Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A Field-Wide Integrated Production Model and Asset Management System for the
Mumbai High Field
S.K. Moitra and Subhash Chand, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited, India,
Santanu Barua, Deji Adenusi and Vikas Agrawal, Schlumberger Data & Consulting Services, India
Abstract
To increase the profitability and field production an Integrated
Asset Modeling project was initiated. A high fidelity, fieldwide, Integrated Production Model (IPM), was developed for
Oil and Natural Gas Corporations (ONGC) giant offshore
field of Mumbai High. The network based IPM enables
superior engineering analysis and more efficient decisionmaking compared to classical single branch and nodal analysis
approaches. This is done by capturing, in the model, the effect
of all the network interactions that occur in the production
network.
Such a model helps to quickly identify and accurately quantify
bottlenecks and other opportunities to improve production.
Production improvements can be made by making daily or
weekly operational changes as in gas-lift-allocation, surface
backpressures, pipeline lineup etc as flow conditions change in
the field. The IPM model would also assist in reliably
evaluating field operational and re-development plans, and
thus expedite the engineering decision processes.
The project-plan also called for an Integrated Asset Model
(IAM) by integrating the IPM to reservoir simulation models
and to a suite of fit-for-purpose optimization tools. The IAM
model will then enable model based field-wide future
development projection studies and planning scenario studies
over time. Network based optimization such as network-gaslift optimization can be easily done to find the optimum
operation set points that maximize production without
violating user defined operational and capacity constraints.
The model will eventually evolve into an online IAM. Here
OTC-18678-PP
OTC OTC-18678-PP
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
OTC-18678-PP
OTC OTC-18678-PP
OTC-18678-PP
OTC OTC-18678-PP
OTC-18678-PP
Existing Platform
Existing Producer
New Platform
z 7H
z 6H
New Producer
z2
b2
2Z
z2
z3
5
z P1
z 6H
z P2
z6
z4
WI3
z1
TW1
WIN
z4
z3
z4
N2
b3
z2
z P1
z2
z1
z3
z3
z2
z1
N1
z1
P5
z2
z3
P2
P2
z3
NU
z3
P1
z8
5
P2
NI
z9
8
9
z2
z1
z6
P7
z2
z3
z4
2
z1
z5
P3
3
z9
z4
b4
z4
NS
z5
b5
NX
5
z9
z7
P5
z1
P2
P1
N11
TW2
7
z3
P3 TW1
P4
zB
z6
6
z5
z7
z8
z6
5 km
1 km
z8
z5
P1
z2
z3
zH
P2
TW1
1
z6
LD
z6
4
z P4
z3
NJ
z z1
z H1
N7
z1
5
z H2
zE
z2
z 2 z H3
4
N12
N6
P1
b7
z P2 z 7
11
TW1
P1
3
z 3 LB
z zH z 1 z 1 7
z9
z2
z
z P2
z2
z 5H
z4 2
z8
P3
z7
z6
TW1
z P2
z1
z6
z8
z7
z6
3
5
z 6 NR
4
5
7 8H
P1
z4
N5
10
z4
z4
z6
P4
z P5
z P8
z8
z 2Z
1
NV
5
z5
z7
z N10
P6
P4
NQ
9
z P1
z P6
z P7
z2
