Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
com
ScienceDirect
Journal of the European Ceramic Society 35 (2015) 23912401
a School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Laser Materials and Devices, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
c College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Technological University, Nanjing 210009, China
Received 29 October 2014; received in revised form 4 February 2015; accepted 5 February 2015
Available online 22 February 2015
Abstract
Spray drying parameters have been systematically optimized to granulate a stoichiometric mixture of commercial oxides for YAG transparent
ceramics. The processing parameters and suspension composition were changed in sequence and SEM analysis, EDS, MIP and transmittance
measurements, were used to choose the best spray drying parameters. The optimized inlet and outlet temperatures of drying medium were 75
and 60 C, and its flux and aspiration rate were 25 Hz and 30 Hz, respectively. The balanced suspension composition were: solid content 45 wt.%,
binder PVB 1.0 wt.%, dispersant DS005 0.50 wt.% and the atomizer rotating speed 8000 r/min. The granulated particles exhibited excellent forming
performance with mono-dispersed, spherical and fully dense aggregates, and mean size was 40 m. They could be crushed under 40 MPa. The
homogeneous distribution and microstructure of ceramics assured the high optical quality of YAG ceramics.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Spray drying method; Transparent ceramics; YAG; Forming performance
1. Introduction
Since high efficiency Nd:YAG transparent ceramics as laser
gain medium were reported by A. Ikesue in 1995 [12], various
transparent laser materials such as Yb/Nd:YSAG [3], Nd:Y2 O3
[4], Cr:ZnS [5], have been developed. Their optical qualities
have been greatly improved and their applications in physical measurements and medical uses as laser materials are now
well established [6]. Transparent ceramics offer homogeneous
(or gradient) and large dopant concentration, design flexibility,
and large scale required for high power laser. YAG transparent ceramics have been proved to be the best laser host material.
Especially, other rare earth ions (Yb, Ho, etc.) [78] doped YAG
have used to generate different wavelengths, pulse width or tunable laser outputs [910]. Furthermore, composite lasers with
complicated structure of YAG ceramics to improve the thermal
2392
component and then sintered at 1780 C for 8 h under high vacuum (1.0 106 Pa), and finally annealed at 1450 C for 10 h.
2.4. Characterizations
The morphology and microstructure of granulated particles and ceramics were examined using scanning electron
microscopy (SEM, JSM-6510, JEOL, Japan) coupled with an
energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS). The particle size
distribution was recorded by Image J software. The apparent
density and tap density were measured according to national
standards of China, GB5061-85 and GB5162-85, respectively.
The pore size distribution of green compact was evaluated
by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP, Poremaster GT-60,
Quantachrome, USA). Optical transmittance of YAG ceramics was measured using a UV/VIS spectrometer (Lambda 950,
Perkin Elmer, USA). Before the measurements, both surfaces of
samples were polished to 3 mm. All measurements were carried
out at room temperature.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Optimization of processing parameters
The primary steps of spray drying include atomization,
droplet to particle conversion (solvent evaporation) and particle
collection. The atomization is a key parameter in determining
particle size. Before studying this step, the other processing
parameters such as inlet (Tinlet ) and outlet (Toutlet ) temperatures
of drying air should be determined firstly. Generally, Tinlet varies
in a range of 10 C with respect to the ethanol boiling temperature of 78 C [21]. Toutlet indicates the energy consumed during
drying process and depends on Tinlet , outlet pressure and feed
speed, etc. Meanwhile, in order to obtain a better bond behavior
of binder, the mean temperature in the drying chamber should
be slightly higher than the glass transition temperature (Tg ) of
PVB. In our experiments, the softening temperature of PVB was
61.5 C. Thus, Tinlet and Toutlet were selected at 75 C and 60 C,
respectively.
In fact, for an efficient drying, Tinlet and drying medium
flux (Finlet ) decide the total energy transferred to the droplet.
The aspiration rate (the capacity of outlet blower, Foutlet ) determines the residence time of granules in the chamber, which is
also required to ensure sufficient drying. They work together to
evaporate the solvent completely from the droplet.
When the inlet blower worked at full capacity of 50 Hz
(100%), the excessive Finlet would lead to poorly granulated and
very hard particles (not shown here) due to rapid evaporation of
solvent, which would lead to the formation of large pores during shaping by pressing. These pores could be hardly eliminated
by sintering. Thus, Finlet needed to be decreased to reduce the
energy. As Finlet decreasing, the particle became more spherical
and softer, and the granulated particles showed the best morphology when the inlet blower worked at half capacity of 25 Hz.
