Donate

Migrant-Rights.org is entirely supported by non-governmental backers and the general public. Your
donations pay for Migrant-Rights projects, staffing, research, resources, servers and protective
infrastructure.

The Impact
Help expand our availability in English, Arabic and provide new content in Bengali, Tagalog, Hindi and
other languages
Help improve data and research on migrant workers to produce evidence-based policy alternatives and
reports
Help ensure that migrants to the Middle East are represented at the UN and other institutions

Donate to Migrant Rights

Payment Method Visa/Mastercard Paypal
Donate to migrant rights
$10 USD
$25 USD
$50 USD

$100 USD

$500 USD

Donate a custom amount to migrant rights

Or donate a custom amount Custom Amount

10

Donate

Advancing the rights of migrant workers throughout the Middle East

About
Donate
Home
Translate For Us
Our Networks
Contact
Search

Search

English

Migrant Rights
News & Reports
Reportage
Interviews
RSS Feed

Interviews, current affairs and resources for media.

Campaigns
Infographics
Statistics
Resources
Rights Abuses
Home News & Reports Migrant fishermen hit by a double whammy. Regional politics and stifling kafala
system

Migrant fishermen hit by a double whammy. Regional politics and

stifling kafala system
Share Find us on Twitter Find us on Facebook Find us on ... Share this via email
Nov 26 2014

After 10 weeks of detention and uncertainty across two countries, five Indian
fishermen finally left Qatar on Wednesday, Nov 26. In a tiny room that houses eight,
in Wakraha coastal town bordering Doha, the fishermen spoke to MigrantRights.org about the nightmare that began at sea and continued on land in Qatar.
First caught in cross-border politics, and then in the shackles of the kafala system
that immobilised them in Qatar.

The five fishermen the day before they left for

India, after two months detention in Iran, and
facing trouble with exit permits in Qatar.
On September 16, Sasikumar (42) along with his colleagues Arokiyam Antony (30), S. Anthonies (34), S.
Antony (30), and Joseph Thadeuse (38) left the coast of Qatar on the fishing launcher. The vessel (Navras,
registration number 3334) was traversing the waters of the Persian Gulf between Qatar and Iran.
Sasikumar said the seas were turbulent and the boat had to change course, accidentally crossing into
Iranian territory, near the Kish Island. On September 22, Iranian coast guards apprehended the five men.
They were held overnight, for over 24 hours, without food or water to drink, and also denied access to a
washroom.
We managed to get a drink of water from the garden hose. But we could not drink much as we were not
allowed to go to the bathroom, the fishermen recount. On the intervention of the Indian consul in Bander

Abbas, the five were allowed to go back to their boat, but not leave the coast.
Migrant-Rights.org first spoke to the fishermen when they were living on the boat anchored off Kish
Island, awaiting release. They spent two months on the 61-feet vessel.
At the time of the arrest, the men had in their possession only their seamens visa and fishing licencetheir
passports safely locked away in their rooms in Dohaand the last of their food rations on board.
What ensued was a seemingly endless wait with no clarity on how and when theyd be released.
The five fishermen had to live on a meagre allowance of around QR1000 that the Indian mission had
given them, and on the charity of other fishermen.
During the time we were detained, 14 other boats were caught too. Eight from Ajman, four from Saudi
and two from Bahrain. But their sponsors sent their agent immediately with food and the fine amount, and
those boats left quickly. Those other fishermen shared their food with us, because we had no means, says
Sasikumar, who has lived in Qatar for 20 years.
The Indian consul in Bandar Abbas and the embassy in Tehran contacted the sponsor and owner of the
ship in Qatar, Yousuf Al Binali, who after six weeks paid the fine of QR30,000 to the Iranian officials, to
release the shipping vessel and its crew. It took another two weeks for Iran to clear the papers.
They did not even look at the letter the embassy gave. They just threw it aside, saw our ID
cards and asked to go get a signed paper from our sponsor. Our plea and explanation fell on
deaf ears. How can we go back to the sponsor when he threatens us?
To Qatar and at the mercy of the kafeel

