Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ADI Systems Inc., 1133 Regent St., Suite 300, Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 3Z2
ADI Systems Inc., 606A Highland Avenue, Austin, Texas, USA 78703
3
Kubota Corporation, Hanshin Office, 1-1-1 Hama, Amagasaki, Hyogo 661-8567, Japan
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: srg@adi.ca
2
ABSTRACT
Kubota Corporation has six operating full-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR)
systems and two more under construction in Japan for treatment of stillage from shochu alcohol
production. The operating systems were commissioned from 2006 to 2008. The AnMBR
process has been demonstrated to have numerous process advantages over more conventional
technologies, such as superior effluent quality, and ability to handle high concentrations of COD,
TSS, and FOG, while attaining high organic loading rates (10 to 15 kgCOD/m3d).
INTRODUCTION
Kubota Corporation presently has six operating full-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor
(AnMBR) systems operating in Japan, and another two under construction, for treating stillage
wastewaters from alcohol production. These alcohol plants produce food-grade ethanol [shochu
and awamori] from barley, wheat, sweet potato, and rice feed stocks. The first full-scale
installation of the AnMBR process by Kubota was completed in 2000 (for treatment of septage
and garbage), and the initial AnMBR for treatment of alcohol distillery stillage was started up in
January 2006. Kubota presently has fourteen full-scale AnMBR installations operating or under
construction in Japan. The first full-scale AnMBR system in the USA was constructed and
started up by ADI Systems Inc. in 2008 for treatment of a salad dressing and BBQ sauce
production wastewater (treating a flow of 500 m3/d and COD load of 19,000 kg/d) at Kens
Foods in Marlborough, MA.
The Kubota AnMBR process incorporates anaerobic digestion and membrane filtration in one
process technology that effectively treats wastewater and produces an anaerobic effluent of
superior quality with virtually negligible suspended solids ( and in many cases without the need
for pre- and post-anaerobic treatment processes) while maximizing biogas production. It
employs the same successful flat-sheet membrane technology used in Kubota aerobic MBR
processes (which have now been used in over 2500 installations world-wide). The membranes
(with nominal pore size of 0.4 micron) are submerged directly in the anaerobic biomass and
completely block all suspended solids from escaping to the effluent.
Biogas is used instead of air to scour the membrane surface to keep fouling to a minimum. The
biogas is recirculated from the reactors headspace through the diffusers located beneath the
membrane cartridges. This creates a sparging effect that scours the membrane surface and
significantly reduces the rate of membrane fouling. Periodic cleaning of the membranes
(typically performed every one to three months) is done in situ with dilute citric acid.
The AnMBR process operates at a higher biomass concentration, typically 30,000 50,000 mg/l
and as a result provides conditions favorable for treatment of high strength industrial
wastewaters under higher volumetric loading rates and longer solids retention times while
maximizing biomass utilization and ensuring stable performance with the ability to retain all the
biomass within the system.
The process incorporates innovative design combined with new technology and proven
techniques to provide numerous process advantages over conventional anaerobic wastewater
treatment processes. Advantages include:
The process concept for the AnMBR system is demonstrated in Figure 1. In Japan, the stillage
from alcohol production is typically a whole stillage in that the suspended solids are also
treated in the AnMBR process if they are anaerobically degradable (such as for rice and sweet
potato). The high non-degradable suspended solids concentration of barley stillage requires that
a significant portion of the suspended solids are removed up front in the process using a screw
press without any chemical addition (producing a thin stillage for treatment in the AnMBR).
The process consists of a solubilization tank, methane fermentation tank, and a submerged
membrane tank. Biogas from the methane tank or membrane tank headspace is used for
scouring the membranes. Excess biogas is often used in the factory boiler to displace fossil
fuels, which significantly reduces the carbon footprint of the process by reducing the overall
release of greenhouse gasses.
Figure 1.
Ammonia Toxicity
Ammonia toxicity is a potential concern with anaerobic treatment of stillage wastewaters due to
the high concentrations of nitrogen with some feedstocks. Typically, the ammonia-nitrogen
concentration in a thermophilic reactor should be held to less than 3000 mg/l to avoid toxicity.
