Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
doi:10.1111/anae.12316
Original Article
Intra-operative correction of acidosis, coagulopathy and
hypothermia in combat casualties with severe haemorrhagic
shock
J. J. Morrison,1,2 J. D. Ross,3 H. Poon,1 M. J. Midwinter4 and J. O. Jansen5,6
1 Research Fellow and Specialty Registrar in General Surgery, 4 Defence Professor of Surgery, Academic Department of
Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
2 Research Fellow and Specialty Registrar in General Surgery, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam
Houston, San Antonio, Texas, USA
3 Director, Trauma and Clinical Care Research, 59th Medical Wing, Science and Technology Ofce, Joint Base San
Antonio-Lackland, Texas, USA
5 Consultant in General Surgery and Intensive Care Medicine, 144 Parachute Medical Squadron, 16 (Air Assault)
Medical Regiment, Colchester, UK
6 Consultant, Departments of Surgery & Intensive Care Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Inrmary, Aberdeen, UK
Summary
We assessed acidosis, coagulopathy and hypothermia, before and after surgery in 51 combat troops operated on for
severe blast injury. Patients were transfused a median (IQR [range]) of 27 (1738 [584]) units of red cell concentrate, 27 (1638 [483]) units of plasma, 2.0 (0.53.5 [013.0]) units of cryoprecipitate and 4 (26 [017]) pools of
platelets. The pH, base excess, prothrombin time and temperature increased: from 7.19 (7.107.29 [6.507.49]) to
7.45 (7.407.51 [7.157.62]); from
9.0 ( 13.5 to
4.5 [ 28 to 2]) mmol.l 1 to 4.5 (1.08.0 [ 7 to
1
+11]) mmol.l ; from 18 (1521 [924]) s to 14 (1118 [921]) s; and from 36.1 (35.137.1 [33.038.1]) C to 37.4
(37.037.9 [36.038.0]) C, respectively. Contemporary intra-operative resuscitation strategies can normalise the
physiological derangements caused by haemorrhagic shock.
.................................................................................................................................................................
The sequelae of haemorrhage the lethal triad of acidosis, coagulopathy and hypothermia are well recognised [13]. Damage control surgery an abbreviated
operation, secondary resuscitation in the intensive care
unit and subsequent denitive surgery has been associated with marked physiological derangement [4, 5].
Complications are common, including wound infection, abscesses, wound dehiscence, incisional herniation
and enterocutaneous stulation [3, 69]. The intraoperative correction of physiological and metabolic
846
2013 Crown copyright. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queens Printer for Scotland.
as a result of military experience in Iraq and Afghanistan, emphasises concurrent haemorrhage control and
resuscitation, minimisation of synthetic uid use and
proactive treatment of coagulopathy [5, 1115]. Several
recent studies have shown that this approach may be
associated with improved survival [1618], but there is
only limited evidence to demonstrate the effect on
patients physiological recovery.
The aim of this study was to determine whether
acidosis, coagulopathy and hypothermia can be
improved during surgery in combat casualties. The
predominant mechanism of wounding in Afghanistan
is blast injury, caused by improvised explosive devices,
and is characterised by traumatic leg amputation,
abdominopelvic injury and profound haemorrhagic
shock [5, 19]. High and bilateral leg amputations are
associated with increased mortality, partly due to the
difculties in controlling bleeding and the burden of
associated injuries [20]. Casualties therefore often
present with severe physiological and metabolic abnormalities.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of combat casualties treated between July 2008 and December 2010 at the medical treatment facility (Field Hospital) at Camp
Bastion, Helmand province, Afghanistan. The study
was approved by the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM) Academic Unit. We used the UK Joint
Theatre Trauma Registry to identify consecutive casualties who had sustained at least one major (proximal
to ankle) leg amputation, and required laparotomy (for
abdominal injury or proximal control of torn leg
arteries).
Combat casualties in Helmand province were
evacuated by helicopter. Physicians or paramedics
attempted to control external haemorrhage with tourniquets and haemostatic dressings in-ight, and used
red cell concentrate and plasma to aid haemostasis.
The hospital was staffed by military emergency physicians, trauma surgeons, anaesthetists and intensivists
from the UK and the USA. Casualties identied as
being in extremis were immediately taken to the
operating theatre [5]. We followed a haemostatic resuscitation protocol. We transfused red cell concentrate
and plasma units in equal proportions, administered
pooled platelets after every ve units and cryoprecipitate after every ten units of red cell concentrate, as well
as tranexamic acid and calcium [5, 14, 2123]. In certain circumstances, we also used recombinant factor
VIIa or fresh whole blood. We used little in the way of
synthetic uids (such as starches), lactated Ringers
solution or 0.9% saline [21, 24]. All casualties had
venous blood sent for analysis as soon as vascular
access was established, usually within minutes of arrival
at the hospital. We sent further blood samples within
30 mins of arrival in the 12-bedded intensive care unit.
We extracted demographic and clinical details
from patients records. We reported the overall and
regional injury severities with the injury severity score
(ISS) and abbreviated injury scale (AIS), with a severe
injury dened as an AIS 3. We calculated the revised
trauma score (RTS) [25] from the admission respiratory rate, blood pressure and Glasgow coma scale,
which, when combined with the ISS, generated a
percentage predicted survival. An expected survivor
was dened as having a percentage predicted survival
greater than 50% [26].
