Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ACTIVITY REPORT
INFID’S 15th CONFERENCE AND
3rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY
-1-
ACTIVITY REPORT
INFID’S 15TH CONFERENCE AND
3RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
I. INFID Conference
1. Historical Background
INFID therefore aims to create an environment that allows for the strengthening of
democracy in Indonesia through greater public participation in accessing and controlling the
development agenda in Indonesia. It is indeed unquestionable that INFID assumes a crucial
role in the social transformation movement in Indonesia. Its founders projected that a
repressive political climate which Indonesia had experienced in the 1980s will be detrimental
to NGOs in Indonesia in efforts to shape government policies.
In its formative years, INFID’s annual conference and Aide Memoire, that were outcomes
of past conferences, were INFID’s primary lobby efforts. The Aide Memoire was presented
before IGGI members during an assembly in the Netherlands for its annual meeting held in
June. INFID’s first four annual conferences were held in the Netherlands; 1985 in
Amsterdam, 1986 in Noordwijkerhout, 1987 in Zeist and 1988 in Zeewolde. A modest
secretariat was then set up in 1986 to ensure the continuity of these conferences.
INFID’s conference was then relocated outside of the Netherlands since the 1989 meeting
held in April in Nieuwpoort, Belgium. Some 52 participants attended the event, of whom 22
were from Indonesia. The 1989 conference in Belgium resulted in the Brussels incident
where INFID’s aide memoire harshly criticized the human rights violation case of the World
Bank-funded Kedung Ombo reservoir which the government considered to have been an
irresponsible act that blemished Indonesia’s image. At the time, the Indonesian government
-2-
was affronted by INFID’s criticism, declaring it improper for Indonesian NGOs to divulge
the country’s flaws to the international community. As a consequence, many NGOs in
Indonesia were pressured into withdrawing from INFID.
After the 5th conference in 1989 held in Belgium, the next conference was convened in
Bonn, Germany. During the 1991 conference in Washington DC, USA, Abdul Hakim G.
Nusantara, then the director of the Indonesian Legal Aid Institute Foundation (YLBHI) was
acknowledged by the World Bank and delivered a speech before World Bank officers. The
following year, INFID’s 8th conference was held in Odawara, Japan. Indonesia’s labor
situation then became the focus of the 9th conference in Paris, France held in 1994. In 1996,
land and development was scheduled to be the topic for the 10th conference in Canberra,
Australia but due to the repressive stance of the Indonesian government, Australian NGOs
eventually called off the conference. The same topic however, was finally addressed in Bonn
in 1998. The 12th conference was organized in Bali 1999 which was the first time such
conference was held in Indonesia. In October 2002, INFID organized the 13th conference in
Yogyakarta on "Inequality, Poverty and Impunity: The Challenges of Indonesia in the Era of
Democratization and Globalization". Since early 2005, the position of Executive Secretary
was changed to Executive Director, held by Ivan A. Hadar. Amidst the deteriorating
developmental condition in Indonesia due to poverty, overwhelming debt and large-scale
natural disasters that occurred consecutively across the country, INFID organized the 14th
conference in Jakarta from 16 to 19 November 2005. In line with the situation faced by the
country, the theme aptly chosen for the conference was “Achieving Social Justice through
Poverty Eradication, Debt Relief and Civilian Supremacy in Post-Tsunami Indonesia”.
In the midst of global economic failure with grave repercussions throughout the world –
including Indonesia – signs of Indonesia’s inability to achieve the MDGs (Millennium
Development Goals) are clearly evident as a consequence of ineffective governance as well
as political and economic policies that exclude the poor. In addition, the fragility of
Indonesia’s democracy marked by intensified intolerance amongst the people as well as the
ruthless power struggle of political contenders approaching the impending shift in power as
general elections draws close, became INFID’s concern for the 15th conference on
“Dynamics of Democracy and Economic Development in Indonesia: Reflection of the
Present and Looking Onward to the Future”
OBJECTIVES:
1. To review the existing political and economic aspects of democracy in
Indonesia.
2. To look at civil society’s position vis-à-vis democracy and economic
development in Indonesia.
3. To formulate strategies for civil society to strengthen democracy in order to
achieve the substantive objectives for the people.
