Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PETER
From
J. LIVESLEY,
Mansfield
A strong
MICHAEL
District
clinical
osteoarthritis
LAVAGE
General,
impression
of the
knee.
OF
DOHERTY,
Harlow
exists
MAURICE
Wood
that
A controlled
trial
joint
was
OSTEOARTHRITIC
NEEDOFF,
Orthopaedic
lavage
and
often
conducted
ALAN
City
MOULTON
Hospitals,
provides
to test
KNEES
Nottinghamshire
symptomatic
this
hypothesis.
relief
for
A group
painful
of 37 painful
osteoarthritic
knees were treated
by arthroscopic
lavage and physiotherapy,
and a control group of 24 knees
were treated
by physiotherapy
alone.
There was better relief of pain in the lavage group, and the effect was still present
at one year. An
improvement
in the signs of inflammation
lasted for about three months.
Pain was relieved more effectively
in
patients
with slight radiographic
changes than in those with advanced
changes.
Our results confirm
the effectiveness
of joint lavage in the management
of painful osteoarthritis
of
the knee.
Osteoarthritis
bearing
(Lowman
is present
radiographically
joints
of 90% of people
1955 ; Keligren
1961)
affected
joint
is the knee (Heine
impression
exists
that washing
the pain (Burman,
is true the simple
improve
Finkelstein
technique
the quality
All new
assessed,
referrals
those
derangement
exclude
with
with
haematological
aspiration.
abnormalities,
disorders,
We
many
and
no
signs.
groups
Moulton,
Mansfield
Mansfield,
A.
Correspondence
The patients
according
to
Orthopaedic
General
Registrar
Hospital,
were
trial.
screened
should
be sent
to Mr
anteromedial
were
referred.
alone
followed
performed
A Key
used.
via
Med
All
and
tourniquet
anterolateral
Olympus
knees
The
(P)
by physio-
with
technique
portals.
a hook
initially
lavage
was
few
days;
Registrar
England.
the
same
by
were
at one, three,
rest, on activity,
six
4; tenderness
regime
with
and
arthroscope
treatable
lesions
IPB,
Surgery
followed
in both
up by the same
at thejoint
line graded
groups.
examiner
pain
at
from 0 to
0 to 4; and duration
of stiffness
after
rest and in the morning,
measured
in
minutes.
The range ofmovement
was measured,
effusions
ifpresent
and
were graded
0 to 3, warmth,
were
Patients
crepitus
sleep
disturbance,
were
also asked
England.
noted.
swelling,
to give
stress
were
and
pain,
wasting
questioned
walking
an overall
Hospitals,
of the
modified
Thomas
Synovial
fluid
effusions
P. J. Livesley.
employed
about
distance.
estimate
They
of their
knee
symptoms.
Nottinghamshire
Orthopaedic
was
and 12 months.
He recorded
and at night,
on a scale graded
Radiographs
Joint
were
by physiotherapy
a standard
admission
FRCS,
Orthopaedic
Consultant
District
General
and Harlow
Wood
Nottinghamshire,
England.
they
treated
The patients
To
were divided
whichever
of
NG5
Mansfield,
1991 British
Editorial
Society
of Bone and
0301 -620X/9l/6259
$2.00
J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991 ; 73-B : 922-6.
922
the
were
MA, MD,
MRCP,
Senior
Lecturer
Unit,
City Hospital,
Nottingham
M. Needoff,
FRCS,
Mansfield
District
NGI9
7AY,
England.
employing
mechanical
into
P. J. Livesley,
BSc, FRCS,
FRCS
Ed, Orthopaedic
Queens
Medical
Centre,
Nottingham
NG7
2UH,
Doherty,
Rheumatology
knee
obvious
all patients
surgeons
were
were excluded
from the trial. The remainder
underwent
lavage with two litres of normal
saline at room temperature. Postoperatively
physiotherapy
was started
within
of the
entered
group
the second
by arthroscopic
therapy
(L + P).
and
METHODS
were
first
Arthroscopy
If this
could
investigation,
radiography
and
joint
excluded
patients
with
haematological
urate
crystals
in the joint
aspirate
or
atypical
radiographic
into
two treatment
M.
