Jon Christian Ryter – Obama Denounces the Supreme Court

Obama denounces the Supreme Court

Author: Jon Christian Ryter
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/Video/100128.html

Obama denounces the Supreme Court for overturning McCain-Feingold, a bill

that prevented GOP candidates from receiving contributions from private
enterprise as the social progressives arrogantly received millions of recycled
taxpayer dollars from far left special interest groups, labor unions like SEIU.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92SerxLWtc&feature=player-embedded#

With a straight face that only a consummate liar could master, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Resident Barack Hussein Obama had the audacity to stand before the American people
during his State of the Union address and say: "With all due deference to separation of
powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law..." Let's get it straight. The
Supreme Court vacated McCain-Feingold (tongue-in-cheek named the Bipartisan Campaign
Reform Act of 2002), Public Law 107-155, 116 Stat 81, which was enacted on March 27, 2002.
"A century of law." Let's do the math:

Page 1 of 3
Jon Christian Ryter – Obama Denounces the Supreme Court

2010
-2002
0008
Nah... the math says his numbers are off by about 92 years. The Supreme Court overturned 8
years of bad law resulting from an effective Cloward-Pivens attack on Republicans by the far
left when GOP candidates out-raised and outspent the social progressives and placed George
W. Bush rather than former Vice President and eco-wacko Al Gore in the White House in
2000. A law in 1974 limited how corporate money could be used, so you might say the high
court overturned 36 years of bad law since that law allowed corporate dollars to both parties to
be laundered through the DNC and the RNC from soft money (corporate donations that could
be used to pay salaries, travel expenses and rent) to hard money (citizen voter contributions
which was the only money that could be used to run campaign ads) the 1974 law was a joke. In
fact, it should have been called the "Maytag Law" during the Clinton years because the Bill,
Hillary and Al Gore used the DNC to launder yuans into dollars as millions of dollars in
illegal Chinese donations were laundered for the Clintons by the DNC, a finding published by
the Congressional Cox Report from the investigation and hearings of Chinagate by the House
Select Committee on National Security, published in 1999.

The left was determined to take Congress back in 2002, but to do so, they needed to curb
private enterprise's ability to fund conservative candidates while expanding the right of social
progressive political action groups to give more money to leftwing candidates. The law stunk
worse than a smelt factory in July. The GOP increased their seats in both Houses in 2002. In
2004 when the K Street lobbyists realized that GOP control of the House and Senate didn't
appear to be going away any time soon, special interest money that
had been going to the left since 1933 suddenly found its way into
the campaign coffers of the right. Overnight, conservative
Republicans became closet Democrats. In 2006 conservatives, now
hopelessly fractured, could no longer see a fiscal difference between
Democrats and Republicans. But somehow they also failed to see
the vast ideological differences between them, or took the time to
think about the consequences of surrendering their government to
communists (which, if you didn't know, is what social progressives
are).

But instead of fighting to replace corrupted GOP incumbents

during their State primaries by putting honest free enterprise
conservatives in their seats, they sat out the election of 2006 and let
the opposition win, not realizing that they were passing control of
the House and Senate not to moderate Democrats, but to
Cloward-Pivens radicals who were—and still are—determined to
destroy this country and complete the redistribution of the wealth
of the American people (you and me) to the governments of the
third world in order to transform the emerging nations into
modern industrial states within the newly formed global
government. The transfer of wealth takes place in the Cap &
Trade bill that Obama promised to sign into law during the State
of the Union address. Like Obamacare, Cap & Trade has passed
both Houses and is in Joint Conference waiting for the differences
to be ironed out.

Page 2 of 3
Jon Christian Ryter – Obama Denounces the Supreme Court

Been to Detroit lately? If you haven't, perhaps this photo will give you an idea of what every city
in the United States will look like within one decade after Cap & Trade goes into effect. At
that time, with no industrial infrastructure, your town will look like the streets of Port-au-
Prince, Haiti looks today. We will replace Haiti as the most impoverished nation in the western
hemisphere.

As he gave the State of the Union address on Jan. 27, Obama fired a shot over the bow of the
high court in what is reminiscent of Franklin D. Roosevelt's attack on the US Supreme
Court in 1937 for overturning, one at a time, every piece of New Deal legislation he signed into
law. The Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937, written by FDR subordinates led by
Raymond Moley and Attorney General Homer Cummings with virtually no input
whatsoever from Senate Majority Leader Joe Robinson [D-AR], House Speaker William
Bankhead [D-AL] and Senate and House Judiciary Committee chairmen Henry Ashurt [D-
AZ] and Hatton Summers [D-TX], was entered into Congress on Feb. 4, 1937. Although FDR
had the votes in both the House and Senate to easily enact the Judiciary Reorganization Bill of
1937, Bankhead refused to put the bill on the docket. Ashurt did the same. While each of the
House and Senate leaders knew Roosevelt was trying to put his own men on the court to
protect what each of them knew was unconstitutional legislation, Roosevelt argued he needed
six new justices on the high court because the court was so backlogged that they could not
handle the petitions before the court. When Senators Burton Wheeler [D-MT] and Carter
Glass [D-VA], the most powerful members of the Senate heard from Ashurt, they called Chief
Justice Charles Evans Hughes and asked about the backlog of cases in the court. Hughes
assured him there was no backlog. In fact, he said, there was currently no pending litigation
before the court. Not even FDR's own party liked the notion of politicizing the high court.

The Democrats scheduled a public hearing. FDR expected the Republicans to parade every
conservative constitutional scholar in the country into the hearing. Instead, the GOP sat back
and let the Democrats destroy FDR's court stacking plan. Wheeler did the opposite of what
FDR expected. His "experts" were all well-known liberals that not even FDR could challenge.
Every witness had one thing in common with all of the other witnesses. At one time or another,
each of them had challenged the authority of the high court, most in public forums. Each
argued that while they had their own disputes with the high court, it would be destructive to
the Constitution—and the nation—to allow the bulwark of an unbiased judicial system to be
torn asunder to serve the personal goals of an ambitious and overly aggressive chief executive.
When the media jumped on the story, no member of Congress was willing to vote "aye" on the
measure, and Roosevelt's court-stacking plan died.

Make no mistake about it. Barack Hussein Obama fired his opening salvo on the Supreme
Court of the United States. Before November he will introduce legislation to add at least two
new justices to the high court. This would give him a 7 to 4 victory on most issues, and those he
would likely lose today in 5 to 4 votes will be 6 to 5 victories. Adding two more social
progressives would guarantee the swift transformation of the United States into what would
initially be a democratic dictatorship, followed by legislated modifications to Constitution—
upheld as legal by the new court—that would give Obama the same head-of-State powers
"legislatively granted" to dictators like Josef Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Adolph Hitler,
Saddam Hussein and Hugo Chavez.

When Barack Hussein Obama arrogantly disrespects any tenet of the Constitution of the
United States, he disrespects all of us.

Page 3 of 3