Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
INTRODUCTION
money.
To improve the well being of our customers, community and people
DIRECTOR
MANAGER
SUPERVISOR
CHEF/
HELPER
DELIVERY
MAN
CASHIER
WAITER
STRENGHTS
1) Over 20,000 franchises around the world.
2) Brand leader in the UK.
3) Innovative range of pizzas under one roof.
WEAKNESS
1) No parking facilities.
2) Advertisings are very less.
3) Still there are fewer outlets of Pizza Hut.
OPPORTUNITIES
1) Pizza Hut can introduce new Pizzas with different crust sizes and
flavours. This may attract new customers with new tastes and this
may increase their sales.
2) Pizza Hut has expanded into the Indian market menu and looks to
the old favourite to bolster sales in the US.
3) Pizza Hut has targeted upscale products and a downscale
consumer base; this will attract customers who are more willing
DOMINOS PIZZA
Papa john
US pizza
OWNER
STORE
MANAGER
ASSISTANT
MANAGER
MANAGER
CREW
MANAGER
CASHIERS
COOKS
STRENGHTS
1) Worldwide presence
2) Strong image
3) Strong network within franchises.
WEAKNESS
1) There is lack of organic pizzas which will limit the target market
2) Price, expensive products compare to small competitors
OPPORTUNITIES
1) Dominos pizza focuses on delivering the pizza the most efficient
way.
2) Sales from iPhone application
3) Special promotions
THREATS
1) Intense competition
2) Tendency to healthy food
3) Increase of food and labour cost
The technique used to complete this project is data collection through method of
primary data collection. Primary data can be collected through many ways but in
this project questionnaire method is used to collect data through the respondents.
Tools used in this project:
Since questionnaire method is used in this project to collect the data. The tool used
to analyse that data and interpret the results thereby pie charts are used to represent
the data and average calculation method is applied to analyse and interpret the data
collected.
CHAPTER-II:
OBJECTIVES
and conclusions.
To compare the two big pizza houses namely Pizza Hut and Dominos.
To conduct a survey through the means of questionnaire regarding
customer satisfaction and preference between services and food offered
2.2 Scope of Study: In this project primary data has been collected through survey. The
survey has been conducted through means of questionnaire containing 22 close
ended multiple choice questions. The data collected will be analysed and interpreted
later on.
satisfaction.
The project provides conclusion drawn upon by conducting the survey
Methodology used for Data Analysis: The data so collected was analysed
later to interpret the results regarding the favourability and preference of the
customers between Pizza Hut and Dominos.
The data was represented in the form of pie charts. The collected data was analysed
through average method. The data was feed in the MS Excel which gave the
averages in percentage
CHAPTER-III
DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
PIZZA HUT
60%
DOMINOS
40%
9
Total
100%
Question 1
pizza hut
40%
dominos
60%
Closest place
Cheapest
Best tasting
Friendly staff
Cool environment
Coupon offers
PIZZA HUT
CLOSEST PLACE
25%
CHEAPEST
65%
BEST TASTING
53%
FRIENDLY STAFF
8%
COOL ENVIRONMENT
8%
COUPON OFFERS
0
Total
100%
Table 2: data analysis for ques 2
10
DOMINOS
21%
17%
50%
4%
0
8%
100%
PIZZA HUT
Closest place
5% 5% 16%
Cheapest
Best tasting
Friendly staf
cool environment
33%
Coupon ofers
41%
DOMINOS
4%
8%
Closest place
Cheapest
21%
Best tasting
Friendly staf
17%
50%
11
Cool environment
Coupon ofers
INTERPRETATION: People prefer Dominos for dining in due to the best tasting
(50%), they also prefer it due its closest place (21%), very less people prefer it for being
cheapest (17%), and only few people opt for Dominos for its coupon offers (8%) and
friendly staff (4%).
Ques 3. How far do you need to travel to reach this restaurant?
o
o
o
o
Less than 1 km
1km to 3km
3km to 6km
More than 6km
PIZZA HUT
LESS THAN 1 KM
30.50%
1 KM TO 3 KM
44.50%
3 KM TO 6 KM
19.50%
MORE THAN 6 KM
5.50%
Total
100%
Table 3: data analysis for ques 3
DOMINOS
34%
50%
8%
8%
100%
PIZZA HUT
6%
20%
1Km to 3km
3km to 6km
More than 6km
45%
12
DOMINOS
8%
8%
34%
1Km to 3km
3km to 6km
More than 6km
50%
DOMINOS
63%
29%
8%
100%
PIZZA HUT
14%
Nominal
41%
High
Very high
44%
DOMINOS
8%
Nominal
High
29%
Very high
63%
14
VERY OFTEN
SOMETIMES
ALWAYS
Total
Table 5: data analysis for ques 5
PIZZA HUT
28%
53%
19%
100%
DOMINOS
25%
37.50%
37.50%
100%
PIZZA HUT
19%
Never
28%
Very often
Sometimes
Always
53%
15
ordered (28%), and only few people have opted that they always get what they have
ordered (19%).
