Adverse Possession Claim

NOTICE TO PRICIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT AND NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Special Appearance: Diane Brown, Penname

c/o 1767 Fernwood Road
Chula Vista, California
650-479-4750
NOTICE: AUTOMATIC
STAY OF
EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT
In Propria Persona
Presenting
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
333 WEST BROADWAY, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101
Civil Unlimited
FEDERAL
8
9
Autochthon--Nata Kentake Candace Dey

being sued as; Diane Brown(Penname),
10
11
Claimant/Alleged Respondent in
Reconvention,
12
13
vs.
14
15
16
17
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As

Trustee For Morgan Stanley ABS CAPITAL I
INC TRUST 2007-NC4
Alleged Respondent
18
19
20
21
Interested Parties: Federal Bureau of Investigations, Securities and

Exchange Commission, Secretary of the State of California, The
California Bar Association, San Diego County Assessor Recorder, San
Diego Risk Management Department, California
Bonding/Underwriters Association-Public Servants Division.
22
Counter Claimant Does the Following: Reserve s All Inalienable

Rights, Accepts the Oath of Office for EACH and EVERY Public
Servant Participants associated with matter in any and all forms.
23
Counter Claimant Requests the Following: Judgment
24
Based on Fact and Law (per California civil code 632,

634), Written Record of Decisional Finding and Due Process.
State case no. 37-2014-00035435-CL-UD-CTL
NOTICE
PURSUANT TO
Adverse Possession Claim FEDERAL RULES
OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 62 STAY OF EXECUTION OF
JUDGMENT OR ANY PROCEEDING TO
ENFORCE IT, under rule(s): 50 - as a matter of
law, rule 60 - relief from judgment or order.
Cause: Fraud, Void Judgment, Lack of Standing, Lack
personal, Subject Matter and specific subject matter
jurisdiction, improper venue
NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR A NEW TRIAL;

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION
Filed: March 2, 2015
Hearing Date :
Department:
Time:
Presiding Justice:
[Filed Concurrently With: Objection to Proof of Claim [Propose]
Order)]
25
26
27
ADVERSE POSSESSION
28
Claim at Common Right By: Diane Brown(Penname), Notice of Stay of Execution for Enforcement of Judgment.
Page 1 of 15

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff complains and for causes of action alleges as follows:

1. Plaintiff __________ [name] is, and at all times
mentioned in this complaint was, a resident of __________
County, California.
2. Defendant __________ [name] is, and at all times
mentioned in this complaint was, a resident of __________
County, California.
3. Plaintiff does not know the true names of defendants
all persons unknown, claiming any legal or equitable right,
title, estate, lien, or interest in the property described in
the complaint adverse to plaintiff's title or any cloud on
plaintiff's title thereto and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and
therefore sues them by those fictitious names. The names,
capacities and relationships of DOES 1 through 10 will be
alleged by amendment to this complaint when they are known.
__________ [Optionally, in addition to language in charging
allegations that includes fictitiously named defendants:
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges
that each of the DOE defendants claims, or may claim, some
interest in the real property described in paragraph 4 of this
complaint.]
4. Plaintiff is the owner by adverse possession of real
property located in __________ County, California and more
specifically described as: __________ [set forth legal
description]. __________ [Add if applicable any street
address.]
5. Plaintiff has possession of all real property described
in paragraph 4 of this complaint by actual, open, hostile,
continuous, and exclusive possession.
6. Plaintiff's possession has been actual, open, hostile,
continuous, and exclusive since __________ [date], in excess of
the 5-year period set forth in Code of Civil Procedure sections
318, 319, 321-323.
7. Plaintiff has been in possession of the real property
described in paragraph 4 of this complaint by virtue of
Page 2 of 15

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
__________ [set forth the type of written instrument, judgment,

or decree, such as: a tax deed executed on __________ (date),
by __________ (name), and recorded on __________ (date).]
8. Plaintiff has been in continuous possession during the
5-year period described in paragraph 6 of this complaint,
adverse to defendants and to all other persons, in support of
plaintiff's title to the real property and as curative of any
defects in the __________ [set forth type of document whether
written instrument, judgment, or decree, such as: tax deed], or
other defects which might have existed with reference to it.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
9. Plaintiff has paid all taxes and assessments that have

been levied or assessed against the real property described in
paragraph 4 of this complaint during the 5-year period.
10. Defendants claim an estate or interest in the real
property described that is adverse to plaintiff.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against defendants as
follows:
1. For judgment that plaintiff is the fee simple owner of
all right, title, and interest in and to the described real
property;
2. For judgment that defendants do not have any right,
title, estate, or interest in or lien on the described real
property;
20
21
22
23
3. For such further relief as the court may deem proper.

