Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
Month
Mean Rainfall
(mm)
Mean Pan
Evaporation (mm)
January
101.1
142.6
February
118.0
109.2
March
129.7
96.1
April
127.1
78.0
May
119.9
58.9
June
132.0
36.0
July
97.4
46.5
August
80.7
58.9
September
68.3
75.0
October
76.9
102.3
November
83.9
129
December
77.6
136.4
1211.8
1058.5
Annual
Average annual precipitation and evaporation data for Australia is shown in Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-2 sourced
from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/maps.shtml). It can be
seen that for many parts of Australia evaporation is much larger than the rainfall.
The total evaporation from continental areas around the world is approximately 70% of total precipitation
over the continents. In Australia the ratio is much larger with evaporation accounting for approximately 90% of
the total rainfall that occurs over the continent.
Page 2-1
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
Evaporation is an important part of the water balance and has large impacts on many water resources
systems. Evaporation losses from reservoirs are a substantial percentage of the total storage capacity
(generally around 20% yield) and in some cases can exceed 50%. Evaporation and evapotranspiration are also
important for agriculture. It is therefore vital that we correctly measure or estimate evaporation.
Figure 2-1 Average annual rainfall for Australia for the period 1961-1990 (Australian Bureau of Meteorology Product Code IDCJCM004)
Figure 2-2 Average annual pan evaporation for Australia for the period 1975-2005 (Australian Bureau of Meteorology Product Code
IDCJCM0006)
Page 2-2
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
E = C (es ea )
2-1
Where E is the evaporation, C is a coefficient and es is the saturation vapour pressure (at the current air
temperature) and ea is the saturation vapour pressure at the dew point temperature.
Remember that the saturation vapour pressure at the dew point temperature (ed) is the same as the actual
vapour pressure at the present air temperature (e). This means that in Equation 2-1 it is the difference
between the saturation vapour pressure and the actual vapour pressure that drives evaporation. As the air
becomes more saturated, ea (or e) equals es and the evaporation tends to zero. As the humidity in soils is often
close to 100% (i.e. es equals ea) there is little evaporation from below the soil surface.
Page 2-3
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
Saturation vapour pressure is a function of the temperature. It is low at low temperatures and increases at an
exponential rate from there as shown in Figure 2-3. Hence warm air can hold a lot more water than cold air. An
approximate relationship for the saturation vapour pressure is:
17.27T
es = 0.6108 exp
237.3 + T
2-2
5
4
3
2
1
Where T is the air temperature in C and es is the saturation vapour pressure in kPa.
-10
10
20
30
40
Temperature (deg C)
Page 2-4
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
Knowledge of evaporative processes has also been used to dispose of contaminated water by placing it is in
large evaporative ponds. This stops the contaminated water from running off or entering groundwater. The
ponds are designed to be shallow to increase the evaporation rate. Examples include brine from desalination
plants, waste water treatment plants or mine tailing water.
The pan heats up more rapidly than the ground around it and there are also the side walls of the pan which
can receive some solar radiation. Therefore evaporation from a pan will be higher than from the environment.
A correction factor is therefore normally used to convert the pan evaporation measurement into true potential
evaporation. This pan factor is normally between 0.6 to 0.8 and depends on the soil type, surrounding
vegetation and climatic conditions. The pan coefficient can be calibrated for sites where enough data exists to
also directly calculated open water body evaporation using the Penman equation. In the absence of a locally
calibrated value, a table of pan coefficients is provided by Allen et al. [1998].
http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/x0490e08.htm#pan%20evaporation%20method
Using this table and average wind speed (3.6 m/s) and relative humidity (65%) for Sydney a pan coefficient of
0.7 would be chosen (assuming 10 m of short green grass adjacent to the pan).
Page 2-5
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
2.4.2 Lysimeter
A lysimeter is a tank of soil which is planted with vegetation and is hydrologically sealed so that the water
leakage from the system is negligible. It is used to measure evapotranspiration in the field and for studying
soil-water-plan relationships under natural conditions. The lysimeter should be representative of the
surrounding natural soil profile and vegetation types. The rate of evapotranspiration from this instrument is
obtained by undertaking a soil water budget. The precipitation on the lysimeter, the drainage through its
bottom, and the changes in soil moisture within the lysimeter are all measured. The amount of
evapotranspiration is the amount necessary to complete the water balance.
Figure
2-5
Network
of
meteorological
(http://www.ozflux.org.au/monitoringsites/index.html)
flux
stations
in
Australia
and
New
Zealand
temperature-based methods
Page 2-6
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
radiation-based methods
combination methods (resistance plus energy)
If all the required climatic data are available then the Penman Monteith method (a combination approach) is
recommended as the most accurate approach. Details of this method are provided in the next section.
2-4
Where
A is Available Energy
Rn is Net Incoming Radiation (i.e. considering the solar and longwave radiation components and
directions)
G is the outgoing heat conduction into the soil
Under most conditions the terms S, P and Ad are neglected. The temporary soil volume energy (S) needs to be
considered when the energy balance is over a forest. Over the course of a day G is approximately equal to zero
so can also generally be neglected if daily evaporation estimates are required. Therefore the available energy
can be approximated as the net radiation.