-3-
4. To review and re-strategize the role of grassroots movements in developing
people’s economy and democracy.
5. To look at potential cooperation between civil society, government and
private sectors in solving current issues, particularly: poverty, climate change,
and MDGs as a whole.
EXPECTED OUTPUTS:
a. A document on the review of the current democratic situation in Indonesia
formulated by the Conference.
b. A mapping of civil society and an assessment of its role in politics and the
economy of Indonesia.
c. Formulation of a strategy for strengthening civil society to support
democratic consolidation.
d. Formulation of a strategy for developing and strengthening grassroots
movements in support of the development of people’s economy.
e. Formulation of a strategy of engagement and cooperation between civil
society, government and private sector in solving problems related to MDGs
particularly poverty and climate change.
3. Conference Preparations
Based on INFID’s articles of association, the organizing of the Conference and General
Assembly (GA) is the responsibility of the Executive Board. The Executive Board meeting
in April 2008 addressed the platform for discussion at INFID’S 15th conference, as well as on
matters pertaining to the time of the event and the formation of the steering committee for
the conference and general assembly. The Executive Board meeting also proposed the
names of resource persons suitable to serve as speakers during INFID’s conference.
-4-
The Executive Board meeting in April 2008 also identified the following committee
members for the selection of new Executive Board members:
1. Bob Muntz
2. Pongky Indarti
3. Septer Manufandu (Foker LSM Papua)
Subsequent meetings were more substantive and technical in nature. Substantive meetings
deliberated on speakers for the keynote speech, seminar sessions, round table discussions
and offered a list of changes/inputs. Technical meetings on the other hand were held to
coordinate on all technical aspects related to the conference, the finalization on resource
persons, participants to be invited and job delegation for INFID staff.
Organizing Committee
All INFID Secretariat staff are involved in preparations and implementation of INFID’s 15th
conference. The conference organizing committee consists of the entire INFID staff with
assistance from one organizing assistant, of which are listed below:
No Name No Name
1 Don K. Marut 9 Jeckson Robinson
2 Dian Kartikasari 10 Suwarno
3 Wahyu Susilo 11 Lia Nurparida
4 Florence 12 Nikmah
5 Misnawati 13 Sabarno
6 Sri Mulyani 14 Wasiton
7 Yaya Suleman 15 Wagimin
8 Wiwit Siswarini (assistant)
4. Implementation
On 27-28 October 2008, INFID organized its 15th conference at Hotel Millennium Jakarta.
The conference focused on the theme “Dynamics of Democracy and Economic
Development in Indonesia: Reflection of the Present and Looking Onward to the
Future”. The conference discussed on strategic issues for input to INFID members
participating in the General Assembly held on 29-20 October 2008 at the same location. The
conference allows members to better understand the agenda for INFID’s program focus for
the next six years and to help them reformulate joint action strategies among INFID
members. 150 representatives, consisting of INFID NGO members and networks,
delegates from embassies and the World Bank attended the conference. INFID’s 15th
conference was made possible with support from Trocaire, Development and Peace, Oxfam
Novib, Oxfam Australia and Ford Foundation
-5-
INFID Conference is divided into two main activities; seminar sessions and round table
discussions. Discussions on selected issues for seminar sessions were held in plenary
meetings while RTDs were essential in encouraging in-depth discussions and in generating
inputs/recommendations on issues previously discussed in seminar sessions.
INFID’s 15th conference was officially opened by Faisal Hadi, an Executive Board member
for the 2005-2008 office term. The event was then followed with an opening address
delivered by M. Dawam Rahardjo who highlighted on the interaction between democracy
and the economy. Dawam Raharjo was of the opinion that democracy and economic
development are two elements that affect each other. Indonesia’s pre- and post-
independence experience had shown that inequalities in economic development tend to
incite political upheavals. Unremitting poverty will provoke the people to start a revolution.
Dawam further mentioned that Indonesia’s best option for the future is to regain the
people’s sovereignty and be bold enough to initiate shifts in paradigms related to economic
development toward greater independence. He went on to say that economic independence
is possible if the government changes its paradigm on the national budget to no longer be
reliant on debt, restore the people’s sovereignty on food, energy and financial matters.
Indonesia urgently needs a second reformation.
