Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Members:
14
Class Schedule:
Three (3)
Arellano, Lory Mae
Experiment 1
MEASUREMENT
I. OBJECTIVE
To measure linear dimensions using different measuring devices, namely: the
straight rule, the Vernier caliper, and the micrometer caliper.
II. APPARATUS
Vernier Caliper
Micrometer Caliper
Ruler
Materials to be measured:
Hollow and solid cylinders
Metal balls
5 centavo coin
Rectangular block
III. Method:
Various instruments with Vernier scales and micrometer screws are examined. The
least count is determined and readings taken with each instrument. Vernier and
micrometer calipers are used to measure certain lengths. The relative errors made in
measuring a given length by various devices are estimated.
IV. PROCEDURE
1. Use the straight rule, the Vernier caliper, and the micrometer calliper to measure
the linear dimensions of different geometric objects as specified below. Tabulate
your data in the given tables.
A. STRAIGHT RULE
a. length, width, thickness of the metal block
b. height and diameter of the solid cylinder
c. outer height and outer diameter of the hollow cylinder
d. Inner diameter of the hollow cylinder
B. VERNIER CALIPER
a. length, width, thickness of the metal block
b. height and diameter of the solid cylinder
WIDTH
(mm)
24.9
THICKNESSS
(mm)
12.8
VOLUME
(mm3)
15298.6
25.00
12.70
15240
24.900
12.690
n/a
Volume
V straight ruler = (48.0 mm) (24.9 mm) (12.8 mm) = 15298.6 mm3
V vernier caliper = (48.00 mm) (25.00 mm) (12.70 mm) = 15240 mm3
Statistical Analysis
Mean =
Standard Deviation =
mean
Standard
deviation
Standard
conclusion
deviation of the
mean (s/(n)1/2)
width
24.93
0.15
0.03
No significant
differences
thickness
0.05
0.06
0.04
No significant
differences
vernier caliper = () (
micrometer caliper
VOLUME
(mm3)
1408
15.90
1409.42
15.850
1394.285
where: = 3.1416
r = radius
h = height
15.90
2
= () (
DIAMETER
(mm)
16.0
15.850
2
Statistical Analysis
Mean =
Standard Deviation =
mean
Standard
deviation
Height
22.17
0.15
Standard
deviation of
the mean (s/
(n)1/2)
0.09
diameter
15.92
0.08
0.05
conclusion
No significant
difference
No significant
difference
OUTER
VOLUM
E (mm3)
INNER
HEIGHT
(mm)
INNER
DIAMETER
(mm)
5505.3
n/a
9.0
INNER
VOLUME
(mm3)
RULE
VERNIER
CALIPER
MICROMET
ER
CALIPER
61.0
19.10
n/a
5563.35
19.10
40.80
n/a
9.40
901.27
n/a
Calculations:
Outer Volume
V
straight ruler
= () (
vernier caliper
19.0
2
19.10
2
= () (
Inner Volume
V
vernier caliper
9.40
2
= () (
Statistical Analysis
Mean =
mean
Standard Deviation =
Standard
deviation
0.06
Standard
deviation of
the mean (s/
(n)1/2)
0.03
DIAMETER
(mm)
19.00
19.000
where: = 3.1416
conclusion
No significant
difference
VOLUME
(mm3)
1143.17
1143.167
r = radius
4
19.00
= ( 3 ) () (
2
straight ruler
vernier caliper
4
19.000
= ( 3 ) () (
2
Statistical Analysis
Mean =
diameter
Standard Deviation =
Mean
Standard
Deviation
19.0
Standard
deviation of
the mean (s/
(n)1/2)
0
Conclusion
No significant
difference
QUESTIONS:
1) A scale whose smallest division is 1 cm is to be provided with a vernier scale
that will enable fifths of centimetre divisions to be accurately estimated. How
many vernier divisions should be used, and how long will each one be?
Based on the problem, there will be 5 divisions in the vernier scale.
Let
Given: S = 1 cm or 10 mm; n = 5
Find: Least count = S V = 1/n S
= (1/5) (10mm) = 2 mm or 0.02cm
Each division will be 2mm long.
2) A micrometer caliper has a zero error such that as the jaws are closed the zero
mark on the sleeve turns 0.05 mm past the zero on the main scale. The reading of
the instrument is 7.82 mm. What is the correct reading?
The uncertainty in the original reading is 0.05mm. Therefore, we can say that the
correct reading is 7.87 mm or 7.77 mm.
A certain object has no exact measurement. However, this measurement can still
be identified if not exactly but accurately with the use of devices or instruments that can
measure objects yielding only a small value for its uncertainty (e. g. straight rule, vernier
caliper, micrometer caliper).
The task in the experiment was to measure four (4) objects (metal bock, solid
cylinder, hollow cylinder, and metal sphere) using three (3) different measuring devices
already mentioned above.
The first instrument used was a straight rule. The straight rule was 10 decimeters
long with 10 divisions measuring 1 centimetre each. The second instrument was the
vernier caliper. Values reported in the data were in tenths place. A vernier caliper is a
slide type measuring instrument that can measure the inside, outside and depth of a
certain object. Compared to that of the straight rule, it is much more flexible in
measuring other complex objects (e. g. hollow cylinder in the experiment). It is observed
in the tables above that there are boxes labelled as n/a. This is due to the limitations
of the measuring device used. As seen, there is no n/a under vernier caliper. This
proves its reliability in terms of measuring difficult objects than the other two measuring
devices. Values reported are in hundredths place. This makes this more accurate than
that of the straight rule. The third device used was the micrometer caliper. As the name
suggests, it can be deduced that it widely used to measure smaller objects, thus putting
a limitation on the objects it can measure. However, the measurement being reported
using this device is in the thousands decimal place and therefore, compared to the other
instruments, it is the most accurate.
Vernier caliper and micrometer caliper are examples of calipers. A caliper is an
instrument with two jaws, widely used to determine the dimensions of linear dimensions.
Both of these instruments uses two scales, one main scale and the vernier scale. These
two scales are related to each other and therefore would increase the reliability of the
estimate of the measurement. Usually, a vernier scale has ten divisions and nine
divisions on the main scale. To sum up, the vernier scale makes the reading of the
measurement accurate than common devices such as the straight rule that will give us
only the rough estimate.
Over the previous paragraphs, the differences between the three instruments were
being tackled. In the experiment however, the values being reported does not have a
significant difference. The standard deviation computed in every table yielded a value
close to zero thus proving that the instruments used in doesnt have that much
difference. Thus, the measurements tabulated are precise.
VI. CONCLUSION:
Accuracy in a measurement is very crucial in our daily life. Living in the world
without proper measurement is unbearable not to mention unimaginable. This is why
scientists keep creating instruments and devices that can measure an object accurately
and precisely. In the experiment, three instruments for measurements were introduced the straight rule, the vernier caliper, and the micrometer caliper. All of these instruments
are good estimate in determining the measurement of an object. However, it should
always be noted that these devices have their own limitations. For example, the
micrometer cannot measure the depth of hollow cylinder. In this dilemma, we should
always put into consideration the type of object measured and the kind of device used.
Sources: http://physics.bk.psu.edu/teaching/LabManuals/Physics211/Measurement
%20Instructions.pdf
https://www.physics.upenn.edu/uglabs/lab_manual/Error_Analysis.pdf