Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
69
One way to clarify the concept of PTRS is to compare it to PTSD. There are four
major differences between PTSD and PTRS: (1) the nature of the stressor criterion; (2)
the initial response to the stressor; (3) the way of coping with the traumatized state;
and (4) the inclusion of a category of relational symptoms.
The Nature of the Stressor Criterion
In recent years there has been extensive emphasis on the mechanism and effects of
trauma in such areas of human violence as wartime atrocities and other forms of
physical abuse of adults or children (Herman, 1995). The change in the description of
the stressor in the DSM-IV criteria for PTSD, from the DSM-III-R description, can be
seen as reflecting the trend to focus on physical trauma. In the DSM-III-R, the description of the stressor is: The person has experienced an event that is outside the range
of usual human experience and that would be markedly distressing to almost anyone
(American Psychiatric Association, 1987, p. 250). In the DSM-IV, the description of
the stressor is: The person experienced, witnessed, or was confronted with an event or
events that involved actual or threatened death or serious injury, or a threat to the
physical integrity of self or others (American Psychiatric Association, 2000, p. 467).
In their attempt to objectively define trauma (which is indeed qualitatively different
from stress, as even the physiological research demonstrates; Shavlev, 1997; Shavlev,
Yehuda, & McFarlane, 2000), they left out many types of events, which can cause
PTSD or other trauma-based disorders. Surveys of women who have experienced
physical, emotional, and sexual abuse as adults have often found that the emotional
abuse was reported to have been the most devastating (Fortune 1981; Fujiwara, Hayashi,
Creadick & Smith, 1991). Indeed, reviews of the literature in the field of
psychotraumatology have revealed that of the various types of traumatic stressors,
interpersonal stressors are characteristically associated with the highest rates of longterm trauma responses (Shavlev, 1997). Even in the DSM-III-Rs description of PTSD,
it was acknowledged that: The disorder is apparently more severe and longer lasting
70
71
latter. Thus, for example, sadistic treatment (i.e., malevolent intent) in an intimate
relationship is likely to be more traumatic than a similar behavior by a stranger.
Response to the Stressor
PTSD was an excellent beginning point in developing a disorder whose ultimate
cause is outside the self and which acknowledges the psychological consequences of
severe environmental stressors (Everett & Gallop, 2001). However, critics have argued
that this is only one possible protean sequel following trauma (Bowman, 1999; Paris,
2000). The rationale is that beyond the stressor, it is the person, and his or her past
experience and personality traits, which may ultimately influence how the person will
experience, react to, and deal with lifes traumatic events (Bowman, 1999; Paris,
2000). Thus, the symptoms described in PTSD may be only one of a number of types
of mental health disorders resulting from trauma. For example, there are some symptoms that are commonly experienced by the traumatized which PTSD does not include, such as alterations of self-perceptions, changes in ones interpersonal functioning, vulnerability to repeated self-injury or repeated injury from others, and problems
with self-regulation of behavior (Everett & Gallop, 2001; Roth, Newman, Pelcovitz,
Van der Kolk & Mandel, 1997). Thus, the symptoms resulting from traumatic stressors
may be more diverse than what is included in the DSM-IV definition of PTSD.
This brings us to the second difference between PTSD and PTRS. In PTSD, the
persons response involve[s] intense fear, helplessness, or horror (American Psychiatric Association, 2000, p. 467). In PTRS, the persons response to the traumatic event
involves rage at the perpetrator and intense fear/terror or horror. Thus, in PTRS, the
person is in touch with the feelings justifiably associated with being put in the victims
role (viz., rage).
The Way of Coping with the Trauma
Another way in which symptomological patterns resulting from trauma can differ
from PTSD is that they may exclude a category of symptoms required for the diagnosis of PTSD, due to a different response to the experience of trauma. As longitudinal
studies like the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study (Kulka et al., 1990)
and the Grant Study (Lee, Valiant, Torrey, & Elder, 1995) indicate, there is need to
develop a posttraumatic disorder in which the full criteria of PTSD are not met. Failure
to meet the full criteria of PTSD is the case in PTRS, and is thus another major
difference between PTSD and PTRS. In PTRS, symptoms in category C of PTSD
(viz., persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma and numbing of
general responsiveness; American Psychiatric Association, 2000, p. 468) are not
present. This is the most salient difference as PTRS describes a very different way of
coping with the trauma than in PTSD. Indeed, the numbing of emotional responsiveness is considered by many to be the hallmark of PTSD (Herman, 1992; Shavlev et al.,
2000), and dissociation, especially at the time of the trauma, has been found to be one
of the best indicators of subsequently developing PTSD (Vanderkolk, 1996).