Agenda
The final agenda distributed to conference participants is attached and contains the
following amendments:
• Opening Speech was delivered by Faisal Hadi (INFID Executive Board member
for the 2005-2008 office term).
• Seminar session 1 featured only two speakers as another speaker, B. Herry
Priyono was unable to attend the conference.
• Seminar session 2 also featured only two speakers as Sri-Edi Swasono was unable
to attend and Satish Misra was represented by Prabowo.
• Seminar session 3 also featured two speakers as Eva Kusuma Sundari had to
attend the working group meeting on the anti-pornography bill held in
parliament.
• Q&A session during seminar session 4 had to be postponed to allow the Minister
of Defence time to present an introduction.
• The RTD in the second day had to be rescheduled as Minister of Defence
Juwono Sudarsono who was expected to arrive at 2.30 pm, came earlier at 11.30
am to present an introductory speech on “Military Presence and Democratic
Governance in Indonesia”. This rearrangement had a bearing on RTD
preparations as the short duration between break and the RTD session allowed
less time for the proper layout of the venue.
• Seminar session 5 was only attended by two speakers as towards the final day of
the conference there was still no response from Martha Tilaar on her willingness
to attend INFID’s 15th conference.
• Each RTD was initially planned to be officially opened by ministers according to
the appropriate theme, but only the Minister of Defence attended the event who
was there not to open the RTD but to deliver a general lecture during the plenary
-6-
session. The minister’s presence was indeed inappropriate for the RTD as it was
only a small-scale forum.
Participants
8o% are from Jakarta, 5% from Java, 5% from Sumatra , 1% from Kalimantan, 2% from
East Nusa Tenggara and Papua, 1 % from Sulawesi and 5% from the international
community.
31%
Perempuan
Laki-laki
69%
-7-
Presentase Peserta Berdasarkan Wilayah
2% Jakarta
2%
1% Jawa
5% 5%
Sumatera
5%
Kalimantan
Sulawesi
80%
Nusa Tenggara dan
Papua
Luar Negeri
Below are the name of speakers who were present during the seminar and RTD at
INFID’s 15th conference as well as key questions for each topic of discussion.
Dawam Rahardjo replaced Vedi R. Hadiz who was initially slated to deliver the opening
speech at INFID’s 15th conference. Vedi was absent at the conference as he was in
Australia and had to return immediately to his university in Singapore.
Seminar Session I discussed the theme “Democracy and State Sovereignty” moderated
by Usman Hamid (Kontras).
-8-
2. Donatus K. Marut, Executive Director of INFID: “Civil Society in
International Interaction: A Necessity and Challenge for Civil Society”
• To what extent can demands for changes at the global level be
transformed into changes at the national and local levels?
• To what extent can changes at the national and local levels be reflected at
the global level?
• Do actors of civil society in Indonesia have the capacity to participate in
this relatively new opportunity?
The speaker was a substitute for Dradjad Wibowo who had to attend to his
parliamentary duties.
Seminar Session III discussed on the theme “Civil Society and Substantive
Democracy” moderated by Antarini Arna
-9-
What key challenges should be overcome to encourage more women in
politics?
3. Keni Mayabubun, FOKER LSM Papua: “Investment and Land Appropriation of Papua’s
Indigenous Societies”
• Are there other more effective strategies to improve the economic condition of
indigenous communities in Papua?
• What is the role of civil society?
• What is the role of international bodies and the private sector?
• What are the failures of agrarian reform in Indonesia?
- 10 -
Round Table Discussions: (Parallel Meetings)
2. Dr. Ir. Dwi Andreas Santosa, MS, Lecturer from the Bogor
Institute of Agriculture: “Lessons from International Negotiations
on Climate Change: Neglected Farmers in Developing Countries”
• What is your analysis of the process and substance of
international negotiations on climate change?
• What can civil society, the local government and the business
community do?
- 11 -
• What are the possible methods for the strengthening of civilian
oversight?
• What are the requirements for civil society?
• What is the legal underpinning required for civilian oversight of the
security sector?
- 12 -
• What are the benefits and drawbacks of greater integration among
ASEAN countries?
• Who benefits and loses the most from such integration?
