni instabilityChemical sensing of specific cation for macroscopic movement
Chaos 22, 037111 (2012)
A simple technique to measure the magnetic susceptibility of liquids
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 095112 (2012)
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
MAY 1999
I. INTRODUCTION
pending on various parameters. Moreover, one or more satellite drops may be formed following the rupture of the fluid
interface. In this paper, a theoretical study is presented of the
effects of surfactants which are insoluble in the bulk liquid
on the dynamics of uniaxially stretched liquid bridges. As
the bridge stretches, the surfactant redistributes on the interface, thereby causing gradients in surface tension. This in
turn causes flows due to the Marangoni effect which can
change considerably the dynamics of bridge deformation and
breakup compared to the situation in which the bridge is
surfactant free. The goal here is to understand the role of the
physical properties of the bridge liquid and the surfactant,
stretching speed, and bridge size on the dynamics, which has
heretofore been lacking.
The statics and dynamics of liquid bridges have attracted
much attention for more than a century. Interest in them has
grown in the last few decades because of applications in
diverse fields. For example, a liquid bridge serves as an idealized but useful model in studying the floating zone technique for crystal growth.4 Anilkumar et al.5 have investigated controlling thermocapillary convection in such a liquid
Studies of long, cylindrical fluid columns and their stability have been carried out since the 19th century. Through
the works of Plateau,1 Rayleigh,2 and Mason,3 among many
others, it has been determined theoretically as well as experimentally that in the absence of gravity, the critical value of
the ratio of the length of a cylindrical column of liquid to its
diameter above which the column cannot be held in stable
equilibrium is p.
A liquid bridge is a column of liquid held between two
coaxial solid disks. When such a static bridge is impulsively
set into motion and stretched uniaxially, it deforms gradually
and contracts at its middle portion. Of great interest in the
dynamics of the stretching liquid bridge is the fate of a slender liquid thread that develops as time advances and eventually thins and breaks. This process subsequently creates two
large drops whose volumes may nevertheless be unequal dea!
1070-6631/99/11(5)/997/19/$15.00
997
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
998
bridge by vibrating one of the supporting rods. Other examples include industrially important processes like spraying
and atomization of liquids where a fundamental understanding of the breakup of liquid columns is essential ~Ref. 6; see
also Refs. 79!. Another reason for studying liquid bridges
comes from the fiber spinning process10 which is industrially
practiced on a large scale. Tsamopoulos et al.11 and Tirtaatmadja and Sridhar12 have exploited the dynamics of liquid
bridges for developing techniques for the measurement of
surface tension, shear viscosity, and extensional viscosity of
molten Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquids. Studies by
Ennis et al.13 and Chen et al.14 have been motivated by the
application of liquid bridges to agglomeration of particles.
Of special interest to the present authors and yet another
motivation for studying dynamics of liquid bridges is the
close analogy between interface rupture during drop formation from a capillary tube and liquid bridge breakup ~cf.
Refs. 1517!. The stretching liquid bridge provides a controlled method of studying the dynamics and breakup of a
fluid neck connecting an about-to-form drop from the rest of
the liquid in the capillary tube.