Finally on November 14, they were allowed to set out. On reaching Qatar, they were received by their
sponsor and a severe reprimand for straying into Iranian territory. The fishermen, already traumatised,
requested an exit permit to go back home to their families. Which is when the next obstacle presented
itself.
The sponsor told us to pay QR60,000 for the exit permit. The money he paid as fine and the loss of
revenue in the two months we were detained. Where do we go for this money? He asked us to go back to
sea and work. We refused. We just wanted to go back home, Sasikumar, who by now was designated as
the spokesman for the group.
On Sunday, the five went to the Indian embassy with their case and were given a standard letter (see
image) to take to the Search and Follow up department of the Ministry of Interior, to turn themselves in.
We would like to inform you that, **Name**, Indian national came to Doha for work as a fishermen
details given below. However, he has reported to the Embassy that he is compelled to seek admission into
your centre due to: Non availability of exit permit
The letter ends with request to deport the person.
Before we could go there the sponsor came back and verbally abused us. Words we cannot repeat. He
made us go to the police station with him and demanded that we turn in our passport to him by end of day.
We were threatened every day.
The very next day, with the embassy letter in hand, the men went to the SFD.
They did not even allow us to queue up until we had an open ticket in hand.

With no money for food or transport, Migrant Support Qatar (MSQ), a volunteer run operation raised the
money for their tickets and sustenance. However, when the fishermen went back with the tickets and the
letter from the embassy, they were turned away again.
They did not even look at the letter the embassy gave. They just threw it aside, saw our ID cards and
asked to go get a signed paper from our sponsor. Our plea and explanation fell on deaf ears. How can we
go back to the sponsor when he threatens us?
And of what value is the embassys letter? When our Lankan fishermen get caught in these situations, the
embassy personally takes care of the letter and communication with the Ministry. They know a poor
labourer like us will not be given any respect there. But the Indian embassy just prints out these letters as
a matter of routine and leaves us to run around and get frustrated. Theres so little faith in their efficiency.
Fortunately for the five fishermen, the sponsor, aware of their visit to the SFD, finally agreed to give an
exit permit.
He has only one fishing boat, and we are the only crew. The only way he can get visas for a new crew is
by letting us go. But we know other fishermen, working for bigger fleets, who are trapped as even if they
refuse to go out to sea, the sponsor can move his crew around, the fishermen explained.
The roles of embassies of the countries where the fishermen are from needs to be better
examined. The process and procedures that the missions take to assist their citizens are
unclear, especially when the citizens stray into a third country.
Plight of seamen

The plight of these five fishermen is neither unique nor the worst-case scenario. Migrant-Rights.org
spoke to several other fishermen on their work contracts.
In general, fishermen do not receive a salary. The crew keeps 50 percent of the proceeds from their catch,
which they share amongst themselves, while 50 percent goes to the sponsor.
Often, if theres maintenance to be done on the ship, thats deducted first before the 50-50 split. The
fishermen also pay half of the annual visa fee (which works out to QR350) and bear the expense of their
medical treatment, if any. They have no insurance coverage either.
From what they earn, they will have to fend for their accommodation and food. For the tiny room shared
by eight men, they have to pay anywhere between QR2000 and QR2500 in total.
In an excellent month, we may make QR1000-1500 each. But those are rare occasions. What we make
regularly is far less. We are also harassed by the sponsor if we dont make a big enough catch, which is
why, often we explore farther and farther from the coast and stray into another country, Sasikumar says.
Fishermen detained for straying into foreign waters is a common enough occurrence. If you are caught in
UAE they will release the fishermen and detain the boat. In Iran it is more difficult, the fishermen say.
Yet, they hope to come back to the region to work. We cant come to Qatar for two years, because of the
ban. But we have families to run, we have no choice, so we will look at another country.
Human Rights activist and founder of MSQ Aakash Jayaprakash says the case of the five fishermen is
indicative of wider issues affecting migrants in the Gulf. While the sponsor did assist in repatriating the
workers back to Qatar, he demanded that the workers repay him QR60,000. How feasible is it to expect
fishermen to cover this amount? Fishermen earn very little in Qatar already. It is a series of unfortunate
events, all of which negatively affect the migrants and their families. If provided with better navigation
equipment and training, it is hard to imagine the fishermen would have voluntarily strayed into Iranian