DATED:
_______________
__________________________________________
(Signature)
24
25
26
27
28
VERIFICATION
I, ___, am a ___in the above-entitled action. I have read the
foregoing ___and know the contents thereof. The same is true of my
own knowledge, except as to those matters which are therein alleged on
information and belief, and as to those matters, I believe it to be true.
Page 3 of 15

1
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct
and that this declaration was executed at Long Beach, California.
2
3
4
5
DATED: _________________ ___________________________________
6
7
8
9
10
NOTICE OF STAY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 62

PENDING THE DISPOSITION OF A MOTION
11
12
TO EACH PARTY AND TO THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY:
13
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT at the above-captioned date and time and department in
14
the courthouse located at 333 Broadway, San Diego, California that Claimant/ Alleged
15
Respondent will move the court for an order requesting relief from judgment and a new trial
16
based upon the following:
17
Inadvertence, surprise, mistake, or excusable neglect
18
Service of the Summons did not result in actual notice, defective notice of
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Hearing; Opposition to Diane Brown(Penname)s Demurrer and Motion To strike

The judgment and/or default is void
Improper Venue
THIS MOTION IS TIMELY
Within 6 months after entry of default: A motion for discretionary relief from default under CCP)
on grounds of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect. The motion for
discretionary relief must be filed within 6 months after the clerks entry of default.
Within 6 months after entry of judgment: A motion for mandatory relief from default based upon
an attorneys affidavit of fault is timely if filed within 6 months after entry of judgment.
Page 4 of 15

1
2
Summons Too Late to Defend Action: A Motion to Set Aside Default under where the service of
a summons / notice of motion, has not resulted in actual notice to a party in time to defend the
action, the time to file and serve a Motion shall be made within a reasonable time, but in no
event exceeding the earlier of: (i) two years after entry of a default judgment against him or her;
or (ii) 180 days after service on him or her of a written notice that the default or default judgment
has been entered.
8
9
Void Judgment: The time to file a Motion to Set Aside Default under is at any time after a void
10
judgment is granted, if the motion is made within a reasonable time. For a default judgment, this
11
may be a reasonable time after the discovery of the existence of the judgment or order.
12
13
Improper Court: A Motion to Set Aside Default under CCP 585.5(b) shall be served and filed
14
within 60 days after the Diane Brown(Penname) first receives notice of levy under a writ of
15
execution, or notice of any other procedure for enforcing the default judgment.
16
17
(f) Stay in Favor of a Judgment Debtor Under State Law. If a judgment is a lien on the judgment
18
debtor's property under the law of the state where the court is located, the judgment debtor is
19
entitled to the same stay of execution the state court would give
20
21
22
The mandatory relief provision of section 473(b) provides, as pertinent,
23
Notwithstanding any other requirements of this section, the court shall,
24
whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of
25
judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorneys /pro pers
26
sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect,
27
vacate any (1) resulting default entered by the clerk against his or her client / him
28
or her, and which will result in entry of a default judgment, or (2) resulting default
judgment or dismissal entered against his or her client / him or her.
Page 5 of 15

