Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
overeducation? !
Overview!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Deni&ons;
Methodology;
Does
overeduca&on
impact
on
the
following
elds?
Wage
penal&es;
Job
sa&sfac&on;
Job
Mobility/Job
quiAng;
Job
mismatching;
Does
overeduca&on
have
an
impact
on
produc&vity;
Does
overeduca&on
have
a
s&gma
eect?
Policy;
References.
Definitions!
Sloane,
Peter
J.
(2014
November)
Different methodology!
Cross Section Data!
Provide information at just one
point in time;!
Have predominated in the
literature.!
Wage Penalties!
In the past: Cross sectional studies show that there is a !
negative wage impact for male college graduate who are over
educated only or over skilled only. !
Now: Only male graduates that change from a wellmatched job to one for which they are both overeducated
and overskilled suer a wage penalty.!
Job satisfaction!
Job satisfaction is treated as an outcome of
mismatch!
Where
! a mismatch does not reduce job satisfaction, it is likely that the
mismatch reflects a voluntary underutilization of qualifications or skills.!
Overeducation!
!
No eects on job satisfaction!
Overskilling!
Alone or combined with overeducation quickly reduces job
satisfaction!
!
According to the Cross section model this is true and with a
rate of 22%;!
Job mobility
Job quitting!
Only overeducation on its own, or jointly with overskilling increases the
probability of quitting as a consequence of job mismatching. !
!
Why?!
- Workers may temporarily accept jobs for which they are overqualified in order to gain
training and experience for a next better job (John Robst, 1995).!
!
Male college graduates who are overskilled only are no more likely to quit than are male
graduates who are well matched, after the analysis controls for unobserved individual
dierences.!
!
Overskilling alone has not a significant impact on job quitting!
Propensity of mismatched
workers to remain in
mismatched jobs!
The eect of previous overskill mismatches on present overskilling mismatches is positive but diminishes
over time.!
Example: A college graduate who has never been overskilled for a job has a 4.6% probability of becoming
overskilled in the following year. By contrast, a college graduate who was overskilled in each of the previous
three years has a 38% probability of being overskilled in the following year. !
Data suggest:!
High persistence or a scarring eect from being in an overskill mismatch;!
Less persistence of mismatching for college graduates in mismatching jobs compared to other workers;!
A greater wage penalty for college graduates.!
!
Public policy therefore needs to consider not only the extent and persistence of skill mismatch, but also
the size and persistence of the associated wage eects of such persistence if the problem is to be targeted
eciently.!
The
data
indicate
that
mismatched
workers
are
more
likely
to
have
a
posi0ve
answer
than
unemployed
workers.
Policy!
Public policy makers should consider: !
1. The mismatch amplitude and duration;!
2. The impact and the persistence of the eects
on the wage;!
3. Overskilling issue more than overeducation;!
4. Employers should be informed of the
potential negative eects of overskilling.!
12
References
Sloane,
Peter
J.
Overeduca&on,
skill
mismatches,
and
labor
market
outcomes
for
college
graduates
(2014
November)
Retrieved
November
24,
2014
from
Ins&tute
for
the
Study
of
Labour,
h9p://www.Iza.org
Kampelmann,
Stephan;
Rycx,
Franois
The
impact
of
educa&onal
mismatch
on
rm
produc&vity:
Evidence
from
linked
panel
data
(2012
December)
Retrieved
November
24,
2014
from
Econstor,
h9p://www.econstor.eu
Robst,
John.
"Career
mobility,
job
match,
and
overeduca&on."
Eastern
Economic
Journal
(Fall
1995):
539-550.
Retrieved
November
24,
2014
from
hkp://college.holycross.edu
Baert,
S&jn,
and
Dieter
Verhaest.
"Unemployment
or
overeduca&on:
which
is
a
worse
signal
to
employers?."
(2014
-
July).
Retrieved
November
24,
2014
from
from
Econstor,
,
h9p://
www.econstor.eu
13