As shown in Equation 2-5, the available energy A can be partitioned into two components sensible heat H
and latent energy E (i.e. the outgoing energy in the form of evaporation)
=
2-5
Thus if there is limited water available for evaporation, the sensible heat partition will become larger and the
air temperatures will be higher. The ratio between sensible heat and latent heat is called the Bowen Ratio and
can be used to summarise the aridity of a location.
=
2-6
Table 2-2 lists Bowen ratios for a number of different climatic conditions.
Table 2-2 Typical values of the Bowen ration [Ladson, 2008]
Conditions
Bowen ratio
10
Semi-arid regions
2-6
0.4-0.8
0.2
Tropical oceans
0.1
~0
Well watered vegetation with low humidity. In this case the leaf
temperature can be less than the air temperature because of
evaporative cooling so the sensible heat is providing additional
energy for evaporation i.e. the Bowen ratio can be negative
<0
Page 2-7
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
A = Rn = Rns Rnl
2-7
Where Rn is the net incoming radiation, Rns is the net shortwave radiation (incoming outgoing) and Rnl is the
net outgoing radiation (incoming outgoing).
Although over the earth as a whole, the net radiation is in balance at any one point and any one time, there
will be an energy inbalance and if the energy inbalance is positive it will lead to evaporation and/or heating.
We therefore need to be able to calculate the energy inbalance at any location and for any time of year by
finding the shortwave and longwave radiation.
118.1
Ra =
d r s sin sin + cos cos sin s
2-8
2-9
and is the latitude for the site (negative for Southern Hemisphere) with the solar declination (in radians),
given as:
2
J 1.405
365
= 0.4093 sin
2-10
and J is the Julian day number (day number from start of year).
The relative distance between the earth and sun is calculated as:
2
d r = 1 + 0.033 cos
J
365
2-11
Not all the energy at the top of the atmosphere reaches the earth's surface and therefore solar radiation (Rs)
at the surface will be less than extraterrestrial solar radiation. On a cloudless day clear sky solar radiation (Rso)
is approximately 75% of the extraterrestrial radiation. When there are clouds the solar radiation will be even
lower.
Solar radiation (Rs) can be calculated using the Angstrom formula:
n
Rs = Ra 0.25 + 0.5
N
2-12
Where n is the actual duration of sunshine (hours) and N is the maximum possible duration of sunshine or
daylight hours (hours) calculated as:
N=
24
2-13
Page 2-8
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
The constants in the Angstrom formula can vary depending on location but the above values are
recommended by Allen et al. [1998] in the absence of local data.
The net solar radiation (Rns) is the balance between the incoming and reflected solar radiation which is
controlled by the albedo ().
Rns = Rs (1 )
2-14
0.34 0.14 e
a
) 1.35 RR
so
0.35
2-15
Where:
-2
-1
-2
-4
-1
Tmax,K and Tmin,K are the maximum and minimum daily air temperature (K)
ea is the actual vapour pressure (kPa)
and Rso is found using:
Rso = Ra 0.75 + 2 10 5 z
2-16
Where z is the station elevation (m above sea level). Once again the constants in this equation can be locally
calibrated. More details are provided in Allen et al. [1998].
Net radiation
Net radiation is simply the difference between incoming net shortwave radiation and outgoing net longwave
radiation:
Rn = Rns Rnl
2-17
Other heat fluxes (if significant) are subtracted from the net radiation in Equation 2-17 to arrive at the
-2
-1
available energy (Equation 2-4). Note that the above estimate is in MJ m day which can be converted to mm
units by dividing it by the latent heat of vaporisation of water. The following conversion may be used to
convert energy to other units:
-2
-1
-2
-1
(at 20C)
2-18
Page 2-9
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
As was shown in Equation 2-1, evaporation is controlled by the difference between the saturated vapour
pressure es and actual vapour pressure ea (equivalent to saturation vapour pressure at the dew point
temperature). The vapour pressure deficit is normally denoted as D such that:
D = es ea
2-19
The Penman-Monteith approach is called a combination approach because it calculates evaporation as the
weighted combination of the available energy and the vapour pressure deficit. The general form for the
equation is therefore:
E =
A + c p D
ra
+ (1 + rs ra )
2-20
Where:
-2 -1
-1
4098es
2-21
(237.3 + T )2
The latent heat of vapourisation () can be calculated using Equation 2-22 if the surface temperature of the
water surface (Ts) in C is known
= 2.501 0.002361Ts
2-22
= 0.00163
2-23
Where P is the atmospheric pressure (kPa). In the absence of data on atmospheric pressure an estimate can be
made using the site elevation (z) in units of metres:
293 0.0065 z
P = 101.3
293
5.26
2-24
The combination approach can be seen more clearly if Equation 2-20 is split into two components:
2-25
Page 2-10
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
Where ET0 is the potential evapotranspiration and ETrad is the contribution from radiation energy input (i.e.
available energy) and ETaero is the contribution from the aerodynamic component (driven by the vapour
pressure deficit and advection from wind).
