Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract: The aim of the present study is to select a suitable, cheaper and easily available agro-waste
substrate for mass production of mycoherbicidal agent Colletotrichum dematium FGCC# 20, which is a highly
effective bioherbicidal agent against Parthenium hysterophorous. The outcome of the study indicates that,
pretreated sugarcane bagasse supported maximum mycelia coverage while maize cob grits supported
maximum sporulation and cause maximum seedling mortality.
Key words: Mass production, agro-waste, mycoherbicide, Colletotrichum dematium
494
Indian Phytopathology
Indian Phytopathology
495
Table 1. Screening of solid agrowaste substrate for mass production of C. dematium (FGCC # 20)
S.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
Wheat Semolina
Wheat straw
Wheat bran
Wheat grain
Paddy grain
Paddy straw
Paddy semolina
Maize flaps
Maize bran
Maize cob grit
Kapas oilcake
Catton stalks
Soyabean bran
Soyabean oilcake
Mixed pulses bran
Sugarcame bagase
Caster seed
Caster oilcake
Gram bran
Gram semolina
Wood shaving
Saw dust
Groundnut hull
Groundnut oilcake
Tea waste
Musturd oilcake
Host leaves
Jowar bran
Bajara bran
Coconut coir
Pea peels
Patato peels
Mung bran
Waste newspaper
Barley straw
Natural
moisture
content
(%)
60
70
70
20
20
30
30
60
60
70
80
60
70
80
73
90
20
65
72
70
60
80
79
80
80
80
70
49
55
60
80
69
55
65
60
Mycelium
coveragea
(%)
84.00
90.00
77.00
91.00
85.67
11.33
0.00
82.67
85.00
91.00
0.00
25.33
35.00
21.00
42.33
92.33
28.00
0.00
41.00
92.33
43.67
0.00
84.00
76.33
20.67
66.33
88.00
58.67
62.00
12.33
83.67
70.67
65.00
12.67
23.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.15
1.53
0.00
2.08
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.53
1.00
1.73
2.52
1.53
1.00
0.00
1.00
2.08
1.53
0.00
1.73
1.53
1.15
1.53
1.00
1.53
2.00
1.53
1.53
1.15
1.00
2.08
1.00
Acervulic
formation
Seateb
formation
Spored
production
(x 105
c/ml /g)
+
+
+
++
++
++
+
++
+
+
+
+
++
+
+
++
++
+
+
+
++
+
+
++
+
+
+
+
++
+++
+
+++
+++
+
+++
+++
+
+++
+
+
+++
+
+
+++
++
++
+
+++
+
+
+++
+++
+
+
+
6.5
7.8*
6.7
8.9
7.2*
00
00
7.2*
7.6
8.14*
00
2.9
5.1
3.11
3.5
7.12*
42
00
4.2
8.5*
00
00
6.7
6.5
2.9
00
6.2
5.2
4.9
00
8.2*
6.1
4.2
2.5
1.9
496
Indian Phytopathology
Table 2. Herbicidal potential of inoculum produced on different agricultural solid waste substrates
S.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
Wheat Semolina
Wheat straw
Wheat bran
Wheat grain
Paddy grain
Paddy straw
Paddy semolina
Maize flaps
Maize bran
Maize cob grit
Kapas oilcake
Catton stalks
Soyabean bran
Soyabean oilcake
Mixed pulses bran
Sugarcame bagase
Caster seed
Caster oilcake
Gram bran
Gram semolina
Wood shaving
Saw dust
Groundnut hull
Groundnut oilcake
Tea waste
Musturd oilcake
Host leaves
Jowar bran
Bajara bran
Coconut coir
Pea peels
Patato peels
Mung bran
Waste newspaper
Barley straw
LSD (P=0.05)
In lab condition
53.33 2.89
92.33 2.52
33.33 10.41
76.67 2.89
82.67 2.08
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
89.00 6.56
65.00 4.58
94.67 1.53
22.33 4.04
0.00 + 0.00
62.33 2.52
19.67 0.58
27.67 2.52
89.67 0.58
34.00 6.93
3.33 0.58
29.33 6.03
96.00 1.73
21.00 1.00
0.00 0.00
32.33 2.52
56.33 1.53
7.67 0.58
10.67 1.15
