Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Equipe de Modlisation Mathmatique et Contrle, UFR: SPI et MAM, Facult des Sciences et Techniques de Tanger, Universit Abdelmalek Essaadi, BP 416 Tanger, Morocco
Laboratoire de Physique et Mcanique des Matriaux, UMR CNRS 7554, Universit Paul Verlaine-Metz, Ile de Saulcy, 57045 Metz Cedex, France
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 July 2007
Accepted 4 August 2008
Available online 7 October 2008
Keywords:
Vibration
Viscoelastic
Sandwich
FEM
Beam
Plate
a b s t r a c t
This work presents an asymptotic numerical method for forced harmonic vibration analyses of viscoelastic structures. A mathematical formulation that may account for various viscoelastic models is presented.
Power series expansions and Pad approximants of the displacement and frequency are developed and
the nite element method is used for numerical solution. Only some matrix inversions and a few iterations are needed for large frequency ranges. Iterations of the process lead to a powerful continuation
method for harmonic responses of viscoelastic structures with constant and frequency dependent coefcients. For numerical tests, undamped, viscoelastic and sandwich viscoelastic beams and plates are considered. Passive control, response curves and equivalent damping characteristics are obtained for various
frequency ranges, excitation amplitudes and viscoelastic models.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The main objective of this paper is the development of an efcient continuation algorithm for response curves of viscoelastic
structures under harmonic excitations at large frequency ranges.
The proposed algorithm is based on the asymptotic numerical
method (ANM) which is a combination of a nite element method
and a perturbation method. The ANM permits to get a large part of
response curves either on the power series expansion [1,2] or on
the rational fraction forms called Pad approximants [3]. The efciency of this method has been largely proved for various nonlinear
static problems [4]. Based on harmonic balance method and on the
ANM, linear and nonlinear vibrations of thin elastic plates with
various shapes and harmonic excitation types are analysed [5,6].
The algorithm developed in this paper is the adaptation of the presented method in [5,6] to linear forced vibrations of viscoelastic
structures.
Based on linear viscoelastic models, the dependence of structure stiffness and dissipation on the vibration frequency is accounted for via the complex and frequency dependent material
coefcients. In the framework of small deformations, the governing
dynamic structures responses under harmonic excitations {F}eixt
can be modelled by the following matrix problem:
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: l.azrar@uae.ma, azrarlahcen@yahoo.fr (L. Azrar).
0045-7949/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.08.006
92
2. Mathematical modelling
(
)
o2 U
dV F
fdeg frg qfdUg
ot2
V
p
where i 1 and x is the vibration frequency. For small stresses
and strains, the linear viscoelastic properties, exhibited under dynamic loading, are described by a complex relaxation matrix
[C(x)] which is a function of the loading frequency x. The stress
strain law can be written in the form:
frg Cxfeg
where the real and imaginary part of [(C(x)] characterizes respectively energy storage and dissipative behavior of the viscoelastic
material. Hence, as established in many studies [7,1820], with
classical notations of computational mechanics, the nite element
discretisation of the variational formulation Eq. (2) (see Appendix
A), leads to the following matrix problem:
r 2l e k I3 e
where
8
< l E x
21t
: k tE x
12t1t
in which I3 is the identity matrix, E*(x) is the complex Young modulus and t is Poissons ratio. As in most analyses, the Poisson ratio is
assumed constant. Using the generalized Hooks law Eq. (4), one can
easily nd that the stiffness matrix [K(x)] can be written as
8
>
< Kx K0 ExK
K0 E 0K
>
:
Ex E x E 0
93
Eix k0 g0 ix
N
max
X
j1
ix
ix
kj
g1
Introducing Eqs. (10) and (11) into Eq. (8) and equating like
powers of a, one obtains the following linear problems:
(
Order 0 :
j
X
ci MfU ji g
12a
12b
j
X
El KfU jl g
12c
l1
For a given initial frequency (p0 = x0), far from the resonant one, the
solution of the linear system Eq. (12a) allows to get the starting displacement U0 for a xed excitation force. Remember that the left
hand side of the problems Eqs. (12a)(12c) have the same matrix.
Then only one matrix inversion is needed for all vectors Uj. But,
the matrix [A] and then the vectors Uj are complex.