Round Table 4 discussed the theme “Food Crisis and Future Food
Self-Sufficiency Policy in Indonesia” moderated by Ayi Bunyamin
- 13 -
Round Table 5 discussed the theme “Foreign Debt and Development
Financing” moderated by Dr. Ivan A. Hadar
1. Novel Anwar, Indonesian Supreme Audit Agency
2. Iman Sugema, Intercafe
3. A. Prasetyantoko, Atmajaya University
4. Don K. Marut, INFID
Resource person:
1. Yanuar Rizky
2. Iman Sugema
3. Prasetyantoko
4. Dawam Rahardjo.
- 14 -
Seminar and RTD
The conference is divided into two main sessions: seminar and round table discussion. Key
topics of discussion raised in these sessions included:
- 15 -
alternative capital such as natural capital or natural resources, human
capital, financial capital, social capital, knowledge capital or intellectual
capital, cultural capital and spiritual capital.
o Reach financial independence by creating a surplus budget system by
exploring local funds through the banking and financial systems in
replacement of foreign debt.
o In this respect, a new national banking structure needs to be established
by substituting the centralized banking system with a more decentralized
arrangement. Under this transformation, national banks will be replaced
by regional banking headquartered in the capital of provinces with
branches at the district level and supported by micro-financial institutions
at the sub-district level.
o Promote industrialization driven by micro, small and medium enterprises.
o Build a network of cooperatives from the village to city levels including
financial and marketing cooperatives as well as production, consumption
and service cooperatives. Micro, small and medium business units should
be strengthened with people’s economy empowerment programs.
The economic democracy system is essentially a substitute for the market sovereignty
system towards people-based economic sovereignty reinforced by two principles:
economic participation and social economic emancipation supported by people’s
economic empowerment with a regulated financial market system. This strategy is
intended to eliminate all tendencies toward exploitation, discrimination and
predation which are the traits of a free market economy.
SEMINAR SESSION 1.
State Sovereignty :
Mochtar Mas’ud :
Bureaucracy is an inevitable part of the government.
Democracy ensures that bureaucracy works for the people. The people’s
grievance however is clear, as bureaucracy remains unresponsive toward the
needs and wants of citizens.
Most bureaucratic systems place priority on doing the thing rightly instead of
doing the right thing.
Three models of government bureaucracy: activist, liberal and republican.
It can be concluded that the public is active in the economic, industrial
and commercial aspects while the government actively protects a strong
and outstanding presidential leadership. A defence mechanism that
maintains national economic development and is protectionist in nature.
o Bureaucratic objective of each model: effectiveness as well as a strong
and sustainable organization.
The fundamental questions are:
- 16 -
o Has bureaucracy been truly responsive toward the demands of the
people?
o Has democracy allowed the people to participate in discussions on shared
concerns and in the decision-making process?
o A recurring issue is when matters related to democracy is being dealt with
the use of technocracy.
o What can civil society do to achieve democracy and change the
bureaucratic system?
International Cooperation
Don K. Marut
The government is a representation of the state in contributing to the
formulation and reaching of agreements on governance at the international
level.
Agreements at the international level bring consequences that are unfair for
Indonesia and other developing or poor countries as they provide more
benefit and advantages to advanced nations.
National interest should be protected by the government of Indonesia in
each and every international gathering.
Indonesia’s national interest, in reality is not protected by the government in
international negotiations. Every representative from government
departments/institutions determine their own stance due to the absence of a
standard formulation on national interest related to issues/topics being
discussed.
Reform measures in the UN firmly emphasized on the need to expand civil
society participation in all fields. Civil society engagement in global
governance is not a choice but a necessity.
Global economic and political powers however, have set up their own
NGOs aligned with their vision and objectives, and to vote for their causes
during deliberations at the international decision-making level.
Civil society at the national and global levels must orchestrate their efforts in
order to shape global agreements that are more in favor of the common
people, uphold human rights and serve overall national interests (in the
economic, political, social, cultural and environmental sectors).
In Indonesia, however there are now efforts to control civil society in
Indonesia, such as through the Home Affairs Ministerial Decree No 3/2008
that requires the approval of the Home Affairs Department or the local
government if civil society plans to establish cooperation with civil societies
from other countries.
