Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PG & Research Department of Physics, Pachaiyappas College, Chennai 600 030, India
b PG & Research Department of Physics, Presidency College, Chennai 600 005, India
Received 8 September 2006; received in revised form 20 November 2006; accepted 30 November 2006
Abstract
Rubber materials have wide range of commercial applications such as, infant diapers, famine hygiene products, drug delivery devices and
incontinency products such as rubber tubes, tyres, etc. In the present work, studies on mechanical properties of some selected rubber materials viz.,
natural rubber (NR), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) and ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) have been
carried out in three states viz., raw, vulcanized and reinforced. To enhance the quality of rubber elastomers, an attempt is made to prepare new
elastomers called polyblends. In the present study an attempt is made to blend NR with NBR and with EPDM. We here report, a novel approach
for the evaluation of various physico-mechanical properties such as mechanical strength, tensile strength, elongation and hardness. The method is
simple, direct and fast and involves infrared spectral measurements for the evaluation of these properties. With the applications of modern infrared
spectroscopy, the mechanical strength of these rubber materials have been analyzed by calculating the internal standards among the methyl and
methylene group vibrational frequencies obtained from FTIR spectroscopy. Also the tensile strength measurements carried out by universal testing
machine. The results pertaining physico-mechanical properties of the rubber derivatives undertaken in the present study obtained by IR-based
method are in good agreement with data resulted from the standard methods.
2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Rubber materials; Vulcanizates; Reinforced materials; Polyblends of NR with NBR and with EPDM; FTIR spectra; Mechanical strength; Tensile
measurement and hardness
1. Introduction
From the age of stone and metals we have come to the age of
polymers. Polymers have taken a vital position in all branches
of science and technology. Industry and polymer materials are
interconnected and inseparable. One of the most important polymers is rubber material which is a polymer of isoprene. The
technology of rubber began with the natural product known
as natural rubber (NR). It has been widely used in the form
of thin film in many applications such as tubing, balloon and
glove. Sruanganurak et al. [1] reported that the deposition of
poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) particles on to natural rubber
latex film surface was successfully performed by the layer-bylayer technique via electrostatic interaction and the contact angle
measurement also confirmed the increase in hydrophilicity of the
polyacrylamide (PAAm) grafted NR film surface. An interest-
1386-1425/$ see front matter 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.saa.2006.11.039
324
325
Table 1
Percentage of constituents to make reinforced sample materials
NR
SBR
NBR
EPDM
NR + NBR
NR + EPDM
Constituents
phr
Constituents
phr
Constituents
phr
Constituents
phr
Constituents
phr
Constituents
phr
NR (raw)
100
SBR (raw)
100
NBR (raw)
100
EPDM (raw)
100
NR (raw)
NBR (raw)
80
20
NR (raw)
EPDM (raw)
80
20
Zn O
Stearic acid
Sulfur
MBTS
TMTD
Carbon black
5
2
0.5
1.5
0.5
50
Zn O
Stearic acid
Sulfur
MBTS
TMTD
Carbon black
5
2
0.5
1.5
0.5
50
Zn O
Stearic acid
MBTS
TMTD
Sulfur
Carbon black
5
2
1.5
0.5
2.5
50
Zn O
Stearic acid
MBTS
TMTD
Sulfur
Carbon black
5
2
2
0.5
2.5
50
Zn O
Stearic acid
MBTS
TMTD
Sulfur
Carbon black
5
2
1.5
0.5
2.5
50
Zn O
Stearic acid
MBTS
TMTD
Sulfur
Carbon black
5
2
1.5
0.5
2.5
50
phr: parts hundred in rubber; MBTS: 2,2-dibenzothiazyl disulfide; TMTD: tetra methylthiuram disulfide; ZnO: zinc oxide.
3.3. Hardness
FTIR spectroscopy is a powerful tool to monitor the vibrational energy levels in the region of different molecules. The
changes in chemical properties are usually followed by FTIR
spectroscopy which is a very sensitive and non-destructive
technique. Infrared spectroscopic analysis of various rubber
materials was carried out using Perkin Elmer professional computer using Idris software. FTIR spectra were recorded in the
range of 4504000 cm1 at room temperature. The resolution
is 4 cm1 and the number of scans to record IR spectra is 32.
For recording IR spectra, the rubber samples were cut into small
pieces. These were taken in a boiling tube and heated so as to
bring them to semi liquid state. A drop of the liquid was smeared
to form a transparent film between two circular NaCl disks. The
NaCl disks with the sample film were placed in the IR cell and
the spectra were recorded.