The primary outcome was the normalisation of
acid/base status, coagulability and temperature. We
measured pH, base decit, prothrombin time and temperature on arrival to hospital and on admission to
the intensive care unit. Casualties who were taken to
the operating room, but died from lethal injury, were
not considered for further analysis.
We compared paired samples with Wilcoxon
matched-pairs signed-ranks tests. Statistical analyses were
conducted with Minitab (Minitab Inc, State College,
PA, USA), p < 0.05 indicating statistical signicance.
Results
We identied 67 consecutive casualties, but for administrative reasons, eight sets of records could not be
retrieved. The study cohort therefore consisted of 59
patients. Data were incomplete for three patients.
Table 1 lists patients characteristics: all 59 men
had lost legs (50/59 bilateral) from blast injuries
caused by improvised explosive devices. The severity
ISS and trauma scores RTS indicate severe injury and
physiological derangement.
The median (IQR [range]) time to hospital was
58 (3878 [42215]) min. A retrieval team led by
2013 Crown copyright. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queens Printer for Scotland.
847
Age; years
Systolic blood pressure; mmHg
Glasgow coma score
Injury severity score
Revised trauma score
Predicted survival
Head AIS 3
Chest AIS 3
Abdominal AIS 3
Arm AIS 3
Leg AIS 3
25
90
3
30
4.1
26
4
9
15
15
59
(2129 [1845])
(72109 [0194])
(37 [315])
(2337 [1650])
(2.75.5 [0.67.5])
Resuscitative thoracotomy
External pelvic fixator
Abdominal surgery
Solid organ
Hollow organ
Vascular control
Non-therapeutic
Temporary closure
6
7
4
18
44
7
26
Discussion
We intentionally selected casualties with severe haemorrhage and profound shock. We demonstrated that they
Table 3 Comparison of physiological variables, before and after surgery, in 51 casualties treated with therapeutic
intent. Values are median (IQR [range]).
Before surgery
pH
Base excess; mmol.l 1
Prothrombin time; s
Core temperature; C
848
7.19
9.0
18
36.1
(7.107.29 [6.507.49])
( 13.5 to 4.5 [ 28 to
(1521 [924])
(35.137.1 [33.038.1])
After surgery
2])
7.45
4.5
14
37.4
(7.407.51 [7.157.62])
(1.08.0 [ 7 to +11])
(1118 [921])
(37.037.9 [36.038.0])
p value
<
<
<
<
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
2013 Crown copyright. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queens Printer for Scotland.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the staff at the UK Joint Theatre
Trauma Registry, Royal Centre for Defence, Birmingham,
Competing interests
No external funding and no competing interests
declared.
References
1. Loveland JA, Boffard KD. Damage control in the abdomen and
beyond. British Journal of Surgery 2004; 91: 1095101.
2. Rotondo MF, Zonies DH. The damage control sequence and
underlying logic. Surgical Clinics of North America 1997; 77:
76177.
3. Shapiro MB, Jenkins DH, Schwab CW, Rotondo MF. Damage
control: collective review. Journal of Trauma 2000; 49: 969
78.
4. Moore EE, Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Offner PJ, Biffl WL. Staged
physiologic restoration and damage control surgery. World
Journal of Surgery 1998; 22: 118490.
5. Mercer SJ, Tarmey NT, Woolley T, Wood P, Mahoney PF. Haemorrhage and coagulopathy in the Defence Medical Services.
Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 4960.
6. Miller RS, Morris JA, Diaz JJ, Herring MB, May AK. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. Journal of
Trauma 2005; 59: 136574.
7. Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Dubose J, et al. Enterocutaneous fistula
complicating trauma laparotomy: a major resource burden.
American Surgeon 2009; 75: 302.
8. Zhang WB, Li N, Wang PF, Wang GF, Li YS, Li JS. Infections
following damage control laparotomy with abdominal packing. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008; 40:
86776.
9. Higa G, Friese R, OKeeffe T, et al. Damage control laparotomy: a vital tool once overused. Journal of Trauma 2010; 69:
539.
10. Gruen RL, Brohi K, Schreiber M, et al. Haemorrhage control in
severely injured patients. Lancet 2012; 380: 1099108.
11. Dutton RP. Resuscitative strategies to maintain homeostasis
during damage control surgery. British Journal of Surgery
2012; 99: 218.
12. Beekley AC. Damage control resuscitation: a sensible
approach to the exsanguinating surgical patient. Critical Care
Medicine 2008; 36: S26774.
13. Holcomb JB. Damage control resuscitation. Journal of Trauma
2007; 62: S367.
14. Jansen JO, Thomas R, Loudon MA, Brooks A. Damage control
resuscitation for patients with major trauma. British Medical
Journal 2009; 338: 143640.
15. Ho AM, Dion PW, Yeung JH, et al. Fresh-frozen plasma transfusion strategy in trauma with massive and ongoing bleeding.
Common (sense) and sensibility. Resuscitation 2010; 81:
107981.
16. Cotton BA, Reddy N, Hatch QM, et al. Damage control resuscitation is associated with a reduction in resuscitation volumes
and improvement in survival in 390 damage control laparotomy patients. Annals of Surgery 2011; 254: 598605.
2013 Crown copyright. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queens Printer for Scotland.
849
850
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
2013 Crown copyright. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queens Printer for Scotland.