Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
www.elsevier.com/locate/talanta
Abstract
The electrogenerated chemiluminescent (ECL) behavior of hemin at a platinum electrode in the alkaline solution
has been investigated in detail. Under the optimum conditions the linear response range of hemin is 1.0 10 5
1.0 10 8 g ml 1, the detection limit was 1.0 10 8 g ml 1, and the relative standard derivation for 110 7 g
ml 1 hemin was 2.8%. It has been also found that hemin would catalyze the ECL of lucigenin at a platinum electrode
in a neutral solution in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, the catalytic ECL intensity was linear with the
concentration of hemin in the range of 1.0 10 14 1.010 10 g ml 1. IgG labeled with hemin was used to
examine the ECL catalytic activity of hemin after conjugating to protein, and the results showed that hemin retained
ECL catalytic activity when conjugated to protein. 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Hemin; Electrogenerated chimluminescence; Lucigenin; IgG
1. Introduction
Recently nonradioactive labels such as enzymes, stable free radicals and chemiluminescent
(CL) reagents have been used in attempts to overcome the intrinsic shortcoming of radioimmunoassay. Of these labels an enzyme is a
promising alternative label, as an enzyme is a
* Corresponding author. Fax: +86-591-3713866.
E-mail address: gnchen@fzu.edu.cn (G. Nan Chen)
catalyst and it can be determined with high sensitivity by various methods. For example,
horseradish peroxide (HRP) is an effective catalyst for the luminol-H2O2 CL system that has
been widely used [13]. However, in enzyme immunoassay, the steric hindrance of macromolecular coumpound and the instability of high
molecular labeling enzymes would affect the antigenantibody reaction, Therefore, some mimetic
enzymes have been developed to be used as a
substitute for natural enzyme in analytical appli-
0039-9140/00/$ - see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 3 9 - 9 1 4 0 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 2 4 0 - 4
1276
2. Experimental
2.1. Apparatus
A Shimadzu RF-540 spectrofluori meter, a
Perkin-Elmer Lambda 9 Spectrophotometer and a
BAS-100 Electrochemical Analyzer (Bioanalytical
System, Purdue, In, USA) were used. ECL experiments were performed with a system made in our
laboratory, which consisted of an HFC-Chemiluminescent Detector, a potentiostat, an electrochemical cell and a recorder. A block diagram of
this system has been shown in the literature [8,9].
The details of the HFC-I CL Detector have been
given previously [10]. The potentiostat used was
XHD-I (Precision Instrumental Company of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China) it mainly included a waveform generator, which could
perform linear, triangular voltage, square wave
and double-step pulse voltage sweep. ECL experiments utilized a platinum plate working electrode(4 6.5 mm, sealed in glass) in a
conventional three electrode cell configuration.
The auxiliary electrode was a platinum ball electrode (d= 2.2 mm, sealed in glass), and the reference electrode was an AgAgCl electrode. The
photomultiplier tube, GDB-413 (Nanjing Electron
Tube Works) with a detection range of 300700
nm was housed directly in front of the electrochemical cell.
2.2. Reagents
Solution of hemin: 10.0 mg of hemin (Sigma)
was dissolved in 5 ml of 0.2 mol l 1 NaOH, and
was then diluted to 100 ml to give a stock standard solution containing 1 10 4 g ml 1 of
hemin. This solution was diluted to the required
concentration with water.
Solution of lucingenin: 52.2 mg of lucigenin
(Aldrich) was dissolved in 100 ml of water to
obtain a stock standard solution containing 1.0
10 3 mol l 1 lucigenin. This solution was diluted
to the required concentration with water.
IgG was obtained from Shanghai Biological
Product
Institute,
1-ethyi3(3dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) was
obtained from Sigma. All the other reagents used
were analytical reagents or better and all water
used were doubly distilled in a fused-silica apparatus.
2.3. Procedure
2.3.1. Measurement of ECL of hemin
The cell filled with 10 ml solution containing
hemin, 0.4 mol l 1 KCl and 0.03 mol l 1 NaOH
was placed in the detector chamber. A potential
was then applied to the working electrode and the
ECL signal was recorded. After each measurement, the working electrode and the auxiliary
electrode were exchanged and electrolyzed at 1.0
V for 1 min in 0.5 mol l 1 HNO3 before the next
measurement.