326
FTIR spectra of raw, gum and cured natural rubber materials are given in Fig. 2. The spectra are very nearly identical
and serve to confirm the belief that the polymeric units are the
same for these three elastomers except for minor differences.
Some of the frequencies can be identified immediately on the
basis of the correlation rules and in some cases the bands are not
discreet because of lack in resolution. By analyzing the double
bond stretching and all of the CH valency vibrations, the strong
asymmetrical (as CH2 ) and symmetrical (s CH2 ) stretching of
methylene group vibrations present in NR are observed near
2950 and 2853 cm1 , respectively. This is supported by the
report of Arroyo et al. [2] They reported the CH asymmetric and
symmetric stretching vibrations during the comparative study of
unmodified and organically modified clay as substitute of carbon black in natural rubber. In spectra of all rubber materials,
which contain methyl groups show two distinct bands occurring
at around 2964 cm1 . The first band results from the asymmetrical stretching mode in which two CH bonds of methyl group
are extending while the third one is contracting. The second
band arises from symmetrical stretching in which all three of
the CH bonds extend and contract in phase. This is evidenced
by the report of Chaudhry and Billingham [17]. From the spectral
analysis of all rubber materials, it is observed that all elastomers
show methyl and methylene group vibrations and OH stretching
vibrations at 3470 cm1 which attributes to polymeric hydroxyl
compound irrespective of their compositions. It is very interesting to note that the band at 1076 cm1 is absent in all raw
materials whereas it is present in all gum and reinforced elastomers. This band is mainly attributed to the symmetric CSC
group stretching vibrations in the two CS bonds [18,19]. Since
during vulcanization the addition of sulfur breaks the double
bonds between the two carbon atoms and the sulfur atoms bridge
the gaps between the two chains i.e. they establish cross-links
between the chains. The spectral difference between gum and
reinforced materials is only in the rate of absorption.
In the case of natural rubber, the absorption is higher for reinforced material. Since for carbon black fillers, structure, particle
porosity and overall physico-chemical nature of particle surface
are the important factors in deciding cure rate and degree of reinforcement attainable. The term structure is used to represent
the clustering together and entanglement of fine carbon particles into long chains, thereby increasing the absorption [20].
The complete spectral identity of cured and uncured rubbers
is not inconsistent with current concepts of the vulcanization
process, which is considered to introduce comparatively few
cross-linkages in building the three-dimensional vulcanizates.
Since the infrared spectrum of a polymer is determined almost
entirely by the small recurring structural units and not by the
gross size or configuration, the net result of vulcanization, consisting mainly of changes which involve relatively few of the
recurring polymer units, does not alter the rubber spectrum to
any appreciable extent. Only two minor differences between the
spectra of gums and their vulcanizates were noticed. In general,
oxidation during vulcanization produces hydroxyl absorption
and carbonyl absorption. These extra bands do not interfere,
however, with any bands useful for analysis. A more consistent difference is the poorer definition of bands themselves and
the increased background absorption of most cured rubber. This
effect has been observed in homologous series of simple hydrocarbons and is consistent with the increased molecular weight of
the vulcanizates. This absorption was not reproducible for different rubber derivatives and serious only in natural vulcanizates.
The fact that the spectra of the various elastomers, when obtained
by the procedures described, are unique and experimentally
reproducible regardless of the past history of the sample constitutes a sound basis for characterization of the elastomer content
of commercial rubber products. The individual elastomers are
identified by the respective absorptions.
In the spectra of SBR shown in Fig. 3, the bands at 756
and 704 cm1 ascribed to the out of plane bending vibrations
of aromatic CH and C C groups of polystyrene in SBR and
the bands at 990 and 902 cm1 attributed to the out of plane
bending vibrations of CH of vinyl groups and the band at
960 cm1 attributed to the trans CH CH group vibrations
of butadiene present in SBR. This is evidenced by the report
given by Fernandez-Berridi et al. [23] in the study of pyrolysis
of SBR. While in the spectra of NBR given in Fig. 4, the band at
2230 cm1 ascribed to alkyl C N stretching vibrations of acrylonitrile present in NBR and the band at 960 cm1 is due to the
CH wagging motion vibrations of butadiene.
