Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
And
Technical studies
PREFACE
The MFC curriculum is designed in such a way that
student can grasp maximum knowledge and can get practical
exposure to the corporate world in minimum possible time.
Business schools of today realize the importance of practical
knowledge over the theoretical base. The Spring Internship
Program provides an opportunity to the students in
understanding the industry with special emphasis on the
development of skills in analyzing and interpreting practical
problems through the application of management theories and
techniques. It is a new platform of learning through practical
experience, which incorporates survey and comparative
analysis. It gives the student an opportunity to relate the
theory with the practice, to test the validity and applicability
of his/her classroom learning against real life business
situations. 1
ACKNOWLADGEMENT
DECLARATION
I do hereby declare that this project report entitled
Working Capital Management of RSP is prepared
by me on the basis of the information collected by me
during the duration of 33 days i.e. from 1 st May, 2014 to
16th June, 2014, under the valuable guidance of Shri. S.
R. BEHERA Manager (F&A) Sales Accounts
Department. I hereby declare that I have fulfilled all the
provisions of institutional training in Rourkela Steel Plant.
During my training I gained knowledge on capital
structure and cost of capital of Rourkela Steel Plant,
Rourkela.
MADHUSMITA ROUT
Roll No 13MFC27
MFC (2013-15)
COMPANY PROFILE
Muhtar Kent is the current chairman & chief executive of the company.
The Coca-Cola Company is a beverage company which has several
competitors throughout the world. But the leading competitors of the
company globally are PepsiCo, Nestle and Dr. Pepper Snapple Group.
The people of Hong-Kong use Coca-Cola as a medicine for cough &
cold, by serving it hot then its normal temperature. 7
Committees of the Board:2.1 Audit Committee of Directors The Board of Directors of the Company has
constituted the Audit Committee of Directors to oversee the companys financial
reporting process and disclosure of financial information and to review Internal
Audit reports, findings of internal investigations. All accounting and financial
policies of the company are being considered by the Audit Committee before
submission to the Board. The Audit Committee comprises of three NonExecutive Directors and one Executive Director. The Chairman of the Audit
Committee is Non-Executive Director.
Bond / Debenture Committee of Directors:The Board of Directors have constituted the Bond/Debenture
Committee of Directors comprising of two members to expeditiously consider
and approve allotment / issue, transfer, transmission, consolidation, splitting of
bonds of the Company and other related issues.
Policies of NINL :-
Quality Policy
Human Resource Policy
Environmental Policy
Human Resource Development Policy
Energy Policy
Occupational Health And Safety Policy
Quality Policies
We, at NINL are committed to meet the needs and expectations of customers
and other interested parties. To accomplish this, we will :
Produce quality products and provide services to all customers to earn
their confidence and their delight.
We, at NINL believe that our employees are the most important resource. To
realize the full potential of the employees, the company is committed to
Provide work environment that makes the employees committed and
motivated for maximizing productivity.
Group of ratios
Historical comparison
RATIOS:The calculation of ratios may not be a difficult task but their use is not
easy. Following guidelines or factors may be kept in mind while interpreting
various ratios is
Accuracy of financial statements
Objective or purpose of analysis
Selection of ratios
Use of standards
Caliber of the analysis
other parties interested in the financial ability of a business concern. These three
basis of classification are as follows :
1. Traditional classification
2. Significant classification
3. Functional classification
1. Traditional classification
business. Therefore, the ratio can also be classified into the two categories
according to their importance for inter- firm comparison these are:
A. Primary ratio
B. Secondary ratio
A. primary ratio:The ratio which are considered as most important for the
inter-firm comparison are call primary ratio there is only one such ratio which
is the return on capital employed . The firm earning higher rate of profit on its
capital employed is comparatively better in its overall activities.
B. Secondary ratio:-The ratio which are not so important for inter-firm
comparison are called secondary ratio. These ratios are generally used to
measure the efficiency of various internal activities of a concern.