- 17 -
SEMINAR SESSION 2
- 18 -
The agricultural sector is inclined toward liberalization by having no control
of prices and failing to initially set up robust production and distribution
systems and as a consequence a much lower bargaining position of farmers.
Liberalization is extensively carried out on all commodities with implications
on economic reform in Indonesia. The sector affected by economic reform is
the agricultural sector where its condition continues to deteriorate and
prompts economic marginalization particularly on small-scale economic
players including the case of traditional markets.
Growth in the financial sector that fails to boost the real sector. In reality, the
growth of a credible economic sector (agriculture, industry and trade) has
experience a downward spiral from year to year whereas the non-credible
sector (finance, transportation, service and telecommunication) is marked by
an incremental growth rate.
Land reform should not be a discourse but must be dealt with seriously as
Indonesia is now experiencing an imbalance in land ownership at a level of
0.7- 0.8%.
To produce a statute that ensures equality in the relationship between
economic actors. This concept in extremely relevant for the agricultural
sector where farmers are relegated to an inferior level compared to other
economic actors.
Transparency in the policy-making process is increasingly at a worrying state
as capital interests have become the key factor in influencing the shape and
nature of policies where no other instruments can prevent capital from
interfering with the decision-making process.
The need to develop a comprehensive social security mechanism that ensures
the actual realization of social justice as embodied in the country’s political
philosophical mandate.
Prabowo
There are several short-lived evidence which concluded that corruption does
not entirely obstructs economic growth rate.
Democracy is not a given condition. Democracy continually evolves and
transforms in line with challenges faced by a country.
The transitional process leading towards democracy instead weakens
economic growth.
The anti-corruption movement at present is still incapable of effectively
curbing corrupt practices because its agenda is now targeted more on
corruption with large-scale impact.
Anti-corruption activities are now geared more toward the issue of
accountability which in truth has become a severe problem. A whole set of
problems emerge in relation to accountability particularly when
accountability is regarded only as being accountable to accountants.
- 19 -
An open dialogue should be initiated on available resources that can help
deal with these issues.
Multi-loan projects are no longer permitted as they result in the breaking
down of multi-year projects into at least five to six months each year to allow
for checks and balances which will only create an ineffective governance
system.
A national debate on a broad scale has never been held to explore on ways to
manage and implement the democratic process.
The partial interpretation of issues on democracy will only open up
opportunities that will impede the achievement of good governance.
It is now more important to address the need to empower civil society in
attaining greater social well-being.
Discussion
Indonesia is currently still in the transition process and has yet to develop an
appropriate concept or order to shape the future of the country.
In any country, corruption cannot be surmounted in a short span of time.
Even to this day, not a single political party has seriously and wholeheartedly
showed support for anti-corruption programs.
Democracy is not simply about freedom but also means effective
governance. If democracy fails to bring about an effective governance then a
dictator will emerge from this process of democratization.
Our joint concern is to work towards ensuring that stakeholders share the
same vision to push for government policies that are more advantageous to
middle-to-lower economic groups. A proposed strategy is to multiply
investment for community empowerment which will allow the people greater
participation in the decision-making process. If this fails then we will
continue to become witnesses to government measures and policies that will
never fend for the common people.
Providing there are no tangible changes to asset ownership rights, then the
exploitation of one economic actor by another will be unavoidable and hence
poverty will persists and hard to curtail. Projects intended to eradicate
poverty are cause for celebration for irresponsible policy makers as well as
those who profit from each poverty-eradication program.
Efforts should be made to further encourage and empower civil society as
there will come a time when political parties will eventually crystallize and
targets must be set on which direction to take.
Although systems may repeatedly change or altered in any form and shape,
nothing can completely eradicate corruption.
Absence of a new concept in the economic sector system in Indonesia.
- 20 -
SEMINAR SESSION 3
- 21 -
o Political education for the people Æ to shift the mind-set of the public
on women’s leadership and women’s political representation.
o Hierarchical political education for cadres.
o Encourage members to participate in strategic areas such as the General
Elections Commission, Elections Supervisory Agency, political parties,
development planning meetings and others.
A common issue today concerns the emergence of a large number of women
political cadres but who are defeated for the lack of financial means.