There have been many theoretical and experimental
studies of static liquid bridges since the pioneering works of
Plateau and Rayleigh. These have addressed various physical
situations such as drops, or liquid bridges, held captive between parallel surfaces, crossed cylinders, and nonparallel
surfaces and those undergoing gyrostatic rotation, as reviewed by Zhang et al.16 It was not until after the work of
Fowle et al.,18 however, that the dynamics and breakup of
liquid bridges began to be studied. The majority of the subsequent theoretical work on liquid bridge dynamics has either relied on one-dimensional models or taken the bridge
liquid and the surrounding liquid to be inviscid. Furthermore,
virtually all of the theoretical and experimental works until
the 1990s have either considered the dynamical response of
the bridge due to oscillations of one of the rods or breakup
that results when a bridge near its static limit of stability is
subjected to a disturbance. The one-dimensional models
have been developed under the assumption that the bridge is
sufficiently slender so that the axial velocity is independent
of the radial coordinate and depends solely on the axial coordinate and time. Until very recently, two fundamentally
different one-dimensional models have been used to analyze
the dynamics of liquid bridges. The first one is the inviscid
slice model due to Lee19 and the second one is the model
based on the so-called Cosserat equations.20 Meseguer21 and
Meseguer and Sanz,22 among others, have studied the
breakup of liquid bridges with these models. Schulkes6,7 has
carried out careful studies evaluating the validity and limitations of the one-dimensional approximations. Sanz and
Diez23 have studied the nonaxisymmetric but linearized oscillations of inviscid liquid bridges. Borkar and
Tsamopoulos24 and Tsamopoulos et al.11 have studied using
linear stability analysis the linearized oscillations of liquid
bridges of small and arbitrary viscosities. Chen and
Tsamopoulos25 have used the finite element method to study
finite amplitude oscillations of liquid bridges of arbitrary viscosity. Sanz26 and Mollot et al.27 have studied experimentally the oscillations of liquid bridges. More recently, Nico-
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
nique to solve for the flow. Stone and Leal43 used a linear
equation of state to relate interfacial tension and the local
concentration of surfactant on the drop surface. Milliken
et al.,44 while restricting the surfactant to be insoluble and
the flow to the creeping flow regime, extended the work of
Stone and Leal43 by adopting a nonlinear relationship between the interfacial tension and the surfactant concentration. Milliken et al.44 performed simulations over a wider
range of drop viscosities and subjected the drops to a wider
variety of flow conditions than those in the earlier work of
Stone and Leal.43 The effect of surfactant solubility on drop
deformation and breakup was taken up by Milliken and
Leal,45 who assumed that surfactant transport in the bulk was
diffusion dominated. Effects of finite fluid inertia in such
problems have recently been considered by Leppinen et al.,46
who studied theoretically the steady and transient behavior
of surfactant-laden drops falling through air. Leppinen et al.,
too, assumed that the surfactant is insoluble in both the drop
liquid and surrounding air and adopted a linear equation of
state relating surface tension and surfactant concentration.
Pawar and Stebe47 have extended the work of Milliken
et al.44 on drop deformation in extensional flows by accounting for surface saturation and nonideal interaction among
surfactant molecules for the case of insoluble surfactants.
Much of the experimental work on free boundary problems in the presence of surfactants has been motivated by the
desire to measure dynamic surface tension ~DST!. Franses
et al.48 have provided a comprehensive review of virtually
all nonoptical techniques that have been developed until
1996 to measure DST for its own sake, for inferring surfactant concentrations along fluid interfaces, and for understanding dynamic interfacial phenomena due to DST effects.
More recently Hirsa et al.49 have used the optical method of
second harmonic generation ~SHG! to measure instantaneous
profiles of surfactant concentration along fluid interfaces.
Building on earlier works of Eggers and Dupont,37
Papageorgiou,8,9 and Zhang et al.,16 a set of one-dimensional
evolution equations is presented in Sec. II that governs the
shape of, axial velocity in, and surfactant distribution along
the surface of a stretching liquid bridge. The numerical
method used to solve the set of evolution equations is described in Sec. III. Section IV presents detailed results of
computations, including ones that highlight the relative importance of surfactant convection to surfactant diffusion
along the liquidgas interface. Concluding remarks form the
subject of Sec. V.
II. PROBLEM FORMULATION
999
vector g. The two contact lines are circles that remain pinned
to the edges of the disks throughout the motion. The free
surface separating the liquid from the ambient gas has a fixed
amount of an insoluble surfactant deposited on it. The surfactant is taken to wholly reside on the liquidgas interface
and hence does not penetrate into, or get adsorbed on, the
disk surfaces. Here either the top disk moves upward along
the axis of symmetry at a constant velocity U m while the
bottom disk is stationary or else the two disks are taken to
move with velocities U m /2 and 2U m /2, respectively, as
shown in Fig. 1. The case of symmetric stretchingmoving
the top and the bottom disks in opposite directionsremoves
any asymmetry that might arise when the bottom disk is held
stationary and the velocity of the top disk is impulsively
changed from 0 to U m ; this is a point which is returned to in
the next section. The surface tension of the liquidgas interface is spatially nonuniform and depends on the local concentration of the surfactant. In what follows, it is convenient
to define a cylindrical coordinate system $ r, u ,z % whose origin lies at the center of the lower disk surface, where r denotes the radial coordinate, z the axial coordinate measured
in the direction opposite to gravity, and u the azimuthal
angle. For axisymmetric configurations of interest in the
present study, the problem is independent of the azimuthal
angle.