3. Functional classification
The financial efficiency of a business concern in normally tested from
four different angles such as judging short-term solvency, judging long-term
solvency, judging operating activities and judging profitability. Therefore, all
the ratios can also be classificationinto four different groupsaccording to their
functions to test the financial ability of a concern form the above four specified
angles . such as:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Liquidity ratio
Activity ratio
Solvency ratio
Profitability ratio
A. Liquidity ratio
These ratio concern with the analysis of short-term financial ability of a
business enterprise, these are calculated by comparing different component of
the current assets with the current liabilities. These ratios are most useful for the
short term creditors to judge the ability of the concern to repay their claim in
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
right time .the following ratio are to be calculated for such purpose.
Net working capital
Current ratio
Liquid ratio
Absolute liquid ratio
Net working capital :- Net working capital is the excess of current assets over
current liabilities a business concern. The net working capital is also popularly
3. Liquid ratio :- The quotient which is by dividing the total liquid assets by the
total current liabilities of firm is call liquid ratio. It is useful to measure the
ability of a business concern to repay its current liabilities immediately at their
due dates . The liquid ratio can be calculated by the following way .
Liquid ratio =
l iquidquick assets
current liabilities
* Generally cost of goods sold may not be known from the published
financial statements. In such case this ratio may be calculated by dividing net
sales by average inventory at cost.
Inventory turnover ratio =
Net Sales
Average Inventory at cost
Significance:- This ratio indicates whether stock has been used or not. It
shows the speed with which the stock is rotated into sales or the number of
times the stock is turned into sales during the year.
The higher the ratio, the better it is, since it indicates that stock is selling
quickly. In a business where stock turnover ratio is high, goods can be sold at a
low margin of profit and even than the profitability may be quit high.
2. Debtor Turnover Ratio:- This ratio concern with analysis the promptness in
debts collection by business firm. The efficiency in debts management can be
tested by this ratio . This ratio is also known as debtor velocity ratio. Because it
indicates the velocity of debtors during the concerned accounting year. The
following formulae can be used can for such calculation.
Debtor turnover ratio =
periodthe year
debtor turnover ratio
Note:- If any information about opening & closing trade debtors are
not given ,then debtors turnover ratio can be calculated :* Debtor turnover ratio =
Total sale
debtors
Significance :- This ratio indicates the speed with which the amount is collected
from debtors. The higher the ratio, the better it is, since it indicates that amount
from debtors is being collected more quickly. The more quickly the debtors pay,
the less the risk from bad- debts, and so the lower the expenses of collection and
increase in the liquidity of the firm.
3. Creditors turnover ratio:- The ratio which concern with exhibiting the
rapidity of creditors payment is called creditors turnover ratio. The average
creditors payment period can be known by the help of this ratio. Such period
can be calculated by dividing the period in the concerned accounting year either
bin day or in moths or in weeks, by the creditors turnover ratio. They can be
calculated as follows.
Creditors turnover ratio =
Significance :- This ratio indicates the speed with which the amount is being
paid to creditors. The higher the ratio, the better it is, since it will indicate that
the creditors are being paid more quickly which increases the credit worthiness
of the firm.
4. Working capital turnover ratio:-This ratio can be calculated by dividing the
cost of sale of the wholes accounting year by the average of net working
capital .the cost of goods sold or the net sales figures may also be used for such
calculation , if no information is available regarding the cost of sales.
Cost of sales
Note:- Instead of cost of sales we can used sales as numerator & Net
working capital as denominator. So,
Sales
*Working capital turnover ratio = Net wrokingcapital
C. Solvency ratio
The liquidity ratio discussed earlier concern with measuring the shoutterm financial position of a concern. They indicate the ability of a firm to meet
its current obligation in due times. Those ratios are not helpful for determining
the long term solvency position of a business firm. The following are such
Debt-equity ratio
Proprietory ratio
Solvency ratio
Fixed assets ratio
Coverage ratio
Cash flow ratio
Debt-equity ratio:- The ratio which representing the debt as proportion on
owned capital of a business undertaking is called Debt-equity ratio. It can be
calculated as under.