The main challenge is on how to put an end to money politics including in
the recruitment of legislative candidates by political parties.
Discussion
The law provides the framework for the realization of political rights but
citizens remain reluctant to make full use of available opportunities.
NGO activists who enter political parties often do not set boundaries and
thus many affiliate themselves with any political party without inquiring into
its history and background.
Many political parties remain ambiguous and there should be institutions that
can encourage political parties to become more democratic.
The inclusion of civil society into the political domain should be regarded as an
advantage for democracy. Aversion and skepticism will only revive past
suppressive practices and norms. Potential women in terms of number and
capacity must be encouraged to assume a greater role in ensuring democratic
consolidation.
- 22 -
DAY II
SEMINAR SESSION IV
Erpan Faryadi
The enactment of the Agrarian Law is in response to inequalities in land
ownership.
It was based on existing social class composition that started off the
organizing of politics instigated by one party known as PKI through BTI.
The organizing of politics according to social class brought about the
radicalization of the 1960s.
Our perspective in examining today’s agrarian structure could either be the
same or different from the standpoint of the 1960s. If such perception has
changed then the organizing strategy must also be adjusted accordingly and
its political structure modified.
Four factors that hampers the implementation of the Agrarian Law since
1962 are: (i) the slow pace of government measures in exercising the right of
the state to take control; (ii) the demands of the farmers’ community
(organization) for the immediate redistribution of land and thus results in a
one-sided course of action; (iii) anti-land reform elements have mobilized a
contesting power with the ploy to circumvent and even thwart land reform
measures – which can also be considered as a one-sided action; and (iv) acts
of violence between pro- and anti-land reform advocates.
The dominance of landowners is the cause for land reform failures between
1962-1965. The power of land proprietors has aborted plans to seize control
of lands as the result of failed politics where the organizing of politics should
be able to produce a well-functioning political system. The struggle to bring
victory to farmers is currently the supremacy of political cleavage instead of
class politics.
Three manifestations of the emergence of farmers’ movement notably in 3
areas are plantation, forestry and mining.
Forest concessions are intensely exploited by concession holders and as a
result have compelled farmers to band together in the hope of taking control
of forest areas or as a form of resistance particularly among indigenous
societies inhabiting areas in proximity to mining sites.
Restlessness among farmers is always evident in the weakening of their
economy and in farmer’s politics.
The agrarian structure of the New Order administration is a continuation and
strengthening of the colonial-era system which inevitably incited the farmers’
movement.
What remains dormant to this day is the potential of political
movements to capitalize on the farmers’ movement.
- 23 -
Investment and the Appropriation of Papua’s Communal Land
Kenny Mayabubun
Supporting factors:
a) Central government policy (development oriented towards economic growth
as well as sector-based laws insensitive to the people)
b) Local government policy (absence of sectoral-based laws on special
autonomy; governor’s policy to build a new Papua do not include for
instance special provisions on natural resources)
c) Papua as a frontier and conflict zone (military engagement) is often used as
justification for military presence that endorses the release of Papuan natives’
control over their own communal land as is the case in Kerom.
d) Investment (mining, oil palm and others); transmigration program;
development of infrastructure and facilities as well as the restructuring of
administrative areas where Papua now has 36 regencies from the previous 10
regencies. Of the 36 regencies, more than half local governments maintain
their offices in Jayapura and only make an appearance once a month. This is
due to the lack of office facilities and other supporting infrastructure.
Establishing these administrative facilities require swathes of land which will
in turn entail the need to take control of communal land. The situation
therefore is not only an investment issue but also a government policy.
e) In favor of development and progress, the people and province of Papua
must be raised from the depths of “backwardness and underdevelopment”.
For this purpose, Papua is in dire need of oil palm plantation, a transPapua
network, free ports, embankments and other vital infrastructure. The
government believes that all these will elevate Papua’s well-being.
f) Natural resource exploitation has used up much of Papua’s land notably by
forest concession holders operating across the province particularly West
Papua. Almost 1 million hectares under the control of companies are located
in Merauke and another 1 million hectares are spread over Timika and other
areas.
- 24 -
managing its own demands, CSR is far from becoming a fundamental
movement capable of bringing constructive changes to the people.