Isothermal, transient flow of a viscous liquid inside a
stretching bridge is governed by the NavierStokes system
and appropriate boundary and initial conditions. The dynamics of the insoluble surfactant along the liquidgas interface
is governed by the convection-diffusion equation ~Refs. 50
and 51, see also Ref. 52!. Following Eggers and Dupont37
and Papageorgiou,8 this spatially two-dimensional system of
partial differential equations is reduced to a spatially onedimensional system by expanding the axial velocity v (r,z,t)
and the pressure p(r,z,t) in a Taylor series in the radial
coordinate:
v~ r,z,t ! 5 v 0 ~ z,t ! 1 v 2 ~ z,t ! r 2 1 ,
~1!
~2!
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1000
In this paper, the surface tension s of the liquidgas inter by the nonface is related to the surfactant concentration G
linear Szyskowsky equation of state ~see Ref. 53!
s 511 b ln ~ 12G
!.
~12!
~3!
Substitution of ~1!~3! into the remaining governing equations and boundary conditions yields the following equations
at the leading order from the z-component of the Navier
Stokes equation, the normal stress balance, the convectiondiffusion equation, and the kinematic condition:
1 ]p0 m
]v0
]v0
] 2v 0
1v0
52
1
4 v 2 1 2 2g ,
]t
]z
r ]z
r
]z
p 01 m
]v0
5 s ~ 2H! ,
]z
~4!
~5!
G ]v0
]G
]G
] 2G 1 ] h ] G
1v0
52
1D s
1
,
]t
]z
2 ]z
]z2 h ]z ]z
~6!
h ]v0
]h
]h
1 v 0 52
,
]t
]z
2 ]z
~7!
where h(z,t) is the bridge profile, G(z,t) is the surface concentration of surfactant, g is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity, s (z,t) is the surface tension of the interface, 2H is twice the local mean curvature of the interface,
and D s is the surface diffusivity of the surfactant. At the
leading order, the tangential stress balance yields an expression for v 2 ,
v 25
3 ] h ] v 0 1 ] 2v 0
1 ]s
1
1
,
2 m h ] z 2h ] z ] z
4 ]z2
~8!
]v
]t
]h
]t
] G
]t
52v
]v
]z
1
Pe
] p
]z
13Oh
1 ]
h 2 ]z
S D
h 2
]v
]z
12
]h
1 ]v
2 h
,
]z 2 ]z
52v
2Oh
] 2 G
]z 2
1 ]h ] G
h ]z ]z
]s
]z
2G, ~9!
~10!
2v
] G
]z
1
2
]v
]z
~11!
Oh p 5
h @ 11 ~ ]h / ]z ! 2 # 1/2
s ] 2h / ]z 2
@ 11 ~ ]h / ]z ! 2 # 3/2
~13!
5 p 2Oh
P
]v
.
]z
~14!
h ~z 5L/R,t ! 51,
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
~15!
and the axial velocity at the disk surfaces follow the adherence conditions
v ~z 50,t ! 50 or 2U
m /2,
v ~z 5L/R,t ! 5U
m or U
m /2.
~16!
] G
~z 50,t ! 50,
]z
] G
~z 5L/R,t ! 50,
]z
~17!
~18!
v ~z ,t 50 ! 50,
~19!
G ~z ,t 50 ! 5G
o,
~20!
~21!
1001
ement method57,58 for spatial discretization and finite differences for time integration. The problem is reformulated by
introducing a new variable V, so that the highest-order derivative appearing in the governing equations is of second
order with respect to the spatial coordinate z . This reformulation requires that Eqs. ~9!~11! be augmented by the equation
V2
]h
50.
]z
~22!
h ~z ,t ! 5
( h i~t ! f i~z ! ,
i51
~23!
V ~z ,t ! 5
( V i~t ! f i~z ! ,
i51
~24!
G ~z ,t ! 5
( G i~t ! f i~z ! ,
i51
~25!
v ~z ,t ! 5
( v i~t ! f i~z ! ,
i51
~26!