territory.
Furthermore, as per Qatari law, fishermen are categorized as domestic workers which effectively
excludes them from any legal protections enshrined in the labor law. They are solely dependent on the
goodness of the Kafeel to assist them in times of distress, and unfortunately was not the case here.
The roles of embassies of the countries where the fishermen are from needs to be better examined. The
process and procedures that the missions take to assist their citizens are unclear, especially when the
citizens stray into a third country. Of course, it must be acknowledged the sponsor paid the amount needed
to repatriate the individuals from Iran.
Sr. Valarmathi, a member of the Migrant Forum in Asia, has been lobbying on behalf of fishermen with
the Indian government. She says, the fishermen are under great pressure to keep increasing their catch.
When they fish with in the territory they cannot get the quote the sponsor expects, which means severe
harassment when they return.
She reiterates what the fishermen told Migrant-Rights.org on the poor employment conditions. There are
fishermen without accommodation, and their boat is their room. Even in bad conditions or when they are
ill, they have only the boat to live on. There is no social security in place in both the sending and
receiving countries.
Caught in political crossfire

Migrant fishermen from the subcontinent often find themselves in trouble in the region. In September this
year, Karthikeyan Thangaraj, a 32-year-old fisherman from India on a Bahraini boat, died in collision with
a Qatar coast guard vessel. While Indian news reports say the fisherman was shot dead, local reports held
it was an accident.
In June last year, 19 Indian fishermen on four boats from Saudi were detained for six months by Iranian
authorities.
This was attributed to the political tension between Saudi and Iran.
A couple of years ago, 32 Bahrain-based Indian fishermen were arrested and detained by Qatari officials,
at the height of political tensions between the two Gulf nations.
In November 2012, 29 Qatar-based Indian fishermen were detained in Kish Island by Iranian authorities.
On the very day, 30 Indian fishermen from UAE were also detained.
The India-based South Asian Fishermen Fraternity (SAFF) has repeatedly urged all the GCC countries to
issue special identity cards to fishermen.
It emphasised that migrant fishermen do not have knowledge to navigate the unfamiliar waters of the Gulf
and so, when they inadvertently breach maritime borders while fishing, they shouldnt be treated as
criminals.
In November 2010, 28 Indian fishermen from Saudi were sentenced to two years in jail by a Qatari court.
The detention and mistreatment of fishermen is highly underreported both within the region and and in
their home countries.
Posted In GCC, Qatar, Slavery, Working conditions
Tweet

Tweet

Contact Migrant Rights

Find Us On
Twitter
Facebook
YouTube
RSS
Subscribe to RSS Feed Republish this Article Connect with Us

Related Articles
British football fans challenge Qatar on migrant abuse record April 21 2015 [Stories of Origin] Returnees
Dreams. Some Interrupted. April 21 2015 [STORIES OF ORIGIN] Better lives. Betting on migration April 17
2015

get breaking migrant rights news in your inbox

Your email address

Sign Up

From officials to citizens, policing of migrants borders on abuse in GCC Nov 29, 2014
Jordan deports workers despite pending legal disputes Nov 20, 2014
How You Can Help
Translate For Us Donate Join Us Spread the Word
Migrant Rights
English |
Follow @MigrantRights

5,323 followers

Follow @MigrantRights

News & Reports

Campaigns
Infographics
About
Resources
Rights Abuses
Translate For Us
Our Networks
Home
Translate For Us
Contact
Legal & Terms
2015 Mideast Youth | Sitemap
We encourage you to share this content widely.
Mideast youth logo
Search

Search

5,323 followers

News & Reports

Campaigns
Infographics
Statistics
Resources
Rights Abuses
Home
Translate For Us
Contact
Legal & Terms
Advancing the rights of migrant workers throughout the Middle East

Donate

Twitter
Facebook
YouTube
Spread the Word

Spread the word comment

Support migrant rights in

the Middle East http://www.migrant-

Share this message to:

http://www.migrant-rights.org
Facebook
Twitter
Google +
Email
Follow

Close
Close

5,323 followers

Follow

5,323 followers

Visit Mideast Youth