Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Process Biochemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/procbio
Review
Departmento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, CP 6109, 13083-970 Campinas, Brazil
Laboratorio de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Barcelona, Avda. Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
c
Department of Agriculture, Medicinal Plants and Drugs Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Evin, 1983963113, Tehran, Iran
d
Departament de Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, Pompeu Fabra University, Av. Doctor Aiguader 80, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 15 April 2010
Received in revised form 3 September 2010
Accepted 7 September 2010
Keywords:
Anti-cancer drug
Bioprocess engineering
Cell culture
Taxus baccata
Taxol
Secondary compounds
a b s t r a c t
Plant cell factories constitute an alternative source of high added value phytochemicals such as the
anticancer drug taxol (generic name paclitaxel), biosynthesized in Taxus spp. The growing demand for
taxol and its derivatives, due to a specic action mechanism and the scarcity of the taxane ring in nature,
has made this group of compounds one of the most interesting targets for biotechnological production.
This review is focused on recent advances in the production of taxol and related taxanes in Taxus baccata,
the taxol-producing European yew, using cell suspension culture technology. The review contains a brief
description of the botany and phytochemistry of T. baccata, as well as the chemical structure of taxol
and the molecular requirements for its anticancer effects. After a short overview of taxol production at
an industrial level, the review focuses on taxol biosynthesis in plant cells and the attempts to produce
taxol in T. baccata cell cultures, giving particular emphasis to the optimization steps that have improved
production, and including the most recently developed new tools. Finally, the future prospects for the
biotechnological production of taxol are also discussed.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taxol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1.
Taxol and anti-cancer activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.
Biosynthesis of taxol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3.
Taxol demand and industrial production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4.
Alternative methods for taxol production and the need for in vitro cell culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Approaches for in vitro production of taxol in T. baccata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.
Callus induction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.
Establishment of cell suspension cultures and production of taxanes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Approaches to increase the production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.
Selection of high yielding cell lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.
Optimization of culture conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.1.
Nutrient media and employment of a two-stage culture system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.2.
Carbohydrate source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.3.
Phytohormones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.3.
Use of elicitors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.4.
Addition of precursors, adsorbants or additives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.4.1.
Synergistic effect of elicitors, additives or inducing factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.5.
In situ product removal and two-phase culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
24
24
24
24
26
26
26
26
27
27
28
28
28
29
29
29
29
29
29
24
5.
6.
7.
4.6.
Immobilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Scale-up studies in bioreactors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Metabolic engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Future perspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30
31
31
31
32
32
1. Introduction
2. Taxol
Among secondary metabolites with anticancer activity, taxol,
a complex diterpene obtained from Taxus spp., is arguably the
most important. Its chemical name is 5, 20-epoxy-1,2,4,7,13hexahydroxytax-11-en-9one-4, 10-diacetate-2-benzoate 13 ester
with (2R,3S)-N-benzoyl-3-phenylisoserine; its molecular formula
is C47 H51 NO14 and molecular weight is 853.9 Da [10]. At the core
of taxol are the A, B and C ring systems, which have several functional groups including two OH groups, one benzoyl group, two
acetyl groups and an oxetane ring. Bound to the C13 of the core is
the side chain or C13 (2 R,3 S)-N-benzoyl-3 -phenylisoserine, with
a hydroxyl and a benzoyl functional group.
25
by Hezari et al. [27], and the gene that codies for TS has
been cloned and functionally expressed in E. coli by Wildung
and Croteau [28]. Afterwards, oxygen and acyl groups are added
to the taxane core by oxygenation at multiple positions mediated by cytochrome P450 mono-oxygenases. The hydroxylation
at the C5 position of the taxane ring by the enzyme cytochrome
P450 taxadiene-5-hydroxylase (T5H) results in the formation
of taxa-4(20),11(12)-dien-5-ol, which is the second step in taxol
biosynthesis [29]. T5H is a protein of 56 kDa with an N-terminal
sequence of insertion in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. This enzyme, apart from its hydroxylating activity, also
conditions the migration of the double bond from 4(5) to 4(20).
Although these two metabolic steps, cyclization and hydroxylation,
are slow, they do not seem to be rate-limiting in taxol biosynthesis
[30].
The next step in the pathway is catalyzed by a specic taxadiene-5-ol-O-acetyl transferase (TDAT) that acylates
taxa-4(20),11(12)-dien-5-ol at the C5 position to form taxa4(20),11(12)-dien-5-yl-acetate. This enzyme is a protein of 50 kDa
that bears no N-terminal organellar targeting information [31].
The product of this reaction is then hydroxylated by the taxoid
10-hydroxylase (T10H) at C10. T10H is a P450-dependent
monooxygenase cloned and functionally characterized in yeast
[32].
Another Cyt P450-dependent hydroxylase leading to the formation of taxa-4(20),11(12)-dien-5-13-diol has been found [33].
