Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Case
Study
Billabong
International
Ltd.,
is
a
leading
surfwear
and
skatewear
company,
and
one
of
Australias
iconic
brands.
From
humble
beginnings
on
the
Gold
Coast
in
1973,
it
has
grown
through
international
expansion,
diversification
and
acquisitions
to
become
a
leading
international
surfwear
grown
its
commitment
to
the
global
boardsports
sector
through
athlete
sponsorship,
event
hosting
and
management
and
support
of
industry
bodies.
But
in
2013
the
company
was
in
serious
trouble.
After
a
couple
of
years
of
poor
results
Billabong
International
lost
$859.5
million
last
financial
year
more
than
three
times
its
market
value
after
writing
off
the
value
of
brands1
such
as
Billabong
and
Element
by
more
than
$600
million.
It
stock
price
had
tumbled
from
a
once
high
of
about
$18
to
a
mere
40
cents
(see
chart
below).
Billabong
risked
going
bankrupt
before
a
bail
out
by
an
American
investment
group
Centrebridge
and
Oaktree
offering
a
$386
million
debt
and
equity
rescue
package
last
September.
Under
the
leadership
of
new
CEO
Neil
Fiske,
the
company
is
now
engaging
in
a
bold
turnaround
strategy.
Is
it
too
little,
too
late?
$12
$10
$8
$6
$4
$2
$0
A
brands
value
is
an
intangible
asset
listed
on
the
balance
sheet
of
a
company.
Billabong
International
de-
valued
their
brands
by
$600m
contributing
to
the
large
financial
loss.
Company
History
Billabong
was
founded
on
Australia's
Gold
Coast
in
1973
by
surfer
and
surfboard
shaper
Gordon
Merchant
and
his
then
partner,
Rena.
Those
early
days
were
rather
inauspicious,
with
the
pair
designing
boardshorts
at
home,
cutting
them
out
on
the
kitchen
table
and
then
carting
the
finished
product
around
to
the
local
surf
shop
to
sell.
The
business
found
immediate
traction,
with
surfers
drawn
to
the
superior
functionality
of
the
Billabong
boardshorts.
The
next
step
for
the
fledgling
brand
was
to
introduce
the
better
local
surfers
to
Billabong
and
incorporate
them
in
the
marketing
of
the
brand.
Company-sponsored
contests
and
special
events
would
later
follow.
By
the
1980s,
Billabong
International
had
firmly
established
its
place
in
Australian
surf
culture
and
was
ready
for
international
expansion.
The
initial
focus
was
on
the
large
North
American
market
and,
again,
the
brand
enjoyed
success.
Sales
began
to
grow
in
other
offshore
markets,
licenses
were
granted
in
a
number
of
territories
including
New
Zealand,
Japan
and
South
Africa,
and
in
the
late
1980s
a
new
beachhead
was
established
in
Europe.
Through
the
1990s
the
surf
industry
grew
exponentially
and
professional
surfing
gained
a
newfound
respectability.
The
company
also
followed
its
core
customers
into
other
boardsports
markets,
including
skate,
snow
and
wake,
where
it
replicated
its
proven
business
model.
By
the
close
of
the
decade,
Billabong
had
been
restructured
to
capitalise
on
the
growing
global
opportunities
in
the
boardsports
sector.
The
restructure
set
the
foundation
for
an
initial
public
offering
on
the
Australian
stock
exchange
in
mid
2000.
This
gave
the
company
greater
impetus
and
the
financial
capacity
to
grow
the
business.
Some
seven
months
after
the
public
float
the
company
demonstrated
its
growth
plans
with
the
acquisitions
of
the
Von
Zipper
sunglasses
brand.
Four
months
later,
the
company
acquired
the
emerging
Element
Skateboards
brand
and
went
on
the
build
the
brand
using
the
same
business
model
as
the
original
Billabong
brand.