Debt-equity ratio=
or
Significance:- This Ratio is calculated to assess the ability of the firm to meet
its long term liabilities. Generally, debt equity ratio of is considered safe.
If the debt equity ratio is more than that, it shows a rather risky financial
position from the long-term point of view, as it indicates that more and more
funds invested in the business are provided by long-term lenders.
The lower this ratio, the better it is for long-term lenders because they are more
secure in that case. Lower than 2:1 debt equity ratio provides sufficient
protection to long-term lenders.
100
Significance:- This ratio should be 33% or more than that. In other words,
the proportion of shareholders funds to total funds should be 33% or more.
A higher proprietary ratio is generally treated an indicator of sound financial
position from long-term point of view, because it means that the firm is less
dependent on external sources of finance.
If the ratio is low it indicates that long-term loans are less secured and they
face the risk of losing their money.
3. Solvency ratio :- This ratio is the little variant of the proprietory ratio. It
concern with measuring the proportion of total net assets financed by outside
liability .This ratio is calculated as the percentage of total outside liabilities on
the total net assets of a business enterprise. Therefore this ratio is also call as
debt to total assets ratio or debt to total capital ratio. This ratio can be calculated
as under .
Solvency ratio =
100
Significance:- Generally lower the ratio of total liabilities to total asset , more
satisfactory or stable is the long term solvency position of the firm.
4. Fixed assets ratio:- The ratios which concern with measuring the proportion of
fixed assets on different components of capital are called fixed assets ratio. The
following are such fixed assets ratio.
(a) Fixed assets to net worth ratio:- This ratio concern with expressing the fixed
assets of a firm as percentage on net worth available to the . it indicates the
portion of the fixed assets financed by the owners fund.
The following
Significance:- It indicates the extent to which the shareholders funds are sunk
Into the fixed assets. Normally 60 to 65 percent is considered to be satisfactory
ratio.
(b) Fixed assets to long term funds ratio: - This ratio concern with reflecting
the total fixed assets as a percentage on long- term funds of the business
concern. The long-term funds for this ratio are the owners equity and longterm debts.
Total
Significance:-Here the total fixed asset must be above to the long term funds
which is good for company. Because some part of working capital requirements
is met out of the long term funds of the firm.
5. Coverage ratio- The ratio which concern with measuring the sufficiency of the
profit earned to meet various fixed charges of a business enterprise are called
coverage ratio. The following are such coverage ratios.
(A) Interest coverage ratio: - This ratio indicates the proportion of operation
profit to the fixed interest charge of a business concern. Here, the concern of
operation profit is the profit before interest and corporate income tax. Because
the interest is tax deductible.
Interest coverage ratio=
Operating profitEBIT
interest charges
(B) preference dividend coverage ratio:- This ratio concerns with analysing
the adequacy of profit after tax to pay the dividend payable to preference
shareholders is also one of the fixed charges for a joint stock company. Because
that dividend paid at an agreed fixed rate.
Preference dividend coverage ratio =
EAT
Preference dividend
(c) Total coverage ratio:-A business concern may have some other fixed
charges in addition to interest and preference dividend such as lease payment,
instalment payment on long-term debts etc . The ratio which concern with
determined the ability of a business firm to cover its total fixed charges is total
coverage ratio. The Total coverage ratio may be calculated as follows:Total coverage ratio=
Tax rate =
6. Cash flow ratio:- This ratio is calculated by dividing the annual net cash inflow
by the total fixed charges. The net cash inflow flow for this purpose is excluding
the amount of cash required for day-to-day operation of the business activities.
This ratio indicates the adequacy of cash inflow to pay such fixed charges.
Therefore, this ratio is also called as cash to debt service ratio. the formula to
calculate this ratio may be as under.
the
100
(b)Net profit ratio:-This ratio concerns with determining the percentage of net
profit earned by a business undertaking on its net sales revenue. This ratio is
also called as the net profit margin. The net profit for this purpose is the profit
after interest and corporate income tax(EAT).This ratio can be calculated by the
following way.
