Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
355
Samuel B. Adeloju
Centre for Industrial Research and Advanced Technology, University of Western Sydney, Nepean,
Kings wood 2 750, Australia
Several wet digestion and dry ashing methods were compared for the precise and accurate determination of
some trace elements in biological and environmental materials. The wet digestion methods were generally
faster than the dry ashing methods, but required the use of large amounts of reagents and, therefore, gave
higher blank contributions for some elements. The main advantages of the dry ashing method were the lower
blank levels, improved (lower) background current and its ability to handle considerably larger amounts of
sample. However, careful dissolution of the sample ash in a suitable reagent was necessary. Under suitable
conditions, both decomposition methods allowed the reliable voltammetric determination of trace elements
in biological and environmental materials with relative standard deviations of between 1 and 3%. The ultimate
choice of decomposition method was influenced by the amount of sample available, the nature of the sample,
the sample matrix and the analysis time available.
Keywords: Digestion methods; trace elements; voltammetry; biological and environmental materials
Experimental
Reagents and Standard Solutions
All acids and the ammonia solution used were of Aristar grade
(BDH, Poole, Dorset, UK); all other reagents were of
analytical-reagent grade. The ammonia - ammonium chloride
456
buffer solution, dimethylglyoxime (dmgH?), standards and
distilled, de-ionised water were prepared as described pre\ iously. i-h
Instrumentation
All experiments were performed by differential-pulse voltammetric methods on an E G &: G Princeton Applied Research
(Princeton, NJ, 1JSA) microprocessor-controlled instrument
as described previously.3--" A medium-size mercury drop
having a surface area of 0.015 cmz was used in all instances.
Glassware
All glassware and polyethylene bottles were soaked in 2 M
nitric acid for at least 7 d , washed three times with distilled,
de-ionised water, soaked in distilled, de-ionised water and
finally soaked in 0.1 M hydrochloric acid until ready for use.
Biological Standard Reference Materials (SKMs)
Animal Muscle (IAEA RM M-4) was obtained from the
Analytical Quality Control Services of the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna, Austria. Bovine
Liver (NBS SRM 1577a). Oyster Tissue (NBS SRM 1566a)
and Orchard Leaves (NBS SRM 1571) were obtained from the
US National Bureau of Standards (NBS), Washington, DC.
All materials were treated as recommended by the suppliers.
Digestion Methods
1. W e t digestion
(a) W i t h H N O j only ( W l ) . Transfer 0.3 g (or 10 ml) of
sample and 10 nil of nitric acid (65%) into a 125-ml
Erlenmeyer flask, insert a pre-cleaned glass funnel and heat
on a hot-plate at approximately 290 "C until nitrogen oxide
fumes are just given off. Repeat the digestion with two
separate additions of 10 ml of nitric acid, cooling the tlask for
about 2 min between each addition. With the final addition of
nitric acid, continue heating at the same temperature until the
nitrogen oxide fumes are completely evolved. Cool the flask
again for about 2 min and rinse the funnel with a small volume
o f distilled. de-ionised water into the flask. For the determination of selenium, add 3 ml of 37% hydrochloric acid (1 + l ) ,
replace the funnel and then heat the mixture at a temperature
setting of approximately 210 "C on the hot-plate for at least 30
min to convert all the selenium to selenium(1V). Cool to room
temperature, rinse the funnel again into the flask with water
and transfer the contents into a 25-ml calibrated flask, making
up to the mark with distilled, de-ionised water.
(b) W i t h H N 0 3 - H 2 S 0 4(W2).Transfer 0.3 g (or 10 ml) of
sample, 10 ml of nitric acid (6.5%) and 1 ml of sulphuric acid
(98%) into a 125-ml Erlenmeyer flask and carry out the
digestion a s described in (a) [including the treatment with HCI
for the conversion of selenium to selenium(IV)]. In this
instance, repeat the digestion with three separate additions of
nitric acid and continue heating after the final addition of
nitric acid until the nitrogen oxide fumes and the sulphite mist
have disappeared.
(c) With FINO3 - K2S2O8("3). Transfer 0.3 g (or 10 ml) of
sample. 10 ml of concentrated nitric acid and 4 ml of potassium
persulphate (10% mlV) into a 125-ml Erlenmeyer flask and
repeat the digestion as described in (a) [including the
treatment with HC1 for the conversion of selenium to
selenium(IV)].
