Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
APJSS/SPECIAL ISSUE/2/168
Abstract
Promotion of the energy system from traditional mode to clean technology arena in
emerging countries possiblitates manifold social and economic betterment leading to
the acceleration of human development process. Forest and agricultural biomass as
well as crop residue conjugately provide considerable share in the daily energy
source in rural Indian agro-economic societies; but these are used mostly through
conventional methods and requires being updated and sophisticated. The execution
of a plan towards promoting clean energy tools and techniques among these
communities necessitate the beforehand confirmation whether the targeted
communities are prepared towards adopting the same. Present study endeavours to
examine the status of community preparedness of rural agricultural communities
towards aforesaid direction.
1.0. Introduction:
The ideology and parameters of analysing the efforts of development has been
diversified to a greater extent and moreover the contemporary social science
does not confine itself within the consideration of the process of development as
a cumulative process of enhancing the physical quality of life of inhabitants;
rather it tries to chalk out the strategies to promote the capabilities of the
targeted
community
for
ensuring
convenient
accessibility
to
resources,
since
2006-07
has
been
Goals.
The
overall
importance
of
energy
to
sustainable
energy is at the core of attention of both the developed and developing nations
to make a mutual balance between the continuation of the process of
development and the preservation of environmental quality. The inhabitants of
rural India use the agricultural and forest biomass and crop residue to a
significant amount to satisfy their need of daily need of energy at house hold
activities. Presently, in India about 289 million of people (approximately 25 % of
total population) are lack of electricity usage and mostly of them are from rural
sector. More interestingly, about 836 million people (approximately 72 % of total
population) rely on the traditional use of biomass for cooking (International
Energy Agency, 2011). This biomass energy is utilized in such a traditional
unsophisticated manner that a considerable portion of energy is wasted away
and a significant scale of pollution is occurred. This rural energy system is
required to be replaced by clean green energy production technology. The
successful transformation from this traditional mode to modern refined mode is
the function of mutual assemblage of dyadic interaction between the innovated
tools & technology and physico- behavioural preparedness of the community
under modification process. Admittedly, all of the social endeavours do not
Page | 3
present
covers
study
the
districts
two
of
Uttar
Uttar
Dinajpur
of
District
having
the
geographical location
2603515
of
latitude
0
87 4837
N
and
E
Bengal
and accommodates a total of 3,000,849
interview technique itself. After the acquaintance, each respondent have been
introduced with the clean energy-tools-technology, their advantages pros &
cons, estimated cost etc in his/her vernacular. Then he/ she has been questioned
whether he/ she is interested in availing those energy and related tools and
techniques within a year / after five years / ten years, i.e. yes or no. After
inserting the answer they have been questioned about some basic information
about household structure, economy and assets. Retrieving of data from these
questionnaires is a very important phase of the study; which is discussed later at
required place.
Page | 5
explored
different
by
research
out
different
in
time.
in
rural India as well as the increase of the share of biomass as the source of
energy in residential usages. The per capita energy consumption by the
inhabitants of rural India has reached up to 4500 MJ during 2004-05 and only
biomass itself has constituted approximately 3750 MJ per capita in that particular
period. The use of fossil fuels, especially coal has been drastically reducing and
gradually replaced by electricity and LPG (See fig.2). Shifting trends in the
patterns of residential energy mix has been assessed by examining the changes
in the percentage of population using different fuels and electricity over time in
the Household Consumer Expenditure Survey, carried out by NSSO (See Tab. 2).
It shows these changes over the last quarter century for India. The fact that the
columns dont sum to 100% provides evidence of the fact that most households
use multiple fuels. The percentage of rural population using biomass like fuel
wood and dung remain unchanged for last three decades; obviously the number
of users of these fuels has been increasing gradually. There is a considerable
change in the percentage of rural population using LPG (0% in 1983 to 12% in
2004-5) and electricity (15% in 1983 to 54% in 2004-5).