Net profit ratio=
100
100
business concern on its net sales revenue is called operation expenses ratio. This
ratio is also popularly known as operating ratio. This ratio is to be calculated as
follows.
Operating expenses ratio =
Operationg Cost
Net sales
100
i.
ii.
Administrative expses
100
Net sale s
iii.
iv.
v.
Sellingdistribution expese
100
Net sales
Financial expenses
100
Nte sales
2. Overall profitability ratio: - The profitability ratio discussed earlier are not so
useful for analyzing the profit of a business concern form investment point of
view. Those ratio simply concern with expressing the profit under different
concepts as a percentage of net sale. The following profitability ratio can be
calculated to examine the overall efficiency in earning of a business firm.
3. Return on investment (ROI)
4. Return on equity capital
5. Return on capital employed
6. Earnings per share(EPS)
7. Earning yield ratio
8. Dividend per share (DPS )
9. Dividend yield ratio
10.Dividend pay-out ratio
11.Price earnings ratio
(a) Return on investment:Return on shareholders investment popularly known as RETUN
ON INVESTMENT Or return on shareholder/proprietors funds is the
relationship between net profits (after interest & tax) and the proprietors
funds. Thus,
Return on Investment =
(b) Return on Equity capital:Return on equity capital which is the relationship between profits
of a company & its equity capital, can be calculated as:Return on equity capital =
Dividend paid
Shareholders
No . of shares
(f) Dividend yield ratio:Shareholders are the real owners of a company & they are interested in
real sense in the earnings distributed and paid them as dividends.
Dividend yield ratio
(g) Earning yield ratio:This ratio also shows the relationship between earning per share and
market values of shares.
Earning yield ratio=
(h) Dividend pay-out ratio:Mainly to find the extend of which earning per share have been retained
in the business. So,
Dividend pay-out ratio =
(i) Price earnings ratio:This ratio mainly calculated to estimate of appreciation in the value of
share of a company and is widely used by investors to decide whether
share buy ir not. So,
Price earnings ratio
LIQUIDITY RATIOS
1 .Net working capital
Net working capital =current assets -current liabilities
Table-2.1.1
Years
Current Assets
current Liabilities
Net working
capital
2012
2011
58007.86 85464.10
60506.76 75087.04
-2498.9 10377.06
2010
54129.78
22180.73
31949.05
2009
56665.56
19862.98
36802.58
Chart -2.1.1
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
-5000
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in COCA COLA , Net working capital is negative
value in the yr 2012. Net working capital position is increasing in year 2009 as
compared to year 2010. In year 2011 net working capital is decreasing as
compared to year 2010.
1.2. Current ratio
Current ratio =
current assets
current liabilities
Table2. 1.2
Years
Current
Assets
current
Liabilities
Current
ratio
2012
58007.86
2011
85464.1
2010
56129.78
60506.76
75087.64
22180.73
0.958
1.138
2.53
2009
56665.56
19862.98
2.85
Chart -2.1.2
Current Ratio
3
2.5
2
Current Ratio
1.5
1
0.5
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
A relatively high current ratio is an indication that the firm is liquid &
has the ability to pay its current obligation when they become due. The
l iquidquick assets
current liabilities
2012
2011
2010
2009
Liquid Assets
15476.44
33178.56
29781.38
12305.31
current Liabilities
60506.76
75087.04
22180.73
19862.98
0.25
0.44
1.34
0.61
Liquid ratio
Chart2. 1.3
Liquid Ratio
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
Liquid Ratio
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
A high acid test ratio indicates that the firm is liquid & has the ability to
meet its current liabilities in time. The acid test ratio is decreased from in
the year 2010-11 to 0.234 in the year 2012. The company need to recast
its quick ratio in the acceptable range of 1:1by reducing its inventory.
