Md: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998. 4 Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med. 1994;69:883885.
5 Fraenkel JR, Wallen NF. How to Design and
Evaluate Research in Education. 5th ed. Boston, Mass: McGraw Hill; 2003.
anatomy in the clinical years. Acad Med. 2004;
79:711716. 7 Sommers PS, Muller JH, Ozer EM. The faculty self-efficacy scale: a tool for evaluating faculty development interventions. Acad Med. 2000; 75:559560.
6 Robinson AG, Metten S, Guiton G, Berek J.
Using fresh tissue dissection to teach human
Teaching and Learning Moments
The Teachable Moment Two students, Stephen and Peggy, were ready to do their videotaped interviews to demonstrate the fundamental skills and tasks of a medical interview with a standardized patient. Stephen, appearing shy, reluctantly agreed to go first while Peggy and I watched through the video monitor. Stephens interview went smoothly until the patient said emphatically, Well, certainly when I started having so much trouble breathing, I was really very scared! Although Stephen asked some good clarifying questions, he never responded to the patients repeated statements of anxiety. He continued being extremely professional and thorough, but never showed a scintilla of compassion or empathy, verbally or nonverbally, to the patients repeated statements of fear. After the interview, I knew we needed to pursue this empathic black hole. I had an exasperated muffled scream in my headbut didnt you see my lectures and videos on relationship building and empathy? Or observe your peers demonstrating this? WHAT HAPPENED? But, instead I went with an analogy, often a useful strategy when covering more directive assaults. I asked Stephen: When you are really nervous about an upcoming test, how would you respond if I simply asked you more details about the test? Stephen responded Oh, Id feel much better than if you said: Yeah, I can see how youd be nervous. I would never want someone to acknowledge my
958
fears. I would think that means there
truly is something to be fearful of. It would only confirm to me that I should be scared. LIGHT BULB! Now I understood. We had totally different frames for making empathic statements. I could lecture all I wanted, demonstrate examples galore, include patient testimonials, but until I understood Stephens perspective, it was useless. Students arrive with their own experiences of communicating in their families of origin, which often dictate their inclinations towards exploring emotions, dealing with conflict, etc. But, there is little time to really dig and understand the students map of communicating. Without exploring these maps and comparing them to the official communication map of the schools communication model, we are often missing a rich opportunity for more authentic integration of skillful medical interviewing. Stephen, Peggy, and I discussed the different ways people respond to emotion, to anxiety, to conflict. Stephen offered his personal preference for avoiding acknowledgement of difficulties, thinking acknowledgement only amplifies or legitimizes the fear. We didnt disavow Stephen of his way of dealing with these situations for him. We posed the possibility of many patients hoping for some empathic comment, some witnessing of their fear or suffering. This discussion was full of personal discovery. Stephen went back into the room. We rewound the patient to where she
first said her fears. This time Stephen
tried the alternative way of respondingstill not sure it was the best approach, but willing to give it a try. This time Stephen responded to her concern. Despite the awkwardness he felt inside, it appeared natural and well integrated. Stephen came back into our room and was more animated than I had ever seen him. Every time I see Stephen in the hall since this experience, we have a knowing exchange. He is a caring, kind, and compassionate student. I am now confident he will convey that to patients in a way that feels more and more genuine. Hell still be doing it in a self-conscious manner, knowing its not how he would necessarily want it done to him, but he had the unforgettable experience of clicking with a patient who did benefit from the empathic approach. I asked Stephen soon after that experience how he would feel if I wrote up what I had learned from this experience. He encouraged me to do so. I still am wrestling with the best ways to tap into the students own map. Ill continue to think more about that. Acknowledgments The names have been changed to protect the confidentiality of these individuals. Kathy Cole-Kelly, MS, MSW Ms. Cole-Kelly is a professor of family medicine and director of Communication in Medicine Program, Case School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Academic Medicine, Vol. 81, No. 11 / November 2006