The fact that this enzyme uses the same substrate as TDAT, the
taxa-4(20),11(12)-dien-5-ol, suggests that taxol biosynthesis is
not a linear pathway and that there are branch points that can
lead to other related taxoids. It has been observed that this alternative step is especially frequent in cell cultures elicited with methyl
jasmonate [34].
The taxoid 14-hydroxylase (T14H) is responsible for the formation of taxa-4(20),11(12)-dien-5-acetoxy-10-14-diol [35].
This enzyme does not use substrates already hydroxylated at the
C13 position, only those hydroxylated at the C10 position, suggesting that T14H cannot be involved in the production of taxol, which
does not present any hydroxylation at the C14 position.
The last steps in the taxol biosynthetic pathway, after the formation of taxa-4(20),11(12)-dien-5,10-diol 5-acetate, include
several hydroxylations at the C1, C2, C4 and C7 positions, oxidation of C9 and epoxidation at the C4C5 double bond. It is known
that the hydroxylations are mediated by Cyt P450 enzymes but not
exactly in which order. Taking into account the oxidation frequency
of the taxoids found in cell cultures, a probable sequence validated by phylogenetic analyses of previously cloned taxoid P450
oxigenases could be: C5, C10, C2, C9, C13, C7 and nally C1 [36].
However, rather than intermediates in taxol biosynthesis, some of
these taxoids might be commodities of the in vitro cultures.
Although different mechanisms for the oxetane ring formation
have been proposed [3739], it is currently accepted that the process involves epoxidation of the 4(20) double bond followed by
migration of the -acetoxy group from the C5 to the C4 position
together with the expansion of the oxirane to the oxetane group.
It is possible that this step precedes hydroxylation at C1 in taxol
biosynthesis, and in this case the hypothetical polyhydroxylated
intermediate would be a taxadien-hexaol rather than a heptaol
hydroxylated at C1 [40]. The enzyme that epoxidates the C4C20
double bond has not yet been functionally characterized and the
expansion of the oxirane-to-oxetane ring is also an incompletely
known step.
After the formation of the hypothetical polyhydroxylated precursor by the activity of the enzyme 2-O-benzoyl transferase
(DBT), a protein of 50 kDa, the next compound obtained is
26
10-deacetylbaccatin III. Another identied transacetylation reaction in the taxol biosynthetic pathway involves hydroxylation at
the C10 position of the 10-DAB (10-deacetylbaccatin III), which
is catalyzed by the enzyme 10-deacetyl-baccatin III-10-O-acetyl
transferase (DBAT). It leads to the formation of a diterpene intermediate, baccatin III, using 10-DAB and acetyl CoA as substrates.
An essential step in the taxol biosynthesis is the esterication of
the C13 hydroxyl group of baccatin III with the -phenylalanoylCoA side chain. The side chain is obtained from the amino acid
-phenyalanine by the action of phenylalanine aminomutase
(PAM) [41]. An unknown ester CoA ligase probably activates the
compound so it can bind to baccatin III. The enzyme that catalyzes the conjugation of the -phenylalanoyl-CoA side chain to
baccatin III is C-13-phenylpropanoyl-CoA transferase (BAPT), yielding the compound 3 -N-debenzoyl-2 -deoxytaxol. This compound,
by the action of an unknown Cyt P450-dependent hydroxylase
that hydroxylates the C2 position and the enzyme 3 -N-debenzoyl2 -deoxytaxol N-benzoyl transferase (DBTNBT) that conjugates
benzoyl-CoA to 3 -N-debenzoyl-2 -deoxytaxol, yields taxol as the
nal compound. This enzyme can be exploited to improve the production of taxol in genetically engineered systems [42].
2.3. Taxol demand and industrial production
Taxol is one of the most successful anticancer drugs developed in the past 50 years. In 1999, worldwide sales for taxol
produced by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) reached $1.5 billion.
Although this company reported a 24% decrease of taxol sales,
from $422 millions in 2006 to $385 millions in 2007 [BMS 2008
Annual Report], this reduction is primarily due to patent expiry
and increased generic competition in Europe, as well as generic
entry in Japan during the third quarter of 2006. Nevertheless,
the total market for taxol remains well above $1 billion per
year [www.strategyr.com/Bulk Paclitaxel Market Report.asp] and
continues to expand, with new clinical uses anticipated [43].
To combat the patent expiries, supergeneric versions of taxol,
such as Cell Therapeutics Xyotax (polyglutamate paclitaxel) and
Abraxis Oncologys Abraxane (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel), have been developed, offering signicant advantages over
taxol in terms of adverse effects and drug delivery. Sales of
Abraxane rose to $275 millions in 2009 [www.BioPortafolio.com:
emerging oncology treatments: a focus on targeted therapeutics
supergeneric reformulations and supportive care] reecting the
growing market for taxol and its derivatives.
