Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
_____________________________
(Date)
_____________________________
_____________________________
Dear _______________________,
You have been chosen to be the Research Adviser of:
______________________________________________
___________________
______________________________________________
___________________
Sincerely,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
Conforme:
__________________________________
Signature over printed name
__________________________________
Date
Name of students/Section:
______________________________
______________________________
Adviser:
________________________________________________
___________________
________________________________________________
___________________
________________________________________________________________________
Research Title:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
No.
Date
Place
Remarks
Advisers
Signature
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
12
13
14
15
Noted by:
_____________________________
Research Teacher
_____________________________
Date
Adviser:
________________________________________________
___________________
________________________________________________
___________________
________________________________________________________________________
Research Title:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Date
Item
Working Title
(Research Topic)
Acceptance Form
Progress Report
Ethics Review
Checked/Endorsed
by
to
Proponent/s
Research Teacher
Research Teacher
Research Adviser
Research Teacher
Research Adviser
Research Adviser
Ethics Coordinator
Remarks
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
Statistical Treatment
Proposal Format
Proposal Content
Proposal Defense Schedule
Revision and Approval of
Proposal
Research Adviser
Statistician
Research Adviser
Research Teacher
Research Teacher
Research Adviser
Research Adviser
Panel members
Research Adviser
Panel members
Submitted by:
Noted by:
__________________________________
__________________________________
Signature of Adviser
__________________________________
Date
__________________________________
Signature/s of Proponent/s
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
Dear _______________________,
It would be highly appreciated if you could be a member of the Research Review
Panel to evaluate the proposed research of __________________________________________
__________________________________________.
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Should you find any basic deficiency that would warrant postponement of the
presentation, please inform the undersigned at least two days before the schedule of
the proposal defense.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
__________________________________
Student Research Committee Chair
__________________________________
Research Teacher
___________________
(R2) ________________________________________________
___________________
Research Title:
______________________________________________________________________________
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Adviser: _________________________________
Key:
5 Outstanding
4 Very Good
3 Good
2 Fair
1 Poor
Rating:
4.5 5.0
4.0 4.4
3.5 3.9
3.0 3.4
=
=
=
=
100
94
88
82
No
.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Group
Points
95
89
83
77
No.
3
4
5
6
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
2.9
2.4
1.9
1.4
=
=
=
=
71 76
65 70
60 64
Failed
Points
R1
R2
Recommendation:
Accepted with minor revision
________
________
________
Evaluated by:
_____________________________
Signature over printed name
_____________________________
Date
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
Dear _______________________,
It would be highly appreciated if you could come as member of the Research
Review Panel to evaluate the research paper of _______________________________________
__________________________________________.
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Should you find any basic deficiency that would warrant postponement of the
presentation, please inform the undersigned at least two days before the schedule of
the final defense.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
__________________________________
Student Research Committee Chair
__________________________________
Research Teacher
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
___________________
(R2) ________________________________________________
___________________
Research Title:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Adviser: _________________________________
Key:
5 Outstanding
4 Very Good
3 Good
2 Fair
1 Poor
No
.
Rating:
4.5 5.0
4.0 4.4
3.5 3.9
3.0 3.4
=
=
=
=
95
89
83
77
Equivalent
Points
100
94
88
82
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
2.9
2.4
1.9
1.4
=
=
=
=
71 76
65 70
60 64
Failed
No.
Systematic/logical arrangement of
materials/procedure
Comprehensive discussions
Equivalent
Points
Average
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
Recommendation:
___________
___________
________
Evaluated by:
_____________________________
Signature over printed name
_____________________________
Date
Research Form No. 08
_____________________________
(Date)
Requirements
Specimen collected
(if any)
Submitted to
Signature of the
person concerned
Date
NHC Curator
Borrowed lab
materials/equipment
Lab Supervisor
Language Editor
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
Statistician
Ethics review
Ethics review
coordinator
Approval Sheet
Registrar
Abstract
RMet Teacher
Library
Hardbound copy/CD*
Research Adviser
RMet Teacher
*The CD copy (pdf version) of the research must bear the scanned copy of the Approval Sheet. It must be
labeled with the name of the student, program, title of research, and name and signature of adviser.
Noted:
_______________________________
Student Research Committee Chair
_______________________________
Research Teacher
DEFENSE PRAYER
(to be lead by one of the researchers)
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.
Forever.
discovering. inventing.
nurturing.