1934).
lavage
people.
osteoarthritis
pain
two consultant
weight-
of 40 years
commonly
A strong
clinical
knee can relieve
and Meyer
of arthroscopic
AND
of the joint
other
1926).
out the
of life of very
PATIENTS
in the
separated
to
were
knees
scoring
samples
the
from
study.
aspirated.
from
the
alizarin
red
crystals.
Pyrophosphate
dye
were
system
all knees
At
The
debris
fluid
demonstrate
levels
using
et al 1975).
were
follow-up
supernatant
to
assessed
(Thomas
obtained
all
knees
on
with
in the
aspirate
was
and
stained
with
calcium-containing
and
enzyme
activity
were
t-test
or the
measured.
The
results
were
THE
assessed
JOURNAL
by the paired
OF BONE
AND
JOINT
SURGERY
ARTHROSCOPIC
Mann-Whitney
test
as
appropriate.
LAVAGE
Scores
OF OSTEOARTHRITIC
were
KNEES
II). No significant
923
difference
was found
in the improve-
compared
at each assessment
with the baseline
score of
the group.
An improvement
score
was generated
for
each patient,
being
the difference
between
the score at
the initial
showed
scores
assessment
of the
and
two
Mann-Whitney
at follow-up.
groups
were
then
The
improvement
compared
by the
while
U test.
28 entered
the physiotherapy
of the trial.
Four
were
lost to follow-up
reviewed.
Of the 41 patients
who entered
(P) arm
and 24
the lavage
were
and
physiotherapy
(L + P) group
of the trial,
two had partial
meniscectomies
and two were lost to follow-up
; therefore
37 of these patients
were reviewed.
The two groups
had
a similar
distribution
of age, sex and radiographic
severity
of disease
(Table
I). Of the factors
measured,
stress pain and morning
stiffness
were worse in the P
group ; swelling
and effusions
were more common
in the
L + P group.
No difference
was observed
between
the
two
groups
at the
initial
features.
The
analgesic
at initial
assessment.
significant
difference
assessment
intake
Although
between
in other
Thomas
(7.9)
score
5.29
(2.7)
61
5.3
two
groups
(7.8)
showed
with
although
show
a
tenderness
unaffected
by
showed
decreased
physiotherapy
73-B,
produced
no
between
(Table
III).
improvement
change.
score
L+ P
at
group
unaffected
showing
six
score
Joint
warmth
months
while
However,
a greater
months.
the
by physiotherapy
benefit
Morning
im-
in
stiffness
but significantly
the
was
diminished
L + P group
to three months.
The improvement
however,
showed
no difference.
Stiffness
after
activity
creased
improved
in both
in the L + P group
did
last
groups.
only,
six months.
beyond
remained
between
low
at
the two
Joint
ofmovement
improved
Mean
flexion
increased
and
swelling
from
de-
1 2 months,
a
groups
existed
significant
up to six
in both
from
groups
105#{176}
to
104#{176}
to 119#{176}
in the L+P
group.
25
12
When
the patients
were
L+P
asked
Difference
In
Improvement
score p value
IQR
p value
IQR
p value
1
0.5
0.5
1.5
1
0
0
0
tol
to 1
tol
to2
0.008
0.004
1
0
1
lto2
0 to 1
Otol
Otol
0.002
0.025
0.01
Painon
activity
0
3
6
12
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
to2
to 2
to 2
to3
0.05
0.06
2
2
2
2
2to3
1 to 2
1 to 2
lto2
0.00003
0.0002
0.0005
0.003
0.05
Painat
night
0
3
6
12
1
1
0.5
2
0 to2
0 tol
0 tol
0.5to2
1
0
1
1
lto2
Otol
Oto2
Otol
0.0005
0.02
0.006
0.01
0.06
0.1
to assess
(M) and
assessment
1991
difference
months.
up to six
0
3
6
12
No. 6, NOVEMBER
reduction,
score
did not show
a significant
difference.
improved
in both groups
up to 1 2 months,
the
improvement
not
; the
a difference
at three
in the L + P group
provement
Stress pain
Painat
rest
immediate
the improvement
score
lavage.