2.4. Alternative methods for taxol production and the need for in
vitro cell culture
Since the discovery of taxol, considerable energy has been
invested in trying to increase its extraction. A serious obstacle to overcome is the low concentration (0.0010.05%) of taxol
found even in the most productive species, T. brevifolia. Since
it is necessary to take 10,000 kg of Taxus bark or 3000 yew
trees to produce only one kilogram of the drug [44] and a cancer patient needs approximately 2.53 g of paclitaxel [45], the
treatment of each patient consumes about eight 60-year-old yew
trees. Other Taxus species such as T. chinensis produce similar
results: CEC China Pharmaceuticals Ltd. reported that 10,000 kg
of leaves and bark of T. chinensis are required to isolate 1 kg
of taxol [http://www.21cecpharm.com/px/fac.htm]. Additionally,
extraction of taxol from yew trees requires a complex system
and specic purication techniques using advanced and expensive
technology.
Taking into account the above facts, together with the seasonal
variation in taxane concentration in Taxus [46] and the high demand
for the drug, there is an urgent need to nd other alternative
sources of taxol production. Since 1997, the Canadian Forest Service Atlantic Forestry Centre have been engaged in a program for
developing ecologically sustainable harvesting protocols of yews
in natural stands, converting elite cultivars of the wild species into
a commercially reared crop [47]. Similarly, in 2004, the company
Yewcare began to plant T. chinensis in the nature reserve of Da Huan
Mountain in the province of Yunan (China). Currently, this Taxus
plantation covers more than 30 km2 and is the largest Taxus yew
tree producer in the world [http://www.yewcare.com/index.php].
Another way to produce taxol is by chemical synthesis, rst
achieved by Holton and Nicolau in 1994 [4850]. However,
the complexity of the biosynthetic pathway and its low yield
limit its applicability. Another alternative is production by semisynthesis, which requires intermediates such as baccatin III or
10-deacetylbaccatin III, found in renewable needles of Taxus. BMS,
a leading global supplier of taxol, has a farm with 30 billion yews to
supply the bark and needles necessary for the extraction of intermediates [51]. In 2007, Indena developed the semisynthesis of taxol
in Europe by a patented process based on 10-deacetylbaccatin III,
which is extracted from T. baccata trees cultivated in the company
plantations [www.Indena.com: latest news from Indena, July 15th,
2009].
The semisynthetic analogue of taxol, docetaxel (registered
as taxotere by Sano-Aventis) is also synthesized from 10deacetylbaccatin III. The market for docetaxel exceeded $3 billion in
2009 but the Sano-Aventis patent expires in 2010 in Europe, 2012
in Japan and 2013 in the USA. Probably this is why the company is
currently investigating two new taxol derivatives, carbazitaxel and
larotaxel, whose biological action is an improvement on docetaxel
[http://www.oncology.sano-aventis.com/tcl/cp/en/index.jsp].
An alternative and environmentally sustainable source of taxol
and analogue compounds is plant cell cultures. This methodology
offers several advantages, not being subjected to weather, season or
contamination, and the material can be grown independently of its
original, potentially remote, location [36,52]. To increase the productivity of taxanes in plant cell cultures, different strategies can
be applied, such as optimization of culture conditions, selection of
high-producing cell lines, and the addition of elicitors or precursors. Currently, Python Biotech is the largest producer of paclitaxel
via plant tissue culture, employing a large-scale fermentor with a
capacity of up to 75,000 L [53]. Another company, Corean Samyang
Genex, uses Taxus plant cell cultures to produce paclitaxel with the
brand name of Genexol (http://www.genex.co.kr/Eng/).
In 1993, an endophytic taxol-producing fungus was discovered
in Taxus, but the production of taxol through fungal fermentation gives low and variable yields. Cytoclonal Pharmaceutics, Inc.
patented this process in 1994 and in 2001 signed an agreement
with BMS for the development of new technology based on microbial fermentation for the production of novel taxane therapeutics
[51].
27
Table 1
Establishment and maintenance of callus cultures in Taxus baccata and comparison of growth media, PGRs and culture conditions.
Explant*
Basal medium
Carbohydrate
(g/L)
Additives
Culture conditions
Remarks
Reference
st, n
B5, 2 X B5 vitamins
24 C, dark
Ascorbic acid
(50 mg/L)
24 C, dark
st
B5, 2 X B5 vitamins
Taxol production
within the callus
ranged between
0.113.1 mg/kg
Callus initiated after
1520 days
[59]
B5
Sucrose
(20.0) + glucose
(2.5) + fructose
(0.0025)
Sucrose (20.0)
Casein
hydrolysate
(1.0 g/L)
st, c, h, r
se, st
B5
B5
23 C, dark
Sucrose (30.0)
[71]
[117]
Sucrose
(5.0) + fructose
(5.0)
22 2 C, dark
[58]
22 2 C, dark
[60]
B5: Gamborg et al. [61], SH: Schenk and Hildebrandt [63], *c: cotyledons, h: hypocotyls, n: needles, r: roots of young seedlings, s: young stem, se: seedlings, st: young stem
of mature trees.
callus induction (Table 1). It has been observed that young tissue
is more responsive or prone to callus initiation than mature plant
parts or young tissue from adult trees [5860]. Variability in growth
response as well as taxol production in callus cultures derived
from different genotypes has been demonstrated by Brunakova
et al. [58]. Different basal media such as Gamborg (1968, B5)
[61], Murashige and Skoog (1962, MS) [62], Schenk and Hildebrandt (1972, SH) [63] and Woody Plant Medium (WPM, 1981)
[64] have been employed for initiation and maintenance of callus
cultures. The medium is supplemented with various phytohormones as well as organic supplements and additives, including
casein hydrolysate, mannitol, polyninylpyrrolidone, ascorbic acid
and amino acids, to stimulate callus growth and proliferation. Out
of all the phytohormones, 2,4-dichlorofenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in
combination with Kinetin (Kn) is the best for callus induction [65].