L
,
Lo
i51,.., N.
~27!
The evaluation of the residuals then requires that time derivatives at fixed locations in physical space be cast onto
time derivatives at fixed isoparametric locations by
d
dt
]
]t
1vm
]
]z
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
~28!
1002
,t )5U
mz /(L/R). Extension to the situation
where v m (z
when both disks are moving is straightforward. With these
manipulations, the residual equations become
R iI 5
E HF
1
dv
dt
R iII 5
~ 11V 2 ! 3/2
h ]z ]z
dG
! dz
~ 12G
V2
E HF
1
R iIV 5
2 ]v ]h
2b
ES
i
R III
5
]z
!
11 b log ~ 12G
f i2
h ~ 11V 2 ! 1/2
! ] V/ ]z d f i
11 b log ~ 12G
23 Oh
G F
G
D
DJ
]v
1 ~ v 2 v m !
dG
dt
dh
dt
f2
]z dz
~29!
]h i
f z j d j ,
]z
1 ~ v 2 v m !
Pe h ]z ]z
]v d f i
1G f i z j d j ,
1 1 ] G ]h
EF
dz
f i1
1 ~ v 2 v m !
~30!
] G
]z
f i1
G ]v
2 ]z
1 ] G d f i
Pe ]z dz
]h
]z
h ]v
2 ]z
fi
z j d j ,
~31!
f iz j d j ,
~32!
/d j and i51,..., N.
where z j [dz
The Galerkin weighted residuals ~29!~32! are a set of
nonlinear ordinary differential equations in time. In this
work, time derivatives are discretized at the pth time step,
Dt p 5t p 2t p21 , by either first-order backward differences
or second-order trapezoid rule. With time discretization in
place, the resulting system of 4N nonlinear algebraic equations is solved by Newtons method. Four backward difference time steps with fixed Dt p provide the necessary
smoothing before the trapezoid rule is used.62 Moreover, in
this work a first-order forward difference predictor is used
with the backward difference method and a second-order
AdamsBashforth predictor is used with the trapezoid rule.
The norm of the correction provided by Newton iterations,
i d p11 i ` , is an estimate of the local time truncation error of
the trapezoid rule. The time step is chosen adaptively by
requiring the norm of the time truncation error at the next
time step to be equal to a prescribed value e so that Dt p11
5Dt p ( e / i d p11 i ` ) 1/3 ~Ref. 63!. Relative error of 0.1% per
time step, e 51023 , is prescribed in the computations.
The algorithm for computing the transient evolution of
shapes of stretching bridges and the concentration profiles of
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1003
stated, the top disk is moving and the bottom disk is stationary.
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FIG. 3. Evolution in time of the shape of the bridge whose profile at the
incipience of breakup is shown in Fig. 2.
FIG. 2. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius h/R
of and dimensionless concentration G/G m , dimensionless axial velocity v
and dimensionless pressure p inside a bridge of glycerol-like liquid at the
m 50.028,
incipience of breakup (t 5125.55). Here Oh54.202, G50, U
3
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1004
FIG. 4. Evolution in time of the concentration profile for the same bridge as
that of Fig. 2. The concentration profiles are at the same instants in time as
the shape profiles shown in Fig. 3.
FIG. 5. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius h/R
of and dimensionless concentration G/G m , dimensionless axial velocity v ,
and dimensionless pressure p inside a bridge of glycerol-like liquid at the
m 50.028,
incipience of breakup (t 5145.55). Here Oh54.202, G50, U
0 50.5.
L 0 /R52, V/R 3 52 p , Pe5105 , b 50.5, and G
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
FIG. 6. Evolution in time of the shape of the bridge whose profile at the
incipience of breakup is shown in Fig. 5.
1005
FIG. 7. Evolution in time of the concentration profile for the same bridge as
that of Fig. 5. The concentration profiles are at the same instants in time as
the shape profiles shown in Fig. 6.
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1006
52 p , b 50.5, and G 0 50.5. Also shown are the limiting lengths of a bridge
of pure glycerol and a glycerol-like liquid on the surface of which surfactant
is uniformly distributed, with other parameters being the same.