Peri-articular
L + P group
but
was
Months
postoperative
Symptom
L + P at three
The improvement
score
from
L + P only at three
showed
an improvement
did
from
the
Table
11. Pain
scores
for the control
group
(P) and
the lavage
group
(L + P). Median
interquartile
ranges
(IQR)
are given.
The p values
refer to the difference
between
the initial
and the current
score.
In the last column
the p value compares
the scores
of the two groups
VOL.
an
to six months
118.5#{176}
in the P group,
13
11
from
a significant
persisting
months.
The range
to a similar
extent.
(2.6)
Sex
male
female
scores
effusions
difference
L+P
60.7
in the L + P group
the
in the
score,
Table
1. Demographic
details
of the two groups
(P and L + P) on entry
to the trial. The average
(standard
deviation)
is given
for the patients
ages
and for the Thomas
radiographic
scores
of the
knees
on entry
to the trial
(years)
benefit
pain
L + P group
physiotherapy
measured
of both groups
was similar
it fell during
the trial no
the groups
emerged.
Age
the
greater
Night
RESULTS
Of the 69 patients,
a significantly
0.1
the current
P. J. LIVESLEY,
924
M. DOHERTY,
M. NEEDOFF,
A. MOULTON
Table III.
The signs of inflammation
for the control
(P) and lavage
groups
(L + P). Median
(M) and
interquartile
ranges
(IQR)
are given.
The p values
refer to the difference
between
the initial
assessment
and the current
score.
In the last column
the p value compares
the scores
of the two groups
L+P
Differencein
improvement
Months
M
IQR
postoperative
Joint
tenderness
0
3
6
12
1
1
0
1
Otol
0 to 1
0 to 1
0 to I
Peri-articular
tenderness
0
3
6
0
0
1
0 to 2
0 to 1
Otol
0
0
0
0 to 2
0 to 0
OtoO
0.001
0.003
Warmth
0
3
6
0
0
0
OtoO
OtoO
OtoO
0
0
0
OtoO
OtoO
OtoO
0.01
0.03
0
3
6
1
1
1
1 to 1.5
Otol
Otol
1
0
0
1 to 1
Otol
Otol
0.001
0.001
0
3
6
12
15
10
15
17.5
5to25
Oto2O
OtolS
0to75
10
5
10
I
Otol5
OtolO
OtolS
Oto3O
12
0
0
0
0
0 to 1
Otol
Otol
Otol
0
0
0
0
0 to 1
OtoO
Otol
Otol
0
3
6
12
0.5
0
1
1
Otol
Otol
Otol
Otol
1
0
1
1
Otol
Otol
Otol
Otol
0
3
6
1
0
0
Otol
0 to I
Otol
1
0
0
Otol
0 to 1
Otol
Morning
stiffness
0
3
6
Effusions
Swelling
Sleep
disturbance
state
of the knee,
those
in the P group
reported
improvement
up to six months,
those in the L + P group
up to 1 2 months.
However,
the improvement
score was
three
significantly
different
between
months
(Table IV).
The L + P group was
which
might
presence
or
subdivided
a good
result
predict
absence
of
an
effusion
the
two
groups
to assess factors
from lavage.
The
was
found
not
subgroups.
The
scores
for
pain
at rest
and
to
in
activity
improved
significantly
at six months
in the group
with slight
radiographic
changes.
In the moderately
damaged
three
subgroup,
months
pain
was
relieved
Synovial
contain
crystals.
cells,
Three
pain
on
but in knees
(Table
fluid
severe
was
improved
changes
from
all knees
debris
and
were found
were
at
only night
found
0.001
0.02
0.02
0.02
p value
score
1
0
0
0
Otol
0 to 1
0 to 1
0 to 1
0.0003
0.002
0.06
0.02
Pyrophosphate
joints
were
significantly
p value
0.07
0.07
0.03
levels
0.03
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.07
0.03
0.0007
0.05
0.1
and
enzyme
activity
measured
on entry to the trial;
from normal
control
values.
within
neither
the
differed
DISCUSSION
Osteoarthritis
of the knee presents
principally
with pain
and functional
impairment.
