Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ill-minded
16.12.2012
December
7-8-2013
2015
aired
by the
BBC
which
showed
girl
was
with
some
very
importantvery
activities
and
disgraced
he
replies
that
he
Association
sent
does..
16-3-2015
The
Petitioner
18-3-2015
OF 2015
Versus
1 Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate
Son of not known,
SCBA Member ship number S-0054
Residing at 31st Gyangudery
Vrindaben, Mathura, U.P.
Also having office at Library I, SCBA,
Supreme Court of India, New Delhi - 110001
2
Act,
1860.
The
Petitioner
Association
is
scandalous,
unjustifiable,
biased,
outrageous,
That the facts leading to the filing of the present Writ Petition before
this Honble Court are as follows:
a. That the documentary titled Indias Daughter was aired by
the BBC which showed interviews with the family
members,
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
That the girl was with some unknown boy who took her
on a date.
ii.
by
mala
fide,
insensitive,
ill
minded
and
is
hereby
annexed
and
marked
as
Annexure A-4.
h.
i.
everywhere;
the
voice
of
women
is
m.
of
India
Rules
regarding
Standards
of
That the Petitioner has not filed any other similar Writ
the
profession,
admittedly,
acknowledged
as
most
respectable profession.
P Because the conduct of these lawyers shows complete
absence of any concern for society on the one hand and utter
disregard of the Constitutional values and human rights of
women besides the ethics and etiquette of the Bar. It is much
more than a crime.
PRAYER
Therefore, the Petitioner humbly prays that this Honble Court
be pleased to call for the records of the proceedings from the
Respondents and be pleased to:
a.
g.
Mahalakshmi Pavani.
Advocate for the Petitioner
Drafted by Ms. Mahalakshmi Pavani
Advocate on Record
Settled by Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija
Senior Advocate
Supreme Court of India
OF 2015
Petitioner
Versus
Manohar Lal Sharma and ors
PAPER BOOK
Respondents
INDEX
Sl.
Particulars
1. Listing Performa
2. Synopsis & List of Dates
3. Writ Petition with Affidavit
4. APPENDIX
Articles 14, 19, 21 and 51 of the Constitution of
India and Gender Sensitization and Sexual
Harassment of Women at the Supreme Court of
India (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal)
Regulations, 2013 ;
5. Annexure P- 1
Page No.
6. Annexure P- 2
A true copy of the Statement/Comments
made by Respondent No.1 dated nil
7. Annexure P- 3
A true copy of the Statement/Comments
made by Respondent No.2 dated nil
8. Annexure P- 4
A true copy of the representation dated
16-3-2015 sent by the Petitioner Association
of 2015
In the matter of
Supreme Court Women Lawyer Association
Petitioner
Versus
Manohar Lal Sharma and ors
Respondents
AFFIDAVIT
I Prerna Kumari, wife of Siddharth Singh, the Secretary of
the Petitioner Association having office at 47, Lawyers
and paragraphs 1
of the Writ Petition and state that the facts stated therein
obtained
from
social
networking
sites
and
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
I, Prerna Kumari, the Secretary of the Petitioner
Associationo.1 in the above Writ Petition do hereby declare
that the facts stated in paras 1 and 2 of this affidavit are true
and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. No part of
it is false and nothing material has been concealed.
Verified at New Delhi on this the 18th day of March 2015
DEPONENT