1277
applied. Considering that some oxidants and reductants would enhance the ECL of some metallic
complex system [11,12], the ECL behavior of
hemin in different media: KCl-NaOH, KClNaOH-H2O2, KCl-NaOH-NH4S2O8, KCl-NaOHNa2C2O4 solutions were investigated in detail. The
results are shown in Table 1. It can be seen from
Table 1 that the presence of the oxidants and
reductants would inhibit the ECL of hemin, and
the inhibition was increased with the concentration of oxidants and reductants. We attempt to
use a buffer solution containing carbonate, phosphate and acetate to control pH, however, we
found that all these anions would decrease the
ECL of hemin. Therefore, KCINaOH system
was used for the subsequent investigation.
The effect of NaOH concentration on the ECL
intensity of hemin was investigated, and the result
showed that the ECL intensity was increased with
NaOH when its concentration was lower than
0.02 mol l 1. When concentration of NaOH was
higher than 0.02 mol l 1, the ECL intensity
reached maximum and became constant. Thus,
0.03 mol l 1 NaOH was selected for subsequent
studies.
KCl was used as the supporting electrolyte. The
ECL intensity of hemin did not change much
when the KCl concentration was varied between
0.30.5 mol l 1, when KCl was lower than 0.3
mol l 1, the ECL intensity was decreased greatly,
and after 5 10 2 mol l 1, hemin almost did not
give ECL. Meanwhile, we also found that KCl
itself gave an ECL background; 0.4 mol l 1 KCl
was used for subsequent investigation.
Square, triangular and symmetric double step
pulse voltages were selected to examine the ECL
behavior of hemin at the platinum electrode.
Table 1
The ECL intensity of hemin in various media (hemin = l.0106 g ml1)a
KCl-NaOH-H2O2
KCl-NaOH-(NH4)2S2O8
KCl-NaOH-Na2C2O4
ECL system
KCl-NaOH
A1
A2
B1
B2
C1
C2
IECL
21
14.5
9.2
12.0
8.0
7.0
9.0
a
NaOH, 0.03 mol l1; KCl, 0.4 mol l1; A1: H2O2, 3.0103 mol l1; A2: H2O2, 3.0102 mol l1; B2: (NH4)2S2O8 = 1.0
103 mol l1; B2: (NH4)2S2O8 = l.0103 mol l1; C1:Na2C2O4, 1.0104 mol l1; C2: Na2C2O4, 1.0103 mol l1.
1278
Table 2
Optimum conditions for the ECL of hemin
Electrochemical parameters
Pulse waveform
Pulse amplitude
Static stand time
Pulse period
Triangular
1.5 V
15 s
8 ms
Hemin gave only a very weak ECL under symmetric double-step and square pulse voltages, but
the ECL of hemin was strong when triangular
pulse voltage was applied. Therefore, the triangular pulse voltage was selected for subsequent
studies.
A triangular pulse voltage was selected to examine the relationship between the potential and
ECL intensity. It was found that when the potential was lower than 1.0 V, the ECL signal was
very weak, above which the intensity increased
with increasing potential. The intensity reached a
maximum and constant value above 1.5 V. Thus a
1.5 V triangular pulse voltage was selected for
subsequent studies.
The effect of pulse duration of the range 0.22
22 ms was tested, and the results showed that the
ECL intensity of hemin increased with increasing
pulse duration; when the pulse period was 8.0 ms,
the intensity was strongest and the peak shape
was better. For a fast ECL reaction system, after
each measurement, the solution should be stood
for some time to let the diffusion layer around the
electrode return to its original state, thus better
reproducibility could be obtained. It was found
that a 15 s static time was enough to give repeatable measurement. The optimum conditions for
the ECL of hemin used in subsequent studies is
shown in Table 2.
NaOH
KCl
0.03
0.4
1279
KCl was used as the electrolyte in our experiment. The effect of KCl on the catalytic ECL has
been examined and the result showed that KCl
would not effect the catalytic ECL in the range of
0.020.2 mol l 1, 0.1 mol l 1 was used for the
subsequent experiment.
The H2O2 concentration had a marked influence on the catalytic ECL intensity. The experiment showed that H2O2 can enhance catalytic
ECL intensity greatly and the enhancement of
intensity increases linearly with concentration of
H2O2 in the range of 1 10 5 5 10 5 mol l 1.
Above this concentration the catalytic ECL intensity decreases with increasing H2O2 concentration.
This is due to the increasing of non-catalytic ECL
(background) in higher concentration of H2O2.