Table: 2
Page | 6
1983
1987-88
Years
1993-94
LPG
Coal /
Coke
Electricity
Kerosene
Fuel wood
Dung
0
3
15
95
86
53
1
3
24
96
89
56
2
2
36
95
88
53
19992000
6
2
47
96
88
52
2000-05
12
2
54
91
88
46
like
carbon
monoxide,
methane,
nitrogen
oxides,
benzene,
The
successful
assimilation
of
technological
innovation
or
Page | 7
obvious for a plan to be structurally flexible enough for being befitted with the
demand; then it is also a pre-execution essential to know the status of
community preparedness in respect to a particular effort of modification. Neither
the tools nor the technology can be superimposed to a community; rather, a
smart plan targets allowing them dissolved.
5.2.
Present
Preparedness
Status
of
towards
Community
Using
Clean
Energy:
The study, as has targeted to examine the
status of preparedness of the inhabitants of
agricultural society for adopting the clean
green energy, the districts of Uttar and
Dakshin Dinajpur have been selected for field
survey. Bothe of these two districts rural
economy is predominated by agriculture and
allied activities as indicated by the principal
share of GDP by this sector. For the purpose
of examining the block level variation of
spatial extension of agriculture as well as the
participation
of
people
in
it,
scatter
data of percentage of net sown area to total area and percentage of population
related to agriculture with total population (See Fig. 4). The scatter shows that
there are insignificant variations between the blocks of these two districts in this
particular aspect. This analysis allows collecting the samples randomly from 17
blocks with equal weight of the two districts.
The data collected from the field survey has revealed that male decision makers
of the households are keener to accept the new technology concept and to use
the clean energy than that of the females. 124 male respondents out of the total
of 308 (i.e. 40.26%) have expressed installing the updated technology within one
year if available. This rate of affirmative response is very low if the female
respondents are concerned. Only 11 female respondents out of 72 (i.e. 15.27%)
answered affirmatively. This pattern of response may be the consequence of the
social status of the females in rural Indian societies. There are a very few
examples that the mistress of the households become the decision makers; and
Page | 8
even in spite of being the most aged members of the family. Some females
matching the criteria who have been interviewed are mostly from tribal society;
and engaged in agriculture as agricultural labourer. This may restricted the
capability of remitting installation cost of the clean energy generating
technology.
The data also reflects that there is
age-specific variation in eagerness
towards
accepting
updated
affirmation
by
the
similar for female respondents; one respondent out of one give affirmative
answer in the age group of 20-24 years and there is also a decreasing trend with
the increasing of age (See Table 3 and Fig. 5).
Table: 3
Age specific affirmative response by male and female respondents towards
Installing clean energy tools & technology within a year
Age
Group
s
(Year)
No. of
Male
Responde
nts
belong to
the age
group
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
2
2
11
17
42
51
67
42
26
No. of Male
Responden
ts gives
affirmative
answer
Percentag
e of
affirmation
in
particular
age group
No. of
Female
Responden
ts belong
to the age
group
No. of
Female
Respondent
s give
affirmative
answer
2
2
6
11
24
21
25
16
9
100.00
100.00
54.55
64.71
57.14
41.18
37.31
38.10
34.62
1
0
4
13
0
0
0
0
11
1
0
1
6
0
Percenta
ge of
affirmatio
n in
particular
age
group
100.00
25.00
46.15
0.00
Page | 9
65-69
70-74
75-79
80
Total
21
18
2
7
308
6
1
0
1
124
28.57
5.56
0.00
14.29
40.26
6
32
5
0
72
1
2
0
11
16.67
6.25
0.00
15.28
Level of
Educational
attainment
Illiterate
Primary
Secondary/
H.S.
