Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
~PR.
1965
RESEARCH
DEPARTMENT
THE
BRITISH
BROADCASTING
ENGINEERING
CORPORATION
DIVISION
RESEARCH DEPARTMENT
This
Report
is
the
property
of
the
third party
in
any
written permission
of
form
the
without
the
Corporation.
THE GOODMANS
Section
6MAXIM~
LOUDSPEAKER
Title
Page
SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . ,
1.
INTRODUCTI ON
2.
FREQUENCY CHARACTERISTICS
3.
EFFICIENCY
4.
5.
SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT . . . . . . .
6.
PRODUCTION VARIATION
7.
CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
March 1965
SUMMARY
1.
IN1ROOUCTION
Fig. 1
2
outer dimensions being 5~ inches wide x 10~ inches high x 7 inches deep (14 cm x 27 cm
18 cm); the weight is 8~ lbs (3'7 kg).
The diameter of the low-frequency unit
is 4~ inches (11 cm) and of the high frequency unit, 3~ inches (8 cm).
An electrical
dividing network of the 12 dB/octave type is provided; this gives an acoustical
crossover frequency of 2 kc/so
x
2.
FREQUENCY CHARACTERISTICS
The tests were carried out in the larger of the two dead rooms at Kingswood
Warren, under conditions simulating free-field radiation at all frequencies above
50 c/s.
Measurements of the frequency characteristics with constant applied voltage
were taken at a distance of 4 feet 6 inches (1'37 m) on the axis and at various
angles to it.
The results are shown in Figs. 2 and 3 for angles in the horizontal
and vertical planes respectively.
./\
...-
p.
-----
AI
./ ~~\
/
\' ,-
._._.J'
yG
\,,.."'"
yr'./'
\V" /'.
\" \(1.1/
":- ,v,,
"
' - \ +30
V V O_"
6O
\.
+60
r~
1\
,
I
\./\
\1 ' Ji
.30~
:, fi I!,,,\
,
1\
11
11
1
1
1
I
I ~' ,
\
0-05
0-1
0-2
0-5
1-0
2-0
5-0
10
14
fraquGlncy, kc Is
;
.~
64
...
aJR 79
"0.=
.....::::
EO
r-->
C'l~
o
./'\
74
.L.
~o
~-
eNE
.IOu
.A
69
... - 64
-~
-.t5,
... "0
c,.
C;b
>~
59
~x
~'" 54
/'"
~-'
.....""
"\,('J \"-vy
\, ,r"
\.,1 ..",
/V
_ ,
....... ......,
'--+30'
\
,v
\
I
\
~'"
,,
'\
~\\
,/
+30
o~
~g
~
~--'\
'
''yv \A
I
I
I
I
...
L.u
a.~
a.
49
"0 III
I
I
c~
::JL.
0
III
44
005
01
02
05
10
frequ<i!ncy. kc Is
50
20
Ln
10
14
vertical plane
the sample tested is representative in this respect, six more specimens of the lowfrequency unit were obtained and tested in a separate cabinet.
Fig. 4 shows the
spread in axial response in the frequency region 200 c/ s to 2 kc/ s, from which it may be
deduced that the curves shown in Figs. 2 and 3 are somewhat smoother than the average.
... ...
64
.~
m5. 79
-0.
......:-~
Eg
r--~
C'l
74
__ spread of
L.
~o
~-
69
~E
IOu
::~
-.:5, 64
c,.
... "0
-6
~~
59
~x
~'"
L.o
~ ...
54
Ill ...
~u
L.~
a. a. 49
"0 III
c~
::J L.
0
11\
44
t------+---+-~--__+_-___+--+___-___+-J
I
I
i
i
~~--~~--~~~--~--~t1
I
005
01
02
05
10
frequency. kcls
20
50
10
14
4
Fig. 5 shows the modulus of the impedance of the loudspeaker from which it
will be seen that the fundamental resonance of the system is at 70 c/s.
100
I/)
1\
80
1_\
~ 60
V \
Cl
~ 40
Cl
0-
E
20
~
0'05
"-
0'1
~~
02
0'5
2'0
5'0
10
14
frClquClncy, kc/s
3.
EFFICIENCY
4.
5
L
84
3~
Cll~
--
u -
79
E~
,,"
,....~
I..
74
~-
, ,--
----
~E 69
IO
v
(~
-c;
-c
'<t
~u
64
a~
(;0
>~
~x
"N
I..
::J
III 0
59
54
.-----
./
-,
-----, , I
....... , :
/'"
"'"
'-'
' ... _,
,- ----,"
/ v '\
"\.rv
\ ~M(
V-
' ,"\\
\(1\
\I
1\
\\
IIl~
,,~
I..
a" 49
u&}
c
"
::J I..
III
44
0-05
0,'
0'2
0'5
',0
frequozncy, kc / 5
20
50
'0
'4
'Maxim' loudspeaker
LS3/1 loudspeaker wi th 12.12/ 25.12 transformer
6
5.
SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT
The loudspeaker was listened to on a variety of programme material.
The subjective assessment was consistent with the results given in Sections
2, 3 and 4; with some electrical equalisation at low frequencies, reasonably wellbalanced reproduction was obtained above 70 c/s.
At domestic listening levels, no
non~linear effects were evident, but attempts to produce the highest sound levels
sometimes demanded of O.B. monitoring loudspeakers led to distortion on loud passages.
6.
PRODUCTION VARIATION
7.
CONCLUSIONS
The small S1ze of the Goodmans 'Maxim' loudspeaker has been achieved at some
sacrifice of efficiency and of power output capacity at low frequencies.
However,
with appropriate electrical equalisation, the frequency range and sound output should
be adequate for a number of applications in which the normal requirements imposed on
a monitoring loudspeaker can be relaxed.
If, however, any widespread use of this loudspeaker in the Corporation is
contemplated, it will be necessary to decide whether to accept any variations in
performance that the normal commercial tolerances may allow or whether to impose
closer limits which would involve a process of selection"
In the latter case, it
would be advisable, before proceeding, to carry out tests on a sufficient number of
production samples to enable the likely proportion of rejects to be predicted.
CHS