Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
INTENTIONAL TORTS- Intent: desire to cause harm, or know harm subst. certain to occur (GOOD MOTIVE DOES NOT
EXCUSE)
Battery: Intentional harmful or offensive contact,to PL or something close to PL
Harm must be offensive to reasonable person, unless particular susceptibility is known to D ( PL need not be aware of contact,
at the time of contact)
Assault- intentional act causes reasonable apprehension of an imminent battery. ACTUAL AWARENESS IS REQUIRED.
Inability to actual battery does not defeat.
False Impr-intentional restraint of PL in bounded area, with knowledge of confinement, or injury due to confinement, by force
threats of harm to Pl or family or failure to release where there is a duty to do so. Brief confinement will suffice, Not confined
where there is escape route. Escape involving embarrassment or physical harm are not a reasonable means of escape.
IIED:-intentional extreme or outrageous conduct causing P to suffer severe emotional distress.no physical injury needed Intent
or recklessness Language not outrageous except for innkeepers and common carriers (for them , only reasonably offensive
conduct) THIRD PARTY- P is immediate family member, and D is aware of presence, or any other PL where distress results in
BI
TRESPASS TO LAND- intent to enter PL land, or cause someone or something to enter, or stays longer than permission. Must
be physical invasion, even if just particulates. Any person with a POSSESSORY interest can bring suit. (landowners without
right to immediate possession may not bring suit) Mistake no defense. Nominal damages avail, even of no damage to land.
EJECTMENT- action to remove def from property.
TRESPASS TO CHATTEL- intentional minor interference with the chattel of another. Mistake not defense. Damages- must
have actual damages. Remedies- Damages or replevin.
CONVERSION-intentional act substantial interference or destruction of the chattel. EXERCISE OF DOMINION AND
CONTROL. Mistake not a defense. Money damages forced sale at market value or replevin.
DEFENSES TO INT TORTS CONSENT- express or implied(words or conduct)
May be implied as a matter of law in emergency situations. DEFENSES TO CONSENT-mistake, (where PL consents under a
mistake, AND def knows of the mistake) fraud, duress, incapacity, criminal act. SELF DEF- BUT if can correct mistake before
defending, should do so. OF OTHERS- same rules as self def. If third party makes a mistake about whether def needed, may be
liable for tort. DEF PROPERTY-reasonable force- to prevent RECAPTURE CHATTEL-prompt recover, but must demand
return first before using force to recover. NEVER DEADLY FORCE Cannot assert def if mistaken about the fact that his
property was taken. NECCESITY-PUBLIC to avoid a greater harm to the public- not liable for damages. PRIVATE- ok to avoid
greater harm, -is liable for damages. AUTHORITY- arrest- by police without warrant or citizen- not liable for tort if reasonable
belief to detain a person who has committed, or is committing a felony or breach of the peace
SHOPKEEPER PRIV-can detain on reasonable suspicion for reasonable time in a reasonable manner.
NEGLIGENCE- elements- duty breach causation damages. DUTY- law recognizes def conform to certain standard of conduct.
Usually only ordinary care. Duties only owed to forseeable -No general duty to act.- EXCEPTIONS 1)MALFEASANCE if the
def negligent actions caused the bad position of PL, duty to aid, incudes negligent omissions, like not stopping for stop sign, 2)
NONFEASANCE 3 kinds of nonfeasance when must act 1) to complete undertaken rescue. 2) when special relationship exists
(family member, common carrier, teacher, jailer, employer. 3) DUTY of person TO CONTROL THIRD PARTY- generally no
duty to assist, unless special relationship (parent/child, employer employee, on employer premises, if they know or have reason
to know necessity to control exists, and also for negligent hiring)
DRAM SHOP- commercial servers of alcohol liable if they knew or should have known the patron was intoxicated. DUTY TO
PROTECT- only if special relationship
NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT- Ownership of vehicle- negligent entrustment owner should know of the negligent
propensities of the person who he is lending it to. FAMILY CAR DOCTRINE-Owner vicariously liable for act of agents of
family when using his car for family purposes
INVITEE-on the premises for the economic benefit of the owner or possessor of the land. DUTY- 1) to affirmatively inspect 2)
to repair and make safe
LICENSEE-invited on the premises for social reasons. Only a duty to warn of known dangers.
TRESPASSERS-unknown- no duty if known-reasonable care to protect. FOR PLs ADJACENT TO LAND-reasonable care
concerning activities, artif conditions, and the land. TREES- rural areas no duty, urban areas- duty of reasonable care
regarding care and maintenance of trees.
ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE- 1) artif cond poses forseeable risk to kids 2)foreseeable the kids likely to trespass 3)kids
unaware or unable to appreciate the risk, 4)risk of danger outweighs utility of condition
Landlord/tenant- WHEN DIVISIBLE, common areas remain LL responsibility. Prior to transfer of possession, must notify
tenant of latent defects (no duty patent or obvious defects) No duty for conditions that arise after transfer. If undertakes repair,
can be liable for negligent repair.
STANDARD OF CARE-1) generally- reasonably prudent person in similar circumstances, mental condition not matter,
physical does
2)child- assessed according to reasonable child of same age, education, intelligence and experience ( gen , under six incapable
of neg. 7-13 rebuttably presumed not negligent 14+presumed capable of negligence) IF engaged in adult activities, must
conform to adult SOC.
3) professionals- must act as reasonably prudent person of similar skill and education, higher if specialist
BREACH-res ipsa loquitor infers DEF breach of duty-satisfies to prevent directed verdict or SJ 1)PL injury would not occur
absent some negligence 2)instrumentality in def control, 3) PL had no comparative fault.
NEG PER SE- violation of a statute. Pl must prove member of class statute sought to protect, and harm suffered was that
attempted to prevent
CAUSE in fact- by direct or circumstantial evidence, but-for or substantial factor.
PROXIMATE OR LEGAL CAUSE- duty to to forseebale PL in the zone of danger, and full damages to eggshell PL, even
APPROACH
GENERALLY
1. who is PL?
2. who is the defendant?
Or responsible parties?
3. what are PL injuries?
4. what legal theory can
PL assert?
5. make sure torts
question!!!
APPROACH TO
NEGLIGENCE
Discuss;
1) duty
2) standard of care
3) breach
4)cause in fact
5) proximate casue
6)damages
7)defenses
FOR NONFEASANCE
1.special relationship?
2. forseeability
Only determines if they
can
proceed
with
negligence analysis
MNEUMONICS
Int tort defenses-CRAP
SON
Consent,
recapture
chattel, arrest/authority,
def Prop, def self, def
others, necessity