Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Table of Contents
Serial
Number
Particulars
Page Number
01.
Introduction
02
Abstract
03.
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
Conclusion
10.
References
10
1|Page
1. Introduction:
THE QUEST FOR REPRESENTATIVE government has been an important feature of the history of
Bangladesh. The independence struggle of the eastern Bengali peoples against the British, partition from
India in 1947, and secession from Pakistan in 1971 set the stage for the people of Bangladesh to create a
democratic political system. The Constitution, as it was initially promulgated in 1972, embodied the
democratic yearnings of the long struggle for independence and guaranteed human rights and political
freedoms within a system of checks and balances similar to those existing in the British and United
States governments. But later events ended these hopes. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (Mujib), hero of the
1971 war of independence, amended the Constitution and assumed dictatorial powers. His successors,
most of whom were military men who seized power during various times of trouble, also ruled through
autocratic means. As a result, successive regimes established single-party systems representing military
interests, with the leader wielding almost absolute power.
Yet the struggle for democracy was still alive in Bangladesh as of the late 1980s. The single-party system
of the 1970s and 1980s was unable to satisfy the varied political movements and interest groups of the
nation. Opposition parties--although they represented conflicting views and were as unwilling as the
ruling regime to share power--remained a vital force that commanded the loyalties of a large proportion
of the population.
Socialist and communist parties, centrist parties representing the policies of defunct regimes, and
conservative Islamic parties-- each with a completely different vision of the path that Bangladesh should
follow but united in their opposition to the rule of President Hussain Muhammad Ershad--all vied for
power in the late 1980s. Their refusal to participate in parliamentary politics under Ershad, who had
seized power in 1982, relegated the opposition to illegal activities and demonstrations on campuses and
in the streets that periodically brought economic life to a standstill in urban areas. The ineffectiveness
and confrontational position of the opposition only strengthened the regime's hold over Parliament and
the civil service and allowed the military to continue its strong autocratic rule.
Remarkably, the policies of Bangladesh's autocratic military rulers have been characterized by a
commitment to democratic ideals and an adherence to the Constitution. Ershad seized power in the name
of the Constitution, and he sought to legitimize his position by claiming that he brought stability to the
country in order to guarantee democratic freedom. One of Ershad's most significant moves toward
democracy was the establishment of a system of local elections that allowed voters to choose members of
local representative councils. In the short term, this democratic reform allowed local elites to control
government patronage, and it also made them docile supporters of the regime. Nevertheless, by the late
1980s the local councils had become training grounds for new political leaders and forums for
democratic competition throughout the nation.
2. Abstract:
BANGLADESH IS one of the few democracies among the Muslim countries despite chronic problems
with dysfunctional political system, weak governance and fettered by pervasive corruptions. This nation
regards democracy as an important denouement, legacy of its bloods for independence and people
participate in all election process in large numbers. But the concept, understanding and practice of
democracy in Bangladesh are most often shallow. Bangladesh is a force for moderation in international
forums and a long-time leader in international peacekeeping operations. Its participations and activities
with other Governments, global organizations and regional partners to promote human rights, democracy
and free markets are also well coordinated and of high profile.
2|Page
This country stands at the cross-roads of history, after thirty-eight years of independence. Thirty-eight
years is a long time to change the face and fortunes of a country and its people. In all these years, for
ordinary people in Bangladesh, our political leadership has always given them reasons for hope, as well
as disappointment. The next five years could be singularly consequential for our country. They bring
challenge as well as opportunity. For all their shortcomings, if the two manifestos are to be believed,
people cannot be blamed for having the audacity to hope for peace and progress for the next five years,
whoever is at the helm.
3. Political system of Bangladesh
Bangladesh has a multiparty parliamentary political system. There areover 100 political parties in the
country but only four political parties dominate the political scene: Bangladesh Awami League (AL);
Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP); Jatiya Party (JP); and Jamaat-e-Islami (JI). Among these, AL and
BNP enjoy majority support of the people and have alternatively formed the government since
democracy was restored in 1991. Other parties, JI and JP, have not formed any government on their own
but have enjoyed power by participating in coalitions. Bangladesh has a unicameral legislature. The
Parliament known as Jatiya Sangsad has 345 members, of which 300 are directly elected by the people.
The remaining 45 seats are reserved for women elected through the process of proportional
representation. The President is the head of state, but in practice the executive power rests with the office
of the Prime Minister. The PM and the Cabinet are, however, answerable to the Parliament.
