Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
System Title
Document No.
System No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 1 of 30
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 2 of 30
PROTOCOL PRE-APPROVAL
Completion of the following signature blocks signifies the approver has read, understands, and agrees with the content of this document.
Name
Signature
Date
(mm/dd/yy)
The Lead Author is signing to confirm that this document has been prepared in accordance with GSK standards
Author:
The Validation Representative is signing to confirm that the acceptance criteria, test methods and technical content is correct.
Approved by:
Validation Representative:
The Quality Assurance Representative is signing to confirm that the acceptance criteria, test methods and technical content is correct.
Approved by:
Quality Assurance
Representative:
PROTOCOL POST-APPROVAL
The system Installation and Operational Qualification has been reviewed; no items are outstanding. The system Installation and Operational
Qualification is unconditionally accepted. Signoff indicates completion of the protocol only, not acceptance of the validation without a summary
of results.
Name
Signature
Date
(mm/dd/yy)
The Validation Representative is signing to confirm acceptance of results and supporting data. All outstanding items have been completed.
Approved by:
Validation Representative
The Quality Assurance Representative is signing to confirm acceptance of results and supporting data. All outstanding items have been
completed.
Approved by:
Quality Assurance
Representative
Campbell University
System Title
Document No.
System No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 3 of 30
CONTENT
Section Title
Section
Reference Documents
Version History
Purpose
System Description
Discrepancies List
Verification Documentation
Acceptance Criteria Summary
Test Sheets
12
Appendices
13
Discrepancy Report
13.1
13.2
List of Attachments
13.3
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
1.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 4 of 30
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Ref.
1
2
3
Document No.
XXX-XXX
Document Title
Reference documents go here Specifications, etc.
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
2.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 5 of 30
VERSION HISTORY
Date
(mm/dd/yy)
XX/XX/XX
Version
0
Revised By
Author Name
Campbell University
System Title
Document No.
3.
System No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 6 of 30
=
=
=
=
Cubic Centimeter
Current Good Manufacturing Practices
Device Assessment
Enhanced Design Review Protocol
FAT
FDA
HMI
IOQ
=
=
=
=
ml
Milliliter
mm
Millimeter
NEC
OIT
OEM
OSHA
PLC
PM
Preventive Maintenance
QA
Quality Assurance
SOP
URS
VMP
=
=
=
Campbell University
System Title
Document No.
4.
System No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 7 of 30
PURPOSE
The purpose of this protocol is to provide documented evidence that (This should be a general
statement for summarizing the intent of the document. Why was this protocol written?)
5.
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
(This should be the system description from your specification sheet. The system description
provides a description of the equipment, location, intended use, major components, operational
characteristics and other pertinent information. This section may also reference the location of a
detailed description (i.e. the original protocol, or applicable specification).)
6.
Campbell University
System Title
Document No.
7.
System No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 8 of 30
DISCREPANCIES LIST
Record each of the discrepancies raised during the completion of the execution of the protocol
and the date that the discrepancy was resolved. (Reference Section 13.1: Discrepancy Report)
Discrepancy
Ref.
Test Page
No.
Discrepancy Description
Date Resolved
(mm/dd/yy)
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 9 of 30
Objective:
To provide documented evidence that all instrumentation classified as critical within the EQUIPMENT NAME has been calibrated.
Method:
Verify that all instruments classified as critical are calibrated. List and review calibration certification available for each of the critical instruments
and document the calibration certificate reference, calibration date and calibration due date as applicable.
Acceptance Criteria:
A valid calibration certificate exists for all instrumentation classified as critical. A copy of the calibration certificates have been attached to this
protocol.
Inst Ref
Instrument Description
Cert Ref
Calibration
Date
Calibration
Due Date
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepanc
y/
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Signature:
Initial / Date
Campbell University
System Title
Document No.
System No.
Ver
Ver Date
Title:
Document Type
Page No.
Page 10 of 30
Objective:
The purpose of this verification is to provide a comprehensive list of key system components.
Method:
Collect and review copies of the purchase orders, system drawings, installation specifications, functional specifications, and other
related information that supports the installation of the equipment, where available.
Record and complete an equipment list of key system components based on information from purchase orders and equipment
specifications. Verify that the items have been delivered and installed as per manufacturer's specification.
Acceptance Criteria:
The critical devices have been correctly installed to the manufactures recommendations and correctly tagged.
Device Ref
Model / Serial
Number
Actual Model
Actual Serial
No
Correctly
Installed?
(Yes/No)
Correctly
Tagged?
(Yes/No)
Acceptance
Criteria
Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy
/ Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Signature:
Initial/Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Title:
Document Type
Page No.
Page 11 of 30
Objective:
To provide a comprehensive list of the engineering documentation and manuals for the equipment as defined in the system description
of this protocol.
Method:
Collect and review copies of the installation specifications, functional specifications, vendor manuals, purchase orders, spare parts lists and
other related information that supports the installation and operational requirements for the equipment, where available.
Prepare a list of all applicable specifications, purchase orders, equipment manuals and spare parts lists. Review these documents for
conformance to the system "as-built". Include copies or document the file location of the latest revisions within the Equipment Project File.