This means that for some feedstocks such as rice and wheat, dilution water must be added to
keep the ammonia-nitrogen concentration less than 3000 mg/l. Since the AnMBR process
volume is determined by volumetric organic loading rate, the addition of dilution water does not
impact on overall system volume like it does for a CSTR-type anaerobic digester which is
typically designed based on hydraulic retention time (HRT) and solids retention time (SRT),
where for a CSTR, HRT = SRT. The membranes in the AnMBR have to increase as the flow
increases (from the addition of dilution water), but the overall system volume is not affected.
AnMBR Startup
The startup of an AnMBR system is typically accomplished within a few weeks with adequate
seed sludge. Unlike other conventional anaerobic technologies, the loss of biomass during
startup or regular operation is completely avoided since the biomass is trapped by the physical
barrier of the membranes.
INSTALLATION EXAMPLES
The total alkalinity (TA) concentration in the AnMBR is about 6000 mg/l (as CaCO3). VFA
concentrations since startup have consistently been less than 700 mg/l. VFA/TA ratio has
typically been less than 0.2, indicating a very stable anaerobic environment.
The TS concentration in the methane tank has generally been stable between 30,000 and 40,000
mg/l.
The AnMBR effluent is further treated and polished in an aerobic MBR system (with Kubota
membranes). This two-stage MBR system allows for exceptional effluent quality in a very
compact process. Effluent limits of 300/300 mg/l for BOD/TSS concentrations are easily met
on a consistent basis as the overall process produces an effluent with less than 10 mg/l BOD and
less than 2 mg/l TSS.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Table 2 shows the wastewater characteristics of the Awamori stillage, rice washwater (used for
dilution), and the final effluent quality limits and actual treated water effluent quality from the H
Company AnMBR and aerobic MBR system.
Table 2:
Stillage, effluent limits, and final treated effluent characteristics
Parameter
Stillage
Rice
Effluent
Treated
Washwater
Limits
Effluent
pH
4.2
-5.7-8.7
6.5
COD (mg/l)
77,000
---BOD (mg/l)
-2,230
< 300
< 10
TSS (mg/l)
-2,300
< 300
<2
TS (mg/l)
50,700
---TVS (mg/l)
49,700
---TN (mg/l)
3,920
80
--n-Hex (mg/l)
--< 30
<5
Iodine consumption
--< 220
15
(mg/l)
Rice washwater is used to dilute the stillage enough to keep ammonia toxicity from being a
problem with treatment of the awamori stillage (which has a TN concentration of 3900 mg/l).
Due to the high alkalinity concentration and strength of stillage wastewaters, the periodic
cleaning of the membranes (once every 1 to 3 months) with 10 percent citric acid does not
impact on the methane tank pH. Citric acid is very effective at cleaning the membranes for both
inorganic and organic fouling. Citric acid is consumed by the bacteria in the bulk solution of the
methane tank, thus there is no citric acid residual.
Figure 4 is a photo of the installation and Figure 5 is a process flow diagram of the process. The
AnMBR system was started up in March of 2007. A screw press is used to remove suspended
solids from the raw wastewater when the plant is discharging stillage from barley feed stock;
solids from sweet potato pass into the AnMBR system without removal.
Post-anaerobic treatment is accomplished with an aerobic MBR designed for biological nitrogen
removal. Phosphorus removal occurs in both the anaerobic and aerobic MBR systems, mostly
through chemical precipitation with ferric chloride. The ferric chloride is also used to tie up the
sulfide and lower the hydrogen sulfide in the biogas.
Figure 4.
Figure 5:
Figure 6 is a photo of the AnMBR system and Figure 7 is a process flow diagram of the system.
Figures 8, 9, and 10 demonstrate the operating data of the AnMBR process in terms of influent
flow, biogas flow, COD removal, and pH and TS concentration in the methane reactor. As
Figure 9 demonstrates, the COD conversion to biogas averages 85 percent in the AnMBR
system (98 percent COD removal is attained by comparing influent and effluent COD
concentrations).
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:
Figure 10:
Figure 11:
Figure 12:
Typical AnMBR and aerobic MBR influent and effluent characteristics for treatment of
stillage from shochu production
In many cases the AN MBR process is followed by an aerobic MBR, which includes nitrogen
and phosphorus removal. The combination of AN MBR followed by aerobic MBR ensures
optimum performance while minimizing reactor volumes and overall plant footprint.
