Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
um =
n Ac
A c =wch hch
Incompressible (constant density)
D =
Reynolds Number:
Dh u m
D h=
Hydraulic diameter:
4 A c 2 w ch hch
=
per wch +h ch
x fd ,h ,lam
0.06 D
Dh
x fd ,t , lam
0.06 D Pr
Dh
h
x fd , t ,lam
Pr
x fd ,h ,lam
Rate of momentum to thermal boundary layer development in laminar flow is
related to Prandtl number. PAO is viscous but not conductive, has a high Prandtl
number. Momentum boundary layer will grow more quickly than the thermal
boundary layer and the flow will become much sooner hydrodynamically fully
developed than it will become thermally developed. (Nellis and Klein, 2008, pg. 647)
Thermal and momentum boundary layer growth for high Prandtl number (Nellis and
Klein, 2008, pg. 648)
The roughness at the duct surface will affect the Nusselt number and friction factor
for a turbulent flow but not a laminar flow (Nellis and Klein, 2008, pg. 650)
For internal flow, pressure gradient correlated using the Moody (or Darcy) friction
factor.
Average or apparent friction factor.
f =( p x=0 p x= L ) 2 D h
l ch u2m
f l ch u2m
P=
2Dh
(Nellis and Klein, 2008, pg. 642)
lc =length of channel
Local and average friction factor as a function of position in the entrance region of
an internal flow.
The average friction factor will approach the local friction factor in the fully
developed region. However, because the average friction factor has some memory
of the developing region it will always be somewhat larger than the local value.
Necessary to calculate average in order to solve an engineering problem, need to
know the total pressure drop across a duct that must be overcome by a pump or
fan.
Friction factor, laminar, fully developed region. (Nellis and Klein, 2008, pg. 652)
f fd ,h =
96
(11.3553 AR+1.9467 AR 2 1.7012 AR 3 +0.9563 AR 40.2537 AR 5)
D
h
Average friction factor for laminar flow, rectangular ducts, approximately computed
using dimensionless position L+ and this equation.
L+ dimensionless position.
+=
l ch
Dh D
L
+
L
0.00021
1+
3.44
(f
)
fd ,h
D
L+
+
4L +
4
1.25
+
L +
3.44
f 4
D
h
The product of the apparent friction factor in a rectangular duct and the Reynolds
number as a function of L+ for two values of the aspect ratio. The results predicted
by Eqs. (5-60) and (5-61) are shown, as well as the more exact solution provided by
Curr et al. (1972).
Local Nusselt number for a laminar, hydrodynamically and dully developed flow in a
rectangular duct exposed to unform heat flux.
AR: Aspect ratio of duct (the ratio of the minimum to the maximum dimensions)
NuDh, H, fd = 7.929
The average Nusselt number will approach the local Nusselt number in the
thermally fully developed region. However, because the average Nusselt number
has some memory of the developing region, it will always be somewhat larger than
the local value.
Local and average heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number as a function of
position. (Nellis and Klein, 2008. 646)
Can also use EES procedure DuctFlow_N, which interpolates a table of data provided
by Kakac et al. (1987) and corrects for the Prandtl number effects by applying the
correction associated with a square duct, also from Kakac et al. (1987).
call DuctFlow_N(Re,Pr,LoverD_h,ALPHA_c,relRough: {Nusselt_T}, Nusselt_H, f_app)
Inputs:
Re - Reynolds number based on properties evaluated at the bulk average
temperature
Pr - Prandtl number of the fluid evaluated at the bulk average temperature
LoverD_h - ratio of tube length to hydraulic diameter.
Aspect - ratio of the minimum to maximum dimension of duct. This value should be
<=1
RelRough - the ratio of the dispersions on the wall of the tube to the tube diameter
(must be between 0 and 0.05)
Outputs:
Nusselt_T - Nusselt number assuming a constant wall temperature
Nusselt_H - Nusselt number assuming a constant wall heat flux
f - apparent friction factor [-]
Use calculated local, conservative. Cant verify sources from Kakac.
Local heat transfer coefficient, correlated using a local Nusselt number that is based
on the hydraulic diameter.
Nu D =
h
h=
h Dh
k
Nu D k
Dh
h
T m=
T u d AC
m
A
c
c u T d Ac k
Ac
Ac
T
d
d A c + gv ' '' A c dx+ g '' ' Ac dx + q s'' per dx= c u T d A c + c
x
dx
A
A
c
u T d Ac
Ac
dxk
d Tm d
+
dx dx
k x d A c
Ac
Will be a useful equation if flow geometry needs further analysis. (Nellis and Klein, 2008,
pg. 672)
q s'' =
q conv
w hx l hx
q s' ' :heat flux from the duct wall to the fluid
gv ' '' : volumetric generation due to viscous dissipation
g' '' : externally iumposed volumetric generation in fluid (e.g. chemical reaction,
electrokinetic effects)
Ac
T
d
x
c
q s'' per =m
dTm
dx
Can be integrated directly to obtain Tm as a function of x. (Nellis and Klein, 2008, pg.
673)
mh ch=
2h
h
w fin k al ch
NEW
Fin Efficiency
mh ch=
2h
h
k w fin ch
fin =
tanh (mhch )
mhch
A tot = A s ,b n A c ,b +n A s , fin
Equation for Prime surface area
Overall surface efficicnecy, in terms of prime surface area, number of fins, surface
area of fins, and fin efficiency
o =1
N fin A s , fin
(1n)
A tot
Rconv ,tot =
1
o h Atot
Rcond =
t
k whx l hx s