Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The very first thought, which strikes those who are looking to install a security surveillance
system in their premises, is whether to go for an IP Video Surveillance or Analog camera
surveillance? In this situation, it is not an easy task to decide which surveillance system will be a
perfect fit to your environment. Since, both the technologies have their pros and cons; this article
will focus on the in-depth analysis on these surveillance architectures, in order to determine
which option is the right choice.
The foremost difference between the two camera categories is the way the video signal is
delivered. In analog surveillance architecture, the analog camera turns the images into a
composite video signal, which can be received as a digital signal by a LCD monitor or a Digital
Video Recorder. In the IP based surveillance architecture, the network camera digitizes the
video signal, with the help of a specialized encoder available on its onboard web server. This
makes the IP camera act as a network device, which allows captured video images to be recorded
in digital format to a mass storage appliance, which can facilitate web browser viewing from a
remote device.
The transmission of signals is possible through a wireless or a wired interface such as Cat 5 cable
and the need for hubs, routers and switches is also essential.
Analog cameras are cheaper than their IP cousins. So, if the IT budget allotted for
Surveillance is limited, then going for Analog camera deployment makes sense.
If the monitoring area is limited and encourages fewer amounts of cameras deployments,
say less than 10 cameras, then going for analog camera deployment will be a wise
approach.
Design flexibility- Analog cameras are available in a variety of designs such as mini
covert to PTZ models. All depends on the needs of the surveillance environment, such as
for instance mini covert cameras are used for spying application needs.
Compatibility- Usually, you can mix and match cameras and brands in analog camera
architecture.
Lack advanced features- Analog cameras lack some of the advanced features such as
advanced zoom and image clarity options.
Long distance applications are tough- Analog cameras do not work for large distances
surveillance environments and so analog camera architectures with broad range fail
usually.
Advantages/Pros of IP cameras
Higher resolution- IP cameras, also known as network cameras are offered with greater
resolution. The clarity of the image depends on the image resolution of the network
camera. IP cameras deliver higher resolution images which may be 3, 5,8,12, 20 Mega
Pixels and beyond in near future. When compared to analog, an IP camera offers four
times greater image resolution. As a result a single IP camera can replace several analog
cameras.
Wireless reception- IP cameras have in-built encryption features and so they transmit the
signals in a secure way. Transmission options such as point-to-Point, point-to-Multipoint
and mesh topology are available in IP camera layout architecture.
Cost is high- IP cameras cost is high, when compared to analog cameras and so their
deployment depends a lot on the allotted surveillance budget.
Storage- If the image is captured in higher resolution, need for a high capacity video
storage becomes essential.
With the advantages and disadvantages of Analog and IP cameras in place, the decision now
comes down to specific surveillance needs. With the prevailing technology of hybrid recorders
and video encoders, Analog and IP cameras can co-exist on the same surveillance network.
So, the selection of the surveillance camera type must be done by carefully assessing the
application needs and keeping an eye on the budget.