Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Skill
Item
5 Week
Assess.
%
Rubric correct
Score
33
18.18
%A
%B
%C
%D
52.73
3.64
12.73
18.18
% of
Names of
students students who
with
have not
mastery mastered skill
Major
distractor
1.8
5 Week
33
18.18
18.18
41.82
18.18
7.27
1.8
5 Week
33
23.64
7.27
23.64
16.36
40
1.8
5 Week
33
30.91
30.91
20
3.64
32.73
1.8
5 Week
33
47.27
1.82
10.91
25.45
47.27
1.8
Ten Week
25
33
58
14
20
58
22
Ten Week
26
33
56
10
56
14
20
22
Ten Week
28
33
52
52
10
36
Distracter
Type(s)
2
22
Mistakes or subskill
deficiencies revealed
Students didn't
differentiate between
necessary and
unnecessary info.
Major
Students chose less
distractor
complicated, but
acurate, sentence.
Major
Students chose
distractor/Bad answer that was true
ansswer
but not specific to the
sentence.
Split
Students did not
differentiate meanings
between different
transition words.
Major
Students chose
distractor
answer that was true
but not specific to the
paragraph.
Major
Students chose
distractor
answer that gave
specific info, not
answer that had big
picture.
Split
Students making their
own inferences instead
of focusing on what the
author is saying.
Major
Students chose
distractor
answer that gave
specific info, not
answer that had big
picture.
Ten Week
30
33
26
28
30
18
26
Pure Guess
Deleting an
unneccesary sentence.
22
Ten Week
31
33
38
50
38
8
22
Major
distractor
Vocab- Hectic.
Transition wordsHowever
Introduce examples of
transition words and how
they change meaning in a
sentence.
Reiew what a question is
actually asking for.
Assessment Target
Skill
Item
5 Week
Assess.
%
%A
Rubric correct
Score
33
43.64 10.91
%B
%C
%D
43.64
25.45
7.27
% of
Names of
students students who
with
have not
mastery mastered skill
Distracter
Type(s)
1.8
5 Week
33
36.36
20
5 Week
33
32.73 32.73
29.09
36.36
1.82
32.73
16.36
5.45
1.8
Split
Split
1.8
5 Week
33
21.82 12.73
36.36
16.36
21.82
1.8
Ten Week
22
33
84
12
84
Ten Week
23
33
74
10
74
14
Ten Week
24
33
62
62
12
20
Ten Week
27
33
74
18
74
50
50
50
50
Ten Week
29
33
38
30
38
18
14
Major
distractor
Major
distractor
Major
distractor
Major
distractor
Major
distractor
Split
50
15 Week
33
10.53
5.26
84.21
15 Week
33
57.89
15.79
10.53
15.79
15 Week
33
42.11
47.37
10.53
16
16
33
36.84
21.05
42.11
16
Students unsure of
where to use commas
in unnecessary info
Pronoun references
Comma rules and
subject verb
agreement.
Subject verb
agreement.
Placing comma before
"and" in series.
Deleting or keeping
descriptions.
Using "or" instead of
"and" in a list.
Punctuation in a quote.
Subject verb
agreement.
Major
distractor
Bad answer
choice
Split
Subject verb
agreement.
Comma rules,
introductory clause.
Subject verb
agreement.
Split
Commas in a series
with long lists.
16
15 Week
Mistakes or subskill
deficiencies revealed
15 Week
33
31.58
47.37
21.05
16
Pure Guess
Comma rules,
introductory clause.
Target
Target Assess.
%
Skill Item Skill Item Rubric correct
Score
%A
%B
%C
15 Week
2 33/39
31.58
15 Week
5 33/39
15 Week
6 33/39
47.37
15 Week
9 33/39
36.84 47.37
%D
% of
students
with
mastery
Names of
students
who have
not
mastered
skill
0 All
0 All
0 21.05 31.58
0 All
5.26 10.53
0 All
Pure guess
Split
Transition
words
Purpose of
different
transition
words and
alignment
to student
vocab
Transition
words
Purpose of
different
transition
words and
alignment
to student
vocab
Instructions
One tab will track a specific target skill over time, with several assessments on it, for one class period.