1
This motion will be based upon this notice, the attached points and authorities and declaration of
Diane Brown(Penname), being sued as Diane Brown(penname) and the records, exhibits and
files in this action.
4
5
Date:
6
7
Diane Brown(Penname)
In Propria Persona
c/o 1767 Fernwood Road, Chula Vista, California
Phone: 650-479-4750
8
9
10
11
12
13
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Set Aside
14
15
I. Background
16
17
On October 17, 2014, Alleged Respondent filed a Complaint in this court, On November 14,
18
2014 Alleged Respondent received a default in error, as Diane Brown(Penname)s motion to
19
quash hearing was filed and on calendar. On January 22, 2015, Alleged Respondent scheduled
20
hearing; Opposition to Diane Brown(Penname)s Demurrer and Motion to quash was held,
21
although Diane Brown(Penname) did not receive the mandatory 9(nine) days notice, Ithe
22
notice via fed-ex was received at approximately 4:30pm on January 22, 2015. On same date,
23
Diane Brown(Penname) spoke with opposing attorney and let him know her demurrer hearing
24
scheduled for January 27, 2015, has been rescheduled to February 11, 2015, and that I would fax
25
him a copy of the demurrer the eve of January 22, 2015. Mr. Hadi pleasantly said, great, I look
26
forward to it, and then filed for a default on January 23, 2015. Extrinsic fraud?
27
Brown(Penname) filed demurrer for the 3rd time on January 30, 2015, same day, Alleged
28
Respondents attorney filed for default. Diane Brown(Penname)s demurrer filing was rejected to
Diane
Diane Brown(Penname)s surprise, for a claim of no fee waiver on file however Diane
Brown(Penname), did file such with one legal along with other documents and had no idea, the
Page 6 of 15

1
waiver somehow got lost in the transference to The Superior court Clerk. (see Exhibit A).
Alleged Respondent requested and received a default and judgment of default, on February 5 th
and 6th respectively, while Alleged Respondent was under the impression demurrer was filed,
and planned on specially appearing at scheduled demurrer hearing on February 11, 2015, which
was requested personally by Diane Brown(Penname) on 12/2/2014.
6
7
8
Additionally, defaults entered:

1. were not in compliance with the Superior court of California Clerk Default judgment
Guidelines. (see Exhibit B)
9
10
11
12
2.
Alleged Respondents misrepresented the nature of the disputed debt/claim on the

default judgment form (see Exhibit C)
3. The complaint was not amended to reflect the party of whom the default was granted.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
The moving Diane Brown(Penname) is now asking this court in the interest of justice, to prevent
irreparable damage to moving party and family members, to prevent unjust enrichment and as a
matter right and law to set aside the clerks default and, clerks default judgments, under the
mandatory provision of ccp 473(b) based Diane Brown(Penname)s declaration of mistake of
facts, surprise, on Inadvertence and.
as well as an motion to strike Alleged
Respondents pleading in its entirety due to lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction.
20
21
22
23
24
II. LEGAL ARGUMENT

(If checked paragraphs A D are argued) Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure
473(b), the Court Should Set Aside this Adverse Judgment or Ruling Based on Inadvertence,
Surprise, or Excusable Neglect
25
26
27
28
Diane Brown(Penname)s, inadvertence and surprise, at the non- processed demurrers, which
Diane Brown(Penname) filed on December 2, 2014 and December 12, 2014 via the subsequent
filings drop box, located on the second floor of 330 west broadway, did result in the Alleged
Respondents obtaining an erroneous default judgment, while Diane Brown(Penname) was
secure in the fact that her pleading each instant was processed and the hearing she scheduled for
Page 7 of 15

1
the demurrer was to be attended as scheduled. Not until January 22, 2015, was Diane
Brown(Penname) notified that neither of her filings were processed. The same date, Diane
Brown(Penname) rescheduled her demurrer hearing with the court clerk for February 11, 2015
and Informed the opposing counsel. Out of nowhere, Diane Brown(Penname)s 3rd and finally
processed submission of demurrer on January 30, 2015 ( this time, in addition to placing
demurrer in the filing drop box, Diane Brown(Penname) personally delivered a copy to the court
clerk in the department 7 which will be the practice hereforth as that was the only time the
demurrer was noticed and filed.
9
10
Costs for processing the demurrer became an issue made known to Diane Brown(Penname) on
11
2/11/2015. A matter of which was not ever remotely conceived as Diane Brown(Penname)s
12
prior filing of a motion to quash, supporting documents and hearing were all performed without
13
issue, based upon Diane Brown(Penname)s, believed processed fee waiver. Diane
14
Brown(Penname) received notice on Febraury 7, 2015, that 3rd demurrer was rejected due to
15
absence of filing fee. A blow of complete and utter surprise. This is a fact that if could not
16
possible have determined unless and untiled formerly noticed. Complaints submitted with NSF
17
matters, are given notice and 15 calendar days to submit funds to cover filing, individuals like
18
myself, whom complete fee waivers, waivers of which are not determined for a week or two after
19
submission are filed. If I had not appeared in court on the 11th of February I would have never
20
known why a default was entered against me as I believed I was moving in complete
21
accordance with the file requirements of the court. If my motion to quash for months earlier had
22
been rejected due to lack of payment and notice thereof sent, there would not be this issue, hence
23
there would be no defaults. I cannot correct what I do not know about. Upon notice I
24
immediately, acted in accordance.
25
26
It is apparent by my(the Diane Brown(Penname)s) the multiple efforts of filings and court
27
appearances that it is my intention to have this case ruled according to the merits. And I know
28
given the right of due process, I will prevail in this case. I am the lawful owner of the subject
property. The Alleged Respondents are intentionally verifying information of which they
have obviously not applied a minimal of verification there of, or they are intentionally placing
Page 8 of 15