Wickremesinhe and Arteca [59] cultured stems and needles on B5
medium with a double concentration of vitamins. B5 medium with
2,4-D (6 mg/L) + Kn (0.5 mg/L) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP; 1.5%)
was favorable for callus induction and supplemented with a halfdose of 2,4-D for further growth and maintenance [58,60]. Table 1
lists the details of various media and combinations/concentrations
of Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) as well as additives used for callus induction and maintenance. Brunakova et al. [58] induced callus
cultures using stems from different genotypes of the same Taxus
species and examined the increase in fresh weight when using two
different basal media i.e. B5 and modied MS. They found that B5
medium favored callus growth irrespective of the genotype, producing a callus growth index of 2.38 0.61 compared to 0.34 0.11
on modied MS medium after one subculturing. Callus growth was
optimized using MS or B5 media fortied with 2,4-D and Kn at content ratios of 1:0.1, 2:0.1, and 5:0.1. Histological studies showed
that both epidermis and mesophyll tissues divided to produce calli
in the leaf explants while cell division in cortical parenchyma and
28
Table 2
Media employed for cell growth and taxane production in cell suspension cultures of Taxus baccata.
Culture type
Single stage
Reference
1.5 mg/L
[112]
39.75 mg/L
[71]
Two stage
Cell growth medium
Yield
[83]
12.04 mg/L
[81]
20.05 mg/L
[117]
[22,78]
12.04 mg/L
[118]
[82]
[60]
B5 + 2,4-D (3 mg/L) + Kn
(0.5 mg/L) + 1.5% PVP
B5 + NAA (2.0 mg/L) + BAP
(0.1 mg/L) + 0.5% sucrose + 0.5%
fructose
B5 + NAA (2.0 mg/L) + BAP
(0.1 mg/L) + 0.5% sucrose + 0.5%
fructose
[80]
[23]
2,4-D: 2,4-dicholorophenoxy acetic acid, ac: ammonium citrate, as: ascorbic acid, AgNO3 : silver nitrate, B5: Gamborg et al. [61], BAP: 6-benzylaminopurine, CoCl2 : cobalt chloride, FE: fungal elicitor, GA3 : gibberelic acid, Kn: kinetin, NAA: 1-naphthaleneacetic acid, MJ: methyl jasmonate, Phl: phenylalanine, Picloram: 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic
acid, SA: salicyclic acid, SH: Schenk and Hildebrandt [63], VS: vanadyl sulphate.
Cells in suspension cultures generally show considerable variability in their capacity to produce secondary metabolites [77],
due to genetic variation or the heterogeneity associated with the
cells. The preliminary step in establishing a long-term cell culture is thus the selection and cloning of fast-growing cell lines
capable of producing taxol. Cell lines of T. baccata growing under
the same conditions show differing capacities for producing paclitaxel in suspension cultures [58]. It has been observed that the
production of paclitaxel is more affected by differences in biosynthetic activity among the cultured lines than by any other factor
[78]. Paclitaxel and baccatin III production in cell lines obtained
by mixing low-, medial- and high-producing cell lines was higher
than the mean productivity of individual lines before mixing [78].
Brunakova et al. [58] observed great variability (in terms of growth
and paclitaxel content) among callus cultures originating from the
same type of explants of different mother plants or from different parts of the same mother plant. Out of the nine well-growing
callus lines established after 18 months of cultivation, only one
showed improved production (23.2 g/g DW). In another study
by the same group, a cell line VI/Ha was selected and cloned
after 20 months of callus initiation, achieving a paclitaxel produc-
Dark conditions are suitable for the growth of cells and taxol
production [59,79]. Cell cultures grown under a 16/8 h photoperiod
showed a reduction in growth [58]. Suspension cultures have been
reported to turn a lime green color upon prolonged exposure to
continuous light but production of taxol did not take place [79].