It should be mentioned that for viscoelastic structures, Youngs
modulus E and the nodal displacement vector U are complex
quantities and can be decomposed in its it real and imaginary parts
as
U U R iU I ;
3. Method of solution
In this section, an asymptotic numerical algorithm is developed
to solve the forced vibration problem (8) with a reasonable computational cost. This algorithm combining the perturbation techniques and the nite element method has been proposed to solve
other classes of nonlinear problems [16]. The various stages of
the proposed algorithm can be presented as follows.
(
Order 0 : B
"
10a
13
U R0
U I0
F
14a
where
B
aj pj
Ex ER x iEI x
xa p0
c0 x20 is given
A K0 E0 K c0 M;
i1
n
X
AfU 0 g fFg;
EI0 K
EI0 K
K
(
Order 1 : B
U R1
#
K K0 ER0 K c0 M
U I1
F R1
)
14b
F I1
j1
x2 a c0
n
X
where
aj c j
10b
j1
n
X
aj U j
10c
1
fhU U 0 ; U 1 i p p0 p1 g
s2
10d
Ua U 0
F R1
F I1
(
p1
F R
1
F I
1
(
p1
j1
in which Uj, pj and cj are the new unknowns which have to be computed p0 x0 ; c0 x20 . In this analysis, the Young modulus is assumed to be frequency dependent and is expanded into power
series with respect to the parameter a as
Ex E0
n
X
aj Ej pk ;
06k6j
11
Step 1: solve B
U I
F I
1
1
s
Step 2: compute p1 p
R
R hU1 ;U 1 i1
U
U
1
1
, U1
U 1
U I
U I1
1
j1
)
R
Fq
F I
q
Order q q P 2 : B
9
8
q1
q1
P
P R R
>
>
R
R
R
R
I
I
I
I
>
>
MU
c
MU
E
KU
E
KU
E
KU
E
KU
p
>
i
0
qi
q
0
q
0
i
qi
i
qi >
=
< q
i1
i1
q1
q1
>
>
P
P R I
>
>
I
I
R
>
;
: pq MU I0
ci MU Iqi ER
Ei KU qi EIi KU Rqi >
q KU 0 Eq KU 0
i1
i1
U Rq
U Iq
(
pq
F R
1
F I
1
and
F R
q
F I
q
U 1 p1 U 1 ,
with
)
14c
94
(
) (
)
where
F R
U R
q
q
Step 1: solve B
U I
F I
q
q
hU ;U i
Step 2: compute pq p1 1s2 q and
(
)
(
)
U R
U Rq
q
,
U
.
With U q
q
U I
U Iq
q
1
Pn Ua U 0 a DDn2
U 1 a2 DDn3
U 2 an1 Dn1
U n1
n1
n1
1
Pn x2 a x20 a DDn2
x21 a2 DDn3
x22 an1 Dn1
x2n1
n1
n1
Uq
pq
p1
U1
U q ,
18
where Dj(a) are polynomials of degree (j) with real coefcients
(dj)[j=1,n1]:
Dj a 1 ad1 a2 d2 aj dj
4. Numerical results
1=n1
kU 1 k
alimit d
kU n k
15
Uj
j
X
ajk U k ; j 1; n
16
k1
U U0
n
X
j1
U j
j
X
ajk a
kj
17
k1
19
95
Elastic layer
2
Viscoelastic layer
Beam
Length: L = 177.8 mm
Width: l = 12.7 mm
Length: L = 177.8 mm
Square plate
Rectangular plate
Length: L = 177.8 mm
Width: l = 88.9 mm
Length: L = 177.8 mm
Width: l = 170 mm
Table 2
Frequencies and loss factors of the six rst modes for cantilever sandwich beam with
different core loss factors
gc
y
z
Elastic layer
Viscoelastic layer
Elastic layer
Fig. 1. Sandwich plate.
H
h
H
Ref. [30]
Ref. [7]
gm/gc
f (Hz)
gm/gc
f (Hz)
gm/gc
f (Hz)
g m / gc
0.1
64.5
298.9
746.5
1407.7
2286.2
3385.7
0.281
0.242
0.154
0.089
0.057
0.039
64.2
296.9
745.5
1398.5
2271.2
3363.4
0.281
0.242
0.153
0.088
0.056
0.038
64.1
296.4
743.7
1393.9
2261.1
3343.6
0.282
0.242
0.154
0.089
0.057
0.039
64.2
297.