Table 2 demonstrates the typical wastewater characteristics and AN MBR and aerobic MBR
effluent quality from the full-scale installations treating stillage from alcohol production.
Table 2:
Typical full-scale raw wastewater (influent) and AN MBR and aerobic MBR
effluent quality characteristics while treating stillage from alcohol
production
Parameter
Influent
AN MBR Effluent
MBR Effluent
pH
3.9
7.4
7.1
COD, mg/l
110,000
2,000
180
BOD, mg/l
79,000
1,500
< 10
TS, mg/l
72,400
3,900
600
TSS, mg/l
25,300
< 10
< 10
TN, mg/l
5,250
1,480
40
FOG, mg/l
1,600
50
<5
Although the stillage applications discussed above are for drinking alcohols, stillage from
commercial fuel-grade ethanol production is similar in characteristics, particularly if the same
feed stocks are used (wheat, barley, sweet potato, and rice). Corn ethanol is similar but has
higher concentrations of oil and magnesium.
Research and pilot demonstration of the AnMBR process for application of the process to corn
stillage from ethanol production indicates that more struvite is formed in the AnMBR system as
a result of higher magnesium concentrations. The struvite does not significantly impact the
membranes in terms of flux or fouling trends. Struvite can build up on the bottom of the
reaction tanks in the form of heavy crystals. Floor piping needs to be placed for removal of the
struvite layer with the waste anaerobic sludge.
Corn oil breaks down readily in the AnMBR process at thermophilic temperatures. However,
the fraction of oil buildup in the sludge needs to be monitored, and organic loading rates
controlled to prevent the oil from accumulating in the sludge.
CONCLUSIONS
1. There are now five full-scale anaerobic MBR systems in Japan treating stillage from
commercial grade alcohol production of Shochu from barley, wheat, rice and sweet
potato feed stocks. The initial installation was commissioned in 2006.
2. Typical COD removal in the AnMBR process is 98 percent, with 85 percent of the
influent COD being converted to biogas.
3. Overall TSS and BOD removal in the AnMBR process is typically 100 and 98 percent,
respectively. With an aerobic MBR process for treatment of the anaerobic effluent, the
overall BOD removal is virtually 100 percent, with final effluent TSS and BOD
concentrations of less than 10 mg/l possible. Significant nitrogen and phosphorus
removal is also possible with proper design of the aerobic MBR.
4. The AnMBR process for alcohol stillages can use the high temperature of the stillage
discharge to operate at 55 C, a thermophilic temperature. Thermophilic operation takes
advantage of higher bacterial kinetic rates (less reactor volume), significantly less sludge
production, higher FOG and TSS digestion, and superior membrane performance (i.e.,
higher membrane flux and less membrane fouling).
5. The AnMBR process loading rate for stillage applications is typically 10 to 15
kgCOD/m3d. This is considered a high-rate loading condition. In many applications the
AnMBR process can handle high influent concentrations of TSS (if most of the TSS is
degradable) and FOG, unlike other high rate anaerobic technologies. This represents
significant savings in primary treatment and operating costs, as well as providing higher
biogas production.
6. Ammonia toxicity can be a concern when influent TN concentrations are high enough to
create an ammonia-nitrogen concentration in excess of 3000 mg/l in the anaerobic
system, as is the case with certain stillages, such as from rice and barley feed stocks.
Dilution water or waste streams are used to maintain the ammonia concentration less
than 3000 mg/l in the AnMBR process. The AnMBR process volume is not affected by
dilution water; however, more membrane surface area is necessary to accommodate the
dilution water flow.
7. Rapid AnMBR process startup is possible when adequate effective seed sludge is added.
Biomass loss from the system is not a concern with the process.
8. Citric acid is typically used to periodically clean the membranes in situ (about once
every one to three months). Stillage wastewaters have more than enough alkalinity such
that there is no affect on methane tank pH during and after cleaning. The citric acid is
especially effective for removing inorganic foulants. For organic fouling, other
chemicals such as sodium hypochlorite may be more effective.
9. Stillage from fuel-grade ethanol production is also very treatable with the AnMBR
process. Higher concentrations of magnesium and oil from corn stillage need to be
factored into the system design, to avoid excessive buildup of struvite and oil.