The
successful
integration
of
those
businesses
saw
the
company
add
to
its
stable
of
brands
in
following
years,
with
Honolua
Surf
Company
acquired
in
January
2004,
Kustom
footwear
and
Palmers
Surf
in
September
2004,
a
controlling
interest
in
the
beachculture
airport-retail
business
in
November
2005
(later
converted
to
100%
ownership)
and
Nixon
watches
and
accessories
in
January
2006.
Other
businesses
were
also
established,
including
the
Element
footwear
range
and
various
branded
retail
stores
around
the
world.
In
2007
the
Group
continued
to
build
its
brand
portfolio
with
the
acquisitions
of
the
specialist
wetsuit
brand
Xcel
and
girls
swimwear
brand
Tigerlily.
This
was
followed
in
2008
with
the
acquisition
of
the
Sector
9
skateboard
brand
and
the
DaKine
premium
boardsport
accessories
brand.
In
late
2009
the
Company
formally
entered
the
online
sales
channel
through
the
acquisition
of
US-
based
boardsport
retailer
Swell.com
and
the
purchase
of
an
interest
in
Australia's
Surfstitch.com.
In
March
2010
the
Company
enhanced
its
skate
offer
through
the
signing
of
an
agreement
to
license
the
California-based
Plan
B
skateboard
brand.
This
was
followed
in
July
2010
by
the
acquisition
of
the
California-based
RVCA
brand,
the
completion
in
September
of
the
acquisition
of
the
West
49
retail
chain
in
Canada
and
the
completion
of
the
acquisitions
of
Australia's
Jetty
Surf,
Surf
Dive
'n'
Ski
(SDS)
and
Rush
retail
banners
in
November.
In
April
2012
Billabong
completed
the
transfer
of
its
Nixon
brand
into
a
new
joint
venture
company.
The
joint
venture
saw
Nixon
become
an
independent
business
owned
by
Billabong
International
and
Trilantic
Capital
Partners
(each
holding
approximately
48.5%)
and
Nixon
management
holding
the
balance
of
approximately
3%.
In
July
2013
Billabong
completed
the
sale
of
its
DaKine
brand
to
Altamont
and
West
49
brand
in
February
2014.
49
in
late
June.
Further
acquisitions
were
then
announced
in
the
remainder
of
2010:
the
acquisition
of
apparel
brand
RVCA
was
confirmed
in
July
and
the
label's
founder
Pat
Tenore
explained
his
decision
in
the
Billabong
press
release:
"One
of
the
key
things
about
Billabong
is
its
respect
for
the
creative
independence
of
each
of
its
brands
and
that
level
of
flexibility
will
allow
RVCA
to
maintain
its
identity
while
benefiting
from
the
support
of
the
wider
Billabong
group";
after
RVCA,
Billabong
then
returned
to
the
retail
market
and
ended
the
year
with
the
October
acquisition
of
the
Australian
retail
stores
Surf
Dive
'n'
Ski
and
Jetty
Surffrom
vendor
General
Pants
Groupfor
an
undisclosed
amount.
A full description of current operations is available in the annual report available on Blackboard.
Corporate Structure
Turnaround
Strategy
The
new
company
mantra
under
the
new
CEO
Neil
Fiske
is
Fewer,
Bigger,
Better.
Fewer,
bigger,
better
businesses.
Fewer,
bigger,
better
brands.
Fewer,
bigger,
better
styles.
suppliers
marketing
programsIT
systemscapital
investments.
This
philosophy
will
pervade
everything
we
do.
The
easiest
way
to
make
money
is
to
make
the
big
ideas
bigger.
Make
no
mistake.
This
is
a
turnaround.
This
is
a
complex,
difficult
turnaround.
We
are
not
daunted
by
challenges
we
face,
but
neither
do
we
underestimate
them.
Quite
simply,
the
business
over
the
last
several
years
has
become
enormously
complex
and
diversified.
We
have
been
trying
to
do
too
many
things
and
none
of
them
particularly
well.
Building
global
brands
takes
one
skill
set.
Running
regional
multi-brand
retail
is
something
totally
different.
And
being
a
pure
play
multi-brand
e-commerce
business
is
another
thing
altogether.