747.2
1408.3
2304.0
3446.1
0.285
0.242
0.154
0.090
0.057
0.038
0.3
64.9
299.9
747.9
1408.9
2287.2
3386.6
0.272
0.237
0.153
0.088
0.057
0.039
64.5
297.5
745.9
1398.7
2271.3
3363.5
0.272
0.239
0.153
0.088
0.056
0.038
64.4
297
744.1
1394.0
2261.2
3343.7
0.272
0.240
0.154
0.089
0.057
0.039
64.7
298
748.2
1409.5
2305.0
3447.
0.275
0.238
0.153
0.088
0.056
0.038
0.6
65.9
303.1
752.3
1412.7
2290.6
3389.5
0.247
0.224
0.150
0.088
0.057
0.039
65.6
299.5
747.3
1399.5
2271.8
3363.8
0.246
0.232
0.152
0.088
0.056
0.038
65.5
298.9
745.5
1394.9
2261.7
3344.0
0.246
0.232
0.153
0.089
0.057
0.039
65.5
301.
753.
1414.
2310.
3450.
0.249
0.227
0.149
0.087
0.056
0.038
67.8
309.1
761.1
1420.6
2297.9
3395.9
0.204
0.201
0.142
0.086
0.057
0.037
67.5
303.3
750.4
1404.2
2273.0
3364.5
0.202
0.217
0.150
0.087
0.056
0.038
67.4
302.8
748.6
1396.6
2262.9
3345.0
0.202
0.218
0.150
0.088
0.057
0.039
67.4
307.
762.
1422.
2316.
3455.0
0.196
0.203
0.141
0.086
0.056
0.038
1.5
70.3
317.4
777.2
1432.8
2310.1
3407.0
0.155
0.176
0.131
0.083
0.056
0.039
70.0
309.4
756.2
1404.3
2275.1
3365.9
0.153
0.197
0.145
0.086
0.056
0.038
69.9
308.9
754.0
1399.7
2265.0
3346.0
0.153
0.198
0.146
0.087
0.057
0.039
70.
315.
774.0
1433.
2328.0
3468.5
0.155
0.177
0.132
0.083
0.055
0.038
Ref. [18]
f (Hz)
only two steps of the Pad continuation are needed for three resonance curves. These results show clearly the efciency of this
method to investigate the undamped forced linear vibration response curves.
Proposed method
Table 3
Frequencies and loss factors of the ve rst modes for sandwich square plate for
g = 0.1, for different boundary conditions (C: Clamped, S: Simply supported)
Excitation amplitude at (L/4, L/4) is F = 10,000 N and at (3L/4,3L/4) is F = 3000 N
Proposed method
gm / gc
Ref. [18]
f (Hz)
gm / gc
f (Hz)
(a) CCCC
0.315
0.229
0.192
0.167
0.148
136.572
260.397
374.360
454.354
553.700
0.288
0.227
0.192
0.169
0.148
136.971
260.539
374.509
454.566
553.653
(b) SSSS
0.548
0.358
0.279
0.237
0.206
96.821
195.751
292.709
358.439
449.635
0.508
0.355
0.282
0.246
0.207
97.261
195.825
292.736
358.254
449.496
(c) CSCS
0.396
0.337
0.239
0.225
0.246
118.374
209.937
250.186
335.713
369.064
0.366
0.323
0.242
0.227
0.236
118.782
210.468
250.258
335.817
367.858
96
Table 4
Frequencies and loss factors of the ve rst modes for sandwich rectangular plate for
different boundary conditions (C: Clamped, S: Simply supported), with g = 0.3 and a/
b=2
Proposed method
gm / gc
Ref. [18]
f (Hz)
gm / g c
f (Hz)
(a) CCCC
0.230
0.159
0.132
0.107
0.086
328.355
426.243
593.745
836.339
931.059
0.170
0.159
0.135
0.106
0.090
331.527
426.943
594.726
835.872
931.099
(b) SSSS
0.545
0.294
0.200
0.169
0.145
195.265
291.886
447.559
576.177
672.825
0.405
0.297
0.212
0.173
0.154
199.526
292.564
449.270
578.142
672.210
(c) CSCS
0.500
0.239
0.168
0.152
0.116
208.766
334.397
522.983
585.317
699.375
0.360
0.237
0.165
0.169
0.144
213.0002
335.309
525.4213
585.367
698.9456
For sandwich viscoelastic plates, the used material and geometrical characteristics are given in Table 1. The response curves
obtained by the proposed method for a simply support sandwich
viscoelastic square plate under harmonic excitation at F(L/4,
L/4) = 2000 N are presented in Fig. 5. Two core damping coefcients are considered (gc = 0.1, gc = 0.3). A large frequency range
is covered with only three steps of the ANM. Various boundary
conditions and viscoelastic core characteristics can be easily considered. The resonance curves of CCCC, SSSS and CSCS viscoelastic
sandwich square plate (gc = 0.1) excited mutually by F(L/4,
L/4) = 10000 N and by F(3L/4, 3L/4) = 3000 N (L = l = 348 mm)
are presented in Fig. 6. The rst fth resonances are obtained
by only some steps of the ANM. The double excitation is used
in order to amplify the rst resonances. The corresponding natural frequencies and equivalent loss factors are given in Table 3a
c. These are extracted from the resonance curves presented in
Fig. 6 by the use the half power bandwidth method. For comparison, the ANM nonlinear eigenvalue algorithm developed in [18]
is also used to determine the frequencies and loss factors by solving directly the free vibration problem. A good agreement is
obtained.