72
73
Relational Symptoms
As trauma in PTSD does not necessarily include trauma in the interpersonal realm,
relational symptoms are, of course, not included. Given that in PTRS the trauma
occurred in the context of an intimate relationship, sometimes referred to as attachment trauma (Allen, 1995), it tends to create problems in ones interpersonal realm.
Because one is more vulnerable in intimate relationships, violation of such basic
principles as trust, fairness, and goodwill is likely to be more traumatic than in
nonintimate relationships (Cardelli, 1997; Hirogogen, 1991), for what is supposed to
be ones harbor of greatest safety becomes a source of unfathomable terror. This can
create a maimed paradigm of interpersonal intimacy (Janoff-Bulman, 1995; Simpson,
1993), leading to concerns about trust and a generalized sense of unsafety.
Consequently, issues of trust created by attachment trauma may become generalized to future relationships (Everett & Gallop, 2001; Hirigogen, 1998; Loring, 1994;
Van der Kolk, 1987). Terror of getting re-victimized in a new relationship is very
common (Everett & Gallop, 2001). The person is hypervigilant about emotionally
intimate relationships and is continually on surveillance for signs of what, for them,
could signify impending overt (e.g., betrayal, abandonment), or covert abuse. In severe
cases of PTRS, individuals may forego new intimate relationships, having great difficulty in initiating and/or maintaining them (see also Krystal, 1993). For those who
have undergone sexual abuse, such trust issues are particularly salient in their sexual
relationships (Lobel, 1992).
POSTTRAUMATIC RELATIONSHIP SYNDROME
74
75
the world of trauma than that in PTSD (or Acute Stress Disorder); and (2) to
highlight the fact that traumatic stressors in the context of an emotionally intimate
relationship are particularly likely to create long-term trauma responses (Allen, 1995;
American Psychiatric Association, 1987; Shavlev, 1997). Further, as our clinical experience has shown, not only is PTRS a qualitatively different syndrome than PTSD, the
treatment approach to the two disorders is significantly different. This is understandable in light of the conscious versus often unconscious experience of the world of
trauma previously described. In PTSD, the client needs assistance in getting in touch
with that world (i.e., less use of avoiding coping) so that the process of working
through the feelings and integrating the experience into the self can begin. In PTRS,
on the other hand, the client remains too acutely aware of the trauma and its aftermath
(i.e., there is an overuse of emotion-focused coping), which, as Herman (1992) suggests, can lead to unnecessary retraumatization of the individual. Thus, in PTRS, the
client needs to employ more desensitization techniques to make the processing of the
traumatic experience(s) more manageable and integrate the experience(s) into the self
at a rate that is tolerable.
CONCLUSION
Although PTSD is one long-term response to trauma, it is not the only long-term
response pattern. We are proposing another trauma-induced syndrome, PTRS, which is
a function of trauma experienced in the context of an emotionally intimate relationship. It differs from PTSD in a number of ways, the most salient of which is the lack
of numbing of emotional responsiveness and avoidance of stimuli associated with the
trauma. This creates a qualitatively different way of coping with the trauma. Future
research on this disorder should investigate which population groups are most likely to
develop PTRS, what resilience factors protect others who suffered intimate interpersonal trauma from developing it, and how it can best be treated.
NOTES
Accepted for publication: November 22, 2002.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Debra VanderVoort, University of Hawaii at Hilo, Social Sciences
Division, Department of Psychology, 200 W. Kawili, Hilo, HI 96720. E-mail: dvanderv@hawaii.edu.
REFERENCES
Allen, J. G. (1995). Coping with trauma: A guide to self-understanding. American Psychiatric Press 1995
American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd Ed.,
Revised). Washington, D.C.: Author
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed.).
Washington, D.C.: Author.
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed.,
Text Revised). Washington, D.C.: Author.
Becker, D. (1995). The deficiency of the concept of the concept of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder when
dealing with victims of human rights violation. In R.J. Kebler, C.J. Figley, & B.R. Gersons (Eds).
Beyond trauma: Cultural and societal dynamics (pp. 99110). New York: Plenum Press.
76
Bowman, M.K. (1999). Individual difference in posttraumatic distress: Problems with the DSM-IV model.
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 2133.