DOMINOS
25%
38%
Never
Very often
Sometimes
Always
38%
16
DOMINOS
8%
75%
17%
100%
PIZZA HUT
14%
31%
Average
Tasty
Very tasty
56%
DOMINOS
17%
8%
Average
Tasty
Very tasty
75%
17
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
PIZZA HUT
POOR
0
SATISFACTORY
36%
GOOD
33.30%
EXCELLENT
30.50%
Total
100%
Table 7: data analysis for ques 7
DOMINOS
8%
21%
63%
8%
100%
PIZZA HUT
Poor
31%
36%
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
33%
18
DOMINOS
8% 8%
Poor
21%
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
63%
19
DOMINOS
0
87.50%
12.50%
100%
PIZZA HUT
11%
17%
Excellent
Good
Average
72%
DOMINOS
13%
Excellent
Good
Average
88%
20
DOMINOS
57%
Total
100%
QUESTION 1
Pizza hut
43%
Dominos
57%
o
o
o
o
o
Closest place
Cheapest
Best tasting
Friendly staff
Coupon offers
PIZZA HUT
CLOSEST PLACE
23%
CHEAPEST
11.50%
BEST TASTING
58%
FRIENDLY STAFF
0
COUPON OFFERS
7.50%
Total
100%
Table 10: data analysis for ques 2
DOMINOS
24%
32%
32%
0
12%
100%
PIZZA HUT
8%
Closest
23%
Cheapest
Best tasting
Friendly
12%
Coupon
58%
22
DOMINOS
12%
Closest
24%
Cheapest
Best tasting
Friendly
32%
Coupon
32%
23
DOMINOS
68%
26%
6%
100%
PIZZA HUT
20%
Nominal
42%
High
Very high
38%
DOMINOS
6%
Nominal
High
26%
Very high
68%
24
DOMINOS
6%
53%
41%
100%
PIZZA HUT
15%
23%
Very often
Sometimes
Always
62%
DOMINOS
6%
Very often
Sometimes
41%
Always
53%
26
DOMINOS
9%
20.50%
70.50%
100%
PIZZA HUT
27%
31%
Very often
Sometimes
Always
42%
DOMINOS
9%
Very often
21%
Sometimes
Always
71%
27
DOMINOS
0
50%
50%
100%
PIZZA HUT
23%
Very often
39%
Sometimes
Always
39%
28
services (38.50%), and rest people says that they always get it in proper condition, fresh
and hot (23%).
DOMINOS
Very often
Sometimes
50%
50%
Always
29
DOMINOS
9%
76%
15%
100%
PIZZA HUT
19%
23%
Average
Tasty
Very tasty
58%
DOMINOS
15%
9%
Average
Tasty
Very tasty
76%
30
DOMINOS
15%
68%
17%
100%
PIZZA HUT
19%
23%
Excellent
Good
Average
58%
31
DOMINOS
15%
17%
Excellent
Good
Average
68%
32
CHAPTER-IV
CONCLUSIONS
4.1
Pizza Hut covers a large portion of market area as compared to that of Dominos
pizza in dining in restaurant and vice versa for home delivery restaurant.
Maximum people look for pizza restaurant which have cheap prices and best
tasting.
Most of the respondents say that Pizza Hut has high product prices whereas
4.2 Conclusion.
On the basis of the study it is found that both the pizza restaurant is preferable by the
people. In case of Pizza Hut covers more market area when it comes to variety and
tasting and is more popular among the consumers as a dining in restaurant. Whereas on
the other hand Dominos covers more market area when it comes to product prices and
quick services and is more popular among the consumers as a home delivery restaurant.
People had overall good experience at food restaurant, Pizza Hut as well as Dominos
pizza. People with high income or high income group people choose Pizza Hut and
middle income group people choose Dominos pizza.
Dominos provide quick home delivery services whereas Pizza Hut very often does it.
Dominos provide more offers than Pizza Hut in their pizza and other beverages.
Overall both the food restaurant has gain equal popularity among the pizza lover.
33
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
34