Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
3)
For each risk issue in every activity, the highest rating was taken as the risk rating to describe the
worst case scenario.
A total of 8 risk issues were identified.
(R1) - Barge contact with platform during setup and anchor drop / drag live existing pipeline
(R2)- Heat radiation and fire ball within 42.5m radius.
(R3)- Pipe buckle (Pipeline pick-up)
(R4)- Pipe buckle (Barge side walk)
(R5)- (1) Drop object on diver
(R5)- (2) Wrong measurement
(R6)- (1) Diver hit by riser clamp during setup
(R6)- (2) Injury during water jet cleaning
(R6)- (3) Hand pinch
(R6)- (4) Drop object on diver
(R7)- Rigging failure during lifting and lowering of Riser
On overall, 0 of the risk issues fell under "Very High Risk", 1 rated in "High Risk), 5 risk issues were
rated as "Medium Risk" and 5 "Low Risk".After applying appropriate mitigation measures the ratings
were reduced as depicted below.
4)
1) People
Assessment Before Mitigation
1
R5
R1, R2
D
C
D
R3, R4
R5, R6,
R7
B
A
R3, R4
R1, R5, R7
R2, R5,
R6
2) Environment
Assessment Before Mitigation
1
2
3
4
C
R5
R4
R3
R5, R6,
R7
R2
C
R1
R3, R4
R1, R2,
R5, R5,
R6, R7
3) Asset
Assessment Before Mitigation
1
2
3
4
D
R3
R1, R5,
R6, R7
R5
R3, R4
C
R2
R1, R5, R7
R2, R5,
R6
4) Reputation
Assessment Before Mitigation
1
2
3
4
C
B
R4
R3
R5
R2, R5,
R6, R7
C
R1
R3, R4
R1, R5, R7
R2, R5,
R6
A
Legend
Very High Risk
High risk
Medium Risk
Low Risk
UMMARY
existing pipeline
fter Mitigation
4
fter Mitigation
fter Mitigation
fter Mitigation
n risk register
Severity
1
Insignificant
2
Minor
3
Moderate
4
Major
People
Slight injury
Minor Injury
Major Injury
Single Fatality
Asset
Slight
Damage
Minor
Damage
Environment
Reputation
E
Almost Certain
D
Likely
C
Possible
B
Unlikely
A
Remotely likely to
happen
Low Risk
Medium Risk High Risk
Very High Ris -
Happens several
times per year at
location
Happens several
times per year in
company
Incident has
occurred in our
company
Heard of incident
in industry
Never heard in
industry
Major Impact
Slight Impact
Limited
Impact
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
5
Catastrophic
Multiple
Fatalities
Extensive
Damage
Massive
Impact
Major
International
Impact
PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFFSHORE FACILITIES FOR SKO PIPELINE REPLACEMENT
SESSION DATE
ACTIVITY
18 August 2011
LOCATION
BARAM FIELD
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES
NO
Activities
RISK ISSUES
Location
1) Barge Setup
2) Pipeline pick-up
3) Barge side walk
CONSEQUENCES
4) Diver metrology
5) Install new riser clamp
6) Install new riser
CAUSES
RISK RATING
BEFORE
P
Barge setup
MITIGATION MEASURES
TECo Office
ACTION PARTY
DUE DATE
(1), OCS,
Prior to start
MC,BF, Surveyor work
(1), OCS,
Prior to start
MC,BF, Surveyor work
Prior to start
work
(5) Communication failure between B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) Pre-test the communication system with (1), OCS, BF,
vessels, platform, barge (e.g. radio
all relevant parties
MC, OIM
failure)
(2) Dedicated communication channel to be
established between the barge anchor
foreman, surveyor and tug boat captain
(3) Use communication language as
captured in the communication protocol
(4) Platform spreads to notify barge before
approaching platform
Prior to start
work
Prior to start
work
B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) Valid certification and visual inspection of (1) OCS, BF, MC Prior to start
towing equipment (anchor lines and tow
work
lines, winches etc)
Page 10 of 13
RISK RATING
AFTER
E
STATUS
PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFFSHORE FACILITIES FOR SKO PIPELINE REPLACEMENT
SESSION DATE
ACTIVITY
18 August 2011
LOCATION
BARAM FIELD
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES
NO
Activities
RISK ISSUES
Location
1) Barge Setup
2) Pipeline pick-up
3) Barge side walk
CONSEQUENCES
4) Diver metrology
5) Install new riser clamp
6) Install new riser
CAUSES
RISK RATING
BEFORE
P
Pipeline Pick-up
(R2)Pipe buckle
MITIGATION MEASURES
TECo Office
ACTION PARTY
DUE DATE
Prior to start
work
Prior to start
work
Page 11 of 13
RISK RATING
AFTER
Prior to start
work
STATUS
PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFFSHORE FACILITIES FOR SKO PIPELINE REPLACEMENT
SESSION DATE
ACTIVITY
18 August 2011
LOCATION
BARAM FIELD
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES
NO
Activities
RISK ISSUES
Location
1) Barge Setup
2) Pipeline pick-up
3) Barge side walk
4) Diver metrology
5) Install new riser clamp
6) Install new riser
CONSEQUENCES
CAUSES
RISK RATING
BEFORE
P
MITIGATION MEASURES
TECo Office
ACTION PARTY
DUE DATE
Barge Side-walk
(R3)Pipe buckle
Diver metrology
(2)
Schedule impact
(3) Cost impact
(4) Damage equipment
(2)
Schedule impact
(3) Cost impact
Page 12 of 13
RISK RATING
AFTER
Prior to start
work
STATUS
PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFFSHORE FACILITIES FOR SKO PIPELINE REPLACEMENT
SESSION DATE
ACTIVITY
18 August 2011
LOCATION
BARAM FIELD
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES
NO
Activities
RISK ISSUES
Location
1) Barge Setup
2) Pipeline pick-up
3) Barge side walk
CONSEQUENCES
4) Diver metrology
5) Install new riser clamp
6) Install new riser
CAUSES
RISK RATING
BEFORE
P
TECo Office
MITIGATION MEASURES
ACTION PARTY
R
BF, RF, Div
Prior to start
Supv, FE, MWS, work
Crane Op
Page 13 of 13
RISK RATING
AFTER
P
DUE DATE
STATUS