1
fraud upon the court or deutsche bank is truly not the Alleged Respondent and the debt
collection law firm is fraudulently using the name of the alleged Alleged Respondent, for a
debt they may have themselves purchased, cause of action for penal prosecution and civil suit for
Diane Brown(Penname),
5
6
7
A. Grounds for Relief. On application, the court shall, on any terms as may be
just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal,
order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake,
10
inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect ( Code Civ. Proc. 473(b)). This
11
motion is filed within a reasonable period of time, not exceeding six months after
12
entry of the default.
13
14
B. Policy of Law Favors Trial on Merits. The policy of the law is that controversies
15
should be heard and disposed of on their merits (Fasuyi v. Permatex, Inc. (2008) 167
16
Cal. App. 4th 681, 694703, 84 Cal. Rptr. 3d 351; Berman v. Klassman (1971) 17 Cal. App. 3d
17
900, 909, 95 Cal. Rptr. 417).
18
19
20
21
(If checked paragraphs E H are argued) The Court should grant Diane Brown(Penname)s
22
motion for relief pursuant to CCP 473.5 because he/she received no actual notice of the action
23
in time to defend, he/she has filed a timely motion for relief, and the default and default
24
judgment was not caused by the Alleged Respondents avoidance of service or inexcusable
25
neglect.
26
27
E. Motion for Relief From Default for Lack of Actual Notice. When service of a summons /
28
notice of hearing has not resulted in actual notice to a party in time to defend the action and a
default or default judgment has been entered against him or her in the action, the party may serve
Page 9 of 15

1
and file a notice of motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the
action ( Code Civ. Proc. 473.5(a)).
3
4
Alleged Respondents declares that service of the summons was substituted and defective. The
summons was not delivered to the Diane Brown(Penname) personally. (See Alleged
Respondents proof of service of summons.) The summons was dropped off with an unidentified
individual, not in the presence of Diane Brown(Penname). The Alleged Respondents
8
9
F. Court May Grant Relief on Timely Motion if Diane Brown(Penname) Not at Fault. On a
10
finding by the court that the motion was made within the two year time period permitted by Code
11
of Civil Procedure Section 473.5(a) and that his or her lack of actual notice in time to defend the
12
action was not caused by his or her avoidance of service or inexcusable neglect, it shall set aside
13
the default and/ or default judgment on whatever terms as may be just and allow the party to
14
defend the action ( Code Civ. Proc. 473.5(c); Goya v. P.E.R.U. Enterprises (1978) 87 Cal. App.
15
3d 886, 890891, 151 Cal. Rptr. 258).
16
17
18
H. Policy Favors Application for Relief. Unless inexcusable neglect is clear, the policy favoring
19
trial on the merits prevails over the general rule of deference and doubts are resolved in
20
favor of the application for relief from default (Tunis v. Barrow (1986) 184 Cal. App. 3d 1069,
21
1079, 229 Cal. Rptr. 389).
22
23
(If checked paragraphs I K are argued) THE COURT SHOULD GRANT DIANE
24
BROWN(PENNAME)S MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE DEFAULT AND DEFAULT
25
JUDGMENT, IF ENTERED ON THE GROUND THAT IT IS VOID BECAUSE, ALTHOUGH
26
ITS INVALIDITY MAY NOT APPEAR FROM AN EXAMINATION OF THE JUDGMENT
27
ROLL, IT IS NONETHELESS VOID IN FACT IN THAT THE SUMMONS AND
28
COMPLAINT WERE NEVER VALIDLY SERVED ON THE DIANE BROWN(PENNAME),