Alternatively we can write the equation as:
ET0 = FA A + FD D
2-26
In this form the weighting factors FA and FD depend on whether evapotranspiration or open water body
evaporation is being calculated. Firstly we will look at the estimate for the reference crop evapotranspiration,
and then with open water body evaporation.
0.408 A +
ETrc =
2-27
-1
-1
-1
The units for A should be MJ m day and D in kPa to give the evapotranspiration in units of mm day . Note
-1
that the constant of 900 has units of kJ kg K.
In practice actual vapour pressure may not be available (if dew point temperature has not been recorded) and
therefore it may need to be calculated from relative humidity measurements. Because the saturated vapour
pressure curve is non-linear, average saturated vapour pressure cannot be calculated using average
temperature. Therefore average saturated vapour pressure needs to be calculated using the minimum and
maximum temperatures. Allen et al. [1998] recommends the following procedures to estimate daily average
saturated and actual vapour pressure (es and ea respectively)
2-28
Where e (T) is the saturated vapour pressure calculated at a specific temperature (T) using Equation 2-2 and
Tmin and Tmax are the daily minimum and maximum temperatures for which the vapour pressures are
calculated.
If maximum and minimum relative humidity data is available then the actual vapour pressure (ea) is calculated
as:
2-29
Where RHmax and RHmin are the maximum and minimum relative humidites (in %) for the day. The idea is that
the maximum relative humidity generally occurs in the morning when temperatures are lowest and the lowest
relative humidity occurs in the afternoon when temperatures are highest.
Page 2-11
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
Refer to Allen et al. [1998] for details of other methods to calculate actual vapour pressure in the absence of
minimum and/or maximum relative humidity measurements.
If wind measurements at a height of 2m are not available, the following equation may be used to convert
measurements from a height zm to corresponding values for a height of 2m:
u2 = u z
ln( 2 / 0.0023)
ln( z m / 0.0023)
2-30
where uz is the wind speed measured at a height of zm. Commonly wind speed measurements are made at a
height of 10 m.
ET0 =
A + 6.43 ( 1 + 0.53u2 ) D
( + )
2-31
-2
-1
As for the reference crop, the units for A should be MJ m day and D in kPa to give the evaporation in units of
-1
mm day
A
+
2-32
where has been empirically estimated as 1.74 for arid climates with relative humidity less than 60% in the
month with peak evaporation and 1.26 for humid climates.
Empirical equations
There are a number of empirically based equations, particularly based on temperature, that are widely
referenced or have been commonly used in the past [McMahon et al., 2013]. The physical basis for estimating
evaporation using temperature alone is that both radiation and vapour pressure deficit are likely to have some
relationship with temperature. In general the only justification of using estimation equations of this type is
that temperature is the only available variable that has been measured. In this case it is unwise to make
evaporation estimates for less than a monthly averaging period [Shuttleworth, 1993]. McMahon et al. [2013]
also recommend the use of physically based equations (such as the Penman-Montheith method) should be
preferred compared to the empirical relationships particularly for areas where the empirical coefficients
were not derived.
The Thornthwaite method [Shaw, 1994] provides estimates of potential evapotranspiration using only mean
monthly temperature data. The estimates are based on climatological average temperatures and therefore
provide a climatological estimate of evaporation rather than true evaporation for any particular day or month.
10T
ETo = 16
2-33
Page 2-12
Fiona Johnson
f.johnson@unsw.edu.au
Where I is a heat index computed using all monthly average temperatures as:
Tj
5
j =1
12
I=
1.514
2-34
And a is:
2-35
ETa = f ( ) ETo
2-36
A typical relationship for the soil moisture extraction function is shown in Equation x.
wp
f ( ) = f
fc wp
2-37
2.6 References
Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith (1998), Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing
crop water requirements, FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Names, Rome.
Ladson, A. R. (2008), Hydrology: an Australian introduction, Oxford university press.
McMahon, T., M. Peel, L. Lowe, R. Srikanthan, and T. McVicar (2013), Estimating actual, potential, reference
crop and pan evaporation using standard meteorological data: a pragmatic synthesis, Hydrology and Earth
System Sciences, 17(4), 1331-1363.
Penman, H. L. (1948), Natural Evaporation from Open Water, Bare Soil and Grass, Proceeding of the Royal
Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 193(1032), 120-145.
Priestley, C. H., and R. J. Taylor (1972), Assessment of Surface Heat-Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale
Parameters, Monthly Weather Review, 100(2), 81-92.
Shaw, E. M. (1994), Hydrology in Practice, Chapman & Hall, London.
Shuttleworth, W. J. (1993), Evaporation, in Handbook of Hydrology, edited by D. R. Maidment, McGraw-Hill
Inc, New York.
Page 2-13