Table 2.1.4
Year
Absolute liquid assets
current Liabilities
Absolute liquid ratio
Chart 2.1.4
2012
2011
2010
2009
8855.15
24999.48
1206.51
2391.34
60506.76
75087.04
22180.73
19862.98
0.146
0.73
0.056
0.12
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, Absolute liquid ratio increasing in year
2011 as compared to year 2009-10. In year 2012 Absolute liquid ratio is
decreasing as compared to year 2011.
2 Activity ratios
2.1. Inventory turnover ratio
Net Sales
Average Inventory at cost
Table2. 2.1.2
Years
2012
2011
2010
2009
193121.66
157760.65
152122.67
131634.66
Average stock
22986.05
23561.37
20541.24
46528.37
Inventory
turnover ratio
8.4
6.69
7.4
7.96
Net sales
5
4
3
2
1
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, inventory ratio increasing in year 2012 as
compared to year 2009-10. In year 2011 inventory ratio is decreasing as
compared to year 2012 which good sign for the company.
Table 2.2.2
Years
Net sale
Debtors
Debtor Turnover
Ratio
Chart 2.2.2
2012
193121.66
1615.65
119.53
2011
157760.65
1303.96
120.98
2010
152122.67
20475.93
7.42
2009
131654.66
599.34
219.66
100
50
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, Debtor turnover ratio decreasing in year
2010 was very low In year 2009 Debtor turnover ratio was highedt as compared
to year 2011-12.
2.3. Creditors turnover ratio
Table 2.2.3
Years
Net credit purchases
Creditors
Creditors turnover
ratio
Chat2. 2.3
2012
2011
2010
2009
125113.55
146648.58
92440.10
89084.42
30959.41
41055.1
6975.58
5374.66
4.04
3.57
13.25
16.57
10
8
6
4
2
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, Creditors turnover ratio is totally
decreasing in year 2011-12 as compared to year 2009-10. In year 2011 Creditors
turnover ratio is increasing as compared to year 2010.
Table2. 2.4
Years
Cost of sales
Average net
working capital
working capital
turnover ratio
Charts 2.2.4
2012
193121.66
2011
157760.65
2009
131634.66
10377.06
2010
152122.6
7
31949.05
-(2498.9)
-77.282
15.20
4.76
3.57
36802.58
2011
2010
2009
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
The above chart shows that in NINL,Working capital turnover ratio negative
value in the year2012. Working capital turnovers increasing in year 2011 as
compared to year 2009& 2010..
3.Solvency ratio
3.1, Debt-equity ratio:Debt-equity ratio=
or
Table 2.3.1
Years
2012
Outsiders funds
175388.81
shareholders' funds 99767.47
debt equity ratio
1.75
Chart 2.3.1
2011
181957.46
100008.73
1.81
2010
179362.32
83310.3
2.15
2009
173019.45
79804.3
2.16
Debt-Equity Ratio
2.5
2
1.5
Debt-Equity Ratio
1
0.5
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, debt equity ratio is decreasing in year
2012 as compared to year 2009-10. In year 2011 capital turnover ratio is
decreasing as compared to year 2010. In year 2012 capital turnover ratio is
decreasing as compared to year 2011 which is good for company.
3.2Proprietory ratio
Proprietary ratio =
100
Table 2.3.2
Years
Owners net
worth
total net assets
proprietory
ratio
Chart 2. 3.2
2012
2011
2010
2009
99767.47
100008.73
83310.8
79804.3
335663.04
345041.19
272686.73
284853.87
29.72
28.98
30.55
28.01
proprietory Ratio
31
30.5
30
29.5
proprietory Ratio
29
28.5
28
27.5
27
26.5
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, propritory ratio highest in year 2010 as
compared to year 2009-10. In year 2011 propritory ratio is decreasing as
compared to year 2010. In year 2012 propritory ratio is increasing as compared
to year 2011.
