Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A lease is a contract wherein, over the term of the lease, the owner of the equipment permits another
entity to use it in exchange for a promise by the latter to make a series of payments. The owner of the
equipment is referred to as the lessor. The entity that is being granted permission to use the equipment is
referred to as the lessee. Most corporate financial executives recognize that earnings are derived from the
use of an asset, not its ownership, and that leasing is simply an alternative financing method. More
equipment is financed today by equipment leases than by bank loans, private placements, or any other
method of equipment financing. Nearly any asset that can be purchased can also be leased, from aircraft,
ships, satellites, computers, refineries, and steam-generating plants, on the one hand, to typewriters,
duplicating equipment, automobiles, and dairy cattle, on the other hand.
In order to compare leasing with other methods of financing, it is necessary to understand the basics of
how leasing works and the differences among the general categories of equipment leases.
borne by the lessee. Only title deeds remain with the lessor. Financial lease is also known as capital
lease.
Reasons of leasing
Leasing is an alternative to purchasing. Because the lessee is obligated to make a series of payments, a
lease arrangement resembles a debt contract. Thus, the advantages cited for leasing are often based on a
comparison between leasing and purchasing using borrowed funds.
1. Conservation of Working Capital
The most frequent advantage cited by leasing company representatives and lessees is that leasing
conserves working capital. The reasoning is as follows: When a firm borrows money to purchase
equipment, the lending institution rarely provides an amount equal to the entire price of the equipment to
be financed. Instead, the lender requires the borrowing firm to take an equity position in the equipment by
making a down payment. The amount of the down payment will depend on such factors as the type of
equipment, the creditworthiness of the borrower, and prevailing economic conditions. Leasing, in
contrast, typically provides 100% financing since it does not require the firm to make a down payment.
Moreover, costs incurred to acquire the equipment, such as delivery and installation charges, are not
usually covered by a loan agreement. They may, however, be structured into a lease agreement. The
validity of this argument for financially sound firms during normal economic conditions is questionable.
Such firms can simply obtain a loan for 100% of the equipment or borrow the down payment from
another source that provides unsecured credit. On the other hand, there is doubt that the funds needed by a
small firm for a down payment can be borrowed, particularly during tight money periods. Also, some
leases do, in fact, require a down payment in the form of advance lease payments or security deposits at
the beginning of the lease term.
When a firm owns equipment, it faces the possibility that at some future time the equipment may not be
as efficient as more recently manufactured equipment. The owner may then elect to sell the original
equipment and purchase the newer, more technologically efficient version. The sale of the equipment,
however, may produce only a small fraction of its book value. By leasing, it is argued, the firm may avoid
the risk of obsolescence and the problems of disposal of the equipment. The validity of this argument
depends on the type of lease and the provisions therein.