FIG. 9. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius h/R
of and dimensionless concentration G/G m , dimensionless axial velocity v ,
and dimensionless pressure p inside a bridge of glycerol-like liquid at the
m 50.28,
incipience of breakup (t 570.36). Here Oh54.202, G50, U
3
L 0 /R52, V/R 52 p , Pe50.1, b 50.5, and G 0 50.5 and the rods are
m /2.
stretched in the opposite directions with speeds U
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
FIG. 10. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless concentration G/G m , dimensionless axial velocity
v , and dimensionless pressure p inside a bridge of glycerol-like liquid at the
m 50.28,
incipience of breakup (t 560.72). Here Oh54.202, G50, U
3
L /R52, V/R 52 p , Pe510, b 50.5, and G 50.5 and the rods are
0
m /2.
stretched in the opposite directions with speeds U
too far removed from the middle of the long bridge to produce a satellite of appreciable size.
Figure 12 shows the variation with Pe of the limiting
lengths of bridges of glycerol-like liquids along the surface
of which a surfactant is depositedindicated by the curve
labeled as mobile surfactantin situations in which the
stretching velocity is high. All the dimensionless groups in
Fig. 12 are the same as those in Fig. 8 except the stretching
velocity which is an order of magnitude larger. Figure 12
shows that the stretching velocity is so high that the depletion of surfactant in the neck that occurs with increasing Pe
dominates the stabilizing influence exerted by the Marangoni
effect. Consequently, the limiting length as Pe` is lower
than that as Pe0. The fall in L d /R at Pe'10 and the rise in
L d /R for slightly higher values of Pe are due to the appearance and disappearance of satellite drops ~cf. Figs. 10 and
11!.
Figure 13 summarizes the variation of the limiting
bridge length with stretching velocity at low and high Peclet
numbers. Figure 13 shows that whereas L d /R is larger for a
bridge with Pe5105 than one with Pe50.1 at low stretching
velocities, the opposite is true at high stretching velocities.
According to the results presented up to this point, there is
depletion of surfactant from the neck due to convection as
1007
FIG. 11. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless concentration G/G m , dimensionless axial velocity
v , and dimensionless pressure p inside a bridge of glycerol-like liquid at the
m 50.28,
incipience of breakup (t 562.14). Here Oh54.202, G50, U
3
5
L 0 /R52, V/R 52 p , Pe510 , b 50.5, and G 0 50.5 and the rods are
m /2.
stretched in the opposite directions with speeds U
Peclet number increases. As shown in Fig. 7, at low stretching velocities the neck is relatively short that the Marangoni
stresses that arise from the resulting concentration gradient
are sufficient to drive an appreciable backflow toward the
neck to increase the limiting length of the liquid bridge. By
contrast, as shown in Fig. 11, at high stretching velocities the
surfactant-depleted neck becomes so long that the Marangoni
stresses are inoperative in delaying the rupture of the neck.
Indeed, in the absence of appreciable Marangoni stresses and
the presence of high surface tensions along the neck due to
the total absence of surfactant there, it accords with intuition
that at high stretching velocities the limiting length of the
high Pe bridge is lower than that of the low Pe bridge.
Figure 14 shows the effect of gravity on the variation
with the dimensionless axial coordinate of the shape of and
the dimensionless concentration, dimensionless axial velocity, and dimensionless total pressure inside a bridge of a
glycerol-like liquid at the incipience of breakup. All of the
dimensionless groups in Fig. 14 are identical to those in Fig.
2 with the exception of the gravitational Bond number,
which equals 0.503 here but 0 in Fig. 2. As in previous
studies of equilibrium shapes and stability of static bridges64
and those of stretching liquid bridges without surfactants,16
Fig. 14 shows that an increase in G hastens bridge breakup
and hence results in a decrease in limiting length. The presence of gravity of course breaks the symmetry of the bridge
/2 and causes liquid to accuprofile about its midplane z 5L
mulate near the bottom disk.
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1008
52 p , b 50.5, and G 0 50.5 and the rods are stretched in the opposite direc m /2. Also shown are the limiting lengths of a bridge of
tions with speeds U
pure glycerol and a glycerol-like liquid on the surface of which surfactant is
uniformly distributed, with other parameters being the same.
