Sunteți pe pagina 1din 12

# 2010

Preliminary design of
BRBF system
Use of equivalent force method

## This preliminary design guide presents an

example for design of a steel structure
with Buckling Restrained Braced Frame
system in accordance with Eurocode. The
internal axial loads are defined from linear
static analysis of the earthquake load case.

## Example: Preliminary design of BRBF system

Note: Although in general concept the following BRBF calculation is in accordance with
Eurocode 8 (EC8) Part 1, it cannot be used as actual design check, since the corresponding
behavior factor q and other seismic relevant parameters are currently not included in EC8.
For actual check, use pushover analysis and capacity design.
Note: For information, the new Romanian Seismic Design Code P100-1/2011 (this version is
currently under public review) already includes behavior factors and design rules for BRBF
system.

1 Building
1.1 Global geometry

building width:
building length:
story height:
number of stories:
building height:
floor area:

a = 3x6 = 18m
b = 3x6 = 18m
h = 3m
ns = 5
H = 15m
Afloor,tot = axb = 18x18 = 324m2

BRB

Braced frame
a

## 1.2 Design loads and seismic actions

roof:
floor:
1.2.2

groof = 3kN/m2
gfloor = 8kN/m2

on roof:
qroof = 1kN/m2
on floor:
qfloor = 2.5kN/m2
combination factor:
2,i = 0.3

In the seismic load combination, combination factor of meteorological loads is 2 = 0, i.e.
they are excluded.
Note that in this example it is assumed that the seismic design situation is dominant, and thus
has to check if e.g. ULS controls the design of bracing system.
1.2.4 Seismic parameters:
Design spectrum parameters:

## peak ground acceleration (PGA):

a gR 0.3g

spectrum:

Type 1

ground type:

D
(vS,30 < 180m/s; NSPT < 15; Cu < 70kPa
Deposits of loose-to-medium cohesionless soil
or of predominantly soft-to-firm cohesive soil)
S = 1.35; TB = 0.2s; TC = 0.8s; TD = 2s; = 0.2

period:
behavior factor:

T 0.572s

q7

## (response modification factor)

BRBF, non-moment-resisting
beam-to-column connections

importance class:

normal I = 1.0

design PGA:

a g I a gR 0.3g

q d q in general case

S D (T ) 0.3g S

2.5
m
1.419 2
q
s

## 1.2.5 Seismic actions:

Total weight in seismic action:

## Gk + E,iQk,i (EC8-1; 3.2.4)

qd,roof = groof + 2,i qroof = 3.3 kN/m2

on roof:

on floor:

## Total A floor,tot qd ,roof (ns 1) qd , floor 12409.2kN

Total
6204.6kN
2
m
m
Fb 1 S D (T ) m1 / g 0.85 1.419 2 6204.6kN / 9.81 2 762.8kN
s
s
if T < 2TC and building has more than two stories;
1 0.85
otherwise 1.00.
m1

where:

story height:

zi i h

(i = 1..ns)

## mci A floor,tot qd , floor

mcns A floor,tot qd ,roof

force distribution:

Fi Fb

z i mci
z j mc j
j

## (Assume linear fundamental modal shape)

Torsional effects (EC8-1-1; 4.3.3.2.4 for lateral force method):
distance of frame under consideration from center of gravity:
max( a, b)
9m
2

## distance of outermost lateral force-resisting system:

Le max( a, b) 18m
x
1 0.6
1.3
Le

Braced frame
a = Le

F ,i Fi

Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

F,i (kN)
157.3
333.7
250.3
166.9
83.4

Vi

Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

k ns

,k

Vi (kN)
157.3
491.1
741.4
908.2
991.7

M ii M ii 1 Vii h

Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

Mi (kNm)
472.0
1945.2
4169.4
6894.1
9869.2

157.3

333.7

250.3
166.9

83.4

Story shear

Overturning moment

## Combination of different direction EQ:

E Ed E Edx 0.3 E Edy
E Edy 0.3 E Edx

Since seismic systems are separated in the two directions, no addition is necessary.

Gk , j EEd 2,i Qk ,i

k, j

E Ed 0.3 LL

where:
Gk , j - characteristic value of permanent action j

Qk ,i

## - characteristic value of the accompanying variable action i

=1
Other, normal (ULS, SLS) combinations are neglected here.