Acceptance Criteria:
All pertinent manuals and technical documentation relating to the system must be available and reflect the installed system.
Document
Number
Expected
Rev.
Revision
No. / Date
Effective
Date:
Location:
Acceptance
Criteria
Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepanc
y/
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Signature:
Initial/Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Title:
Document Type
Page No.
Page 12 of 30
Drawing Verification
Objective:
To verify that appropriate drawings for this equipment exist, are accurate, and reflect the as-built field installation.
Method:
Collect the current drawings that pertain to the system and prepare a list of all drawings and P&ID's associated with the system. Attach
field verified copies of the latest revisions within the validation protocol.
Acceptance Criteria:
All drawings must reflect the as-built condition or must have been red-lined where necessary. Each drawing must include the
signature of the person who field-checked the drawing for accuracy, and the review signature of the technical representative. Copies of
all drawings are to be attached (where applicable) and all red-lined drawings must be attached.
Document Type / Title
Drawing Number
Revision
No. / Date
Signature
(Yes/No)
Effective
Date:
Location:
Acceptance
Criteria
Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepanc
y/
Initial/Date
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Signature:
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Title:
Document Type
Page No.
Page 13 of 30
Objective:
To provide a comprehensive list of spare parts, which are installed in this system
Method:
Collect and review copies of the purchase orders, system drawings, installation specifications, functional specifications, and other related
information that supports the installation of the equipment, where available.
Record and complete a list of spare parts on this system. Verify that the spare parts list has been delivered with manufacturer's documentation.
Acceptance Criteria:
Change Parts must be identified and described.
Componen
t
Manufacturer
Description
Expected
Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Signature:
Initial/Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Title:
Document Type
Page No.
Page 14 of 30
Objective:
To provide a comprehensive list of materials in product contact.
Method:
Collect, review, and complete a list of the materials of construction of the system components in product contact based on information from
purchase orders and equipment specifications. Using field verification or equipment documentation, record the method of documentation used
and attach any supporting documentation. Verify that the materials conform to specifications and are suitable for use.
Acceptance Criteria:
Materials of construction must conform to specifications and be suitable for intended application.
Component
Title:
Material
Expected Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria
Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Objective:
To verify that the supporting utilities for the equipment are connected and supplies services within the specified parameters.
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Signature:
Initial/Dat
e
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Title:
Document Type
Page No.
Page 15 of 30
Method:
Record the as-found condition in the table below. If information is not specified, record the information as baseline information. Verify that the
utilities have been installed or are available as specified. Include description, specifications and available qualification for each item, as
applicable.
Tools:
Calibrated multi-meter, pressure gauge and thermometer
Acceptance Criteria:
As-Found conditions must conform to specifications. Where specifications are not listed, the as-found conditions are recorded.
Utility
Expected Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Signature:
Initial/Date
Title:
Procedure Verification
Objective:
To document and verify that the procedures for the equipment are current and applicable.
Method:
Obtain each procedure that is applicable to the equipment (including, but not limited to, operation, preventive maintenance, SOPs, etc.) Attach
any draft or red-lined procedures.
Acceptance Criteria:
All applicable procedures are listed in the data table. Any changes have been red-lined where necessary. Any draft or red-lined procedure is
attached.
Type
Procedure Title
Title:
Document
Number
Revision
Number
Location
Effective
Date
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Initial/Date
Objective:
To verify that the installed PLC/software program is adequately documented and that backup versions are available and that their storage
locations are documented.
Method:
Verify that the PLC/software program information is available and can be backed-up accordingly. Verify and document the location of each
electronic media copy.
Acceptance Criteria:
The programs on the two backup copies are the same as the installed program on the PLC and are properly labeled. The storage location has
been documented.
Item
OIT Model
File Name
Version
Number
Version Date
Location
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Initial/Date
Title:
OIT Manufacturer
Verify the following items
Can the PCL/Software program be backed up?
If so, verify the backup copy has the same version # and date.
Discrepancies
(Y/N):
Inspected By/Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 18 of 30
Signature of author verifies that all discrepancies have been documented and closed.
Name
Name:
Role
Author
Signature
Date (mm-dd-yy)
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 19 of 30
(This section (s) should be used to test functionality of the equipment. For example: dial functionality, toggle switches, on/off
capability, etc. Each test section should have a purpose, method, and a table which provides results for test data (see sample below)
Title:
Objective:
(Describe objective here. ** EXAMPLE : To verify the vessel can maintain a temperature setpoint of 2-8 degC at low volume.**)
Method:
(give general instructions here. *** EXAMPLE : Calibrated thermocouples will be placed throughout the vessel to verify temperature is
maintained at 2-8 C at low volume.***)
Tools:
(List tools used here).
EXAMPLES:
Kaye Validator 2000 w/ laptop
Wrench
Screwdriver
Acceptance Criteria:
(The acceptance criteria should be written as such the actual results obtained match the pre-decided expected results. ***
EXAMPLE: Entire vessel maintains temperature range of 208deg for NLT 5 hours at low volume.****)
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Title:
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 20 of 30
Pre-calibrate thermocouples
2Place thermocouples throughout
vessel as indicated on Thermocouple
Placement Map (Attachment #1)
Fill vessel with 750Liters of water.