The role of civil society in most countries is confined to criticism, facilitation,
partnerships and endorsements.
CSR should evolve from being a voluntary act to an obligation.
In many countries, CSR has forged partnerships with civil society. In
Indonesia, this is not the case.
Critique: CSR development associated with the theory of development.
The case for Indonesia reveals that CSR is encumbered by many obstacles.
- 25 -
SEMINAR SESSION V
Bambang Ismawan
Small- and medium-sized enterprises as well as micro-finance are potent forces
that can help support the economy of the people.
A large number of departments carry out programs for small- and medium-sized
enterprises as well as micro-credit but are mostly project-based and non-
sustainable.
Some elements of civil society also run programs on small- and medium-scale
business units as well as micro-finance which can be developed further to help
sustain the economy, promote democracy and become a driving force for
economic resilience.
Challenges
Lack of understanding and knowledge on opportunities associated with
micro-credit as well as small- and medium-scale enterprises as instruments
for empowerment.
Low level expertise on financial management.
Restrictions in accessing capital sources.
Absence of a legal framework and the necessary regulations.
- 26 -
¾ CENTRAL IDEAS IN ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION (RTD)
9 Actors in the defence and security sector consider that reform measures
introduced in this sector have had significant positive impact on efforts to
build democracy and strengthen human rights.
9 Civil society as the external party observing this sector sees a different picture
as there are no substantial changes and impact from the security sector
reform. This is apparent in widespread violations and or tolerant attitude of
state apparatus in allowing the persistent repressive acts of non-state actors.
9 Successful reform measures will influence democracy and the realization of
human rights (particularly civil and political rights)
9 It is crucial to establish a shared understanding on clear targets to achieve
objectives and the timeframe of security sector reform.
9 The use of a benchmark in introducing reform measures.
9 Strengthening of the role of civil society in carrying out security sector
reform.
- 27 -
9 Indonesia’s bilateral relationship with Europe and the U.S. is important
because Indonesia plays a central role in forging such ties; thus the reason for
us to enhance our bargaining position.
9 We must soon view ASEAN as an institution that deserves advocacy by civil
society organizations and also continue to provide public education and
consolidation with the grassroots.
9 Strengthen the people of Indonesia in assuming a broader role in bilateral
and regional cooperation.
9 Strengthen civil society to participate/intervene in dialogues as well as in
bilateral and regional cooperation.
RTD V Debt
9 Initiatives have been carried out to ease debt burden through debt relief
(illegitimate debt) and debt swap.
9 Consolidation with civil society to align perception on illegitimate debt.
9 The importance of conducting audits on central and local governments’ debt.
9 The need to perform various forms of debt audits: thematic audit,
performance audit and loan agreement-based audit.
- 28 -
The global economic slump has resulted in lower export level for
Indonesia and the price hike of commodities that rely on imported
materials and components.
5.Media Advisory
Throughout the conference, INFID’s information officer has issued three media
advisories on:
b. 15th INFID Conference: Dynamics of Democracy and Economic Development
in Indonesia – Reflection of the Present and Looking Onward to the Future.
c. 15th INFID Conference: Indonesia at a Crossroad
d. 15th INFID Conference: Is Indonesia Still a Sovereign State?
6. Lesson Learned
Preparations for INFID’s 15th Conference was relatively brief with many valuable
lessons drawn from the experience. Among the lessons learned from organizing the
conference include:
a. Link between the process and substance of the seminar with the round table
discussion according to objectives spelled out in ToR:
• Discussions that examine the present situation associated with democracy
and the economy.
• Discussion on the role of civil society in today’s democracy and the
economy.
• Initiatives to reformulate strategies devised by civil society to strengthen
democracy in order to achieve objectives set out by the people.
• Initiatives to heighten the role of civil society based on counseling and
assistance or membership aimed at reinforcing civil society movement that
contribute to economic development and democratic consolidation.
• Initiatives to foster cooperation between civil society, the government and
private sector in dealing with the economic crisis and today’s democratic
situation particularly in tackling poverty and achieving MDGs, impact of
climate change and security sector reform.
