Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract
Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a multifactorial disorder with a
variety of treatment options. The assortment of components that contribute to its pathophysiology can be categorized into local joint impairments, altered lower extremity biomechanics, and overuse. A detailed
physical examination permits identification of the unique contributors for
a given individual and permits the formation of a precise, customized
treatment plan. This review aims to describe the latest evidence and
recommendations regarding rehabilitation of PFPS. We address the utility of quadriceps strengthening, soft tissue flexibility, patellar taping,
patellar bracing, hip strengthening, foot orthoses, gait reeducation, and
training modification in the treatment of PFPS.
Introduction
Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a condition
characterized by insidious onset anterior knee pain that is
magnified in the setting of increased compressive forces to
the patellofemoral joint, such as squatting, ascending or descending stairs, and prolonged sitting (47). PFPS is remarkably common, accounting for up to 25% of all knee injuries
presenting to sports medicine clinics (23). The precise etiology, however, remains poorly defined. Current understanding supports a multifactorial basis in which a diverse array
of contributing factors result in excessive patellofemoral
joint stress (Table 1).
Mounting evidence suggests that PFPS is not self-limiting,
with persistent symptoms observed in as many as 91% of
individuals after extended follow-up (72). Moreover individual responses to specific conservative strategies in isolation are unpredictable (17). The chronicity and variability of
response to treatment likely reflects the diversity of causes
and underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique contributing factors for a given individual.
This tailored approach to rehabilitation necessitates a focused history and examination, including assessment of static
Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of
Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
Address for correspondence: Michael Fredericson, MD, FACSM, Division
of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Stanford University, 450 Broadway Street, MC 6342, Redwood City,
CA 94063-6342; E-mail: mfred2@stanford.edu.
1537-890X/1303/172Y178
Current Sports Medicine Reports
Copyright * 2014 by the American College of Sports Medicine
172
Copyright 2014 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Table 1.
Etiologic contributors to PFPS.
Training Errors/Overuse
Quadriceps weakness
Impaired VM function
Pes planus
Gastrocnemius
Iliotibial band
Hamstring
exercise promotes strengthening throughout the arc of motion. Moreover open kinetic chain exercises (especially in the
range of 90-Y45-) may be better tolerated in the acute phases
of PFPS when there is significant weakness or pain with
weight bearing (31). In the long run, however, closed kinetic
chain exercises with an emphasis on cocontraction of the
hamstring and quadriceps muscles have proven overall superior to open kinetic chain exercises in improving function
(2,84). Thus closed kinetic chain exercises should be incorporated to the rehabilitation program as early as a patient is
able to tolerate (15).
Table 2.
Approach to PFPS management.
Local factors
Causative Element
Management Considerations
Patellar malposition/maltracking
Patella alta
Patellar taping
Patellar bracing
Tight quadriceps
Tight hamstring
Lower extremity
biomechanics
Foot malposition
Gait
Tight gastrocnemius
Static hip abductor weakness,
Dynamic knee valgum,
Excessive hip adduction with
SLS, and Contralateral pelvic
drop with single leg squat
Excessive pronation contributing
to increased femoral rotation
Ipsilateral hip adduction
Foot orthosis
Gait retraining
Overly rapid
exercise progression
NA
Relative rest
Correct training errors
www.acsm-csmr.org
Copyright 2014 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
173
Once vasti activation imbalance is recognized, several techniques may be effective to modify VM discrepancies. EMG
biofeedback measures neuromuscular contractions and provides auditory or visual feedback signals designed to increase
awareness and voluntary control of muscle activation. When
combined with therapeutic exercise, EMG biofeedback aimed
at increasing VMO activation while maintaining constant VL
activity has been shown to improve VMO/VL activation ratios (53). Patellar taping, discussed in greater detail below,
may likewise represent a useful adjuvant to augment temporal activation of the VMO (14,19).
Soft tissue flexibility
Stretching the muscles that surround the knee is another
commonly employed technique in the management of PFPS.
Inflexibility of both the rectus femoris and the gastrocnemius has been prospectively associated with development of
PFPS (84). Cross-sectional studies likewise have observed a
relationship of hamstring and iliotibial band tightness to the
presence of PFPS (37,65). The iliotibial band, in particular,
appears to play an essential role in patellar maltracking, with
its derivative fibers comprising the strongest and most substantial layer of the lateral retinaculum. The transverse orientation of these fibers serves to resist medial displacement of
the patella; however, when excessively tight, it may result in
disproportionate lateral translation. Cadaveric studies support this notion, demonstrating increased lateral patellar shift
and tilt with augmented iliotibial band loads (42,46). Furthermore among a small sample of patients, surgical release
of iliotibial tract contracture has been shown to result in reduced lateral patellar subluxation and patellar tilt (87).