AND THE DIANE BROWN(PENNAME) LACKED ACTUAL NOTICE OF THIS LAWSUIT
AND THE ALLEGED ALLEGED RESPONDENTS HAVE NO STANDING. AS IT IS A
Page 10 of 15

1
LEGAL IMPOSSIBILITY FOR THE ALLEGED RESPONDENT TO POSSESS ANY
INTEREST IN SUBJECT PROPERTY (see exhibit D). THERE ARE CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT NOT MET, ISSUES OF ESTOPPLE, FRAUD AND THE REPRESENTING
ATTORNEYS HAVE KNOWINGLY FAILED TO ACT IN ACCORD WITH THE FAIR DEBT
AND COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT OF 2006 AND IN ADHERENCE TO THE THEIR
OATH OF OFFICES, AND IN COMPLETE DISREGARD OF THE BUSINESS AND
PROFESSION CODE, AND ABA MODEL ACTS.
8
9
I. Statutory Power to Set Aside Void Judgment. The court may, on motion of either party after
10
notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order ( Code Civ. Proc. 473(d)).
11
12
J. Inherent Power to Set Aside Judgment Not Void on Its Face but Void in Fact. The law is settled
13
that courts of record have inherent power to set aside a void judgment whether or not it is void
14
on its face (Rogers v. Silverman (1989) 216 Cal. App. 3d 1114, 1122, 265 Cal. Rptr. 286). As
15
described in the attached Declaration, the service of the Summons was improper, depriving the
16
court of jurisdiction as to the Diane Brown(Penname). Furthermore, the Diane Brown(Penname)
17
is filing this motion within a reasonable period of time within six months of learning of the
18
existence of this lawsuit.
19
20
K. Court Has Duty to Set Aside Judgment. It is well settled that when an application to vacate
21
and set aside a judgment that is not void on its face but void in fact is made within a reasonable
22
time after its rendition and is based on a sufficient showing, it is within the power of the court,
23
and its duty, to set it aside (Smith v. Bratman (1917) 174 Cal. 518, 520, 163 P. 892).
24
25
26
(If checked paragraphs L O are argued) THE COURT SHOULD SET ASIDE THE
27
DEFAULT AND, IF ENTERED, DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN THIS ACTION AS VOID ON ITS
28
FACE BECAUSE NO PROOF OF SERVICE WAS FILED THIS IS A CONSUMER

CREDIT DEBT, HOWEVER NO DECLARATION OF VENUE HAS BEEN FILED AND THE
COMPLAINT IS NOT VERIFIED.
Page 11 of 15

1
2
L. Relief From Void Judgment or Order. The court may, on motion of either party after notice to
the other party, set aside any void judgment or order ( Code Civ. Proc. 473(d)).
4
5
M. Inherent Power to Set Aside Judgment Void on Its Face. A court has inherent power,
independent of statute, to set aside a judgment or order that is void on its face (People v. Greene
(1887) 74 Cal. 400, 405406, 16 P. 197; Hendrix v. Hendrix (1955) 130 Cal. App. 2d 379, 383,
279 P.2d 58).
9
10
N. Test for Establishing That Judgment Is Void on Its Face. A judgment or order is void on its
11
face when its invalidity appears from an examination of the judgment roll (People v. Davis
12
(1904) 143 Cal. 673, 676, 77 P. 651; Carrasco v. Craft (1985) 164 Cal. App. 3d 796, 808, 210
13
Cal. Rptr. 599).
14
15
16
(If checked paragraphs P-S are argued) THE COURT SHOULD QUASH SERVICE OF THE
17
SUMMONS DUE TO LACK OF JURISDICTION
18
19
P. Motion to Quash Service of Summons. On or before the last day of his or her time to plead, or
20
within such further time as the court may for good cause allow, a Diane Brown(Penname) may
21
serve and file a notice of motion to quash service of summons on the ground the court lacks
22
jurisdiction over him or her ( Code Civ. Proc. 418.10(a)(1)).
23
24
Q. Compliance With Statutory Provisions Governing Service of Process Is Required. Service of
25
summons in conformance with the mode prescribed by statute is deemed jurisdictional, and,
26
absent such service, no jurisdiction is acquired by the court in the particular action (Renoir v.
27
Redstar Corp. (2004) 123 Cal. App. 4th 1145, 1150, 20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 603; Schering Corp. v.
28
Superior Court (1975) 52 Cal. App. 3d 737, 741, 125 Cal. Rptr. 337; Sternbeck v. Buck (1957)
148 Cal. App. 2d 829, 832, 307 P.2d 970).
Page 12 of 15