Then
multiply
that
complexity
by
a
regionalized
organization
structure
with
independent
decision
making
and
different
operating
infrastructures.
As
complexity
grew,
we
lost
focus.
We
confused
the
organization.
As
someone
said
to
me
on
my
first
global
tour
of
the
Company:
We
need
clarity.
Are
we
a
retail
company
with
brands
or
are
we
brands
with
retail?
I
believe
the
greatness
of
Billabong
lies
in
the
authenticity,
heritage
and
aspiration
of
our
brands.
Period.
Thats
what
we
do
best.
Thats
what
we
need
to
build
upon.
The
core
of
this
business
is
good.
Its
profitable
and
can
be
even
more
profitable.
It
has
real
growth
potential.
Our
direction
will
put
the
focus
back
on
that
core.
I
know
that
Billabong,
globally,
in
Australia
and
especially
here
on
the
Gold
Coast,
has
an
iconic
status.
That
means
when
you
hit
turbulent
times
there
will
be
no
shortage
of
opinions
and
speculation.
So
lets
not
lose
sight
of
the
facts.
The
Billabong
brand
is
still
the
number
one
brand
in
specialty
surf
shops
in
both
Australia
and
the
US.
It
has
over
90%
awareness
and
high
regard
in
the
target
demographic.
And
by
the
way
the
current
world
champion,
Joel
Parkinson.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
Brand:
Building
powerful
global
brands
is
seen
as
the
core
of
what
Billabong
does
well.
I
believe
the
greatness
of
Billabong
lies
in
the
authenticity,
heritage
and
aspiration
of
our
brands.
Period.
Thats
what
we
do
best.
Thats
what
we
need
to
build
upon.
Strategic
focus
on
the
big
three
brands
(Billabong,
Element,
RVCA)
and
emerging
brands
that
have
global
scale,
but
are
locally
responsive.
Product:
Build
a
strong
merchandise
planning
and
buying.
Develop
clear
assortment
strategies
with
a
balance
of
global
versus
regional
mix,
and
fewer,
larger
style
to
reduce
product
lines
by
25%.
Marketing.
Develop
an
integrated
marketing
plan
12
month
calendar
by
region.
Develop
customer
database,
with
emphasis
on
digital
to
target
the
15-18
year
target
consumer,
customer
relationship
management.
Omni-Channel.
Mix
of
online,
own
stores
and
wholesale
to
other
retailers.
The
best
customers
shop
in
all
channels.
Drive
retail
profitability
through
closures,
productivity,
rent
negotiations
and
inventory
management.
Unify
three
channels
to
build
scale.
Invest
to
build
key
wholesale
accounts.
Supply-Chain.
Large
cost
reductions
possible
through
productivity
improvements.
Currently
logistics
costs
are
50-100%
higher
than
industry
benchmarks.
Aim
to
improve
productivity
stock
turnover
from
2.4X
to
4X
over
next
few
years.
Diversify
out
of
China
for
cost
and
capability.
Move
to
fewer,
bigger
suppliers.
Organization.
Alignment
of
organizational
structure
with
new
strategy.
Develop
global
brand
structure
for
the
big
three
brands.
Strengthen
the
merchandizing,
design
and
marketing
teams
through
new
talent.
Build
global
scale
and
capability
in
four
critical
areas:
finance,
the
supply
chain,
IT
and
direct
to
customer
platform
(online
sales).
Recruiting
talent
for
key
positions
in
the
leadership
team.
Rationalizing
the
administration
by
eliminating
low
priority
work
and
streamlining
layers
and
diversity
(doing
fewer
things
bigger
and
better).
Financial
Discipline.
Key
cost
reductions
(inventory
management,
logistics,
administrative
streamlining)
to
fund
the
marketing
war
chest.
Portfolio actions
Sold
West
49
Strategic
review
of
SurfStitch
and
Swell
Distribution changes
Country
tiering
Chile,
Peru
to
distributor
model
(Forus)
Smaller
brands
to
distributors
outside
of
Tier
1
countries
Restructuring
Organisational
re-alignment
Europe
downsizing
South
Africa
restructuring
Talent
Financial / Corporate
The
Surfwear
Market
Here
is
one
commentators
view
about
Billabongs
brand
prospects.