2 Static analysis

leaning
leaning
column
column

## 2.1 Static model

Static analysis is being performed, with the equivalent
lateral loads considered. In the current case, the
following assumptions and simplifications can be made:
No contribution of columns to the lateral load
resistance is considered.
Behavior of the braced frames can be separately
analyzed due to the structural regularity and
separation of the braced systems in the two
directions.
Beam-to-column connections are pinned.
This allows the use of simple 2D truss structure
analysis of the braced part only. Each column
and BRB element at a story is represented by
single, pin-ended spar elements. Beams are
continuous over the bracing connection.
To model realistic rigidity, one has to consider
the relative large stiffness of the BRB endings. Because a single element is used
between the nodes (workpoints), an effective rigidity (1.4 x actual rigidity in this
example) of BRB is applied. Contact Star Seismic Europe to obtain the relevant value.
Leaning column (additional pinned columns, connected to the frame with pin-ended
rigid links at each floor) is used to consider the whole mass tributary to the bracing
system, primarily for inclusion of second-order (P-) effects

## 2.2 Internal forces Brace demands

From linear static analysis of the EQ load case, internal axial loads (NEd,i) in the BRB
elements:

110kN

334

491

586

622

## 2.3 Second-order (P-) effects

As per EC8-1; 4.4.2.2, second-order effects shall be considered as follows:
< 0.1
0.1 < < 0.2
0.2 < < 0.3
> 0.3

If

Horizontal displ.
ei 2 d Si 2 d Si 21

ds,i
(mm)
189
148
106.1
66.1
29.8

#
R
4
3
2
1

neglect P- effect,
simplified procedure: increasing factor = 1/(1-),
second-order analysis,
not allowed.
above the story:

Ptoti
#
R
4
3
2
1

mck

k ns

Ptot
(kN)
535
1952
3370
4787
6205

Vtoti

k ns

,k

Vtot
(kN)
157
491
741
908
992

#
R
4
3
2
1

Check P- effect:
i

#
R
4
3
2
1

Ptoti ei

f PDi

Vtoti h

1
1 i

fPD
#
(-)
(-)
0.046
R
1.049
0.056
4
1.059
0.061
3
1.065
0.064
2
1.068
0.062
1
1.066
f PD max( f PD ,i ) 1.068

Where:

## 3 Design of BRB elements

At this step, determine the strand area (BRB steel core). Use characteristic or low-bound
values for material properties.
Material: S235 steel: fy = 235 MPa; E = 210 GPa
Partial safety factors: M0 = 1.0; M1 = 1.0
Design can be strength- or stiffness controlled.
Required steel core area:
Areqi

#
R
4
3
2
1

N Ed i M 0
fy

Areq
(cm2)
4.7
14.2
20.9
24.9
26.5

Stiffness control:*
#
R
4
3
2
1

Areq
(cm2)
5.3
16.5
25.0
30.6
33.4

Member force
check

tpl = 14 mm
b pli

Areqi
t pl

bpl
(mm)
40
120
180
220
240

#
R
4
3
2
1

Asci t pl b pli

#
R
4
3
2
1

Asc
(cm2)
5.6
16.8
25.2
30.8
33.6

N pl, Rd i
#
R
4
3
2
1

Asci f y

M0

NEd/Npl,Rd
(%)
84
85
83
81
79

* In the given case not strength but lateral displacement (BRB stiffness) governs the design.
6

Based on the required core area and overall geometry conditions (workpoint-to-workpoint
length, beam and column sizes, connection, etc.), Star Seismic Europe will provide detailed
design of the BRB member.

## 4 Damage limitation check

Limitation of interstory drift, considering 95-year return period EQ, as per EC8-1; 4.4.3.2:
brittle non-structural elements:
ductile non-structural elements:
non-interfering non-structural elements:
where =0.5 for importance class II.

e / h 0.005
e / h 0.0075
e / h 0.010

Story#

ei

Roof
4
3
2
1

h
0.683%
0.698%
0.667%
0.605%
0.497%

## e - is the design interstory drift as defined in EC8-1; 4.4.2.2 (2)

where:

Assuming ductile non-structural elements, the damage limitation criteria are met.

## 5 Determination of overstrength factor

Estimated yield length:
To calculate this, consult with Star Seismic Europe.

