Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
If you have sufficient training and experience with logs, log analysis methods,
and a year or two in the oil and gas industry, you can probably perform the basi
c petrophysical analysis tasks without learning everything on this website. In f
act, many engineers, geologists, and technical staff are given, or build for the
mselves, calculator or spreadsheet programs that can do a credible job with very
minimal training.
Some of the quicklook methods embedded in these programs may be "local" or conta
in assumptions that do not apply universally. The following material provides si
mplified, quicklook math suitable for programmable calculator or spreadsheet sof
tware that covers about 95% of the world/s oil and gas reservoirs. More detail o
n the methods, and alternate methods, are contained elsewhere in this Handbook.
This presentation assumes that you have mastered the concept of the log response
equation and the visual log analysis rules contained in other sections of this
Chapter.
A spreadsheet that performs the math is available for download and is illustrate
d here.
SHALE VOLUME
Shale is an imprecise term used to describe a rock composed of clay, silt, and b
ound water. The clay type and silt composition can vary considerably from one pl
ace to another. These can be determined from appropriate cross plots of PE, thor
ium, and potassium logs. The bound water volume varies with clay type, depth of
burial, and burial history. Some shales have not lost as much water as others at
similar depths and are called overpressured shales. Most shales are radioactive
due to potassium and thorium, and sometimes due to uranium.
Shale volume, shown in black, can be estimated from logs in a number of ways. Th
e result is
the average over the interval measured by a log and is independent of the shale
distribution. Blue shading represents the effective porosity.
Shale volume estimation is the first calculation step in a log analysis. All oth
er calculations depend on the shale volume being known from this step.
STEP 1: Convert density log (gm/cc or Kg/m3) to porosity units if a density poro
sity log is not available (skip this step if density data is already in porosity
units):
1: PHIDSH = (DENSSH
KD2) / (KD1
KD2) do this once in an obvious shale zone
2: PHID = (DENS
KD2) / (KD1
KD2) do this for every data level
Where:
KD1 =
KD2 =
KD2 =
KD2 =
KD2 =
KD2 =
KD2 =
KD1
1000
2.65
2650
2.71
2710
2.87
2870
NOTE: The choice for KD2 must match the neutron log units
if neutron is in Limes
tone units, KD2 must be 2.71 for gm/cc or 2710 for Kg/m3 log scale.
STEP 2: Calculate shale volume from the three common methods:
3: Vshg = (GR - GR0) / (GR100 - GR0)
PORE VOLUME
The second calculation step in a log analysis is to find shale
y. Pore volume is the space in a rock filled with oil, gas, or
sity includes the bound water in the shale and is called PHIt.
y does not include bound water, and is called PHIe. When there
equals PHIt.
corrected porosit
water. Total poro
Effective porosit
is no shale, PHIe
Logs read total porosity. All our analysis methods correct for shale, so the ans
wers from any method presented below will give effective porosity. Some analysis
methods NEED total porosity as an intermediate step, so you may also need to ca
lculate it.
Raw log porosity, as presented in the field by the service company, does NOT tak
e into account shale or lithology effects, so raw log readings should NEVER be u
sed as answers. Log analysis MUST ALWAYS be done to find the correct porosity. A
ll our analysis methods also account for matrix rock (lithology), but YOU may be
required to define the rock type for some methods. Other methods will define th
e lithology for you.
POROSITY FROM THE COMPLEX LITHOLOGY DENSITY NEUTRON CROSSPLOT
While there are many other porosity methods, the best method available for moder
n, simple, log analysis involves the density neutron crossplot. Several variatio
ns on the theme are common, but not all models are recommended. A crossplot meth
od, called the shaly sand model was once widely used. It was found to be a poor
model for any sandstone that contained other minerals in addition to quartz. The
complex lithology model works equally well in quartz sands as in mixtures, so i
t is the preferred model today. Although the name of the method is complicated,
the mathematics are not.
NORMAL CASES:
STEP 1: Shale correct the density and neutron log data for each layer:
1: PHIdc = PHID
(Vsh * PHIDSH)
2: PHInc = PHIN (Vsh * PHINSH)
PHIDSH and PHINSH are constants for each zone, and are picked only once.
STEP 2: Check for gas crossover after shale corrections and calculate porosity f
or each layer from the correct equation:
KD1
1000
2.65
2.71
1.80
2.00
CASE 3: IF rock is dolomite AND porosity is less than 5%, use the following inst
ead of Equation 4 or 5:
10: E = (4 - (3.3 + 10 ^ (-5 * PHInc - 0.16))
11: PHIxdn = (E * PHIdc + 0.754 * PHInc) / (E + 0.754)
This option can be used instead of equation 4 as long as there is no gas crossov
er after shale corrections. It is slightly more accurate, but requires a compute
r or preprogrammed calculator.
Bad hole, high shale volume, and statistical variations can cause erratic result
s in both very low and high porosities. Values from any method used should be tr
immed by the following:
1: IF PHIe < 0
2: THEN PHIe = 0
3: IF PHIe > PHIMAX * (1 - Vsh)
4: THEN PHImx = PHIMAX * (1 - Vsh)
5: AND PHIe = Min (PHIe, PHImx)
PARAMETERS:
PHIDSH
PHINSH