4.2.1. Nutrient media and employment of a two-stage culture
system
Like other secondary compounds, taxol is produced in cell cultures when the exponential growth phase has ended and the
cells are in their stationary phase. Therefore, a two-stage system where the cells are rst cultured for biomass production and
then transferred to a medium favorable for taxane production is
an effective strategy for enhancing production. This system has
the added advantage in that it allows precursors and elicitors to
be added when secondary metabolite production is at its highest. The strategy has been successfully employed to improve the
production of paclitaxel and baccatin III in suspension cultures
of T. baccata (Table 2) [69,71,80,81]. Cells were cultured in B5
medium [61] supplemented with sucrose (0.5%), fructose (0.5%), 1naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA; 2.0 mg/L) and 6-benzylaminopurine
(BAP) (0.1 mg/L) for growth and then transferred to a medium with
3% sucrose, picloram (2.0 mg/L) and Kn (0.1 mg/L) for the production of paclitaxel and baccatin III [69,80,82].
4.2.2. Carbohydrate source
The growth and production of secondary compounds from cultured cells depends greatly on the source of carbon employed, its
concentration and on the biosynthetic pathway or process involved,
as well as the requirements of different plant species. Addition of
fructose (1%) to moderately-productive T. baccata cell cultures at
day 10 signicantly improved the fresh weight of cells in the later
stages of the run [79]. The various carbohydrate treatments result
in marked differences in taxol production in cell cultures, which is
enhanced by fructose treatment and suppressed by glucose. Therefore, it has been interpreted that the limiting step in taxol synthesis
is stimulated by the presence of fructose and inhibited by glucose
[79].
29
4.2.3. Phytohormones
Different concentrations and combinations of auxins (NAA,
2,4-D, 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid or 2,4,5-T, picloram) and
cytokinins (Kn, BAP) have been tested to achieve optimum cell
growth and taxol production from suspension cultures of T. baccata. 2,4-D or NAA (alone or together) in combination with Kn was
used for cell growth by Khosroushahi et al. [71], while NAA (5.0 M)
in combination with BAP (0.5 M) was found to be best for suspension cultures raised from stem-derived calli [83]. The optimum
concentration of PGRs for cell growth and production of taxol in cell
suspension cultures is summarized in Table 2. Picloram improved
cell growth but suppressed taxol production [79].
4.3. Use of elicitors
An elicitor is a substance that, when introduced in small
concentrations to a living cell system, initiates or improves the
biosynthesis of specic compounds and elicitation is a process of
induced or enhanced plant biosynthesis of secondary metabolites
due to the addition of trace amounts of elicitors [84]. Elicitors
can be classied into abiotic (such as metal ions, inorganic compounds) and biotic (including polysaccharides derived from plant
cell walls and micro-organisms and glycoproteins) depending on
their origin [84,85]. Elicitors have been used as an important
means of enhancing the production of taxanes in cell cultures of
Taxus species [25,8688]. Table 3 depicts the taxane production
in cell suspension cultures of T. baccata in response to various
treatments.
The accumulation of paclitaxel and related taxanes in Taxus
plants is thought to be a biological response to specic external
stimuli [86] and jasmonates have been reported to play an important role in a signal transduction process that regulates defense
genes in plants [8991]. It has been proposed that jasmonates are
key signal transducers leading to the accumulation of secondary
metabolites [92,93]. Methyl jasmonate has been used to increase
paclitaxel production in cell cultures of T. canadensis [9497] and
T. cuspidata [98]. The biosynthesis and accumulation of paclitaxel
and related taxanes in T. baccata are strongly promoted by jasmonic acid or its methyl ester [78,83,86]. The addition of methyl
jasmonate to the culture medium has increased the production of
paclitaxel (0.229%, 48.3 mg/L) and baccatin III (0.245%, 53.6 mg/L)
in cell cultures at week 2 compared to the control, which yielded
only 0.4 mg/L of both secondary compounds [86]. Moon et al. [83]
reported that the time course of taxane production after methyl
jasmonate addition differed from normal kinetics without elicitation. Baccatin III and 10-deacetyl baccatin III were detected
rst, followed sequentially by paclitaxel, 10-deacetyl taxol and
cephalomine [83].
30
Table 3
Taxane production in cell suspension cultures (using shake asks and bioreactors) of Taxus baccata in response to various treatments.