Through these outcomes, ToR objectives can be achieved.
b. Link between process and substance with the expected output includes: result of
discussions and reviews in seminars and RTDs are reexamined and agreed upon
as an organizational mandate.
c. The majority of conference participants are from Jakarta due to budget
constraints in providing adequate facilities for participants coming from outside
of Jakarta. Not all invitees from outside of Jakarta were able to attend the
conference as INFID could only cover for one-trip expenses for members and
other participants.
d. Women’s participation is disproportionate to men’s attendance in the seminar.
This is due to the small number of women’s organizations in INFID’s
membership.
- 29 -
II. INFID’S 3rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY
1. Activity
The General Assembly (GA) is held once in every 3 (three) years. The agenda for the
3rd General Assembly included:
1. Accountability report of the Executive Board for the 2005-2008 period.
2. Commission meeting of INFID members to discuss on issues related to the
accountability of the Executive Board, programs and strategies for 2008-2011,
institutional development and recommendations.
3. Discussions on the structure of the new Executive Board and the criteria of
Executive Board members.
4. Selection of Executive Board and Supervisory Board members for the 2008-
2011term of office.
2. Process
The assembly’s agenda then continued with the accountability and financial reports
from the Executive Board for the 2005-2008 period and carried on with a
presentation by Bob Muntz on the proposed new structure of the Executive Board.
Recommendations covered the role and position of the International Board in
INFID’s executive structure. Bob Muntz proposed that board members must come
from organizations that are members of INFID. The Executive Board will carry out
its role and function in compliance with INFID’s article of association which is to
oversee the execution of the GA’s mandate and the duties of the Secretariat.
GA participants were then divided into four commissions where each commission
discussed on INFID’s narrative and financial reports (Commission I), mandate
formulation for INFID’s 2008 – 2011 programs (Commission II), the institutional
aspect of INFID such as changes to the articles of association, membership and
financial matters (Commission III), and recommendations on INFID’s end of the
year statements as well as on the results of RTDs (Commission IV). The result of
each commission meeting is then reviewed in the plenary session.
Once agreements have been reached during discussions on the result of commission
meetings, the agenda then moved on to matters related to the procedure and criteria
for the election of Executive Board members for the 2008-2011 office term.
- 30 -
The selection of new board members could only be made after an agreement has
been reached on candidates who have met the list of requirements and INFID’s
articles of association. During this stage in the election process, the following two
issues took more time to deliberate on:
• Ensure that the number of women candidates meet the 30% quota from
the composition of Executive Board and Supervisory Board members.
• Encourage greater representation from the regions in the Executive
Board.
The next agenda was the handing over of the mandate from the former Executive
Board to the newly appointed members. The new Board then convened to decide on
its Chair, Vice-Chair and Treasurer as well as to determine the Executive Board
meeting for the 2008-2011 period which is scheduled to be held in early December
2008.
3.Outcome
- 31 -
c. Capable of providing recommendations and specific information on
international events and developments when required;
d. Able to collaborate on specific program activities appropriate to the
international environment.
7. Acceptance of recommendations for both national and international levels (in
areas related to the economy, poverty eradication, environment and food
production, law and human rights as well as democracy and civil society).
10. Supervisory Board members for the 2008-2011 office term are:
1. Poengky Indarti
2. Anton Pasaribu
3. Risma Umar
4. Reflection
1. Due to thorough preparation and clarity in the formulation of the mandate execution
report in the form of narrative and financial reports, the General Assembly has
approved the accountability report of the Executive Board for the 2005-2008 period.
This is in contrast to the previous accountability report in the 2005 General
Assembly which was not approved, required corrections and had to be rewritten.
2. Greater awareness on gender equality resulted in a balanced representation of
women in the Executive Board where 4 in 9 members are women, while 2 in 3
Supervisory Board members are women.
3. Heightened awareness on equal representation based on region in the Executive
Board has also managed to create a balanced composition with representatives from
Papua (1 person) , Southeast Sulawesi (1 person), Aceh (1 person), Siantar – North
Sumatera (1 person), Yogyakarta (1 person) , Solo (1 person ) and Jakarta (3
persons). A representable mixture of members from different regions is expected to
help ensure that strategic issues in the respective regions will be accommodated in
INFID’s advocacy work.
- 32 -
Appendix :
1. Term of Reference
2. Agenda Schedule
5. Financial Report
- 33 -