Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1
0095-1137/02/$04.00⫹0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.1.281–283.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
The performance of a strand displacement amplification assay (the BDProbeTec-SDA assay) in detecting
Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens was evaluated. When performed under stringent quality control
conditions, the BDProbeTec-SDA assay is a sensitive, specific, and efficient method for the screening of large
numbers of noninvasively obtained specimens. Because the predictive value of an assay is a function of the
prevalence of the disease, culture confirmation is needed for samples with positive results from populations in
which the prevalence of a disease is low or in situations in which false-positive results may have important
medical, psychosocial, or medicolegal consequences.
281
282 NOTES J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.
TABLE 1. Performance of BDProbeTec-SDA system compared difficult to remove caps that are placed closely in the block
with that of culture for detection of N. gonorrhoeae in without cross-contamination. The company now recommends
3,544 urine specimens from patients attending the
that the block be tapped on the counter to shake down fluid
Denver Metro Health (STD) Clinica
before removal of the caps.
No. of specimens
Test result
(% of total) The work area and the automatic pipettor should be cleaned
frequently with 20% sodium hypochlorite-detergent solution.
BDProbeTec-SDA assay positive, culture positive ............... 129 (3.64) To improve reproducibility, work surfaces are monitored
BDProbeTec-SDA assay culture negative ............................. 23 (0.65)
BDProbeTec-SDA assay negative, culture positive.............. 1 (0.03)
weekly by performing the BDProbeTec-SDA assay with envi-
BDProbeTec-SDA assay negative, culture negative............. 3,391 (95.68) ronmental samples taken before and after routine cleaning. If
a
the samples test positive, work surfaces are recleaned and
The performance of the BDProbeTec-SDA assay was based on a prevalence
by culture of 3.63%. retested on the following day. The performance of the assay
should be monitored continuously, and training should be up-
dated.
were recorded as negative for N. gonorrhoeae. Specimens with Another explanation for discrepant results is the higher sen-
an amplification control MOTA value of ⬍1,000 were re- sitivity of the BDProbeTec-SDA system, which may detect
corded as indeterminate, as described in the package insert. nucleic acid from as few as 10 gonococci. Becton Dickinson
N. gonorrhoeae was detected in 129 specimens by culture and informed us that BDProbeTec-SDA assay-positive specimens
in 152 specimens by the BDProbeTec-SDA assay (Table 1). On with MOTA scores above 10,000 are true positives. Therefore,
the basis of a prevalence of 3.63% by culture, the sensitivity, we retest specimens with MOTA values in the range of 2,000 to
specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive 10,000, which represent about 50% of specimens with discrep-
value for the BDProbeTec-SDA system were 99.2, 99.3, 84.9, ant results.
diseases: the global picture. Bull. W. H. O. 68:639–654. 11. Pasternak, R., P. Vuorinen, T. Pitkajarvi, M. Koskela, and A. Miettinen.
8. Domeika, M., M. Bassiri, and P. A. Mardh. 1994. Diagnosis of genital 1997. Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx
Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic males by testing urine by assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using
PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2350–2352. urine specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:402–405.
9. Martin, D. H., C. Cammarata, B. Van Der Pol, R. B. Jones, T. C. Quinn, 12. Walker, C. K., J. G. Kahn, A. E. Washington, H. B. Peterson, and R. L.
C. A. Gaydos, K. Crotchfelt, J. Schachter, J. Moncada, D. Junkind, B. Sweet. 1993. Pelvic inflammatory disease: metaanalysis of antimicrobial reg-
Turner, and C. Peyton. 2000. Multicenter evaluation of Amplicor and auto- imen efficacy. J. Infect. Dis. 168:969–978.
mated Cobas Amplicor CT/NG tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Mi- 13. Xu, K., V. Glanton, S. R. Johnson, C. Beck-Sauge, V. Bhullar, D. H. Candal,
crobiol. 38:3544–3549. K. S. Pettus, C. E. Farshy, and C. M. Black. 1998. Detection of Neisseria
10. Pasternak, R., P. Vuorinen, and A. Miettinen. 1997. Evaluation of the Gen- gonorrhoeae infection by ligase chain reaction testing of urine among ado-
Probe Chlamydia trachomatis transcription-mediated amplification assay lescent women with and without Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex.
with urine specimens from women. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:676–678. Transm. Dis. 25:533–538.