In all of these wet digestion methods, care was taken to
avoid sample charring because this can result in reductive
conditions that might lead to the loss of selenium via the
formation of volatile hydrogen selenide. For the arsenic
determination, conversion of the element to arsenic(II1) was
2. Dry ushirig
(a) Direct dry ushing without an ashing nid ( 0 1 ) . Accurately weigh 0.5 g of sample into a pre-cleaned silica dish and
heat gently on a hot-plate to volatilise as much moisture and
organic matter as possible. From time to time, spread the
sample out with a pre-cleaned silica rod to accelerate drying.
When the sample is fairly dry (30-60 min) transfer the dish to a
temperature-controlled muffle furnace at 450 "C. Leave in the
furnace for 8 h (or overnight) to complete the decomposition
step. Remove from the furnace, leave to cool and add 3 ml of
6 M hydrochloric acid. Warm gently on a hot-plate to dissolve
the sample ash and to extract the elements from any insoluble
residue. Transfer the contents quantitatively into a 10-ml
calibrated tlask by washing the dish with distilled, de-ionised
water and mix thoroughly to ensure homogeneity.
(b) With sulphuric acid as a n ushing aid ( 0 2 ) . Accurately
weigh 0.5 g of sample into a pre-cleaned silica dish and add
5 ml of 20% V/V sulphuric acid (3.6 &I). Heat gently on a
water-bath for 30 min and transfer to a hot-plate, heating until
the white fumes cease to be evolved and the residue is
completely dry. Transfer the dish to the muffle furnace at
500 "C and leave overnight or for at least X h to complete the
decomposition. Dissolve the residue and make up the solution
as described in 2(a). If the sample contains carbonaceous
residue, leave it to settle before removing an aliquot for
analysis.
(c) Wirh nitric acid us a n ushing aid ( 0 3 ) . The procedure
was similar to that in 2(b) except that 5% VIV nitric acid was
added instead of sulphuric acid and the ashing was carried out
at 4.50 "C.
(d) With magnesium nitrate as a n ushing aid ( 0 4 ) . The
procedure was similar to that in 2(b) except that the sample
was first digested with nitric acid and 5 ml of 80% miV
magnesium nitrate solution before dry ashing in the muffle
furnace at 500 "C for 30 min as described previously by
Holak.8 The ashed sample was dissolved accordingly.
Voltammetric Determinations
The determinations of arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, copper,
lead, nickel, selenium and zinc were performed as de5cribed
previously by the author and co-workers.'.'
Bismuth and
vanadium were determined as described by Velghe and
Claeysg and van den Berg and Huang.10 respectively.
Working Area
This work was carried out in clean air conditions controlled at
a temperature of 22.5 k 0.5 "C. All sample preparations were
performed in a class-100 clean room, and the analytical
measurements in a class-1000 clean room.
457
Table 1. Suitability of direct decomposition methods for the voltammetric determination of tracc elements in biological and environmental
materials
Decomposition
Sample
Elemental
Vo I t a m me t r i c
t YPe
state
technique'
method
Liquid
..
W 2 > W3 > W1
DPCSV at
HMDE
Solid
W2 = D4
DPASV at
..
..
Liquid
W 2 > WI = W3
Bismuth
HMDE
Solid
Dl-D2-D3=W2
Liquid
DPASV at
..
..
W2>W1=W3
Cad m i u m
HMDE
Solid
W 2 = D 2 > D1= D3
..
..
DPACSV, DPP at
Liquid
W2 > w3 > w1
Cobalt . .
HMDEiDME
Solid
D 1 > D3 = D2 > W2
DPASV at
Liquid
..
. .
W2 > W 1 = W3
Copper. .
HMDE
Solid
D1 > D2 = D3, W2
Liquid
Lead . .
..
..
DPASV at
w2 > W3 > W1
D 2 > Dl = D 3 , W2
HMDE
Solid
..
..
DPACSV. DPP at
W2>W3>W1
Liquid
Nickel . .
HMDEIDME
Solid
D l > D3 = D2 > W2
DPCSV at
Liquid
..
..
W2 > w3 > W1
Selenium
IIMDE
Solid
W2 = D3
DPACSV, DPP at
Liquid
W2 > W3 > W1
Vanadium
..