Symptoms
are often episodic
but in the long-term
deterioration
is common
and there
is no specific
to
calcium-containing
to have birefringent
crystals
of calcium
pyrophosphate
within
theirjoints
; no
urate
crystals
were found.
No change
was noted
in the
crystals
or debris
present
in samples
taken
at follow-up.
therapy
Although
there exists a strong
clinical
impression
that lavage
of arthritic
joints
leads
to symptomatic
improvement,
there
have been few trials
to test the
validity
of this belief. The first account
of joint lavage,
by
V).
samples
cartilage
patients
activity
with
0.002
IQR
at
correlate
with the result. Radiographic
criteria
were used
to subdivide
the 37 knees
into those
with
slight
(10),
moderate
(1 3), and severe (14) changes.
There
was no
difference
in the age or sex distribution
between
the three
subgroups.
Pain scores were found to have improved
in
all three
Symptom
Stress
pain
only
p value
Burman
et
al
(1934),
reported
two
patients
who
obtained
remarkable
symptomatic
relief after diagnostic
arthroscopy.
Both had simple
villous arthritis,
presumably osteoarthritis.
Lavage
with a small bore cannula
has been shown
to produce
no greater
benefit than aspiration
of the joint
(Lindsay
et al 1971). Dawes,
Kirlew
and Haslock
(1987)
compared
joint lavage,
using a 14-gauge
needle,
with
aspiration
and injection
ofsaline
in a group of2O patients.
They found no difference
between
the two groups at three
months,
though both had improved.
Bird and Ring (1978)
THE
JOURNAL
OF BONE
AND
JOINT
SURGERY
ARTHROSCOPIC
LAVAGE
OF OSTEOARTHRITIC
KNEES
925
Differencein
Improvement
score p value
Months
Table
V.
values,
the
postoperative
0
3
6
12
1
0
0
Average
pain
determined
score
scores
IQR
Otol
0 to 1
1 to 1
for the
p value
0.003
0.05
1
0
0
ltol
0 to I
0 to 1
0.0003
0.003
0.03
U test,
weeks
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.05
2.1
1.8
1.9
2.4
1.8
2.0
3.4
2.4
2.7
0.05
0.02
2.8
2.0
2.3
1.8
1.4
1.3
3.2
2.5
2.5
2.1
1.7
1.8
0
3
6
0
3
6
50%
useful
study
in rheumatoid
was
uncontrolled
selected
patients
Reviewing
arthroscoped
had
was
and
and
at rest
maintained
their
improve-
seronegative
and
included
was of
but less
arthritis.
only
14
Their
highly
at a secondary
referral
centre.
a series of patients
with osteoarthritis
to exclude
(1982)
found
of the
a meniscal
persisting
65 patients
lesion,
symptomatic
who
underwent
Jackson
improvement
lavage
of management.
To reduce
contact
between
of the
the
Those
degree
lasted
VOL.
no
other
significant
difference
between
them.
treated
by joint
lavage
improved
to a greater
than did the control
group, and the improvement
longer. Pain relief persisted
throughout
the review
73-B, No. 6, NOVEMBER
1991
Pain
period
The
score
and
on activity
Difference
In
improvement
score p value
0.05
2.0
1.5
1.6
and
the signs
of inflammation
(Doherty
et al 1988)
improved
for between
three
and six months.
Joint
swelling
and effusions
were diminished
for the same
period.
The patients
who underwent
lavage
reported
improvement
in their condition
; many requested
further
lavage at a later date.
The improvement
in the lavage group persisted
for
the duration
of the trial.