Treatment
Compounds
Taxanes
Yield/productivity
Reference
Elicitation
Taxol
13.75 mg/L
[71]
Elicitation + inducing
factors
Taxol
39.75 mg/L
1.02 mg/L/d
[71]
Elicitation
Vanadyl sulphate
(0.1 mg/L) + silver nitrate
(0.3 mg/L) + cobalt chloride
(0.3 mg/L) + phenylalanine
(0.1 mM)
Vanadyl sulphate
(0.1 mg/L) + silver nitrate
(0.3 mg/L) + cobalt chloride
(0.3 mg/L) + phenylalanine
(0.1 mM) + methyl
jasmonate
(10 mg/L) + salicyclic acid
(100 mg/L) + fungal elicitor
(2.5 mg/L)
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M)
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M)
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M)
Paclitaxel
20.05 mg/L
[78]
Elicitation
Elicitation
Elicitation
Elicitation + immobilization
Elicitation + immobilization
Stirred bioreactor (5 L)
Elicitation + immobilization
Airlift bioreactor (4 L)
Elicitation + immobilization
Wave bioreactor (2 L)
Additive
Additive
Additive
Cell suspension culture
[119]
Taxol
4.25 mg dm
2.4 mg dm3
7.09 mg/L on day
22
3.49 mg/L on day
22
8.8 mg/L
[23]
Paclitaxel
13.20 mg/L
[82]
Baccatin III
4.62 mg/L
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
Paclitaxel
43.43 mg/L
(2.71 mg/L/d)
5.06 mg/L
12.03 mg/L
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
20.79 mg/L
7.78 mg/L
[82]
Taxol
Taxol
0.3 mg/L
1.5 mg/L
[112]
[112]
Glutamine
Taxol
0.1 mg/L
[112]
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M)
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
[86]
Cephalomannine
Total taxane
Taxol
48.3 mg/L
(0.229%)
53.6 mg/L
(0.245%) in 2
weeks
3.6 mg/L (0.017%)
36860 nmol/L
13.1 g/g DW
Baccatin III
Taxol
16.0 g/g DW
40 mg/L
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M)
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M) + sodium alginate
(1.5%)
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M) + sodium alginate
(2.5%)
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M) + sodium alginate
(2%)
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M) + sodium alginate
(2%)
Methyl jasmonate
(100 M) + sodium alginate
(2%)
Glutamine
Glutamine
Vanadium sulphate
0.05 mM
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
[80]
[82]
[82]
[69]
[22]
polyacrylamide, agarose, polyurethane foam, and hollow ber. Bentebibel et al. [82] used calcium alginate for immobilization of the
paclitaxel- and baccatin III-producing cells of T. baccata and found
that immobilization enhanced the production of paclitaxel and
baccatin III by factors of 3 and 2, respectively, compared to free
cells. The taxane yield depends on the concentration of alginate
e.g. the accumulation of paclitaxel was 13.20 mg/L, 10.85 mg/L, and
11.90 mg/L at the end of the culture period when using 1.5%, 2.0%
and 2.5% alginate, respectively [82]. However, maximum accumulation of baccatin III (4.62 mg/L) was achieved using 2.5% alginate
[82]. These observations reect differences in the levels of enzymes
induced by alginate concentrations due to variable calcium binding
capacity [111]. Immobilization of cells entrapped with 2% calcium
alginate beads substantially enhances taxane production under
optimized conditions in both shake ask and bioreactor cultures
31
Table 4
Total taxane production (cell associated + extracellular) and excretion into the media in cell suspension cultures of T. baccata.
Taxane
Treatment
Cell-associated
Extracellular
Total
Excretion (%)
Reference
Paclitaxel
PM
18.23 mg/L
1.68 mg/L
19.91 mg/L
8.4
[78]
Taxol
PM
Taxol feeding (200 mg/L)
0.82 mg/L
17.95 mg/L
0.38 mg/L
21.3 mg/L
1.20 mg/L
39.25 mg/L
31.6
54.2
[22]
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
PM
PM
2.85 mg/L
0.67 mg/L
1.33 mg/L
1.46 mg/L
4.18 mg/L
2.13 mg/L
32
69
[82]
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
Im (1.5% alginate)
Im (2.5% alginate)
12.94 mg/L
4.26 mg/L
0.26 mg/L
0.36 mg/L
13.20 mg/L
4.26 mg/L
2
8
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
PM
PM
1.55 mg/dm3
0.73 mg/dm3
37
44
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
100 M MJ
100 M MJ
4.25 mg/dm3
2.4 mg/dm3
37
44
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
200 M MJ
200 M MJ
1.49 mg/dm3
0.75 mg/dm3
32
70
Paclitaxel
Baccatin III
Im + 100 M MJ
Im + 100 M MJ
13.20 mg/dm3
4.62 mg/dm3
2
8
Taxol
MJ
SA
FE
21.14 mg/L
18.65 mg/L
25.16 mg/L
0.003 mg/L
0.02 mg/L
0.015 mg/L
21.143 mg/L
18.67 mg/L
25.175 mg/L
[119]
[71]
FE: fungal elicitor, Im: immobilization, MJ: methyl jasmonate, PM: production medium, SA: salicylic acid.
6. Metabolic engineering
It is possible to increase the production of paclitaxel and other
desirable taxanes either by the overexpression of genes controlling limiting steps or by suppressing the undesired taxanes by
employing antisense technology. With a full understanding of the
taxol biosynthetic pathway and the availability of the responsible
genes, it may be possible to bioengineer Taxus cell cultures for high
and commercially sustainable production rates of useful taxanes
[39,72].
In order to engineer the biosynthetic pathway, the time
course of expression of the genes 10-deacetylbaccatin III10-O-acetyltransferase (dbat) and 3 -N-debenzoyl-2 -deoxytaxol
N-benzoyltransferase (dbtnbt), which are involved in paclitaxel
biosynthesis and intracellular taxane accumulation, was studied
in callus and cell cultures [115,116]. It was shown that although
the increase in transcriptional activity of dbat and dbtnbt positively correlates with callus growth, the intracellular accumulation
of paclitaxel varied during subculture with the maximum occurring between the late linear and stationary phase. The advances in
taxol and related taxane production in T. baccata cell cultures are
highlighted in Table 5.