The country is divided into seven administrative divisions: Barisal; Chittagong; Dhaka; Khulna;
Rajshahi; Sylhet; and Rangpur. Rangpur is the newest division created in January 2010. In all, there are
64 districts across the country. Bangladesh has an estimated population of 158,570,535 (July 2011-2 est) ,
61.1 per cent of which is in the 15-64 age group; 34 per cent arebelow the age of 14; and 4.7 percent
above 65 years. Ethnically the country is homogenous in nature: 98 percent of its population is Bengali
while the remaining two percent includes tribals and non-Bengali Muslims. The state religion is Islam
(89.5 percent are Muslims; 9.6percent, Hindus; and other minorities are 0.9 percent of the total3
population). The literacy rate is 47.9 percent, with 54 percent formales and 41.1 percent for females.
4. Political Parties of Bangladesh
Name of Party
Bangladesh
Awami
League (AL)
Founding
Year
1949
Self-Description
Support Base
Current Head
Liberal,democratic,
secular
andnationalist
All groups
ofpeople,includingethnic
andreligious
minorities
All sections/
classes of
people: religious,
military and
business groups
Religious and
business groups
Sheikh Hasina
Wajed
MatiurRahman
Nizami
Popular in
Rangpur region
HussainMuhammad
Ershad
Bangladesh
Nationalist
Party (BNP)
1978
Nationalist,
democratic and
liberal
Jamaat-eIslami (JI)
1979
Islamic and
conservative
but pragmatic
Jatiya Party
(JP)
1986
N/A
Begum
Khaleda Zia
3|Page
of Bangladesh
Source: Political Parties in South Asia: The Challenge of Change South Asia Regional Report by
International Institutefor Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, 2007
Year 1996
%
Polled
Vote
Seats
Year 2001
%
Polled
Vote
Seats
Year 2008
%
Polled
Vote
Seats
88
37.4
146
40.2
62
49.02
230
140
33.6
116
42.7
198
32.74
30
35
16.4
32
6.99
14
6.65
27
18
8.61
03
4.62
18
4.55
300
299
300
299
Decentralising
public
administration
VISION 2021 calls for devolution of power,
responsibility, and financial management to the
upazila and other local government tiers for
better utilisation of public resources. The fiveyear plan seeks to reform the property tax base
in order to strengthen the financial autonomy of
city corporations and municipalities. The first
budget
speech
mentioned
about
the
governments intention about preparing a district
budget
by
FY2010-11.
It also suggested transformation of all union
headquarters into planned rural townships. It
made a commitment to turning upazila
headquarters into municipalities with modern
amenities. It also talked of decentralising police
administration and setting up a public
representative board.
The second budget mentioned steps that were
being taken to reform upazila parishad
legislation and frame its terms of reference. The
third budget provided a list of laws which were
enacted in reforming the local government
structure, namely, the Local Government (Union
Parishad) Act 2009, the Local Government
(Paurashava) (Amendment) Act 2010 and Local
Government (City Corporation) Act 2009.
The government is, however, yet to make any
positive impact on reducing the core local
conflict over distribution of public provisions.
There have been talks of establishing a
National
Decentralisation
Policy
and
Decentralisation Commission. Here, the
overarching objective should be to bring the
citizenry closer to public service provisions.
(BNP)
9. Conclusion
To conclude, whether political priorities will be dictated by economic motives is a matter which remains
open to debate. We can only hope that heed is paid to the outstanding issues of good governance which
are restraining Bangladesh from embarking on an inclusive economic development path, dictated by
solid, transparent political commitments. This country stands at the cross-roads of history, after thirtyeight years of independence. Thirty-eight years is a long time to change the face and fortunes of a
country and its people. In all these years, for ordinary people in Bangladesh, our political leadership has
always given them reasons for hope, as well as disappointment. The next five years could be singularly
consequential for our country. They bring challenge as well as opportunity. For all their shortcomings, if
the two manifestos are to be believed, people cannot be blamed for having the audacity to hope for peace
and progress for the next five years, whoever is at the helm.
10 | P a g e
10. References
I.
Political Parties in South Asia: The Challenge of Change South Asia Regional Report by
International Institutefor Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, 2007
II.
III.
Election Watch: Awami League's 1996 manifesto, DAILY STAR 28 Sep 2001
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:Z4cYW2f_0cQJ:www.thedailystar.net/newDesign
/election/resources/Manifestos/Manifesto_Bangladesh_Awami_League.pdf
IV.
11 | P a g e