For rectangular plates with characteristics in Table 1, the obtained frequencies and equivalent loss factors are given in Table
4ac for CCCC, SSSS and CSCS. These results are well compared
with those obtained using the ANM nonlinear eigenvalue algo-
nite elements, the dynamics matrix inversions and the strain energy method. Results of reference [18] are investigated with the 2D
eight node quadrilateral elements and the numerical solution of
the resulting nonlinear eigenvalue problem is obtained by an
asymptotic numerical method.
Fig. 3. Response curves of an elastic nearly square plate (L = 177.8 mm, l = 170 mm)
excited by F(L/4, l/4) = 1000 N using: (a) series-continuation method, (b) Padcontinuation method.
97
Fig. 7. Response curve of a nearly sandwich viscoelastic square plate: L = 177.8 mm,
l = 170 mm, h + 2H = 3.175 mm, excitation amplitude at (L/4, l/4) is F = 1000 N,
gc = 0.3.
Table 5
Forced vibration of a simply supported plate
DOF
Method
ANM + Pad
Direct method
ANM + Pad
Direct method
number of steps
Total time (s)
Saved time (%)
4
9
92
400
112
4
67
95
400
1377
Computing time: Comparison between ANM and direct method (Computer used:
Toshiba core duo T2050, 1.6 GHz).
Fig. 5. Response curves of SSSS square plate: L = 177.8 mm, h + 2H = 3.175 mm,
excitation amplitude at (L/4, L/4) is F = 2000 N.
plate excited at (L/4, l/4) is presented in Fig. 7. The points () represent the starting points and again a very few iterations of the ANM
are needed. It is clearly shown that the isolated as well as the very
close resonances are obtained. Many others numerical tests to assess the efciency of this method for dynamic response curves are
investigated.
Remember that the solution is obtained in a polynomial form in
the validity zone from a starting point. Only one matrix inversion is
needed for all vectors Uj (j = 1,n) and some algebraic manipulations. Iterating this approach leads to the series-continuation and
Pad-continuation methods. The zone of validity of the obtained
solution at each step can be large as clearly presented in Figs. 2
7. These presented results are also obtained by the direct method
which necessitates a matrix inversion at each frequency point.
For the sake of clarity about the used CPU time, let us consider
the plate response curve in the frequency range [0:1400] as presented in Fig. 5. Two cases with 968 and 3528 degree of freedom
numbers are tested and only three and four Pad continuation
steps are respectively needed. These steps can be clearly shown
in Fig. 5 for 968 d.o.f and gc = 0.3. This curve is presented with
100 frequency points at each Pad step. In order to get the same
results with the direct method 400 frequency points are necessary
for the considered d.o.f. The total time needed by the direct method is more than 12 times, the needed one for the Pad continuation
for 968 d.o.f and more than 20 times for 3528 d.o.f. The percentage
of the saved time is given in Table 5 for the considered plate FE discretisation. The saved time is increasing by increasing the degrees
of freedom.
4.2.2. Frequency dependent Young modulus
Based on the Maxwell model equation (8), the mathematical
formulation of the power series development of the frequency
dependent Young modulus is elaborated. Various models can be
considered and only some ones are selected in order to test the
efciency of the proposed method. The used material coefcients
of viscoelastic core materials are given in Table 5. The vibration
98
Table 6
Maxwell series terms and material properties of the used viscoelastic core
Viscoelastic material
3M ISD112 at 27 C
3 Maxwell series terms
Viscoelastic material
3M ISD112 at 20 C
3 Maxwell series terms
147.168E+3
kj
gj
kj
gj
1
2
3
373,000
1,632,500
21,642,000
795.818
344.235
302.548
143918.04
670237.82
2323287.1
4624.972
1501.247
422.221
In this paper, an asymptotic numerical method has been developed for response curve corresponding to forced harmonic vibrations of viscoelastic structures. The mathematical modelling has
been developed in a general way in order to take into account various viscoelastic models undamped sandwich and viscoelastic
structures. The constant and frequency dependent viscoelastic
models of Maxwell type are considered. The power series development and the resulting linear problems are explicitly presented.
