Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
289-291, 2001
Copyright 0 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd
Frintedin the USA. All rights reserved
07351933/016-see front matter
PII: So7351933(01)002354
(Communicated
by A.R. Balakrishnan)
ABSTRACT
Study of heat transfer in a two-dimensional wavy channel due to a pressure driven Stokes
flow, normal to the wall corrugations, is made. Expression for the mean Nusselt number
describing the average rate of heat transfer from the warmer surface, obtained analytically,
predicts a decreased heat transfer rate due to corrugations. This observation is found to be
significantly opposite to the prevailing results of moderate or large Reynolds number flows.
432001 Elsevier Science Ltd
introduction
fluid in a wavy/corrugated
which are
otherwise parallel except for a phase shift p , Fig.1, was studied by Wang [ 1,2] when the pressure driven
flow is (i) parallel to the corrugations
to the corrugations.
analytically that for a given mean pressure drop, the flow transverse to the corrugations always decreases
and that the phase shift p could be utilized to control the flow through corrugated surfaces. Nishimura,
Yoshino and Kawamura [3], adopting a finite element analysis, studied two-dimensional
a wavy channel with periodically converging
The related
considerations,
pulsatile flow in
- diverging cross-sections.
has been made by several
investigators
from energy
such as to simulate forced convective cooling of electronic packages etc. Straight ducts of
constant cross-section
as well as
of heat
transfer by the wavy walls has been uniformly predicted by almost all workers in the field. Experimental
289
290
Flow
a
FIG.1
Flow geometry : vertical section of the channel
evidence in this context can be traced to the work of Goldstein and Sparrow [4]. Sparrow and Hossfeld [5]
showed that the rounding of the wavy peaks brought about a decrease in the Nusseh number. Numerical
predictions of laminar flow and heat transfer in wavy channels of uniform cross-sectional
wall temperatures,
100
was made by Xin and Tao [6] for moderately large Reynolds number Re in the range
Re < 1000. Using Greens function technique, Rutledge and Sleicher [7] numerically
possibility of enhancement
studied the
a rectangular channel with plane surfaces, they presented averaged heat transfer results for Grashoff s
number Gr upto O(10) for different
mass flow rates were found to be always less than those for a
channel with plane walls. However the work of Bhavnani and Bergles [lo] show enhanced heat transfer
results.
Observing
are concerned
large
number flows. With this motivation. we wish to study the effect of corrugations and phase difference
heat transfer in the laminar regime of flow transverse to the corrugations
on
291
Such a study. coupled with the ease of controlling flow distribution in such wavy channels as evidenced
in the literature, can be effectively
sterilisation is necessary. Wangs [2] velocity analysis forms a basis for this study. The analogous heat
transfer problem in respect of flow parallel to the corrugations,
Mathematical
Analvsis
Velocitv Field
The corrugated walls constitute stream surfaces for the flow, hence volumetric flow discharge per
unit time, per unit thickness of the channel is a constant Q for a given pressure drop. The appropriate
velocity field is (0, av//&,
flow such that the Stokes equation holds. Normalising the stream function by Q and all lengths by a
the mean gap width between the walls, the Stokes flow is obtainable as a solution of the boundary value
problem:
v4w=o
(1)
w = 0, awlan = 0 on 2 = E sin hy
(2)
y = 1, *ian
(3)
= 0 on z = 1 + E sin (hy + p)
a2
where
V2 =
ay2
a2
+
az2
and
1= 2xafL.
(4)
Here II is the normal direction to the boundary and L is the wave length of the sinusoidal
surfaces. A
regular perturbation solution for the flow field is sought in the form
I+l =
where
vo+&W,
+EZ~2+...,
(5)
i = 0,1,2,...
V4w, = 0,
(6)
The respective boundary conditions for vo, w,. v2 etc. are obtainable from the Eqns.(2-3) subjecting them
to Taylor expansions
around z=O and z=l respectively. The corresponding solutions, Wang [21 are as
follows :
WIJ=
322 - 223
y, =
eiaY(C,
IJI~.=
eL + C, emb + C, z eh +
(7)
Cd Z e-9
+ e-i2)iy Wz,(z)
(8)
(9)
292
where the real parts of w, and v2 only have any physical significance.
appearing in the above solutions are listed in Wang [2]. The key result of Wangs work is the expression
for the total flow Q interns of mean pressure gradient, given as follows :
= ;= 1 - E*B, + 0 (a4) .
(10)
12 P
Temperature
Field
heat transfer problem. The wavy section of the upper wall binded
by heaters on its outer surface is maintained at an elevated uniform temperature T,. Attaching a cooling
jacket to the outer surface of the lower wall, its surface temperature may be regulated to remain at the
entrance
flow temperature
Tt
convective
in
V2T=-Br[
where
T - Tp
-
Br =
$-
(11)
MQW*
and
(12)
k&-T1 )
T - Tl
characterised
are :
& sin hy
1 + E sin(hy + /3) on T = 1 I
on T=O
(13)
(14)
T,,+ET~+E*T~+...
(15)
The Taylor expansion of the boundary conditions (13,14) give the corresponding
z=l
To = 0
T, + sin(hy) aTdaz
T, + sin(hy) dT,/az + $5 sir&y)
To= 1
= 0
a2T&iz2 = 0
T, + sin(Ly+P) BTo/az = 0
T2 + sin(Xy+P) dT,/az + w sin2(1y+8) $Tt-,Gz2 = 0
(16)
293
(17)
is obtained as
T, = z - 6 Br (2z4 - 4z3 + 3z2 - z) .