7. Future perspectives
Taxus baccata (European yew) has been one of the most frequent sources of taxol for studies of the biosynthetic pathway and
improved production of this anticancer drug. Taxol production in
T. baccata suspension cultures has been improved by optimizing
culture conditions, assaying several basic media, plant growth regulators, sugar supplements, etc, and cultures have been scaled up
to a bioreactor level for large-scale production. However, these
empirical methods have not been able to meet the increasing world
demand for taxanes, which according to Global Industry Analysts
will reach 1040 kg per year by 2012 [www.strategir.com: Bulk
Paclitaxel, a global strategic busines report]. A rational approach
might provide new insight into how the taxol biosynthetic pathway
is regulated, with genetic and metabolic engineering techniques,
differential genetic expression, transcription factors and key genes
leading to higher taxol yields. One aspect to take into account is the
mechanism of taxol excretion from cells, which could be enhanced
32
Table 5
Chronological studies of cell suspension cultures of T. baccata.
Year
1993
1994
1995
1996
1996
1998
1999
2002
2002
2004
2005
2005
2006
2006
2007
2008
2009
2009
Reference
Detection and evaluation of taxol in callus cultures
Four new bioactive taxoids were isoloted from a cell culture and their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic analyses
Scale up studies with cell suspension cultures were carried out using 1 L working volume pneumatically mixed and stirred tank
bioreactors
The response of cell suspension cultures to basic manipulation of culture conditions is described
Effects of methyl jasmonate and its analogs were studied on the accumulation of paclitaxel and related taxanes in cell suspension cultures
Studies on the kinetics of cell growth, production of paclitaxel and related taxanes after methyl jasmonate treatment were carried out
A callus line and its derived cell suspension cultures were treated with the abiotic elicitor VSO4 and its effect on the synthesis of taxol and
baccatin III was studied
Suspension cultures were grown in a 20 L airlift bioreactor (running for 28 days in batch mode) and their growth as well as capacity to
accumulate taxol and baccatin III was measured
Taxol transport in T. baccata L. cell suspension cultures was studied using [14 C]-taxol as a tracer. Taxol uptake was inhibited by
Na-orthovanadate and verapamil and Ca2+ was required for the active absorption of the molecule
Selection and cloning of a rapidly growing callus line with improved taxol production. The effect of the genotype on callus initiation,
growth and taxol production was studied
Effect of immobilization by entrapment with alginate on paclitaxel and baccatin III production in cell suspension cultures was studied and
scaling-up was carried out using different bioreactors
Stable-growing callus lines with different growth characteristics were selected after 12 years of culture. The ability to produce paclitaxel
and its analogues from these lines and their derived suspension cultures was demonstrated
Studies were carried out with cell lines showing different paclitaxel producing capacities. It was described how the production of
paclitaxel and baccatin III is affected when cell lines with different capacities are mixed and cultured in a production medium with or
without methyl jasmonate
To improve the production of taxol, cell suspension cultures were treated with a combination of inducing factors and their effects were
studied
It was discovered that isopentenyl diphosphate is a source for taxol and baccatin III biosynthesis in cell cultures of T. baccata
The time course of expression of two genes, dbat and dbtnbt, involved in paclitaxel biosynthesis and intracellular taxane accumulation
were studied in callus cultures
Effect of taxol feeding was studied on taxol and related taxane production in cell suspension cultures
Studies on gene expression proling in T. baccata seedlings and cell cultures were carried out
[59]
[75]
[112]
[79]
[86]
[83]
[69]
[81]
[117]
[58]
[82]
[60]
[78]
[71]
[23]
[115]
[22]
[116]
33
34
[93] Hu FX, Zhong JJ. Jasmonic acid mediates gene transcription of ginsenoside
biosynthesis in cell cultures of Panax notoginseng treated with chemically
synthesized 2-hydroxyethyl jasmonate. Process Biochem 2008;43:1138.
[94] Phisalaphong M, Linden JC. Ethylene and methyl jasmonate interaction and
induction models for elicited biosynthetic steps of paclitaxel in suspension
cultures of Taxus canadensis. In: Kanellis AK, Chang C, Klee H, Bleecker AB,
Pech JC, Grierson D, editors. Biology and biotechnology of the plant hormone
ethylene. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999. p. 8594.
[95] Phisalaphong M, Linden JC. Kinetic studies of paclitaxel production by Taxus
canadensis culture in batch and semi-continuous with total cell recycle.
Biotechnol Progr 1999;15:10727.
[96] Linden JC, Phisalaphong M. Oligosaccharides potentiate methyl jasmonate induced production of paclitaxel in Taxus canadensis. Plant Sci
2000;158:4151.
[97] Senger RS, Phisalaphong M, Karim MN, Linden JC. Development of a culture
sub-population induction model: signaling pathways synergy and taxanes
production by Taxus canadensis. Biotechnol Progr 2006;22:167182.