82.00 3.00
2.33 0.58
0.83 0.76
0.00 0.00
78.00 9.85
50.67 1.15
7.67 2.52
44.67 2.52
10.67 1.15
5.923496
% Seedling mortality
In green house conditionb
In field conditionc
40.67 1.15
70.33 0.58
21.33 3.21
68.00 2.65
71.33 1.15
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
74.33 2.08
43.00 2.00
75.67 6.03
11.33 1.15
0.00 0.00
42.33 2.52
10.67 0.58
18.00 2.00
63.00 1.73
13.00 2.65
1.67 0.58
25.00 2.65
71.67 1.53
19.00 1.00
0.00 0.00
25.00 2.65
42.33 1.53
1.67 0.58
8.00 1.00
72.67 2.08
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
57.67 2.52
42.33 2.52
6.00 1.00
20.67 5.31
6.67 1.53
5.166259
25.00 0.00
53.33 2.89*
22.33 2.52
57.67 2.52
54.00 1.00*
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
57.67 2.52*
30.00 5.00
72.33 2.52*
1.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
21.67 2.89
1.17 0.29
12.33 2.52
51.33 1.15*
2.17 0.29
0.00 0.00
19.33 0.58
61.67 3.51*
12.00 2.65
0.00 0.00
19.33 0.58
27.33 2.08
0.00 0.00
5.00 1.00
62.33 2.52
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
33.67 1.53*
31.00 3.61
3.00 1.00
16.33 1.53
3.00 1.00
3.110640
Indian Phytopathology
497
REFERENCES
Berger, R.D. and Hanson, E.W. (1963). Pathogenicity,
host parasite relationships and morphology or
some forage legume cercosporae and factors
related to disease development Phytopathol. 53:
500-508.
Boyette, C.D. (1982). Evaluation of Fusarium solani
sp. cucurbitae as a potential bioherbicide for
controlling taxus gourd. Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Arkansa, Fayetteville.
Boyette. C.D. Quimby P.C. Jr. Connick, W.J. Daigle,
D.J. and Fulgham F.E. (1991) Progress in the
production formulation and application of
mycoherbicides. In: Microbial control of weeds.
(TeBeest D.O. eds). Chapman and Hall Inc. New
York, pp. 209-222.
Churchill, B.W. (1982). Mass production of
microorganisms for biological control. In:
Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens
(R. Charudattan and H.L. Walker. eds), Wiley,
New York: pp. 139-156.
Diagle, D.J., Connick, W.J. Jr., Boyette, C.D. Jackson,
M.A. and Dorwer, J.W. (1998). Solid state
fermentation plus extrusion to make biopesticide
granules. Biotechnol. Tech. 12: 715-716.
Eilenberg, J., Hajer, A. and Lomer, C. (2001).
Suggestions for unifying the terminology in
biological control. Biocontrol. 46: 387-400.
Feng, M.G., Poprawshi, T.J. and Khachatatourians,
G.G. (1994). Production, Formulation and
Application of the Entomopathogenic fungus,
Beauveria bassiana for insect control: Current
status. Biocontrol Sci. Technol 4: 3-34.
Gayathri, S. and Pandey, A.K. (1997) Preliminary
assessment of Colletotrichum dematium as a
potential mycoherbicides against Parthenium
hysterophorus L.: In First International Conference
on Parthenium management. (M. Manadevappa
and V.C. Patil eds), University of Agriculture,
Dharwad, 8: 92-93.
Gressel, J. (2003). Enhancing microbiocontrol of
weeds. ASM News. 69: 498-502.
Hesseltine, C.W. (1977). Solid state fermentation
Process Biochem. 12: 24-27.
Hilderbrand, D.C. and McCain, A.H. (1978): The use of
various substrates for large scale Production of
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cannabis inoculum.
Phytopathol. 68: 1099-1101.
498
Indian Phytopathology