z1
z P3
NQO
z5
N9 z
NA
BHN
z4
z4
P1
z4
z 6H
z7
6
9
P3
4
z5 z4
z P2
NW
z3 z8
z4
4
5
3
NB
WI4
z P1
BSS
z 1 z H-1
z P1
z9
zA
TW1
z P2
3
z P1
z2
z2
z P3
z 3 LC
LA
z4
7
1
7 z1
P2
z6
TW1
z8
z5
z 6H
z4
3
8
5
z6
TW2
TW1
NP
z5
8 z 1
9
z P2
z8 5
2X
z6
z5
z2
N4 z
z3
z1
NO
8
z3
z7
P1
z 12
z 11
z1
z9
NC
z5
9
z3
b4
z8
z6
2
P1
WI5
z7
z8
z6
z2
ND
z2
z2
N8
z7
z4
z1
N3
z9
z 10
z5
8
z4
z9
TW1
b4
z3
z4
4
2
z6
WI2
z3
NE
NH
5
z 5Z
z1
z 5H
1 1Z
z2
z3
z4
LE
z2
z4
8H
z1
9H
2
z 8H
NT
z1
N o d al A nal ysi s G r o up
NK
N o v- 0 1
OTC OTC-18678-PP
RS5
WA
RS4
WI6
RS1
ZB
RS2
BH-13
NL
SK
RS3
BH-45
BH-37
SI
SJ
IP
IU
NM
BH-10
IA
IS
IF
WI7
SC
IQ
EA
SN
RS11
RS7
BH-23
SB
SM
IG
BH-64
BH-16
RS8
IB
SQ
EB
SA
BH-24
SP
ZA
WI8
SD
S1-5
BH-36
BH-61
IC
SF
EC
IH
BH-6
SS
SE
WB
SR
WI9
S1-4
ID
SU
II
BH-35
SG
ED
ST
WI10
IJ
BH-26
SH
EE
SW
Exploratory Well
Platform
WI11
BH-5
S1-6
SV
IK
BH-11
IN
BH-52
IE
SY
Producer
IM
WI12
IW
Injector
IL
Released Well
BH-12
IT
Proposed Producer
BH-17
Proposed Injector
BH-21
Gas Well
BH-7
10
OTC-18678-PP
Test Data
Calculated data
2000.00
1500.00
1000.00
500.00
0.00
0.
500.
1000.
1500.
2000.
2500.
3000.
Liquid rate
3500.
400
OTC OTC-18678-PP
11
12
OTC-18678-PP
MPIP
Well Test
Process Complex Liquid Oil Water Liquid Oil Water Liquid
ICP
138,037 55,988 82,049 144,605 61,128 83,477 150,889
SCA
40,465 12,730 27,735 39,863 12,476 27,387 36,762
BHS
108,963 34,203 74,760 110,015 34,418 75,597 90,441
SHP
162,748 46,540 116,208 162,618 49,135 113,483 155,866
NQO
165,519 64,366 101,153 157,271 63,850 93,421 155,534
Total Field-BHN 656,197 226,557 429,640 654,235 233,483 420,752 626,254
DPR
Oil
58,501
9,898
33,600
49,687
72,511
234,095
Model
Water Liquid Oil Water
92,388 139,689 54,479 85,210
26,864 38,093 11,568 26,525
56,841 111,062 36,059 75,003
106,179 161,820 46,928 114,892
83,023 161,746 65,174 96,572
392,159 652,565 227,056 425,509
Table: 1a: Flow rate History Match results w.r.t Daily production report, MPIP and well tests data
Process Complex
ICP
SCA
BHS
SHP
NQO
Total Field-BHN
MPIP
Well Test
DPR
Liquid
Oil
Water Liquid
Oil
Water Liquid
Oil
1.2% -2.7% 3.9% -3.4% -10.9% 2.1% -7.4% -6.9%
-5.9% -9.1% -4.4% -4.4% -7.3% -3.1% 3.6% 16.9%
1.9% 5.4% 0.3% 1.0% 4.8% -0.8% 22.8% 7.3%
-0.6% 0.8% -1.1% -0.5% -4.5% 1.2% 3.8% -5.6%
-2.3% 1.3% -4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 3.4% 4.0% -10.1%
-0.6% 0.2% -1.0% -0.3% -2.8% 1.1% 4.2% -3.0%
Water
-7.8%
-1.3%
32.0%
8.2%
16.3%
8.5%
Table: 1b: Flow rate History Match Error (%) w.r.t Daily production report, MPIP and Well tests data
Wellhead
Platform*
Production
Optimization
Severe
Slugging
NQO
SHP
BHS
SCA
ICP
Total
9
2
1
4
25
41
10
9
5
3
27
Erosion
High
Risk
Backpressure
Number of Findings
7
1
24
1
9
1
1
1
22
3
63
7
Low
PI / II
Multi-Point
Injection
43
24
10
12
52
141
14
16
12
4
30
76