[98] Mirjalili N, Linden JC. Methyl jasmonate induced production of taxol in
suspension cultures of Taxus cuspidata: ethylene Interaction and induction
models. Biotechnol Progr 1996;12:1108.
[99] Luo J, He GY. Optimization of elicitors and precursors for paclitaxel production in cell suspension culture of Taxus chinensis in the presence of nutrient
feeding. Process Biochem 2004;39:10739.
[100] Luckner M. Structure, biosynthesis, and metabolism of secondary products in
microorganisms, plants, and animals. In: Secondary metabolism in microorganisms, plants, and animals. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990. p. 32931.
[101] Freeman A, Woodley JM, Lilly MD. In situ product removal as a tool for bioprocessing. Nat Biotechnol 1993;11:100712.
[102] Chiang L, Abdullah MA. Enhanced anthraquinones production from
adsorbent-treated Morinda elliptica cell suspension cultures in production
medium strategy. Process Biochem 2007;42:75763.
[103] Hooker BS, Lee JM. Cultivation of plant cells in aqueous two-phase polymer
systems. Plant Cell Rep 1990;8:5469.
[104] Wu ZL, Yuan YJ, Liu JX, Xuan HY, Hu ZD, Sun AC, et al. Study on enhanced
production of taxol from Taxus chinensis var. mairei in biphasic-liquid culture.
Acta Bot Sin 1999;41:110813.
[105] Yuan YJ, Wei ZJ, Wu ZL, Wu JC. Improved Taxol production in suspension
cultures of Taxus chinensis var. mairei by in situ extraction combined with
precursor feeding and additional carbon source introduction in an airlift loop
reactor. Biotechnol Lett 2001;23:165962.
[106] Collins-Pavao M, Chin CK, Pedersen H. Taxol partitioning in two-phase plant
cell cultures of Taxus brevifolia. J Biotechnol 1996;49:95100.
[107] Kwon IC, Yoo YJ, Lee JH, Hyun JO. Enhancement of taxol production by in situ
recovery of product. Process Biochem 1998;33:7018.
[108] Brodelius P, Mosbach K. Immobilized plant cells. Appl Biochem Biotech
1982;7:314.
[109] Lindsey K, Yeoman MM. Immobilized plant cells. In: Yeoman M, editor. Plant
cell culture technology. Oxford: Blackwell Publications; 1987. p. 22870.
[110] Drnenburg H. Evaluation of immobilisation effects on metabolic activities
and productivity in plant cell processes. Process Biochem 2004;39:1369
75.
[111] Villegas M, Len R, Brodelius PE. Effects of alginate and immobilization
by entrapment in alginate on benzophenanthridine alkaloid production
in cell suspension cultures of Eschscholtzia californica. Biotechnol Lett
1999;21:4955.
[112] Srinivasan V, Pestchanker L, Moser S, Hirasuna TJ, Taticek RA, Shuler ML. Taxol
production in bioreactors: kinetics of biomass accumulation, nutrient uptake,
and taxol production by cell suspensions of Taxus baccata. Biotechnol Bioeng
1995;47:66676.
[113] Roberts SC, Shuler ML. Large-scale plant cell culture. Curr Opin Biotech
1997;8:1549.
[114] Kolewe ME, Gaurav V, Roberts SC. Pharmaceutically active natural product synthesis and supply via plant cell culture technology. Mol Pharmaceut
2008;5:24356.
[115] Katkovcinov Z, Lzrov M, Brunkov K, Kosuth J, Cellrov E. Expression of dbat and dbtnbt genes involved in paclitaxel biosynthesis during the
growth cycle of Taxus baccata L. callus cultures. Verlag der Zeitschrift fur
Naturforschung 2008;63:72130.
[116] Brunkov K, Kosuth J. Gene expression proling in Taxus baccata L. seedlings
and cell cultures. In: Jain SM, Saxena PK, editors. Protocols for in vitro cultures
and secondary metabolite analysis of aromatic and medicinal plants, vol. 547.
Springer; 2009. p. 249.
M,
[117] Fornal S, Esposti DD, Navia-Osorio A, Cusid RM, Palazn J, Teresa Pinol
et al. Taxol transport in Taxus baccata cell suspension cultures. Plant Physiol
Biochem 2002;40:818.
[118] Moyano E, Gene A, Bonll M, Cusido RM, Palazon J, Pinol MT. Improvement
of paclitaxel and baccatin III production in Taxus sp. cell cultures. Recent Res
Dev Biochem 2004;5:23953.
[119] Bonll M, Bentebibel S, Moyano E, Palazon J, Cusid RM, Eibl R, et al. Paclitaxel and baccatin III production induced by methyl jasmonate in free and
immobilized cells of Taxus baccata. Biol Plantarum 2007;51:64752.
[120] Guo BH, Kai GY, Jin HB, Tang KX. Taxol synthesis. Afr J Biotechnol
2006;5:1520.