Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
www.executiveboard.com
All-Inclusive, Unlimited Access to a Comprehensive Suite of Services
Dynamically Delivered Through Multiple Channels
Implementation
Research Executive
Tools and
and Analysis Forums
Diagnostics
Identify Proven Solutions Frame Thoughts and Stimulate Ideas Save Time and Reduce Risk
• Best Practices • Senior Executive Retreats • Implementation Toolkits
• Quantitative Analysis • Member-Hosted Forums • Emerging Issue Resource Centers
• Daily News Highlights • Leadership Briefings • Department Performance
Assessment
Audit Director Roundtable Corporate Strategy Board Investor Relations Roundtable Risk Integration Strategy Council
CFO Executive Board Division Finance Forum Procurement Strategy Council Tax Director Roundtable
Controllers’ Leadership Roundtable Government Finance Roundtable Real Estate Executive Board Treasury Leadership Roundtable
CFO1AOT7M9 © 2008 C
Corporate EExecutive
i B Board.
d All Ri
Rights
h R Reserved.
d
Corporate Executive Board ®
Overview of the
Planning Process
Structuring the Strategy Process
Strategic planning is the periodic resetting of mid-to long-term
strategic direction and priorities; the process focuses on key issues
and the specific initiatives needed to attain long-term strategic goals.
A Valued Activity
Somewhat
Significant Very
29% Significant
44%
Not at all
Significant Extremely
3% Significant
n = 796.
14%
CSB19GDVQL © 2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved. 2
Key Components
Establishing Guidelines and Strategic Direction
– Who should be involved with the process and what are our strategic aims?
Budgeting
– How can we align our budget and operating plans with corporate strategy?
Illustrative
Time Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Frame
Process steps for Set of Discussion Planning dialogue Central and Companywide
Key upcoming cycle assumptions of strategic between corporate BU budget e-mails on strategy
Outputs about external alternatives and BU head targets created objectives
Evaluation of trends and communicated
previous year’s threats Presentation Hiring and Dashboards
performance; of strategic BU develops redefinition created and
lessons learned Evaluation plan to board individual plan in of employee monitored
of internal line with corporate roles/
Preplanning competencies goals responsibilities Strategy
dialogues responsibilities
between BU BU adjusts plans cascaded down
heads and center based on center’s the line
input
Presentation of BU
strategic plan to
the board
CSB19GDVQL © 2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved. 4
1 Establishing Process Internal/External Defining Formulating Communicating
Budgeting
Guidelines Analysis Corporate Strategy BU Strategy the Plan
May
“Run the Business” Strategy Development Process
• BU Strategy
July August
Process Design
plans and objectives 5-year financial
and Center
• Update key projection (if
technical strategic needed after annual
initiatives budget is prepared)
Corporate • Kick-off planning • Update 5-year • Consolidate
process with financial projection 5-year plan
business units • Partner business
• Provide standard unit leader and
tools, templates facilitate strategy
development
• Facilitate strategic
process; provide
standard strategy
toolkit to simulate
strategic insights
Milestones • BU strategy • BU Strategy Board • Publish 5-
*
meeting/workshop Reviews year “Run the
Palladio Corporation Business” Plan
Responsibilities Chart
analysis
Design • Strategy formulation (strategic workshops) • Support SBU on demand with • Advise OCE on
• Target setting Facilitation of Business Strategy workshops Decisions regarding identified strategic issues
SBU target setting Functional guidance on strategy and
Competitive Technological
Competitor using cash flow from international markets Impact of new orally administered treatments on
to fund initiatives “in-play” in the United States existing core injectable product line
Organizational Regulatory
Primary decision making regarding treatment Strategic Issues Drug approval processes becoming less
options moving away from traditional Threats and antagonistic, more cooperative and more
marketing channel contacts (i.e., specialists) Opportunities partnership-oriented
to third-party payers and primary physicians
Demographic Economic
Increased longevity, improved diagnostic capabilities, Presence of treatment on third-party payer approved
adoption of western dietary habits will increase list determines consumer willingness to pay premium
treatment demand for convenience
* Pseudonym, case disguised.
Competitive Technological
Competitor using cash flow from international markets Impact of new orally administered treatments on
to fund initiatives “in-play” in the United States existing core injectable product line
Organizational Regulatory
Primary decision making regarding treatment Strategic Issues Drug approval processes becoming less
options moving away from traditional Threats and antagonistic, more cooperative and more
marketing channel contacts (i.e., specialists) Opportunities partnership-oriented
to third-party payers and primary physicians
Demographic Economic
Increased longevity, improved diagnostic capabilities, Presence of treatment on third-party payer approved
adoption of western dietary habits will increase list determines consumer willingness to pay premium
treatment demand for convenience
* Pseudonym, case disguised.
CSB19GDVQL © 2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved. 10
Establishing Process Internal/External 3 Defining Formulating Communicating
Budgeting
Guidelines Analysis Corporate Strategy BU Strategy the Plan
Growth Strategy
Introducing an unfamiliar business system Adding to the core business by entering
that delivers more effective growth within an adjacent industry space using an
the existing industry. unfamiliar business system.