327
328
Table 2
Internal ratio parameters (IRP) among the methyl and methylene group vibrations of rubber samples
Sample materials
R1 = A2964 /A2950
R2 = A2853 /A2864
R3 = A2950 /A2964
R4 = A2853 /A2950
R5 = A2864 /A2964
Quality of rubber
NR: raw
NR: gum
NR: reinforced
SBR: raw
SBR: gum
SBR: reinforced
NBR: raw
NBR: gum
NBR: reinforced
EPDM: raw
EPDM: gum
EPDM: reinforced
NR + NBR: gum
NR + NBR: reinforced
NR + EPDM: gum
NR + EPDM: reinforced
0.9420
0.9466
0.9568
0.9095
0.9226
0.9292
0.9205
0.9247
0.9361
0.9385
0.9391
0.9481
0.9217
0.9279
0.9296
0.9635
0.9748
0.9786
0.9792
0.9739
0.9740
0.9921
0.9685
0.9771
0.9818
0.9736
0.9740
0.9812
0.9719
0.9729
0.9730
0.9756
0.9612
0.9622
0.9714
0.9700
0.9753
0.9755
0.9618
0.9695
0.9725
0.9552
0.9578
0.9643
0.9556
0.9615
0.9646
0.9695
0.9838
0.9649
0.9598
0.9740
0.9628
0.9430
0.9751
0.9691
0.9536
0.9697
0.9674
0.9646
0.9654
0.9605
0.9597
0.9557
0.9700
0.9488
0.9522
0.9701
0.9628
0.9282
0.9683
0.9615
0.9446
0.9524
0.9514
0.9478
0.9493
0.9493
0.9515
0.9498
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Good
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
329
Table 3
Tensile strength and elongation for rubber sample materials
S. no.
Samples
Load at
maximum
load (kN)
Displacement
at maximum
load (mm)
Load/width at
maximum
load (N/mm)
Stress at
maximum
load (MPa)
Elongation at
maximum
load (%)
Tensile strength at
maximum load
(MPa)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
NR: gum
NR: reinforced
SBR: gum
SBR: reinforced
NBR: gum
NBR: reinforced
EPDM: gum
EPDM: reinforced
NR + NBR: gum
NR + NBR: reinforced
NR + EPDM: gum
NR + EPDM: reinforced
0.014
0.021
0.018
0.158
0.021
0.097
0.018
0.146
0.056
0.114
0.014
0.059
79.610
159.220
75.740
334.600
92.100
149.900
34.400
124.800
260.600
379.300
170.300
200.900
2.380
26.537
3.013
52.733
3.490
16.125
2.953
24.400
18.783
18.933
4.500
9.758
1.190
13.600
1.205
23.970
1.424
6.582
1.136
11.619
9.163
9.467
2.093
4.243
159.220
392.000
151.480
669.200
184.200
299.800
68.800
249.600
521.200
758.600
340.600
401.800
1.190
13.600
1.205
23.970
1.424
6.582
1.136
11.619
9.163
9.467
2.093
4.243
330
Table 4
Hardness of rubber samples
S. no.
Sample
Hardness shore A
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15
16
NR: raw
NR: gum
NR: reinforced
NBR: raw
NBR: gum
NBR: reinforced
SBR: raw
SBR: gum
SBR: reinforced
EPDM: raw
EPDM: gum
EPDM: reinforced
NR + NBR: gum
NR + NBR: reinforced
NR + EPDM: gum
NR + EPDM: reinforced
40
44
63
35
49
62
20
48
53
36
54
70
43
55
40
43
ing with gum and raw states due to carbon filler added to the
sample. Hardness of EPDM reinforced material is 70. While it
gets decreased when it is blended with NR. In spite of reinforced
NR material has hardness as 60 and for EPDM 70, the polyblend
of this material in both gum and reinforced state are 40 and 43,
respectively, these values are in good agreement with the values
reported by Kiatkamjornwong and Pairpisit [24].
5. Conclusion
From the present study of rubber elastomers viz., NR, SBR,
NBR, EPDM in raw, gum and reinforced and polyblends of NR
with NBR and EPDM, we report a novel approach for the evaluation of various physico-mechanical properties by analyzing
the mechanical strength from FTIR spectral measurements and
tensile strength by ASTM. The results obtained by IR-based
method and standard methods for quality control purpose have
been found to be in good agreement. The quality of rubber materials can be enhanced for specific applications by blending of two
rubber elastomers. From the present study, we conclude that