Temperature setpoint of the vessel is
set to 5 3 deg C
Expected Results
Thermocouples are
satisfactory calibrated
Thermocouples are
placed in vessel as
specified.
Vessel is filled with
75010 liters of water
Vessel setpoint reads
5 3 deg C
Qualification run is
started
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Vessel volume =
_____ liters
Vessel temp
setpoint =
_____ deg C
Qualification
start time
=________
Qual End time =
______
Run Time
=________
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Initial/ Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Title:
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 21 of 30
Objective:
(Describe objective here.)
Method:
(give general instructions here. )
Tools:
(List tools used here).
Acceptance Criteria:
(The acceptance criteria should be written as such the actual results obtained match the pre-decided expected results. ***
EXAMPLE: Entire vessel maintains temperature range of 208deg for NLT 5 hours at low volume.****)
Test Method
Expected Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Initial/ Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Title:
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 22 of 30
Objective:
(Describe objective here.)
Method:
(give general instructions here. )
Tools:
(List tools used here).
Acceptance Criteria:
(The acceptance criteria should be written as such the actual results obtained match the pre-decided expected results. ***
EXAMPLE: Entire vessel maintains temperature range of 208deg for NLT 5 hours at low volume.****)
Test Method
Expected Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Initial/ Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Title:
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 23 of 30
Objective:
(Describe objective here.)
Method:
(give general instructions here. )
Tools:
(List tools used here).
Acceptance Criteria:
(The acceptance criteria should be written as such the actual results obtained match the pre-decided expected results. ***
EXAMPLE: Entire vessel maintains temperature range of 208deg for NLT 5 hours at low volume.****)
Test Method
Expected Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Initial/ Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Title:
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 24 of 30
Objective:
(Describe objective here.)
Method:
(give general instructions here. )
Tools:
(List tools used here).
Acceptance Criteria:
(The acceptance criteria should be written as such the actual results obtained match the pre-decided expected results. ***
EXAMPLE: Entire vessel maintains temperature range of 208deg for NLT 5 hours at low volume.****)
Test Method
Expected Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Initial/ Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Title:
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 25 of 30
Objective:
(Describe objective here.)
Method:
(give general instructions here. )
Tools:
(List tools used here).
Acceptance Criteria:
(The acceptance criteria should be written as such the actual results obtained match the pre-decided expected results. ***
EXAMPLE: Entire vessel maintains temperature range of 208deg for NLT 5 hours at low volume.****)
Test Method
Expected Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Initial/ Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Title:
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 26 of 30
Objective:
(Describe objective here.)
Method:
(give general instructions here. )
Tools:
(List tools used here).
Acceptance Criteria:
(The acceptance criteria should be written as such the actual results obtained match the pre-decided expected results. ***
EXAMPLE: Entire vessel maintains temperature range of 208deg for NLT 5 hours at low volume.****)
Test Method
Expected Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Initial/ Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Title:
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 27 of 30
Objective:
(Describe objective here.)
Method:
(give general instructions here. )
Tools:
(List tools used here).
Acceptance Criteria:
(The acceptance criteria should be written as such the actual results obtained match the pre-decided expected results. ***
EXAMPLE: Entire vessel maintains temperature range of 208deg for NLT 5 hours at low volume.****)
Test Method
Expected Results
Actual Results
Acceptance
Criteria Met?
(Yes/No)
Discrepancy /
Comment
Comments:
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Initial/ Date
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 28 of 30
Objective:
To identify personnel involved in the completion of the protocol.
Method:
Each person involved in the completion of the protocol must enter their name, the name of the company / department they represent, sign and
initial / date the table below.
Acceptance Criteria:
All personnel involved in the completion of this protocol are identified.
Name
Company / Department
Signature
Initial / Date
Supporting Data:
Initial / Date:
Initial / Date:
Reviewed
by:
Signature:
Date:
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
13.
Ver
Ver Date
Document Type
Page No.
Page 29 of 30
APPENDICES
13.1
DISCREPANCY REPORT
Page _____ of _____
DISCREPANCY REPORT
Discrepancy Number
Discrepancy Type
Discrepancy
Classification
No cGMP Impact
IQ
OQ
cGMP Impact
Discrepancy Description:
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
________
Proposed Corrective Action Plan:
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
___________
An Investigation Is Required? Yes No
Date: _________________________
Date: _________________________
Resolution: Comments:
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
________
Discrepancy Satisfactorily Resolved? Yes
If Required Investigation Closed? Yes No
Discrepancy Closed?
Yes No
No
N/A
Date: _________________________
Date: _________________________
Campbell University
System Title
System No.
Document No.
Ver
Ver Date
13.3
Document Type
Page No.
Page 30 of 30
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Page _____ of _____1
Attachment
No.
Number of
Pages
Attachment Title
Reviewed by:
Signature:
Date:
Initial / Date