The series-continuation and Pad continuation methods are elaborated for numerical solutions. The response curves are numerically
computed for various frequency ranges, excitations types and viscoelastic models. The continuation method based on the series and
on the Pad approximants are rstly tested for singular resonances
curves of the elastic beams and plates. The efciency of both methods is demonstrated in comparison to the classical matrix inversion method. The asymptotic method based on Pad approximant
is shown to be powerful and necessitate very few iterations for
large frequency ranges. Numerical results for linear frequencies
and equivalent loss factor obtained from half power bandwidth
of the obtained response curves are well compared to the available
ones. The frequency dependent viscoelastic model based on Maxwell models with various coefcients is considered. The resonance
curves of sandwich beams and plates with the associated viscoelastic cores are investigated. The efciency and applicability of
this method are illustrated here for forced vibration of undamped
elastic, sandwich and viscoelastic beams and plates with different
shapes, boundary conditions and viscoelastic models.
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the nancial support from:
Action Intgre Franco-Marocaine PAI MA/05/117, the Moroccan
Ministry of Higher Education and Scientic Research and CNRST
Project PROTARS III D11/22 and the European FP6 STREP project
CASSEM.
Fig. 9. Response curves of SSSS sandwich plate with viscoelastic core material 3M
ISD112 at 27 C and at 20 C, excitation amplitude at (L/4, L/4) is F = 1000 N.
of sandwich viscoelastic beams and plates modelled by two viscoelastic Maxwell models with three coefcients, taken from [31],
are analysed. The response curves corresponding to the viscoelastic
core materials at 27 C and at 20 C (Table 6) are depicted in Fig. 8.
Starting points of the series () and Pad continuation (j) methods
are presented. Again, the Pad approximants method is better than
the series one even if the radius of convergence is reduced. The
matrix inversion solution is used as a reference solution and the
obtained results with the matrix inversion, the series-continuation
99
8
ow
>
< U i x; y; z; t ui x; y; t z zi ox
ow
V i x; y; z; t vi x; y; t z zi oy
>
:
W i x; y; z; t wi x; y; t
i 1; 3;
A:1
where ui, vi are the in-plane displacements at each mid plane layer
and w the transverse displacement. The displacement eld for the
middle layer is given by
8
>
< U 2 x; y; z; t u2 x; y; t zbx x; y; t
V 2 x; y; z; t v2 x; y; t zby x; y; t
>
:
W 2 x; y; z; t wx; y; t
A:2
8
u1 x;y;tu3 x;y;t
3 x;y;t
zu1 x;y;tu
Hh Rx x; y; t
>
2
2
< U 2 x; y; z; t
v1 x;y;tv3 x;y;t
v1 x;y;tv3 x;y;t
z
Hh Ry x; y; t
V 2 x; y; z; t
2
2
>
:
W 2 x; y; z; t wx; y; t
ow
oy
where Rx
are the rotations of the normal of midplanes of the elastic layers. The number of independent generalized
displacements is then reduced to seven unknowns {U1(x, y, t), U3(x, y, t), V1(x, y, t), V3(x, y, t), w(x, y, t), Rx(x, y, t), Ry(x, y, t)}.