Generalized stretching protocols that encompass the
quadriceps, hamstring, gastrocnemius, and iliotibial band
have established benefit, especially when combined with an
exercise program. In a randomized, controlled, single-blind
trial, Moyano et al. (50) demonstrated significant reductions
in pain among individuals managed with a stretching routine
combined with strengthening or aerobic exercise. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching, in particular, a
technique combining passive and isometric stretching, may
yield enhanced pain control and function. However there is
currently a paucity of research addressing isolated stretching
protocols. Of the two controlled studies examining the role of
isolated rectus femoris stretching in PFPS (45,58), only one
showed significant clinical improvement (45). There are no
randomized clinical trials that assess directed hamstring or
iliotibial band stretching in the management of PFPS.
Although further investigation is necessary to identify
whether specific muscles or stretches contribute more significantly to clinical improvement in PFPS, a stretching
protocol aimed to reverse identified inflexibility of the quadriceps, gastrocnemius, hamstring, and/or iliotibial band is a
valuable component of PFPS rehabilitation. Given the role of
the iliotibial tract on patellar tracking, an emphasis on relieving iliotibial band tightness may prove particularly high yield,
especially in individuals with concurrent maltracking and
iliotibial band tightness on examination.
Patellar taping
A variety of taping methods have been proposed with the
tailored McConnell taping technique representing the standard
Rehabilitation of Patellofemoral Pain
Copyright 2014 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Hip strength
Deficits in hip muscle performance, particularly the external rotators and abductors including gluteus maximus and
medius, could result in internal rotation of the femur during
dynamic lower limb functions and consequent increased patellofemoral compressive forces. Multiple studies have established a correlation between hip external rotator and abductor
weakness in women with PFPS (8,38). Altered neuromuscular
activity of gluteus medius and maximus also has been associated with PFPS (51).
Recent experience corroborates the incorporation of hip
strengthening in the management of PFPS, especially for the
female population. In 2008, Nakagawa et al. (51) published
the first randomized controlled trial investigating the utility
of a hip strengthening protocol. This study demonstrated that
the addition of hip abduction and external rotation strengthening exercises to a traditional rehabilitation program of patellar mobilization and quadriceps strengthening results in less
pain and improved gluteus medius neuromuscular activation
(51). Since that time, four additional randomized controlled
trials investigating female patients with PFPS have supported
hip strengthening further in reducing patellofemoral pain and
optimizing function (25,34,35,41). Importantly when compared to knee stretching and strengthening alone, the addition
of targeted hip exercise appears to provide significantly more
lasting benefits at 1 year and minimize risk of pain relapse
(35). Thus targeted hip muscle strengthening is encouraged for
PFPS rehabilitation, particularly in women who demonstrate
static or dynamic evidence of hip weakness and medial femoral
collapse on physical examination. Exercises should address the
gluteus medius and maximus specifically. Gluteus medius may
be targeted with side-lying abduction and single-limb squats.
Gluteus maximus is best recruited using front planks with hip
Current Sports Medicine Reports
Copyright 2014 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
175
Copyright 2014 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
References
1. Arazpour M, et al. The effect of patellofemoral bracing on walking in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 2013;
37:465Y70.
2. Bakhtiary A, Fatemi E. Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises for patellar
chondromalacia. Br. J. Sports Med. 2008; 42:99Y102.
3. Barton CJ, et al. Foot and ankle characteristics in patellofemoral pain syndrome: a case controlled and reliability study. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.
2010; 40:286Y96.
4. Barton CJ, Menz HB, Crossley KM. Clinical predictors of foot orthoses efficacy in individuals with patellofemoral pain. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011;
43:1603Y10.
5. Barton CJ, Menz HB, Crossley KM. Effects of prefabricated foot orthoses on
pain and function in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a cohort
study. Phys. Ther. Sport. 2011; 12:70Y5.
6. Barton CJ, Menz HB, Crossley KM. The immediate effects of foot orthoses
on functional performance in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Br. J. Sports Med. 2011; 45:193Y7.
7. Barton C, Balachandar V, Lack S, Morrissey D. Patellar taping for
patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate clinical outcomes and biomechanical mechanisms. Br. J. Sports Med. 2014;
48(6):417Y24.
8. Bolgla LA, Malone TR, Umberger BR, Uhl TL. Hip strength and hip and knee
kinematics during stair descent in females with and without patellofemoral
pain syndrome. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2008; 38:12Y8.
9. Boling MC, et al. A prospective investigation of biomechanical risk factors for patellofemoral pain syndrome: the joint undertaking to monitor
and prevent ACL injury (JUMP-ACL) cohort. Am. J. Sports Med. 2009;
37:2108Y16.
www.acsm-csmr.org
Copyright 2014 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
177
64. Powers CM, Landel R, Perry J. Timing and intensity of vastus muscle activity
during functional activities in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain.
Phys. Ther. 1996; 76:946Y55.
65. Puniello M. Iliotibial band tightness and medial patellar glide in patients with
patellofemoral dysfunction. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1993; 17:144Y8.