Lt 4243mm

workpoint-to-workpoint length

L y 0.70Lt 2970mm

## assume now 70% of workpoint-to-workpoint length,

exact value is provided by Star Seismic Europe

be,i

bs,i

factor

bs

drift

be,i

N Ed i

Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

NEd (kN)
110
334
491
586
622

Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

N Ed i Ly

bs,i qd be,i

E Asci

be (mm)
2.78
2.81
2.76
2.69
2.62

Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

bs (mm)
19.45
19.68
19.29
18.84
18.33

bs

2 bs,i

Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

Ly

bs (%)
1.310
1.325
1.299
1.268
1.234

## Strain hardening effects:

To derive strain hardening parameters, consult with Star Seismic Europe.
Wildcat test report, USA
Full Scale Testing of Wildcat Series
Buckling-Restrained Braces
Final Report
By: Pedro Romero, Ph.D., P.E.
Lawrence D. Reaveley, Ph.D., P.E.
Philip J. Miller
Terry Okahashi
May 15, 2007
Page 11, Figure 5 - WC backbone
curve

## For tension, the regression equation is:

= 26.798 + 1.0333

## For compression, the regression equation is:

= 45.186 - 0.7691
- the strain hardening adjustment factor

where:

## - the compression strength factor

Note: Eurocode does not include strain hardening adjustment factors, but BRBF design is similar to
the design of other dissipative structures. The new Romanian Seismic Design Code P100-1/2011
already includes BRBF system and section 6.11.4 includes the aforementioned factors. AISC 341-05
Section 16.2d also includes these factors.

As per AISC 341-05 Section 16.2d In no case shall be taken as less than 1.0.
For tension:
Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

i
1.384
1.388
1.381
1.373
1.364

For compression:
Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

i
-1.361
-1.368
-1.356
-1.342
-1.327

ov 1.25

## In most cases, actual material overstrength factor will be lower than

1.25. For calculation of a given structure, contact Star Seismic Europe. In this preliminary
calculation, overstrength factor of 1.25 was applied.
Element and system overstrength:

N pl. Rd i
N Ed i

d min()
Max deviation:

Story#
i
Roof
1.196
4
1.182
3
1.206
2
1.235
1
1.269
d 1.182
max( )
1 7.40%
min( )

## < 25% which means global plastic mechanism

(acceptable uniform mechanism)

## Formulation of non-dissipative elements (integrate system overstrength):

General formula for non-dissipative elements:
N Ed N Ed ,G 1.1 ov max( , ) N Ed , E
VEd VEd ,G 1.1 ov max( , ) VEd , E
M Ed M Ed ,G 1.1 ov max( , ) M Ed , E

Note: These design rules shall be used to design non-dissipative elements, for example columns,
beams and foundation (as per EN 1998-1 Section 6.7.4).

## General formula for connections:

N Ed N Ed ,G 1.1 ov max( , ) N pl, Rd
VEd VEd ,G 1.1 ov max( , ) V pl, Rd
M Ed M Ed ,G 1.1 ov max( , ) M pl, Rd

Safety factor of 2.0 was already used in this section in the calculation of and . Although the
multiplier of 1.1 is not used in these BRBF design rules of P100-1/2011 Romanian Seismic Design
Code, to be in conjunction with EC8 design rules, as an additional safety factor, 1.1 may be applied as
it was done in this example.

System overstrength:

1.1 ov max( , ) d

Story#
Roof
4
3
2
1

2.277
2.257
2.291
2.332
2.381
9

## 6 Design of non-dissipative elements

Design check of the first story column is illustrated. Unbalanced forces due to the difference
between tension and compression ultimate resistance of BRB elements at the collapse level
are neglected in this example.
Contribution of column bending to the seismic resistance is now neglected for simplification.

N Ed .E 1150kN

N Ed .G 633kN

Overstrength factors:

ov 1.25

d 1.182

## N Ed N Ed .G 1.1 ov max( 1 , 1 ) d N Ed .E 3220.3kN

Applied section: HEA450

Ac 178.03cm 2

iz 7.29cm

Material: S235

f y 235MPa

E
93.913
fy

## N pl.Rd Ac f y 4183.7kN > N Ed 3220.3kN OK

Buckling strength:

l z h 3.00m

z 1.00

z lz
0.438
i z 1

0.34

0.5 1 0.2 2

z
z

1
2 z

N b.Rd z Ac

fy

M1

0.911

3810kN >

N Ed 3220.3kN

OK
Similarly to the above check, all structural members (e.g. columns and beams) shall be
designed with the appropriate design values and combinations (M, N, V, M-V, M-N).

10

## Enquiries from Europe and select markets in Central Asia,

the Middle East and Africa:
Star Seismic Europe Ltd.
www.starseismic.eu
Budapest, Hungary
+36 30 630 3037
General information: info@starseismic.eu
Design and engineering information: design@starseismic.eu
Enquiries from North America, Africa and Asia:
Star Seismic LLC
www.starseismic.net
Park City, Utah, USA
+1 435 940 9222
brb@starseismic.net
Enquiries from Latin America:
Star Seismic Latin America
www.cesarmendezfranco-sc.com
Mexico City, Mexico
+52 55 5663 14 90
cmf@cesarmendezfranco-sc.com