FIG. 13. Variation of the dimensionless limiting length L d /R with the dimensionless stretching velocity U m /U at two extremes of Pe. All other
parameters are the same as those of the bridge of glycerol-like liquid the
governing dimensionless groups for which are given in the caption to Fig. 2.
FIG. 14. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless concentration G/G m , dimensionless axial velocity
v , and dimensionless pressure p inside a bridge of glycerol-like liquid at the
m
incipience of breakup (t 592.15). Here Oh54.202, G50.503, U
3
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
FIG. 15. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless concentration G/G m , dimensionless axial velocity
v , and dimensionless pressure p inside a bridge of water-like liquid at the
m
incipience of breakup (t 548.93). Here Oh50.00293, G50.342, U
3
1009
FIG. 16. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless concentration G/G m , dimensionless axial velocity
v , and dimensionless pressure p inside a bridge of water-like liquid at the
m
incipience of breakup (t 565.2). Here Oh50.00293, G50.342, U
0 50.5.
50.028, L 0 /R52, V/R 3 52 p , Pe5105 , b 50.5, and G
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1010
52 p , b 50.5, and G 0 50.5. Also shown are the limiting lengths of a bridge
of pure water and a water-like liquid on the surface of which surfactant is
uniformly distributed, with other parameters being the same.
the
m
U
the
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
FIG. 21. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless axial velocity v , dimensionless radial velocity
and dimensionless pressure p , inside a pure water bridge at an intermediate
m 50.028,
time of stretching (t 564.25). Here Oh50.00293, G50.342, U
L 0 /R52, and V/R 3 59.766.
1011
FIG. 22. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless axial velocity v , dimensionless radial velocity,
and dimensionless pressure p inside a pure water bridge at the incipience of
m 50.028, L 0 /R52,
breakup (t 564.28). Here Oh50.00293, G50.342, U
and V/R 3 59.766.
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1012
careful look into the underlying physics than that which has
heretofore been provided. This is followed by a discussion of
results on the effect of surfactants on the switch in the
breakup point.
Although the pressure profile and the associated pressure
peak that results in the neck region of a bridge being
stretched at a low velocity is during the early stages of the
necking process virtually symmetric about the axial location
where the neck radius is smallest, insights into the breakup
dynamics can be gained by examining the radial velocity in
the bridge in addition to the usual variables of interest. In the
context of the slender-jet theory, the radial velocity is a derived quantity and is obtained from the continuity equation,
viz. u52(r/2)( ] v / ] z).
Figure 21 shows the variation with the dimensionless
axial coordinate of the dimensionless radius of and the axial
velocity, the dimensionless radial velocity evaluated at the
free surface, and the dimensionless pressure inside a water
bridge a few time steps before it ruptures. Figure 21 focuses
on the neck region to emphasize certain salient features of
the breakup process. The bridge is being held captive between two rods of radii R50.16 cm, has volume
V50.04 cm3, and is being stretched at a velocity
FIG. 24. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless axial velocity v , dimensionless radial velocity
and dimensionless pressure p , inside a pure water bridge at an intermediate
m 51.17,
time of stretching (t 53.27). Here Oh50.00293, G50.342, U
L 0 /R52, and V/R 3 59.766.
FIG. 23. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless axial velocity v , dimensionless radial velocity,
and dimensionless pressure p , inside a pure water bridge at an intermediate
m 51.16,
time of stretching (t 53.27). Here Oh50.00293, G50.342, U
L 0 /R52, and V/R 3 59.766.
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1013
FIG. 25. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless axial velocity v , dimensionless radial velocity,
and dimensionless pressure p inside a pure water bridge at the incipience of
m 51.16, L 0 /R52, and
breakup (t 54.04). Here Oh50.00293, G50.342, U
V/R 3 59.766.
FIG. 26. Variation with axial position of the dimensionless bridge radius
h/R of and dimensionless axial velocity v , dimensionless radial velocity,
and dimensionless pressure p inside a pure water bridge at the incipience of
m 51.17, L 0 /R52, and
breakup (t 54.07). Here Oh50.00293, G50.342, U
V/R 3 59.766.
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1014
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1015
Downloaded 09 Oct 2012 to 150.140.190.160. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://pof.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions