Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
MERITS:
1
The linear water way of this alignment runs straight almost on the centre line of the
existing road
In this alignment curves proposed are of larger radius which results in clear visibility
and comfort riding.
DEMERITS:
1
Approaches length of this alignment is very large and runs through agricultural
land.
Land acquisition required is very large when compared to other two alignments.
MERITS
This alignment runs along the existing road itself
This alignment requires minimum land acquisition.
Approach length is very less when compared to alignment 1.
DEMERITS
3 Curves introduced at very short intervals when compared to other alignments which
affects riding comfort.
1
2
MERITS
The linear water way of this alignment runs straight.
This alignment requires land acquisition only on approaches which is comparatively
3
4
5
6
.
DEMERITS:
1.
2.
SL.NO
1
DESCRIPTION
Colour
ALIGNMENT-1
Yellow
ALIGNMENT-2
Green
ALIGNMENT-3
Golden yellow
Skew angle
144442
145854
132931.
Length
733.16 m
326.10 m
302.06 m
1.97 m U/S
11.84 m D/S on
alagramam side and
15.99 m D/S on
thenputhur side
Number of curves
Three
Three
Two
Land Acquistion
LA involved
Minimum
involved
LA LA involved
CONCLUSION:
Considering all the merits, demerits of the three alignments, the alignment no-3 marked in
Golden yellow colour is recommended and submitted for alignment committee approval even
though alignment no-2 requires very less land acquisition, the linear waterway is in curve portion.