The physiotherapy
group
initially
and
by lavage.
the initial
p value
0
3
6
only
treated
between
3.2
2.5
2.6
Slight
The conclusion
in osteoarthritis
37 knees
Night
pain
score
Score
by four
of the
to the difference
Score
Months
postoperative
ment.
value
subgroups
refer
0.08
p value
Radiographic
subgroup
Severe
Rouse
IQR
at assessment
Moderate
in 45%
radiographic
by the Mann-Whitney
Paiji
studied
reporting
p value
experienced
an improvement
but
by the
end
of
not
differ
between
perhaps
because
greater
Some patients
degree and
radiographic
the
groups
the measure
benefited
for a longer
changes
is too
in the
longer
term,
insensitive.
experienced
more
pain
to a
slight
relief
than
those
enced
support
inflammatory
the
agents,
hypothesis
though
that
the
lavage
nature
removes
of
these
is
P. J. LIVESLEY,
926
unclear.
Whether
outcome
requires
of the
further
such
disease,
study.
We conclude
in any
party
that
form
related
modifies
symptomatically
simple
a day-case
procedure,
management
of painful
patients
for whom
other
No benefits
commercial
article.
treatment
joint
M. DOHERTY,
the
lavage
performed
received
or will be received
or indirectly
to the subject
Dieppe
as
the
in
from a
of this
Doherty
M, Richards
N, Hornby
J, Powell
R. Relation
fluid
C3 degradation
products
and local joint
rheumatoid
arthritis,
osteoarthritis
and crystal
pathy.
Ann Rheum
Dis 1988; 47:190-7.
Goldenberg
DL,
degenerativejoint
Halverson
PB,
in synovial
Heine
RW,
Jackson
Ring EF.
1978; 37 :78-9.
HA,
Therapeutic
value
Burman
MS, Finkeistein
H, Meyer
BoneJointSurg
1934; 16:255-68.
Byers
of arthroscopy.
L. Arthroscopy
Ann Rheum
of the
knee
joint.
Dis
J
PH,
Ward
PA, Kellermeyer
RW,
Naff GB. Complement
as a
mediator
of inflammation
in acute
gouty
arthritis.
II Biological
activities
generated
from complement
by the interaction
of serum
complement
and
sodium
urate
crystals.
J Lab C/in Med 1973;
81 :761-9.
Dawes
PT, Kirlew
results
ofa
C, Haslock
I. Saline
controlled
study.
C/in
Marans
washout
Rheumato/
64-B
Cohen
Rouse
in patients
DW.
over
AS.
Identification
Rheum
1979;
Silver
RS. The
of the knee.
Path
Joint
1926;
Anat
arthroscopic
J Bone
in
crystals
260:
treatment
Surg
[Br]
The results
of partial
arthroscopic
40 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg
of
1988 ; 70meniscec[Br]
1982;
:481-5.
Kellgren
JH. Osteoarthrosis
1961 ; ii:l-6.
in patients
Lindsay
DJ,
Ring EF, Coorey
PF, Jaysan
rheumatoid
arthritis.
Acta Rheumato/
Lowman
synovitis
of hydroxyapatite
22 :389-95.
Arch
of
between
synovial
inflammation
in
associated
arthro-
Inflammatory
1982 ; 9:205-9.
J Rheumato/
Virchows
HJ,
arthritis
RW,
tomy
MS,
disease.
deformans.
degenerative
B:332.
REFERENCES
Egan
McCarty
DJ.
fluid. Arthritis
J. Arthritis
52 1-663.
Jackson
Bird
A. MOULTON
PT,
Musk.inson
EC,
Willoughby
DA.
The
inflammatory
component
of osteoarthritis
In : EG Nuki,
ed. Aetiopathogenesis
osteoarthritis
London
: Pitman
Medical,
1980 : I 17-22.
eventual
or structurally,
should
be considered
in
osteoarthritis
of the knee
procedures
are not indicated.
have been
directly
M. NEEDOFF,
EW.Osteoarthritis.
Thomas
RH,
Compartmental
comparative
JAMA
Resnick
and
M1U.
Scan
populations.
Br Med
Synovial
irrigation
1971 ; 17:169-74.
J
in
1955; 157:487-8.
D,
Alazraki
NP,
Dale
D, Greenfield
R.
evaluation
of osteoarthritis
of the
knee : a
study
of available
diagnostic
modalities.
Radiology
1975; 116:585-94.
THE
JOURNAL
OF BONE
AND
JOINT
SURGERY