1
R. Strict Compliance Necessary for Substituted or Constructive Service. A court has no authority
to render judgment on the basis of substituted or constructive service of the summons when
statutory requirements have not been strictly complied with (Summers v. McClanahan (2006)
140 Cal. App. 4th 403, 412, 44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 338 (improper service on personal manager); Zirbes
v. Stratton (1986) 187 Cal. App. 3d 1407, 1416, 232 Cal. Rptr. 653 (substituted service); Eagle
Electric Mfg. Co. v. Keener (1966) 247 Cal. App. 2d 246, 251, 55 Cal. Rptr. 444 (same); Bank of
America v. Carr (1956) 138 Cal. App. 2d 727, 737, 292 P.2d 587 (constructive service)).
8
9
S. General Appearance After Default Judgment Does Not Validate Defective Service. The
10
general appearance after entry of a default judgment by a Diane Brown(Penname) who was
11
defectively served with summons does not make the defective service retroactively valid (In re
12
Marriage of Smith (1982) 135 Cal. App. 3d 543, 545, 547552, 185 Cal. Rptr. 411).
13
14
THE DIANE BROWN(PENNAME) ADDITIONALLY ARGUES:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
There is no evidence upon the court except that which the Diane Brown(Penname) has filed
(Affidavit of Truth, Declaration, Verified Pleading(s), being of first-hand knowledge, and signed
under the penalties and pains of perjury, under the California Republic. And wholly admissible
under the Federal Rules of Evidence. The Alleged Respondents rebutted complaint is not
verified nor can it be viewed as evidence as it was signed by an attorney on informed,
information and belief, per Civil Code 446.
23
For the aforementioned reasons, Diane Brown(Penname) requests set aside of the default, and e,
24
default judgment entered her and requests that the Service of the Summons be set aside for
25
lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
26
27
28
Dated:
Page 13 of 15
c/o 1767 Fernwood Road
Chula Vista, California
Phone: 650-479-4750
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
The mandatory relief provision of section 473(b) provides, as pertinent, Notwithstanding

any other requirements of this section, the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made
no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an
attorneys /pro pers sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
neglect, vacate any (1) resulting default entered by the clerk against his or her client / him or her,
and which will result in entry of a default judgment, or (2) resulting default judgment or
dismissal entered against his or her client / him or her.
18
19
20
DECLARATION
21
22
23
24
Affidavit of Truth
I, Diane Brown(Penname), am the Claimant in reconvention, in this matter, and I declare the
following in support of my motion to set aside the defaults and default judgments in my case:
25
26
27
28
1. That I do acknowledge the aforementioned surprises, inadvertent awareness, my mistake

of facts, have contributed to the erroneous defaults and default judgments in conjunction
with the opposing counsels improperly noticed hearings, substituted service of summons
and misleading conversations with the opposing counsel.
Page 14 of 15

1
2
2. The defaults and default judgments entered were erroneous and correction there of is a
matter of due process
3. The Alleged Respondents have no legal nor lawful interested in subject property.
4. It is and has alsway been my intent to prevail in this matter based upon the merits.
5. The Alleged Respondents have knowingly side stepped mandatory and procedural rules
in order to obtain said defaults.
6. The request for entry of default are in compliance with the summons on file.
7. The summons on file has not been amended to correctly note the party as to which the
9
10
11
12
13
Diane Brown(Penname)s through misrepresentation obtained defaults.

8. It is a legal impossibility that the alleged Alleged Respondent hold any legally
recognized interest in subject property (see exhibit E)
9. The attorneys for the alleged Diane Brown(Penname)s are debt collectors and have
placed nothing into evidence proving that they are not infact acting on their own behalf.
14
10. I have disputed the alleged debt and noticed the Alleged Respondents of such disputed
15
since the first instance of communication with the Alleged Respondents attorneys.
16
11. Attorneys and public officers owe the public a duty of integrity, professionalism and
17
adherence to their oath of office(s) which in and of itself would prevent most of the
18
frivolous and fraudulent lawsuits of unjust enrichment.
19
20
21
22
23
12. Alleged Respondents filed this suit with unclean hands and continue to act in such a
manner.
13. The Alleged Respondents rebutted proof of claim also negates their claim. (see exhibit
G)
14. The sale of the subject property was not duly perfected as the Alleged Respondents
24
assert on their complaint. A minimal effort of checking the records at the San diego
25
county recorders office will and would have quickly verified sale, assignment and
26
substitution were no in strick adherence to 2924, which is mandatory. (see Exhibit H)
27
15. This complaint is not meant to harass, delay or mislead. I am the lawful owner of subject
28
property.
16. I filed a quite title action of subject property in 2012, which I abandoned , due to health
issues in the family.
Page 15 of 15