Record the assessment (i.e. "5-week" or "pronoun bell ringer 9/25/09")
Record the question/item numbers for the assessment items that address this target skill.
Record the score this assessment received on the assessment rubric.
Purpose: to consider assessment quality when looking at student data - did scores drop because assessment is harder?
This only applies to our formal 5-week assessments.
Record the % of students who got each item correct.
Record the % of students who chose each multiple choice answer. Bold and underline the correct answer so that it stands out.
This only applies to multiple choice assessments: formal 5-week, and any multiple-choice formative assessments
Record the % of students who have demonstrated mastery (as defined by getting 80% of target skill items correct).
List names of students who have not demonstrated mastery.
Analyze percentages and determine distracter types that appear.
This only applies to multiple choice items
Distracter Types:
The Major Distracter (majority pick same distracter)
The Split (2 answers get chosen most often, at about same rate)
Bad Answer Choice (no one picked a certain multiple choice answer not a valid distracter)
AWOL (absent without luck where kids didnt even put a guess, but left it blank)
Pure Guess (responses scattered pretty evenly over the 4 choices)
Reflect on what mistakes kids made or what subskill deficiencies they have demonstrated
(based on what distracters they picked and what that means)
This applies to ALL assessments - even if they did not have multiple choice distracters, you can still determine what mistakes students
seem to be making.
Generate some ideas for instruction to correct students' mistakes or remediate their subskill deficiencies
This applies to ALL assessments
Assessment Target
Skill
Item
Assess.
%
% A % B % C % D % of students Names of students
Rubric correct
with mastery
who have not
Score
mastered skill
bell ringer,
9/12/09
18/24
94
bell ringer,
9/12/09
18/24
72
Distracter
Type(s)
Jamie
Liz
Habib
30 Andrea
Jamie
Liz
Habib
36 Andrea
5 week
18/24
44
11
39
44
The split
Jamie
Liz
47 Andrea
5 week
18/24
78
17
78
5 week
20/24
17
17
50
28
5 week
10
20/24
22
22
28
28
22
Pure guess
10 week
21
20/24
39
11
28
39
22
Some guessing
Major distracter
Mistakes or subskill
deficiencies revealed
None
Ideas for
instruction to
remediate
deficiencies
Move on to next
higher skill level,
or reassess rigor of
this question
Students are inverting the x Graphing practice
and y axes on graphs
with identifying x
and y axes,
students creating
list of "rules" for
what variables
should go where
Subskill - extrapolation;
Picking C: higher than the
real C point is on the graph;
didnt realize could extend
off the axes must follow
the trend of the line, not
focus on the labeled points
Extrapolation
review where there
are points and a
line of best fit
practice using both
the points and the
lines, determining
when each is
appropriate to
focus on; graphing
points and making
line of best fit
Students cannot
distinguish between
evidence that refutes a
hypothesis, and facts that
are irrelevant
Evidence Sort
where kids practice
sorting evidence
that is already
there, then expand
to them coming up
with the evidence
that would either
support or refute
the hypothesis
(also base on
experiments
which outcomes
would
support/refute)
Have to conceptually
??? Not sure what
understand that less rainfall mistake picking B
would lower all 3 metrics
represents need
help
B inverts the appropriate Evidence Sort
choices, matching low
where kids practice
numbers to more
sorting evidence
weathering;
that is already
C does not see that answer there, then expand
choice that combines the 2 to them coming up
forces cannot help
with the evidence
differentiate between the 2 that would either
forces;
support or refute
D picks statement that is the hypothesis
supported by table, but does (also base on
not support the hypothesis experiments
given in Q
which outcomes
would
support/refute)
Tie into extrap.
review, graph
biases validity of
data, how
supported by more
B, D interpolates too low points near line of
best fit