Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 UM Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
b
Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia
article info
abstract
Article history:
hydrogen due to unique chemical and physical properties has adversely affect on pipeline
network, hence increases the potential risk of explosion. This study was carried out to
27 July 2013
pipeline. A 90 pipeline with L/D ratio of 40 was used. Pure hydrogen/air mixture with
equivalence ratio, 4 0.13, 0.17, 0.2, 0.24, 0.27 and 0.30 were used in this work. Different
composition of hydrogenemethaneeair mixtures were tested in this study i.e. 3%
Keywords:
H2 97CH4, 4%H2 96CH4, 6%H2 94CH4 and 8%H2 92CH4. All mixtures were operated at
Flame propagation
ambient condition. The results show that bending is the critical part of pipeline and higher
Flame speed
concentration of hydrogen can affect on maximum overpressure, flame speed and tem-
Overpressure
1.
Introduction
* Corresponding author. Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 UM Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia. Tel.: 60 166308085.
E-mail addresses: sinadavazdahemami@gmail.com, sinade1987@gmail.com (S.D. Emami).
0360-3199/$ e see front matter Copyright 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.056
Please cite this article in press as: Emami SD, et al., Experimental study on premixed hydrogen/air and hydrogenemethane/air
mixtures explosion in 90 degree bend pipeline, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.ijhydene.2013.08.056
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 e6
2.
Methodology
3.
Please cite this article in press as: Emami SD, et al., Experimental study on premixed hydrogen/air and hydrogenemethane/air
mixtures explosion in 90 degree bend pipeline, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.ijhydene.2013.08.056
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 e6
Pressure (bar)
(a)10
3.9% H2
5.1% H2
6
6.0% H2
7.2% H2
8.1% H2
9.0% H2
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
bend
Distance (cm)
(b)
Pressure (bar)
10
8
3%H2+97%CH4
4%H2+96% CH4
6%H2+94%CH4
8%H2+92%CH4
bend
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Distance (cm)
Fig. 2 e Pressure Vs. Distance from ignition of (a) hydrogen/air and (b) hydrogenemethane/air mixtures in 90 pipeline.
Pressure (bar)
(a)
12
10
3.9% H2
5.1% H2
6.0% H2
7.2% H2
8.1% H2
9.0% H2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
bend
Time (ms)
Pressure (bar)
(b) 12
3%H2+97%Ch4
10
4%H2+96% CH4
6%H2+94%CH4
8%H2+92%CH4
bend
2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Time (ms)
Fig. 3 e Pressure Vs. Time profile of (a) hydrogen/air and (b) hydrogenemethane/air mixtures in 90 pipeline.
Please cite this article in press as: Emami SD, et al., Experimental study on premixed hydrogen/air and hydrogenemethane/air
mixtures explosion in 90 degree bend pipeline, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.ijhydene.2013.08.056
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 e6
(a)
3.9% H2
5.1% H2
6.0% H2
8.1% H2
9.0% H2
bend
7.2% H2
100
50
dP/dt
0
-50 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
Distance (cm)
dP/dt
(b)
150
100
50
0
-50 0
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
3%H2+97%Ch4
4%H2+96% CH4
8%H2+92%CH4
bend
50
100
150
200
250
6%H2+94%CH4
300
350
400
60
50
130
140
Distance (cm)
Fig. 4 e Rate of pressure rise of (a) hydrogen/air and (b) hydrogenemethane/air mixtures in 90 pipeline at different distance
from ignition.
dP/dtmax
(bar/s)
V(1/3)
(m)
KG (dP/dt)maxV(1/3)
(bar.m.s 1)
51.25
63.55
77.85
93.16
40.54
52.34
64.53
76.34
87.74
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
4.6.125
5.7195
7.0065
8.3844
3.6486
4.7106
5.8077
6.8706
7.8966
Please cite this article in press as: Emami SD, et al., Experimental study on premixed hydrogen/air and hydrogenemethane/air
mixtures explosion in 90 degree bend pipeline, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.ijhydene.2013.08.056
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 e6
(a)
3.9% H2
5.1% H2
6.0% H2
7.2% H2
8.1% H2
9.0% H2
bend
300
Sf(m/s)
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Distance (cm)
(b)
3%H2+97%CH4
400
4%H2+96% CH4
350
6%H2+94%CH4
Sf (m/s)
300
8%H2+92%CH4
250
bend
200
150
100
50
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Distance (cm)
Fig. 5 e Flame speed Vs. distance from ignition of (a) hydrogen/air and (b) hydrogenemethane mixtures in 90 pipeline.