Graduation
Higher
Total
No. of
Responden
ts within
this
category
No. of
Respondents
gives
affirmative
answers
Percenta
ge
41
92
4
23
9.76
25.00
52
45
11
30.23
71.43
91.67
172
63
12
380
135
Table 4 exhibits that most of the sample respondents, i.e. decision makers posses
up to secondary level of education; besides, Illiteracy has not been wiped out
completely (Also see Fig 6). Only around 10% of illiterate sample respondents
give affirmative response; and, the percentage of affirmative responses has been
limited to 30% for respondents attaining primary to secondary level of education;
whereas 45 out of 63 graduate respondents and 11 out of 12 respondents with
higher educational attainment delivers their opinion affirmatively.
Page | 10
Page | 11
Income
is
one
of
the
important
factors
in
motivating
the
people
towards
updated
sophisticated
technologies.
Admittedly,
The
sophisticated
clean
renewable
tools
energy
volume
of
options,
account
the
taking
cost
of
this
curve,
they
are
(in
cost
Rs/kWh
options
(grid
Singh
and
Neuhoff,
2007).
Page | 12
The data obtained from the field survey reveals that the respondents from the
higher per capita household income shows more interest towards clean energy.
Comparatively higher installation cost as well as production cost than that of the
grid electrification (where available) causes least interest on clean technology for
lower incoming households; where no affirmative answer found from the
respondents with annual per capita household income below Rs. 20000. Most of
the few affirmative answers
(affirmation rate not more than
25%) received from the respondents with annual per capita household income
below Rs. 100000 are from the areas of no grid connection availability; whereas
the affirmation rate increases away with the augmentation of per capita annual
household income (See Table: 5).
Table: 5
Interests towards clean energy is a function of Income of the household
Per capita annual
income range of
the household of
the respondent
< 10000
10000 - 19999
20000 - 29999
30000 - 39999
40000-49999
50000 - 99999
100000 - 149000
150000 - 199999
200000 - 299999
300000 - 399999
400000 - 499999
500000 & more
Total
No of
respondents
belong to this
category
21
32
39
47
64
57
41
27
21
18
7
6
380
No of
respondents
responded
affirmatively
0
0
11
11
16
13
20
22
14
16
7
5
135
Percentag
e of
affirmatio
n
0.00
0.00
28.21
23.40
25.00
22.81
48.78
81.48
66.67
88.89
100.00
83.33
All the above analyses have been done on the basis of the rate of affirmative
answer received from the respondents with some specified socio-economic
criteria; which may have explored how those factors do influence the decision
making process of the inhabitant of the rural agrarian India towards assimilating
the innovative technology. The social system is dynamic in nature. A very few
portion of population accept the innovative ideas initially; and their successful
Page | 13
8 (A)
8 (B)
Fig: 8 Time-lag graph towards adopting clean energy technology. (A) With
observed frequency;
(B) With Theoretical Frequencies using Binomial Distribution
The above figures clearly indicate the behavioural pattern of the rural Indian
societies towards accepting new technology ideas. When the respondents are
questioned about their decision to accept the same within one year time limit,
Page | 14
then the rate of affirmative answer becomes 35.5% only (135 affirmations out of
380 respondents). As the time limit has been increased to 5 years and 10 years,
then the rate of affirmation increases to 44.2% (i.e. 167 affirmations out of 380
respondents) and 57.1% (i.e. 217 affirmations out of 380 respondents)
accordingly. This increment of 22% (i.e. 35% to 57%) is truly prospective
favouring the acceptability of the innovative ideas. The present figure of possible
increment is indicative only; and there is fair possibility for the rate of actual
increment in future to be faster than that of the observed rate at present if the
incorporation of new tools and techniques succeed to bring real benefit to the
early adopters. Early success stories are the key of mass popularization of the
same at forthcoming periods.
6.0. Conclusion:
Agriculture is the principal source of occupation in India and around three fourth
of the population is related to it. The effort of development to the mass
essentially
directs
the
target
towards
the
agro-economic
societies;
the
of
considerably
over-casual
pattern.
