Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
REFERENCES
2fr 00
r + 1
2fr
r + 1
Where c is the speed of light in a vacuum.From previous relationships and taking into account that
you want to design an antenna with resonance frequency at 915 MHz for an RFID tag with a chip
Monza 4E [4] of impedance Zchip= 11+j143 , using a dielectric substrate with the dimensions and
properties listed in table 1, design 1, and shown in Figure 4 where was used the tool of electromagnetic
R
simulation CST Microwave Studio
.
According to [3], the materials magneto-dielectric provide these features by which use a substrate
with permeability larger than the permittivity (r > r ), will allow you to significantly reduce the
size of the patch and achieve a higher bandwidth and efficiency of the antenna that would be achieved
using a substrate dielectric type only.
However for the case in question has to be treated by a substrate of magneto-dielectric considered
have loss tangents (tan = tan = 0.02). Them, the patch resonant length directly obtained from
simulations and rigorously given by (5) is compared to the approximated resonant length given by (6)
0
L=
= rigorous resonant length
(5)
2 rere
L
=
The return loss and the input impedance to a discrete port of 50 are shown in figures 2 and 3 in red
color respectively.
0
= approximated resonant length
2 r r
As can be seen, the main difference between expressions (5) and (6) only concerns the substrate
parameters ( , ). To our knowledge, there is no available formula for calculating the effective permeability (re ) of the substrate even if accurate formulas already exist for calculating the effective
permittivity ( re) [1], [2].
In this formulation, the relative parameters (r , r ) have been considered instead of the effective
ones ( re, re ) for that reason.
Important to note that both the permittivity and the permeability alters the value of input impedance
of the antenna, still less when r decreases and increasing once r makes it.
Results
The profile of the proposed antenna shown in figure.
?? the right side, it is designed in a substrate magneto-dielectric with the parameters described in table 1, design 2.
Variables Desing 1 Desing 2
h
tan
W L
(6)
10
1
3mm
0
10*20
18
31.5
3mm
0.02
0.02130 0.0370
Conclusions
It was demonstrated that the use of a substrate magnetodielectric allows miniaturize the patch in function of the
square root of the product between the dielectric permittivity and magnetic permeability of the material while
preserving the relationship of r > r . Moreover, the use
Table 1: Table caption
of a substrate with the characteristics mentioned allowed
to design a simple model of patch whose impedance has
an inductive behavior to which impedance matching is
achieved with the chip yielding low loss and thus return an optimal coupling between the antenna and
designed chip.
References
[1] Constantine A Balanis. Antenna theory: analysis and design. 2012, ch.14,pp. 736-751.
[2] Ramesh Garg. Microstrip antenna design handbook. 2001, pp 41-43.
[3] Pekka MT Ikonen, Konstantin N Rozanov, Alexey V Osipov, Pekka Alitalo, and Sergei A
Tretyakov. Magnetodielectric substrates in antenna miniaturization: Potential and limitations.
Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on, 54(11):33913399, 2006.
[4] Impinj. Monza 4 tag chip datasheet. Seattle, US, 2014.
Figure 3: Smith Chart of two antennas
[5] JR Mentzer. The use of dielectric lenses in reflection measurements. Proceedings of the IRE,
41(2):252256, 1953.