..
HMDEiDME
Solid
W2 = D2
. .
..
DPASV at
Liquid
Zinc
..
W2 > W 1 = W3
HMDE
Solid
W 2 = D 2 > D 1 = D3
* DPCSV = differential-pulse cathodic stripping voltammetry; DPASV = differential-pulse anodic stripping voltammetry; DPACSV =
diffcrential-pulse adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry; DPP = differential-pulse polarography; H M D E = hanging mercury drop electrode;
and D M E = dropping mercury electrode.
Element
..
Arsenic
Digestion Time
Blank Contributions
Generally, the extent of contamination from the sample
decomposition process was greater for the wet digestion
methods in terms of the number and amounts of reagents used
than for dry ashing. particularly if the decomposition was
performed under conventional laboratory conditions.
However, this did not cause a major problem under clean
laboratory conditions because the blank contributions were
easily maintained at very low and constant levels. In this
regard, an attractive feature of the dry ashing methods was
their ability to decompose relatively larger amounts of sample
(up to 10 g) compared with wet digestion, without significant
increases in the decomposition time and the blank contributions. The decomposition of such large amounts of sample by
dry ashing proved useful in reducing the effect of the higher
and variable blank contributions obtained in a conventional
laboratory. Nevertheless, stringent control and maintenance
of the furnace was required in order to avoid or reduce the
irregular and variable blank contributions. This control and
maintenance required an initial firing of the furnace up to
800 "Con a regular basis to remove any residual trace elements
from the digestion chamber, prior to the introduction of the
sample for decomposition at lower temperatures. Table 2
gives the typical residual blank contributions which resulted
before and after furnace conditioning. Evidently, prior
conditioning of the furnace was effective in reducing the blank
contributions significantly and was used prior to all the dry
ashing methods discussed in this paper. In comparison, the
blank contributions from the wet digestion methods given in
Table 3 were generally higher. As can be seen from these data
the blank contributions for these digestion methods increased
with the amounts and number of reagents used for the sample
decomposition.
Determination of Volatile Trace Elements
458
Blank contributionipg 1
Element
Arsenic . .
Bismuth . .
Cadmium
Cobalt
. .
Copper . .
Lead
. .
Nickel
.
Selenium . ,
Vanadium
Zinc
. .
HNO,
<0.05
0.13
0.042
0.012
0.20
0.33
0.01s
<0.01
0.05
0.20
. .
. .
..
. .
. .
. .
..
..
..
. .
HNO,-I,SOI HNOI-KZS20,
<0.05
<o. 05
0.15
0.48
0.049
0. 1 I3
0.022
0.104
0.26
6.84
0.31
2.35
0.030
0.85
<0.01
<0.01
0.06
0.09
0.52
7.08
0.025 UA
c-'
21
~
0.50
0.3
-
0.4
0.5
0.55
0.75
0.35
0.55
E.'V
Fig. 2. Effect of ( a ) incomplete and ( h ) complete wet digestion on
the determination of Se in Orchard Leaves by DPCSV. ( a ) Samplc
(1 g) plus 50 ng of Se'V. ( h ) Sample (1 g) plus 1.0; 2. 1; and 3 , 2 pg 1 - 1
of SeV'. Final volume = SO ml. Other conditions as in Fig. 1
-
(a:
0.35
0.35
0.6
E!V
Selenium found * /
ng ml- 1
HN03
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2kO.6
HNO, - HZSO, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.9 i 0.3
HNO, - K,SZO, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.2 k 0.3
. . . . 7.0 k 0.5
Dry ashing-l with Mg(NO,)? as ashing aid
* Based on triplicate determinations (+ mean deviation).
t The sample was freeze-dried before ashing.
Digestion mixture
459
bl
t
4-
2
3
0.8
1.o
1.2
1.o
0.8
1.2 0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
-EN
The requirement for the complete decomposition of biological and environmental materials for the cathodic stripping
voltammetric determination of selenium and arsenic is further
demonstrated by the results given in Table 4. It can be seen
that the selenium concentrations obtained for the urine
sample by wet digestion with the H N 0 3 - H2S04 and H N 0 3 K2S208 mixtures and by dry ashing with Mg(N03)2 as an
ashing aid were comparable. The lower selenium concentration obtained by wet digestion with H N 0 3 only was due to the
incomplete decomposition of some of the organic matrix.