3.3Solvency ratio
Solvency ratio =
100
Table 2.3.3
Years
2012
2011
2010
2009
Total outside
liabilities
Total net asset
235895.5
245032.46
201543.05
192882.43
335663.04
345041.19
272686.73
284853.87
solvency ratio
70.27
71.01
73.91
67.71
Chat 2.3.3
Solvency Ratio
76
74
72
Solvency Ratio
70
68
66
64
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, solvency ratio increasing in year 2010 as
compared to year 2009. In year 2011 solvency ratio is decreasing as compared
to year 2010. In year 2012 solvency ratio is decreasing as compared to year
2011.
Table 2.3.4.1
Years
Total fixed assets
owners equity
fixed assets ratio to net wroth
Chart2. 3.4.1
2012
2011
2010
2009
277615.18
259577.02
230724.09
216021.17
99767.47
100008.73
83310.8
74804.3
278.26
259.55
276.94
288.78
270
260
250
240
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, fixed assets ratio to net worthies
decreasing in year 2010 as compared to year 2009. In year 2011fixed assets
ratio to net worth is decreasing as compared to year 2010. In year 2012 fixed
assets ratio to net worth is decreasing as compared to year 2011. In 2013 fixed
assets ratio to net worth is increasing.
Table 2.3.4.2
Years
Total fixed assets
Total long-term fund
fixed assets to longterm funds ratio
Chart 2.3.4.2
2012
2011
2010
2009
277615.1
8
275156.2
8
100.89
259577.02
230724.09
216021.37
251885.53
262673.14
252823.75
103.05
87.83
85.44
60
40
20
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, Fixed assets to long-term funds ratio is
greater in the year 2011 as compared to other year. In year 2010 fixed assets to
long-term is lower than the other financial years.
Operating profitEBIT
tnterest charges
Table 2.3.5
Years
operating profit
or EBIT
fixed interest
charges(10.45%)
interest coverage
ratio
Chart 2.3.5
2012
2011
2010
2009
15568.28
--28968.8
18094.56
27750.3
20000
20000
20000
20000
0.77
-1.44
0.90
1.38
interestcoverage ratio
2
1.5
1
0.5
interestcoverage ratio
0
-0.5
2012
2011
2010
2009
-1
-1.5
-2
The above chart shows that in NINL, Interest coverage ratio negetive in year 2011 as
compared to year 2009-10 & 2012. In year 2012 Interest coverage ratio is covered some
extent of loss which is made in the year 2011.
100
Table 2.4.1.1
Years
Gross profit
Net sale
Gross profit
ratio
Chart2. 4.1.1
2012
2011
2010
2009
43036.73
29200.49
42550.01
56255.96
193121.66
157760.65
152122.67
131634.66
22.28
22.71
27.97
42.73
25
20
15
10
5
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in NINL, gross profit ratio is decreased in year 2012
as compared to year 2009-10. But in year 2012 gross profit ratio is
approximately same as compared to year 2011 not greater than in the year 2009.
100
Table 2.4.1.2
Years
Net profit(EAT)
Net sales
net profit ratio
Chart 2.4.1.2
2012
2011
2010
2009
2944.5
-173.14
3793.47
7923.04
193121.66
157760.65
152122.67
131634.66
1.524
-10.97
2.49
6.018
0
-2
2012
2011
2010
2009
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
The above chart shows that in COCA COLA , net profit ratios negative in year
2011. In year 2009 sound well as compared to year 2010 & 2012.
100
Table 2.4.1.3
Years
Operating profit
(EBIT)
Net sale
operating profit
ratio
Chart2.4.1.3
2012
2011
2010
2009
10468.58
-6788.4
152122.67
22192.00
193121.66
157760.65
17054.18
131634.66
5.42
-4.3
11.21
16.85
5
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
-5
-10
The above chart shows that in COCA COLA , 0perating profit ratio negative in year 2011 as
compared to other financial year. In year 2012 operating profit ratio is slightly decrease as
compared to year 2010-09.