(18)
(19)
are :
z=O
and
T, = (1 - 6 Br) ieiP eY on z = 1
(20)
solution is
T, = ey f(z),
where
f(z) =
(21)
- 6(2C,h + 2C,+C3)z)
exz
(e - e-3
(22)
(23)
(24)
and
(25)
where
(26)
d,
(27)
294
to another
savings.
and consequential
energy
Accordingly
we compute
describing the average rate of heat transfer from the warmer surface, per unit width along the corrugations,
for one full wave length of the wall, using the formula
where
I (- JTIW, =
ap
Nu =
(l/A)
l+s
sin(ky+p)
(28)
surface area of the wall.
Making use of the available solution T upto O(&*), and subjecting @T/&I)~ = r+r sin(Iy+P) to a Taylor
expansions about z = 1, we finally obtain
Nu = (6 Br-1) + a* (N, + N2) + O(E~),
(29)
where
N, =
(30)
and
N, =
Br(-36-
(31)
1.5X2).
The flow rate in the channel, Wang 121, quantified by the equation (10) is G= 1 - E* B, + O(E).
The expression for the real part of B,, computed and plotted by Wang for increasing 1 is found to be
always positive. Hence the flow rate decreases due to corrugations. Effectively this means that corrugations
offer flow resistance, consequently causing viscous heat generation. This generation of heat is represented
by the expression
E* N2, which is readily seen to be negative for all 1, and hence accounts for heat
transfer from the plate to the fluid. It may also be noted that N2 is not influenced by the phase difference
factor /3. Table 1 gives the numerical values of N2/Br for various values of 1 ranging from 0 to 10.
Effect of corrugations
J.N$Br
10
-36
-37.5
-42
-49.5
-60
-73.5
-90
-109.5
-132
-157.5
-186
The expression
corrugations
TABLE 1
on viscous heating of the fluid : N-/BR
a*N, appearing
as measuring
the effect of
on heat transfer due to the impressed temperature difference T, - TI. Table 2 gives the
numerical values of N, for various values of A ranging from 0 to 10 for the phase difference @O. 90
and 180.
Effect of corruaations
b
295
TABLE 2
on heat transfer due to the impressed temperature difference T,,-Tr : N,
O0
0.0000
-0.2121
-0.5232
90
180
-1.0000
-2.0000
-1.0630
-1.9140
-1.0746
-1.6261
-0.4654
0.1439
1.3169
3.0297
5.2628
8.0054
11.2522
-0.7649
-1.0644
-0.0027
-0.1493
1.2495
1.1822
2.9999
2.9702
5.2500
5.2372
8.0000
7.9946
11.2500
11.2478
to k2.5,
heating of the fluid. This increase reduces in size as h goes upto 3.5. Between k3.5
in sign thus accounting
and 4, Nl changes
for heat reversal. Such a kind of heat transfer persists and increases with the
B=90 . Beyond
p=90 , a little
difference is seen; heat transfer from the surface to the fluid always decreases steadily upto h=4, beyond
which N, becomes positive and keeps increasing with h, reflecting the earlier character.
It may be seen that for a given I, 1N, 1 is maximum at B=I? for a I 4 and at S=O for b4;
also the effect of p appears more pronounced
corrugations
of the frequency
of
convection from the surface to the fluid and for some other wave lengths absorbing heat from the fluid.
From Tables 1 and 2 it is seen that the contribution of N, is substantial compared to N, and hence
&2(Nl+N2) remains negative for all A. The results of the entire analysis thus leads to the following key
observation
: Corrugations
not only retard the flow in the channel but also diminish the rate of heat
transfer from the warmer wall. Alternatively one can say that the heat transfer performance of a wavy wall
is inferior to that of a plane wall. Fig.2 shows Nu verses h for selected values of Br = 2.4.6,8 and E =
0.1.
This prediction of heat transfer reduction in respect of low Reynolds number flows, is significantly
different from the successful attempts of many workers in simulating heat transfer enhancement
of moderate or large Reynolds number flows, by incorporating small corrugations
surface. However our findings qualitatively
results are
difference
applicable
to free convection
in the case
agree with the reports of Faghri and Asako [9], though their
flows only. It may also be observed mat the effect of phase
on mean Nusselt number is very very marginal; maximum heat transfer occurring when the
walls are in phase and minimum when they are out of phase, for a given 1. However, in the case of flow
parallel to the corrugations,
the effect of /3 appears more pronounced as can be realised from the results
of Vasudeviah and Patturaj [ 1 I]. It is thus seen that orientation of pressure drive, coupled with factors like
wave length, phase difference,
mechanism
to
296
FIG.2
Mean Nusselt number : Nu vs 1,
Nomenclature
Br
Brinkman number
Gf
Grashoff number
thermal conductivity,
wl(m.K)
Nu
volumetric flow discharge per unit time, per unit thickness of the channel, m*/s
non-dimensional
Re
TRIT
T
non-dimensional
temperature of fluid, K
X,Y,Z dimensional
x.y,z
volumetric flow
temperatures,
spatial coordinates,
non-dimensional
respectively
m
spatial coordinates
291
dimensionless
non-dimensional
(b/a)
stream functions
References
1.
2.
3.
T. Nishimura, T. Yoshino and Y. Kawamura, J. Chem. Engg. Japan, 20(S), 479 (1987).
4.
5.
E.M. Sparrow and L.M. Hossfeld, Zt~r.J. Hear Mass Transfer, 27(10),
6.
7.
J. Rutledge and CA. Sleicher, Comm. Nr. Methods in Engg, 10, 489 (1994).
8.
B. Snyder, K.T. Li and R.A. Wartz, In?. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 36(12), 2965 (1993).
9.
M. Faghri and Y. Asako, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 29, 1931 (1986).
14,465.
(1988).
1715 (1984).
First Annual
Conf. ISIAM,
Roorkee.