1
17. Once a secured interest is pursued by a debt collector, the security is dissolved, and
becomes an unsecured debt, where by which the debt collector may only pursue monetary
judgment if alleged debt is not disputed and properly validated.
18. Alleged Respondents have no legal possesionary right to subject property.
19. Alleged Respondent have no legal equitable interest in subject property.
20. Alleged Respondents are placing fraud upon the court , practicing extortion and are in
7
8
9
10
sanctionable violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

21. Alleged Respondents have presented to the court as proof of claim, a counterfeit
security according to the security and exchange commission.
22. Diane Brown(Penname) and Diane Browns (Penname)s family members will suffer
11
irreparable harm if Alleged Respondents are allowed to commit grand larceny of Diane
12
Brown(Penname)s home.
13
23. The best evidence of this case is presented by Diane Brown(Penname).
14
24. The Diane Brown(Penname)s would like the Alleged Respondents to show cause to
15
the court, the Diane Brown(Penname) and the public at large: why they are attempting to
16
collect a disputed debt, an alleged debt of which the statute has expired, an alleged debt
17
of which they have not validated, an alleged debt more than a year and a half after
18
claimed rights are due, an alleged debt that they have not taken a minimal amount of
19
effort to confirm.
20
25. This court has not subject matter jurisdiction, as Alleged Respondents have no
21
standing, have not suffered nor alleged injury and have not presented any evidence of
22
contract with defent.
23
Based on the Diane Brown(Penname)s honest mistake of facts, inadvertent surprises, misleading
24
communications with the opposing counsel and Diane Brown(Penname)s earnest efforts and
25
devout intention to address this case solely on the merits, and Diane Brown(Penname)s period of
26
uninterrupted possession of subject property and as a matter of law, and evidence before court, I
27
request this court in the interest of truth, justice, right, due process and as a matter of recognized
28
law.Grant Diane Brown(Penname)s motions to set aside the defaults and default judgments
and allow Diane Brown(Penname) to defend her real property and prevent the Alleged
Page 16 of 15

1
Respondents from a practice of greed, pursuit of unjust enrichment and causing unwarranted and
the indifferent destruction of family lives.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED on EVERY CLAIM / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
4
5
Date:
Diane Brown(Penname) in Propria Persona
Phone: 650-479-4750
7
8
9
Claimant in Reconvention, Diane Brown(Penname) Reserves the right to amend this complaint if /when needed correction is
noted and or in a timely manner included material information as to express claim in most effective means.
10
11
12
13
VERIFICATION
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
I, Diane Brown(Penname), Diane Brown(Penname) in subject case being of sound mind, age
of competence and having first hand knowleged of the facts and statements here in. Do declare I
have scribed and read this complaint and affirm that all statements contained herein are the truth,
the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and if asked as a witness will testify to the veracity
thereof. This pleading is not meant to delay, harass or mislead, but is solely effected for the
purpose of justice in accordance to law. I declare this statements to be true under the penalties
and pains of perjury and under the laws of the California Republic.
23
24
25
Declared in honor This 2ND day of March, 2015.
26
27
28
Diane Brown
Page 17 of 15

1
2
Claimant/Alleged Respondent in Propria Persona

Phone: 650-479-4750
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 18 of 15

Adverse Possession Claim

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Adverse Possession Claim

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

NOTICE TO PRICIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT AND NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL.

Special Appearance: Diane Brown, Penname

Autochthon--Nata Kentake Candace Dey

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As

Interested Parties: Federal Bureau of Investigations, Securities and

Counter Claimant Does the Following: Reserve s All Inalienable

Counter Claimant Requests the Following: Judgment

Based on Fact and Law (per California civil code 632,

State case no. 37-2014-00035435-CL-UD-CTL