Operationg Cost
Net sales
100
Table 2.4.1.4
Years
2012
2011
2010
2009
operating cost
187924.24
165009.89
139692.07
116270.76
Net sales
193121.66
157760.65
152122.67
131634.66
97.30
104.59
91.82
88.32
operating
expenses ratio
Chart 2.4.1.4
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in COCA COLA , operating expenses ratio is in year 2011
increasing as compared to year 2009-10. In year 2012 net profit ratio is comparatively low as
in the year 2011
Expenses ratios
4.1.5.1
Table 2.4.1.5.1
Years
2012
2011
2010
2009
150084.93
128560.16
109572.66
75378.70
Net sale
193121.66
157760.65
152122.67
131634.66
77.71
81.49
72.02
57.26
Chart 2.4.1.5.1
50
40
30
20
10
0
2012
2011
2010
2009
The above chart shows that in COCA COLA Cost of goods sold ratio is in year 2012 slightly
decreasing as compared to year 2011. In year 2011 Cost of goods sold ratio is increasing as
compared to year 2010-09.
Table 2.2.5.1
Years
Net Profit
Shareholders
Fund
Return on
investment(%)
Chat 2.2.5.1
2012
2011
2010
2009
2944.50
(17314)
3793.47
7923.04
99767.47
100008.73
83310.8
79804.3
2.95
(17.31)
4.55
9.92
Return on investment
15
10
5
Return on investment
0
-5
2012
2011
2010
2009
-10
-15
-20
The above chart shows that in COCA COLA, return on investment totally decreasing in year
2011 as compared to other year . In 2009 financial year figure was better than the other
financial year.
Table2. 2.5.2
Years
2012
2011
2010
2009
Net PAT
2944.50
(17313.93)
3793.47
7923.04
Preference Dividend
2135.72
2135.72
2135.72
2135.72
58129.41
47951.05
39979.41
39979.41
1.39
(31.65)
4.146
14.47
Equity share
capital(paid up)
Return on equity
capital
Chart2. 2.5.2
2011
2010
2009
-10
-20
-30
-40
The above chart shows that in COCA COLA, return on equity capital is totally
decreasing in year 2010 as compared to other financial year. In year 2009 is
highest ratio than the other financial year.
2009
2011
2010
2012
INCOMES
Gross Sales
including Inter
Plant Transfer
135870.6
0
157995.9
1
161584.8
2
4235.94
5873.24
3824.17
131634.6
6
152122.6
7
157760.6
5
330.76
101.08
703.8
131965.
42
152223.
75
158464.
45
Raw materials
consumed
89084.82
92440.10
146668.5
8
Changes of
inventory of
finished goods
[+/(-)]
-20534.08
12508.98
-18549.25
714.31
-665.63
1919.32
3137.74
2796.50
3486.48
772.97
939.23
803.86
Repair and
maintenance
370.05
623.36
460.83
4679.36
5129.86
6690.14
35167.56
23401.61
24988.41
9325.53
9302.93
9310.00
0 0
EXPENDITURE
Changes of excise
duty on stock of
finished goods
Stores& Spares
consumed
Employees
benefits expenses
Other expenses
Depreciation
expenses
Total
expenditure
122718. 146476.
26 94
175778.
37
9247.16
2746.81
17313.9
2
(Less) Tax
deduction(Current
+ differed tax)
2861.69
3906.68
7923.04
3793.47
17313.9
2
Comparative Statement from Balancesheet:Comparative study of financial statement is the comparison of the
financial statement of the business with the previous years financial statements
and with the performance of other competitive enterprises, so that weaknesses
may be identified and remedial measures applied.
Comparative statements can be prepared for both types of financial
statements i.e., Balance sheet as well as profit and loss account. The
comparative profits and loss account will present a review of operating
activities of the business. The comparative balance shows the effect of
operations on the assets and liabilities that change in the financial position
during the period under consideration.
Comparative analysis is the study of trend of the same items and computed
items into or more financial statements of the same business enterprise on
different dates.
The presentation of comparative financial statements, in annual and other
reports, enhances the usefulness of such reports and brings out more clearly the
nature and trends of current changes affecting the enterprise.