Using these displacements expressions, the strains elds in each
layer can be stated on:
8 i 9
>
=
< exx >
0 0 0
z zi oxo
e
>
;
eixy
6
40
o
oy
0 0 0
o
oy
o
ox
0 0 0 z zi oyo
9
8
e2xx >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
e2 >
>
=
< yy >
2 1
>
:
i
yy
o
ox
8 9
u1 >
>
>
>
>
>
>v >
>
>
>
1>
>
>
3>
>
> >
>
>
0
>
=
< u3 >
z zi oyo 7
5 v3 ;
>
>
> >
>
>
z zi oxo >
>
>w>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rx >
>
;
: >
Ry
h oxo
0
h oxo
0
2
2
1 z o
6
1
0
z o
0
6
6 1 z o 21 hz oxo 1 z o 21 hz oxo
2
6
exy 6 2 h ox 2 h ox 2 h ox 2 h ox
>
>
> 6
>
1
>
0
1h
0
>
>
e2xz >
> 4
>
h
>
>
>
1
1
;
: e2 >
0
0
h
h
yz
fue gt
u1j
v 1j
fei g Bi fu g;
u3j
v3j
wj
Rxj
Rzj ;
A:7
i1
where Vi are the volume of each layer, q2 and q1 (q1 = q3) are,
respectively, the mass density of the core and faces and [Ci] are
the matrices obtained from the strain stress laws:
mf
Ef
6
7
0 5
4 mf 1
1 m2f
0 0 1 mf
2
0
0
1 mc
6
0
0
6 mc 1
E c x 6
6 0 0 1 mc
C 2 x
0
6
1 m2c 6
0
1 mc
40 0
C 1 C 3
z Hh
o
ox
0 z Hh oxo
0 1 Hh
0
0
0
0
0
1 mc
3
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
A:8
A:4
8 9
> u1 >
>
> >
3>
>
>
>
v1 >
0
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
H o 7>
u3 >
z h ox 7>
>
=
<
7
H o 7
z h ox 7 v3
>
> >
7>
w>
0 5>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
H >
>
>
R
1 h >
x
>
>
>
;
: >
Ry
A:5
i 1; 2; 3
Rxj
i1
3 R
>
P
>
>
q Ni t Ni dV i
: Me
Vi i
i 1; 3
8 _
< fU g N i fue g;
8
3 R
P
>
>
B t C i Bi dV i
>
< K e
Vi i
0
A:3
ow
; Ry
ox
E E0 1 ig
j 1; n
A:6
where [Ni] are matrices that depend only on the shape functions of
the considered nite element discretisation in the elastic layer, n is
the number of nodes of the considered element and [Bi] is the product of the differential operating matrix relating {ei} to the shape
functions matrix [Ni] in the each layer [19,33].
B:1
100
Order 0 : E0
ik1 p0
k1
g1
Order 1 :
B:2
ip0
8
< E1 p1 E1
B:3
k1 E0
: E1 i k1 ip
0
g1
8
>
< Ek pk E1 Ek
k1
Order k P 2 :
P
i
>
Em pkm
: Ek k1 ip
0
g1
B:4
m1
c0 R2 ip0 R3 f0 R1
Order 0 : E0
B:5
R6 c0 R4 ip0 R5 f0
(
E1 p1 E1
B:6
Order 1 :
2p E R R i3p20 E0 R1 R3 E0 R5
E1 0 0 4 R62c0 R4 ip
0 R5 f0
8
< Ek pk E1 Ek
P
Pk1
Pk1
k1
Order k P 2 :
: E Dk R11 R4 j1 Ej cij i Ak R12 j1 Ej fij R5 j1 Ej pij
k
R6 c0 R4 ip R5 f0
R6 c0 R4 ip R5 f0
0
B:7
in which
8
c0 p20
>
>
>
< c 2p p
1
0 1
kP
1
>
>
>
pj pkj 2p0 pk Dk
: ck 2p0 pk
;
for k P 2
j1
where Dk
Pk1
j1
pj pkj
8
f0 p30
>
>
>
< f 3p2 p
1
0 1
k1
>
P
>
2
>
cj pkj 3p20 pk Ak
: fk 3p0 pk Dk p0
B:8
for k P 2
j1
where Ak Dk p0
Pk1
j1
cj pkj
8
>
T i gki ; i 1; 2; 3
>
>
i
>
>
>
3
>
P
>
> R1 kj ; R2 k1 T 2 T 3 k2 T 1 T 3 k3 T 1 T 2
>
>
>
j1
<
3
P
>
>
R3 k1 T 2 T 3 k2 T 1 T 3 k3 T 1 T 2 ; R4 T j
>
>
>
j1
>
>
>
>
3
>
Q
>
>
: R5 T 2 T 3 T 1 T 3 T 1 T 2 ; R6 T i
8
R7 2p0 E0 R4 R2 2p0 R11
>
>
>
<
R8 3p20 E0 R1 R3 E0 R5
>
R9 R6 c0 R4
>
>
:
R10 p0 R5 f0
B:9
i1
B:10
References
[1] Azrar L, Cochelin B, Damil N, Potier-Ferry M. An asymptotic numerical method
to compute the postbuckling behavior of elastic plates and shells. Int J Numer
Methods Eng 1993;36:125177.