Cardarelli, A.P. (1997). Violence between intimate partners: Patterns, causes and effects. Toronto: Allyn
& Bacon.
Everett, B., & Gallop, R. (2001). The link between childhood trauma and mental illness. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Fortune, M. (1981). Family violence: A workshop manual for clergy and other service providers. Rockville,
MD: The National Clearinghouse on Domestic Violence.
Freud, S. (1949). An outline of psychoanalysis. New York: Norton. (Originally published in 1938.)
Fujiwara, E.J, Hayashi, L.A., Creadick, J.P., & Smith, S.L. (1991). Our rights, our lives: A guide to
womens legal rights in Hawaii (2nd Ed.). Honolulu: Hawaii Women Lawyers.
Globe & Mail (2002). Relational disorder. Toronto, Canada, Sept. 17, p.11 (author unknown).
Hammond, N. (1989). Lesbian victims of relationship violence. Women and Therapy, 8, 89105
Herman, J.L. (1992). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.
Herman, J.L. (1995). Complex PTSD: A syndrome in survivors of prolonged and repeated trauma. In G.
Everly, Jr., & J. Lating (Eds.), Psychotraumatology: Key papers and core concepts in post-traumatic
stress (pp. 87100). New York: Plenum Press.
Hirigogen, M.F. (1998). Stalking the Soul: Emotional Abuse and Erosion of Identity. New York: Hilen
Marx Books.
JanoffBulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Toward a new psychology of trauma. New York: The
Free Press.
Khan, M. (1977). Das kumulative trauma. In M. Khan (Ed.), Selbserfahrung in der therapie (pp. 7496).
Munich: Kindler Verlag..
Krysal, H. (1993). Beyond the DSM-III-R: therapeutic considerations in posttraumatic stress disorder. In
J.P. Wilson, B. Raphael (Eds.). International handbook of traumatic stress syndromes (pp. 841854).
New York: Plenum Press.
Kulka, R.A., Schlenger, W.E., Fairbank, J.A., Hough, R.L., Jordan, B.K., Marmar, C.R., Weiss D.S.
(1990). Trauma and the Vietnam War generation: Report of findings from the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Lee, K.A., Valliant, G.E., Torrey, W.C., & Elder, G. H. (1995). A 50-year prospective study of the
psychological sequel of World War II combat. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152(4), 516522.
Lobel, C.M. (1992). Relationship between childhood sexual abuse and borderline personality disorder in
women psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1(1), 6380.
Loring, M.T. (1994). Emotional abuse. New York: Lexington Books.
Obrien, L.S. (1998). Traumatic events and mental health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paris, J. (2000). Predispositions, personality traits, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Harvard Review of
Psychiatry, 8, 175183.
Roth, S., Newman, E. Pelcovitz, D., Van der Kolk, B., & Mandel, F.S. (1997). Complex PTSD in victims
exposed to sexual and physical abuse: Results from the DSM-IV field trial for posttraumatic stress
disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 10, 539555.
Shavlev, A.Y. (1997). Acute to chronic: Etiology and pathophysiology of PTSD B A biopsychological
approach. In: C.S. Fullerton & R.J Ursano (Eds.), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Acute and long-term
response to trauma and disaster (pp. 209240). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Shavlev, A., Yehuda, R., & McFarlane, A. (Eds.) (2000). International handbook of human responses to
trauma. New York: Plenum.
Simpson, M.A. (1993). Traumatic stress and the bruising of the soul: The effects of torture and coercive
interrogation. In J.P. Wilson & B. Raphael (Eds.), International handbook of traumatic stress syndromes
(pp.667685). New York: Plenum.
Vaillant, G. E. (1992). Ego mechanisms of defense: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Washington
D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.
Van der Kolk, B. (1987). Psychological trauma. Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Van der Kolk, B. (1996). The body keeps score: Approaches to the psychobiology of posttraumatic stress
disorder. In B. Van der Kolk, A. McFarlane, & L. Wesaeth (Eds.), Traumatic stress: The effects of
overwhelming experience on mind, body, and society (pp. 214241). New York: Guilford.
VanderVoort, D. J. (2001, May). Posttraumatic Relationship Disorder. Paper presented at the 2001 annual
convention of the Western Psychological Association, Maui, HI.
VanderVoort, D. J., & Rokach, A. (in press). Posttraumatic Relationship Syndrome: The conscious processing of the world of trauma. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal.
World Health Organization (1992). International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition.
Geneva: Author