66. Reischl SF, Powers CM, Rao S, Perry J. The relationship between foot pronation and rotation of the tibia and femur during walking. Foot Ankle Int.
1999; 20:513Y20.
67. Rodrigues P, Trampas T, Van Emmerik R, Hamill J. Evaluating runners with
and without anterior knee pain using the time to contact the ankle joint
complexes range of motion boundary. Gait Posture. 2014; 39:48Y53.
68. Salsich GB, Brechter JH, Farwell D, Powers CM. The effects of patellar
taping on knee kinetics, kinematics, and vastus lateralis muscle activity
during stair ambulation in individuals with patellofemoral pain. J. Orthop.
Sports Phys. Ther. 2002; 32:3Y10.
69. Souza DR, Gross MT. Comparison of vastus medialis obliquus: vastus
lateralis muscle integrated electromyographic ratios between healthy subjects
and patients with patellofemoral pain. Phys. Ther. 1991; 71:310Y6.
70. Souza RB, et al. Femur rotation and patellofemoral joint kinematics: a
weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging analysis. J. Orthop. Sports Phys.
Ther. 2010; 40:277Y85.
71. Souza RB, Powers CM. Predictors of hip rotation during running: an evaluation of hip strength and femoral structure in women with and without
patellofemoral pain. Am. J. Sports Med. 2009; 37:579Y87.
72. Stathopulu E, Baildam E. Anterior knee pain: a long term follow-up. Rheumatology. 2003; 42:380Y2.
73. Steinkamp LA, et al. Biomechanical considerations in patellofemoral joint
rehabilitation. Am. J. Sports Med. 1993; 21:438Y44.
74. Syme G, Rowe P, Martin D, et al. Disability in patients with chronic
patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomised controlled trial of VMO selective training versus general quadriceps strengthening. Man. Ther. 2009;
14:252Y63.
75. Thijs Y, De Clercq D, Roosen P, Witvrouw E. Gait-related intrinsic risk
factors for patellofemoral pain in novice recreational runners. Br. J. Sports
Med. 2008; 42:466Y71.
76. Tiberio D. The effect of excessive subtalar joint pronation on patellofemoral
mechanics: a theoretical model. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1987; 9:160Y5.
77. Vicenzino B, Collins N, Cleland J, McPoil T. A clinical prediction rule for
identifying patients with patellofemoral pain who are likely to benefit from foot
orthoses: a preliminary determination. Br. J. Sports Med. 2010; 44:862Y6.
78. Voight ML, Wieder DL. Comparative reflex response times of vastus
medialis obliquus and vastus lateralis in normal subjects and subjects with
extensor mechanism dysfunction. An electromyographic study. Am. J. Sports
Med. 1991; 19:131Y7.
79. Whittingham M, Palmer S, Macmillan F. Effects of taping on pain and
function in patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2004; 34: 504Y10.
80. Willson JD, Binder-Macleod S, Davis IS. Lower extremity jumping mechanics of female athletes with and without patellofemoral pain before and
after exertion. Am. J. Sports Med. 2008; 36:1587Y96.
81. Willson JD, Davis IS. Lower extremity mechanics of females with and
without patellofemoral pain across activities with progressively greater task
demands. Clin. Biomech. 2008; 23:203Y11.
82. Willy RW, Scholz JP, Davis IS. Mirror gait retraining for the treatment of
patellofemoral pain in female runners. Clin. Biomech. 2012; 27:1045Y51.
83. Willy RW, Davis IS. The effect of a hip-strengthening program on mechanics
during running and during a single-leg squat. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.
2011; 41:625Y32.
84. Witvrouw E, Lysens R, Bellemans J, et al. Open versus closed kinetic chain
exercises for patellofemoral pain: a prospective, randomized study. Am. J.
Sports Med. 2000; 28:687Y94.
60. Powers CM, et al. Patellofemoral pain: proximal, distal, and local factors. J.
Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2012; 42:A1Y54.
85. Witvrouw E, et al. Reflex response times of vastus medialis oblique and
vastus lateralis in normal subjects and in subjects with patellofemoral pain
syndrome. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1996; 24:160Y5.
86. Wong YM. Recording the vastii muscle onset timing as a diagnostic parameter
for patellofemoral pain syndrome: fact or fad? Phys. Ther. Sport. 2009; 10:71Y4.
62. Powers CM, et al. The effect of bracing on patella alignment and
patellofemoral joint contact area. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2004; 36:1226Y32.
87. Wu CC, Shih CH. The influence of iliotibial tract on patellar tracking. Orthopedics. 2004; 27:199Y203.
63. Powers CM, et al. The effects of patellar taping on stride characteristics and
joint motion in subjects with patellofemoral pain. J. Orthop. Sports Phys.
Ther. 1997; 26:286Y91.
178
Copyright 2014 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.