Particulars
31st
March
2012(In
lakhs)
31st March
2011(In
lakhs)
Changes
(In
Lakhs)
277,655.1
259,577.
180,78.
02
16
42,519.30
52,259.0
9,739.7
1615.65
8,855.15
5017.76
1,303.96
24,999.9
8
6901.12
4
311.69
16,144.
83
1,883.3
6
335,663.0
345,041.
12
9,378.0
8
Shareholders Funds :
Share Capital
60,265.13
39,502.34
50,086.7
10,178.
36
31,853.3
7649
Total Shareholders
99,767.47
81,940.1
17,827.
36
175,388.8
169,945.
5,443.3
42
60,506.76
75,087.0
14,580.
Funds(A)
Non
current
liability
(B)
Current liability(C)
28
Total Liabilities
(A+B+C )
335,663.0
345,041.
12
9,378.0
8
Particulars
31st March
2010(In
Lakhs)
Changes
259,577.
230,724.
28,852.
02
09
93
52,259.0
24,348.4
27,910.
64
1,303.96
20,475.9
19171.9
31st
March
2011(In
Lakhs)
(In Lakhs)
24,999.9
8
1,260.51
6901.12
8,044.94
7
23739.4
7
1143.82
345,041.
284853.8
60,187.
12
25
50,086.7
42,115.1
7971
31,853.3
41,195.6
81,940.1
83,310.8
1370.71
169,945.
179,362.
-9416.9
42
32
75,087.0
22,180.7
52,906.
31
345,041.
284853.8
60,187.
12
25
Shareholders Funds :
Share Capital
Reserves and Surplus
Total Shareholders
Funds(A)
Non
current
liability
(B)
Current liability(C)
Total Liabilities
(A+B+C )
9342.35
Particulars
31st March
2009(In
lakhs)
Changes
230,724.
216,021.
14702.3
09
17
24,348.4
44,360.2
20011.8
20,475.9
599.34
31st
March
2010(In
lakhs)
(In Lakhs)
3
1,260.51
2391.34
9314.63
8,044.94
5
19876.5
9
1130.83
1269.99
284,853.
272,686.
12,167.
87
73
14
42,115.1
42,115.1
41,195.6
37,689.1
83,310.8
79,804.3
179,362.
173019.4
6342.8
32
22,180.7
19,862.9
2317.75
284853.
272,686.
12,167.
87
73
14
Shareholders Funds :
Share Capital
Reserves and Surplus
Total Shareholders
Funds(A)
Noncurrent
liability
(B)
Current liability(C)
Total Liabilities
(A+B+C )
3506.52
3506.52
The overall financial position of the company for the year (2010-2009) is
satisfactory.
FINDINGS OF THE STUDY:1) The current ratio is gradually decreasing from the financial year 2009
,which is not good for the profit point of view . Because the firm shall not
able to pay the current liabilities in time.
2) The liquid ratio is decreasing year after year. Though the ratio is above 1
in all thefour years, it is preferable to improve upon the situation. This
may be due to the fact that the stock is major composition of current
assets, which excludes liquid assets. The firm should try to clear the
stocks.
3) The inventory turnover ratio from the four years indicated a good
inventory policy and efficiency of business operations of the company.
4) The working capital turnover ratio has been increasing during the four
years, which indicates that there is lowest investment of the working
capital and more profit. More profit is in the sense that there is higher
ratio.
5) The proprietary ratio in all the four years is not above the satisfactory
level, that is, 50%. It indicates the creditors are facing some credit
problems for them.
6) The debt to equity ratio is decreasing year after year, which indicates, the
servicing of debt is less burden and consequently its credit standing is not
adversely affected. But it maintaining its standards as like 1:1.
7) The Net Profit for the four years has been ups & down which shows that
the selling and distribution expenses arent works properly.
8) Comparative balance sheet proves that the financial performance for each
financial year is not as much satisfactory as compared with its previous
year during the period of 2009-2012.
BIBLOGRAPHY
WEBSITES:-