Similar observations have been made by Neve et a1.15 who
found that wet digestion with H N 0 3 only gave erroneous
results for the determination of selenium by atomic absorption
spectrometry because of the incomplete mineralisation of
some organic selenium compounds including selenium derivatives, which are the main metabolites of the element in urine.
With voltammetric techniques, the adsorption of the incompletely digested organic matrix inhibits the electrode process
and distorts the response due to the catalysis of the evolution
of hydrogen. The complete destruction of the organic matrix
by wet digestion with HNO? only seems to be limited by the
low boiling-point of this acid. Repeated digestion of the urine
sample with additional nitric acid did not improve the recovery
or precision of the wet digestion procedure for the voltammetric determination of selenium.
0.8
1.o
1.2
-EN
0.85
0.65
0.45
-EN
higher than for dry ashing in the muffle furnace (Table 2).
Further, the resulting sensitivities and background currents
for the voltammetric determination of the elements were
dependent on the nature of the chosen decomposition
method. Fig. 3 shows that the background current for the
determination of nickel and cobalt in Oyster Tissue digested
by the direct dry ashing technique without an ashing aid was
considerably lower than those obtained with the wet digestion
methods. Such high background currents can affect the
accuracy of the voltammetric peak measurements and, hence,
reduce the reliability of the method. However, unlike wet
digestion with H N 0 3 only [Fig. 3(b)] the inclusion of
potassium persulphate in the digestion mixture [Fig. 3(c)]
reduced the background current in the region of positive
potential. Such a reduction in the background current is
undoubtedly due to improved decomposition with the H N 0 3 K2S20Xmixture, as is already evident from the selenium
results in Table 4. Further, previous evidencelh.17 has indi-
460
Table 5 . Comparison of the wet digestion method using H N 0 3 H,SOI with the direct ashing method without an ashing aid for the
voltatnmetric determination of Cd. Pb, Co and Ni in Oyster Tissue
Wet
Certified
Voltammetric digestion/ Dry ashing*/ value-i./
Element
technique
pg gPgg-
ELsg
3 . 1 4 k 0 . 1 2 3 . 2 2 k 0 . 1 7 3.5 kO.3
DPASV
Cadmium . .
0.51 10.02 0.50 k 0.05 0.48 t 0.04
DPASV
Lead . . . .
0.4$
0.32 k 0.04 0.37 k 0.04
Cobalt
. . DPACSV
1.12 2 0.05 1.10 i 0.04 1.03 k 0.19
Nickel
. . DPACSV
Triplicate determinations (imean deviation)
f The error is the standard deviation.
Non-certified value.
Table 6. Comparison between open and closed wet digestion
procedures using HNOi - H,S04 for the CSV determination o f
se I e n i u in
Animal Muscle/ Bovine Liver/
Mode of digestion
pgg IofSe
p g g IofSe
Closed
..
..
..
0.273 t 0.005
1.08 2 0.0 1
Open . . . . . .
..
0.288 -t 0.002
1.13 k 0.03
Certified values+ . . . .
0.28 k 0.03
1 . 1 50.1
* The error is the mean deviation based on triplicate determinations.
f The error is the standard deviation based on the results obtained
by various inst r u me n t a1 tech n i q ues .
results.i This did not create any problems with the wet
digestion methods, provided that thc sample was digested
carefully as described in this paper. Nevertheless, the background currents of the sample decomposed by wet digestion
were very high as shown in Fig. 5 for the determination of
cadmium and lead in the sample of Oyster Tissue. In
comparison, the background currents for samples decomposed by the dry ashing methods were generally much lower,
as demonstrated previously.-? The data given in Table 5
provide a more direct comparison between the two preferred
decomposition methods for the reliable voltammetric determination of cadmium, lead, nickel and cobalt in the Oyster
Tissue sample. Both sets of results agree favourably with the
certified values and hence verify their suitability for the
voltammetric determination of these elements in similar
biological and environmental materials.
46 1
Conclusion
References
1.
2.
Actm, 1OS1
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
13.
1s.
16.
17.
1Kt
ipi
Paper 8103122C
Received August l s t , 1988
Accepted October 31st, I988