Matrix
• Brand Attributes Existing
Core Value Adjacency
• Employee Skill Set Maximization Extension
Existing New
Setting Goals
• Ambition to gain or retain the leading position in current markets
meet objectives
Analysis of markets • Anticipation of major economic or market developments
or macroeconomic
trends • Methods vary depending upon market situation and other external variables
• Examination of business projections given current strengths
• Ad-hoc discussion of long-term goals over the course of the year
Business line
• Assessment of objectives necessary for the coming year or years
partnership or
internal analysis • Negotiation with business units concerning their assessments of appropriate goals
• Determination by business unit management; “Healthier businesses tend to set
bold, more creative goals”
Tradition or desire to
meet predetermined • A predisposition towards certain performance measures stemming from the
goals, set by board of corporation’s culture—essentially, an historical preference
directors, charter, • Certain levels of profitability, market share, ROI or other traditional measures
or long-term plan
Business System
New
Core New Business
• Pricing Model
Transformation Creation
• Value Chain Structure
• Leveraged Technology
• Applied Intellectual
Property
• Brand Attributes Existing
Core Value Adjacency
• Employee Skill Set Maximization Extension
Existing New
Question Template
3 How to Win • Value proposition to
• What are specific features of your future products? How do these differ from today? target customers
• How do your major competitors look in three years? In which areas are they dominant? Are there • Sources of competitive
“white spaces”? advantage
4 Capabilities Required for Success
• Functionalities
• In which core capabilities must you excel, compared to your competitors?
• Critical competencies
• What processes or functionalities are necessary in three years, but currently present to a lesser
• Required investments
degree, or absent altogether?
5 Performance Management Systems Required • Metrics to judge success
• How will you measure success in creating value for the customer? • Reward systems
• What incentive programs are necessary to promote this value creation? • Feedback mechanisms
Strategy Discussion
• Other principal decision • Fact-based analysis
makers, typically:
• Not
– CFO
– Short-term financial
– Group or division head
performance
– HR head
– Annual operating planning
– Top BU leaders
– Budgeting or investment
• Head of strategy as owner decision making
of process – All discussed elsewhere
• 6–12 total, must be capable
of real discussion
How • Intense BU-owned
Guidelines
preparation
• Supported by strategy group;
Where • BU site if possible but not overly “templated”
• Mandatory prereading
• Real discussion, not “dog
May
When • Annually—timing linked to and pony” slide show
overall corporate calendar • Constructive challenge,
• Half- to full-day per BU not “gotcha”
Planning Outputs
1 Aspirations • Revenue
• What are specific business unit aspirations in terms of market leadership, share, penetration, • Operating margin
customer loyalty, and brand image? • Earnings growth
• Three years from now, why are you the company of choice for your various customer groups? • Industry-specific metrics
2 Where to Play
• Customer segments
• In three years, how will your customer base change? What types of customers will you gain or lose? • Geographic areas
• In which specific markets will you play? In which markets will you not play? • Product types
• How will the types and mix of products be different from today? • Distribution channels
• How will distribution channels differ?
3 How to Win • Value proposition to
• What are specific features of your future products? How do these differ from today? target customers
• How do your major competitors look in three years? In which areas are they dominant? Are there • Sources of competitive
“white spaces”? advantage
4 Capabilities Required for Success
• Functionalities
• In which core capabilities must you excel, compared to your competitors?
• Critical competencies
• What processes or functionalities are necessary in three years, but currently present to a lesser
• Required investments
degree, or absent altogether?
5 Performance Management Systems Required • Metrics to judge success
• How will you measure success in creating value for the customer? • Reward systems
• What incentive programs are necessary to promote this value creation? • Feedback mechanisms
CSB19GDVQL © 2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved. 15
Architecting a Good Strategic Conversation
Who • CEO and BU head What • Mid- to long-term strategy
• Other principal decision • Fact-based analysis
makers, typically:
• Not
– CFO
– Short-term financial
– Group or division head
performance
– HR head
– Annual operating planning
– Top BU leaders
– Budgeting or investment
• Head of strategy as owner decision making
of process – All discussed elsewhere
• 6–12 total, must be capable
of real discussion
How • Intense BU-owned preparation
• Supported by strategy group;
but not overly “templated”
Where • BU site if possible
• Mandatory prereading
• Real discussion, not “dog
and pony” slide show
May
When • Annually—timing linked to • Constructive challenge,
overall corporate calendar not “gotcha”
• Half- to full-day per BU
Stage 5—Budgeting
Objective: Determine Corporate and BU budgets
to align resource allocation to strategic priorities.
Budgeting Structures
process (“Imposed Buy-in can become an issue if budget
Budgeting”) holders feel targets are unrealistic
1
Jan
Budgeting Cycle
Planning Cycle
1
Jun
2 3
Dec
Budgeting Cycle 1
Planning Cycle 2 3
Strategy Communication
EVP Sales to
Core Message Document
Divisional VP
1. Become the most admired growth
company in America
• Seven years of remarkable growth
• Time to move to the next level Divisional VP to
• Evolution based on RadioShack’s Regional Sales
core principles, strategy Managers
2. Realigning organization to heighten
our already intensely customer-
focused culture Regional Sales
• Become a multichannel sales/ Managers to District
Cascade
service company Sales Managers
• Expand customer base
District Sales
Managers to Store
Managers
Store Manager to
Frontline Staff
Monitoring Strategy
Balanced Scorecard
Balanced Scorecard
Business targets
Profitably
Achieve earnings targets Earnings of $X M
EVP Sales to
Divisional VP
Store Manager to
Frontline Staff
p 9: Duke Energy Corporation; Marakon Associates; Working Council for Chief Financial Officers research.
p.10: Christensen, Clayton M., Making Strategy: Learning by Doing, Harvard Business Review (November/December 1997):
141156; Wexler Company; Corporate Strategy Board research.
w w w.executiveboard.com
CSB19GDVQL