Arrangement
of
campaigning
consciousness among the inhabitants of these targeted areas does annex extra
dimension at the perceptual receptors of human minds to enable rational
decision making at the situation when the choice is to be made not considering
the presently prevailing circumstances, rather it is to be done based on the
projected future. The targeted community is to be prepared first to ensure the
high level of participation of those peoples for whom a particular action plan has
been chalked out.
References
ATKINSON (Giles), Ed. Handbook of Sustainable development. 2007. Edward Elgar
Publishing Ltd.; UK.
BANERJEE (R.). Comparison of options for distributed generation in India. 2006.
Energy Policy 34(1)
CHATTOPADHYAYA (P.K.). Krishi utpadaner arthonaitik bisleshan. 1983. West
Bengal State Book Board; Kolkata.
CUST (John), SINGH (Anoop) and NEUHOFF (Karsten). Rural electrification in India:
Economics and institutional aspects of renewables. 2007. EPRG 0730 &
CPWE 0763.
DESHMUKH and BILOLIKAR. Optimisation of rural electrification methods. 2006.
Advances in Energy Research
HITOFUMI (Abe). Summary of biomass power generation in India. 2005. Japan
International Cooperation Agency.
HODDER (Ruppert). Development geography. 2000.Routledge; London.
HUSAIN (Majid). Systemetic agricultural geograohy. 2005. Rawat Publication; New
Delhi
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. Energy for all: Financing access for the poor,
Special early excerpt of World Energy Outlook 2011. October, 2011. CECD/
IEA.
KHANDKAR (S.R.), BARNES (D.R.) and SAMAD (H.A.). Energy poverty in rural and
urban India: Are the energy poor also income poor? Policy Research Working
Paper 5463. 2010. World Bank.
KNOWLES (R.) and WAREING (J.). Economic and social geography. 2004. Rupa &
Co.. New Delhi.
LALWANI (Mahendra) and SINGH (Mool). Conventional and renwable energy
scenario of india: present and future. 2010. Published in 'Canadian Journal on
Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Vol. 1, No.6'.
LEVIN (Richard I.). Statistics for management. 2006. Pearson Education Inc;
London
McKENNA(Judy) and NIXON (Jan). Energy interests - rural and urban differences in
"Journal of Extension, 17(5)". September 1979. U.S.Coperative Extension
System.
MEISEN (Peter) and Akin (Irem). The case of meeting the millenium development
goals through acess to clean electricity. 2008. GENI.
Page | 16
Observe
d
Frequen
cy
(f.x)
Theoretical
Frequency
(Binomial distribution)
(f)
(f)
0
0
8
13
9
5
2
0
0
16
39
36
25
12
Page | 17
7
8
9
10
Total
1
0
0
0
38
7
0
0
0
135
38 x 10c7
38 x 10c8
38 x 10c9
38 x 10c10
x
x
x
x
(0.6447)3 x
(0.6447)2 x
(0.6447)1 x
(0.6447)0 x
38
(0.3553)7 = 0.9
(0.3553)8 = 0.2
(0.3553)9 = 0.0
(0.3553)10 = 0.0
Table: A2
Generalized distribution of trend of affirmation when the option of time limit is
given for five years
No. of
affirmative
answers out of
10 respondents
of the sample
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
Observe
d
Frequen
cy
(f.x)
Theoretical
Frequency
(Binomial distribution)
(f)
(f)
0
0
4
7
9
6
5
5
2
0
0
38
0
0
8
21
36
30
30
35
16
0
0
168
Table: A3
Generalized distribution of trend of affirmation when the option of time limit is
given for ten years
No. of
affirmative
answers out of
10 respondents
of the sample
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Observe
d
Frequen
cy
(f.x)
Theoretical
Frequency
(Binomial distribution)
(f)
(f)
0
0
0
5
5
7
12
3
2
2
0
0
8
15
20
35
72
21
16
18
Page | 18
10
Total
2
38
20
217
38 x
10
----x----
Page | 19