Regaining
their
cool:
can
the
big
three
surf
brands
recover?
by
Marketing
ON
2
October
2013
By
Andrew
Warren
Australias
big
three
surf
brands
have
found
themselves
in
choppy
financial
waters.
Last
week,
Billabong,
one
of
Australias
most
iconic
surf
brands,
confirmed
a
$386
million
refinancing
agreement
with
US
consortium
Centerbridge-Oaktree
Capital
Management
acquiring
a
40%
share,
guaranteeing
the
struggling
brands
short-term
future
after
it
posted
an
$859
million
loss
last
financial
year.
Like
Billabong,
public
surf
company
Quiksilver
has
reported
declining
revenues,
asset
write-downs
and
growing
losses,
recently
announcing
third-quarterly
earnings
had
declined
84%.
Privately-owned
Rip
Curl
has
also
been
in
profit
free-fall.
In
mid-2012
Rip
Curl
founders
Brian
Singer
and
Doug
Warbrick
engaged
Bank
of
America
Merrill
Lynch
to
help
source
a
prospective
buyer
for
the
brand.
The
planned
sale
was
abandoned
in
March
with
a
lack
of
interest
at
the
asking
price
of
$400
million.
The
current
woes
are
a
long
way
from
the
heady
days
of
the
1990s
and
2000s,
which
saw
each
of
the
big
three
surf
brands
aggressively
pursue
international
expansion
and
high-profile
sports
sponsorship
deals.
So,
why
have
the
Big
Three
surf
brands
found
themselves
struggling?
And
what
is
the
way
to
calmer
waters?
Heady
ride,
then
dumped
Each
of
the
big
three
had
grown
embryonically
in
the
1970s
alongside
the
rising
popularity
of
the
beach
and
surfing
in
Australia
and
California.
The
people
running
each
business
were
avid
surfers
themselves
and
brands
established
strong
credibility
within
surfing
subculture.
Billabong,
Quiksilver
and
Rip
Curl
clothing
came
to
symbolise
surfings
laid-back,
counter-cultural
values,
equally
consumable
by
non-surfers
that
identified
with
the
lifestyle.
The
1990s
and
2000s
saw
Quiksilver
and
Billabong
aggressively
acquire
emerging
youth
labels
(DC
Shoes,
Rossignol
Skis,
Element,
RVCA,
Dakine,
Mrs
Palmers
surf
gear,
Nixon
watches)
to
consolidate
market
share.
The
brands
integrated
business
operations
by
funding
new
retail
stores,
buying-up
existing
chains
and
standardising
design.
Between
2005
and
2011
Billabong
purchased
some
600
retail
outlets;
150
of
which
have
closed
in
the
last
12
months.
Large
department
chains
have
also
featured
prominently
and
agreements
with
surf
brands
were
intended
to
facilitate
greater
access
to
non-surfing
consumers.
The
companies
fortunes
further
rode
on
a
re-organised
World
Championship
Tour
which
included
highly
publicised
surfing
events
on
every
inhabited
continent.
Snowboarding
and
skateboarding
rose
to
greater
prominence
and
complemented
the
values
already
imbued
in
the
surf
brands.
New
and
highly
profitable
markets
emerged
in
Europe
and
Asia.
Problems
facing
the
large
surf
brands
such
as
Billabong
are
a
reminder
that
doing
business
in
surfing
is
volatile
and
inherently
risky.
But
the
big
three
will
survive
in
one
form
or
another.
The
challenge
for
them
and
other
emerging
brands
is
to
maintain
subcultural
credibility.
This
article
was
originally
published
at
The
Conversation.
Read
the
original
article.
http://theconversation.com/regaining-their-cool-can-the-big-three-surf-
brands-recover-18406
Andrew
Warren
does
not
work
for,
consult
to,
own
shares
in
or
receive
funding
from
any
company
or
organisation
that
would
benefit
from
this
article,
and
has
no
relevant
affiliations.