at the bend are caused by both friction and momentum exchanges resulting from a change in the direction of flow.
Interestingly, the recorded maximum flame speeds in this
study are different in comparison with previous studies for
pure hydrogen in 90 bend [17,27]. This difference can be result
of different experimental rig design.
4.
Conclusion
4. the explosion severity based on pressure rise has low significant effect on lower concentration of both hydrogen/air
and methane-hydrogen/air mixtures in 90 pipeline.
Acknowledgment
This research paper would not have been possible without the
support of many people. The authors wish to express their
gratitude to all of them.
references
Please cite this article in press as: Emami SD, et al., Experimental study on premixed hydrogen/air and hydrogenemethane/air
mixtures explosion in 90 degree bend pipeline, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.ijhydene.2013.08.056
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 e6
[5] Schefer R, Wicksall D, Agrawal A. Combustion of hydrogenenriched methane in a lean premixed swirl-stabilized
burner. Proc Combust Inst 2002;29(1):843e51.
[6] Bauer C, Forest T. Effect of hydrogen addition on the
performance of methane-fueled vehicles. Part I: effect on SI
engine performance. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2001;26(1):55e70.
[7] Sierens R, Rosseel E. Variable composition hydrogen/natural
gas mixtures for increased engine efficiency and decreased
emissions. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2000;122(1):135e40.
[8] Di Sarli V, Benedetto AD. Laminar burning velocity of
hydrogenemethane/air premixed flames. Int J Hydrogen
Energy 2007;32(5):637e46.
[9] Xiao H, Wang Q, He X, Sun J, Yao L. Experimental and
numerical study on premixed hydrogen/air flame
propagation in a horizontal rectangular closed duct. Int J
Hydrogen Energy 2010;35(3):1367e76.
[10] Salzano E, Cammarota F, Di Benedetto A, Di Sarli V.
Explosion behavior of hydrogenemethane/air mixtures. J
Loss Prev Process Ind 2012;25(3):443e7.
[11] Ilbas M, Crayford AP, Ylmaz I, Bowen PJ, Syred N. Laminarburning velocities of hydrogeneair and
hydrogenemethaneeair mixtures: an experimental study.
Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31(12):1768e79.
[12] Di Sarli V, Di Benedetto A, Long EJ, Hargrave GK. TimeResolved Particle Image Velocimetry of dynamic interactions
between hydrogen-enriched methane/air premixed flames
and toroidal vortex structures. Int J Hydrogen Energy
2012;37(21):16201e13.
[13] Zhian H, Zhigang L, Shengguo C, Yansong Z, Yinghua Z.
Numerical simulation and study on the transmission law of
flame and pressure wave of pipeline gas explosion. Safety Sci
2012;50(4):806e10.
[14] Phylaktou H, Foley M, Andrews G. Explosion enhancement
through a 90 curved bend. J Loss Prev Process Ind
1993;6(1):21e9.
[15] Guo C, Wang C, Xu S, Zhang H. Cellular pattern evolution in
gaseous detonation diffraction in a 90 -branched channel.
Combust Flame 2007;148(3):89e99.
[16] Thomas G, Oakley G, Bambrey R. An experimental study of
flame acceleration and deflagration to detonation transition
in representative process piping. Process Saf Environ Prot
2010;88(2):75e90.
Please cite this article in press as: Emami SD, et al., Experimental study on premixed hydrogen/air and hydrogenemethane/air
mixtures explosion in 90 degree bend pipeline, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.ijhydene.2013.08.056