Therefore, 3 10 5 mol l 1 H2O2 was selected
for subsequent experiment.
The effect of lucigenin concentration has been
examined and the results showed that the catalytic
ECL intensity would be increased with the concentration of lucigenin, but the non-catalytic ECL
(background) was increased as well. It was found
that when the concentration of lucigenin was 1
10 9 mol l 1 the difference between catalytic and
non-catalytic ECL could be maximized, therefore,
1 10 9 mol l 1 lucigenin was used in the subsequent experiment.
Linear sweep, square, triangular and symmetric
double step pulse voltages were selected to examine the catalytic ECL behavior of lucigenin at the
platinum electrode in the presence of hemin. It
was found that the catalytic ECL was stronger
when linear sweep was performed. Fig. 1 shows
the ECL intensity observed during the electrolysis
of lucigenin in the presence of hemin at the platinum electrode as a function of potential under
the stated conditions. The curve shows the intensity maximum with peak potential at 0.40 V
versus AgAgCl. Unlike non-catalytic ECL of
lucigenin, the light life of catalytic ECL of lucigenin is shorter, therefore, the intensity was related to the scan rate. The experiment showed
that the lower scan rate lower scan rate was better
than higher, the best scan rate was in the range of
1030 mV s 1; 20 mV s 1 was used in the
subsequent experiments.
1280
Table 3
Optimum conditions for the ECL of lucigenin catalyzed by
hemin
Electrochemical parameters
Waveform
Scan rate
Linear sweep
20 mV s1
Solution conditions
(mol l1)
KCl
H2O2 3105
Lucigemn
0.1
3105
1109
Lu2 + + e Lu +:
H2O2 + e OH + OH
The optimum conditions for the ECL of lucigenin catalyzed by hemin are shown in Table 3.
Fig. 2 presents the cyclic voltammegram of
lucigenin under the stated conditions. An irreversible reduction process of lucigenin can be
observed from Fig. 2. The peak potential of lucigenin reduction wave is 0.40 V versus Ag
AgCl, which can match the peak potential versus
ECL intensity.
It has been confirmed that hydrogen peroxide
should be involved in the ECL reaction of lucigenin at a platinum electrode. The formation of a
reduction product of lucigenin, which is most
probably a radical, is necessary for the lucigenin
to produce ECL [13]. Based on the results obtained by cyclic voltammetry and the intensity
versus potential curves, the following general reaction scheme is proposed for the ECL reaction of
lucigenin at the platinum electrode in the presence
of H2O2 and hemin,
1281
4. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
This project was financially supported by the
Natural
Sciences
Foundation
of
China
(296750003) and the Natural Sciences Foundation
of Fujian Province, China.
References
[1] G.H.G. Thorpe, L.J. Kricka, in: M.A. Deluca, W.D.
Mcelroy (Eds.), Methods in Enzymology, Academic
Press, Florida, Vol. 133, (1992) p. 331.
[2] Y.X. Ci, W.B. Chang, J.K. Tie, Fenxi Huaxue 20 (1990)
1100.
[3] G.H. Aherne, Anal. Proc. 27 (1990) 100.
[4] T. Hara, M. Toriyama, H. Miyoshi, S. Syogase, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 57 (1984) 3009.
[5] T. Hara, M. Toriyama, K. Kitamura, M. Imaki, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 58 (1985) 2135.
[6] T. Hara, K. Tsukagoshi, Anal. Sci. 6 (6) (1990) 797.
[7] Y. Ikarlyama, S. Suzuki, Anal. Chem. 54 (1982) 1126.
[8] G.N. Chen, R.E. Lin, Z.F. Zhao, J.P. Duan, L. Zhang,
Anal. Chim. Acta 341 (1997) 251.
[9] G.N. Chen, R.E. Lin, H.S. Zhuang, Z.F. Zhao, X.Q. Xu,
F. Zhang, Anal. Chim. Acta 375 (1998) 269.
[10] G.N. Chen, J.P. Duan, Q.F. Hu, Mikrochim. Acta 116
(1994) 227.
[11] I. Rubinstein, A.J. Bard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103 (1981)
512.
[12] H.S. White, A.J. Bard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104 (1982)
6891.
[13] K.E. Haapakka, J.J. Kankare, Anal. Chim. Acta 130
(1981) 415.
[14] R. Maskiewicz, D. Sogah, T.C. Bruice, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 101 (1979) 5347.