The granules size was about 2050 m although its shape was
still apple or doughnut. Meanwhile, the mass collection rate of
granules to theoretical yield increased with the decrease of Finlet
35.7
78.7
94.1
65.9
85.6
(Table 1), and it was higher than 94% without sieving and 85%
after 100-mesh sieving when Finlet and Foutlet decreased to 25 Hz
and 30 Hz, respectively. However, a further decrease of Finlet and
Foutlet lower than 50% would cause the incomplete drying and
obstruction of nozzle. Therefore, Finlet and Foutlet were selected
25 Hz and 30 Hz, respectively.
3.2. Optimization of suspension composition
The atomization is a key parameter in determining particle
size. In this study, the centrifugal force was employed to assist
atomization process. After selecting an atomizer, the empirical
equation of control droplet diameter (Dd ) could be expressed
[22]:
0.25 0.06 0.375
fL
L
L
Dd = C
(1)
0.375
fL vL + fA vA
A
C is a constant, and it depends on nozzle design. , , , v and
f are density, viscosity, surface tension, velocity and flow rate
of the liquid (L) or hot air (A). This equation indicates that the
suspension composition plays more important role in producing
various product shapes and sizes than processing parameters.
And Dd is mostly proportional to the density, viscosity and
surface tension of suspension. However, these three parameters of suspension are effectively changed by its solid content,
dispersant content and binder content.
3.2.1. Solid content of suspension
As the primary factor, the solid content (Cd ) of droplet (d)
atomized from suspension has a strong influence on the density
(g ) and particle size (Dg ) of granules (g) [23]:
D 3 Cd
g
= d3
d
Dg Cg
(2)
The increase of solid content results in an increase of suspension viscosity and leads to the formation of dense granules
and large size. Fig. 1(a) presents the morphology of granulated
particles atomized from suspension with increased solid content
of 50 wt.%. All granules exhibited better spherical and solid
shape without any pinhole and their mean size was 48.9 m
(Fig. 1(b)). There were great improvement in particle shape
and increase in size compared to that of solid content 40 wt.%,
Fig. 1(c and d), under the same processing parameters determined by above results.
As known, the droplet shrinks because of the fast evaporation of solvent during drying. The solvent moves from inside
2393
to outsize of the droplet and the solid powders are also carried
along. At a lower solid content 40 wt.%, the faster and more
free movement of solid powders would form a soft shell around
the droplet and produce the hollow granules. The shell would
decrease the evaporation rate through the droplet surface. As the
temperature of the droplet inside increasing, the solvent would
begin to evaporate directly from the inside and a void would be
produced inevitably in Fig. 1(c). However, a higher solid content
would shorten the drying process because the movement of solid
powders became more difficult due to the low moisture. Thus,
it avoided the formation of hollow and hard particles [24].
In addition, the granules was formed with spherical shape
and high density when solid content was 50 wt.% in Fig. 1(a),
the extra-large granules were also formed. High solid content
seemed to have a negative effect on the formation of well packed
structure during shaping. Moreover, such high solid content
could cause the obstruction of nozzle in the mid-stage of spray
drying, being difficult to continue work for atomizer. Therefore,
a modest reduction of solid content was needed and 45 wt.% was
selected to continue the optimization of suspension composition.
3.2.2. Binder content of PVB
Generally, binder has to be added in the suspension to create
a mesh that keeps the solid particles combined with each other
and gives the outstanding increase in strengths for granulated
particles. Here, PVB was selected as the binder to optimize its
content.
Fig. 2 shows SEM images and size distribution of granulated
particles with different contents of binder. All the granulated
particles atomized from suspension of PVB content 1.0 wt.%
(Fig. 3(a and b)) exhibited monodispersed and fully dense aggregates with good spherical shape and smooth surface. However,
the binder content increased to more than 2.0 wt.%, a doughnut
or apple shape formed again in most granules (Fig. 3(c)). The
mean particles size gradually became larger from 30 m to
60 m with increasing binder content (Fig. 3(d)). Especially,
the granules exhibited similar mean size 40 m when binder
contents were 0.5 wt.% and 1.0 wt.%. But the maximum size
jumped from 87 m to 101 m when PVB content was from
1.0 wt.% to 2.0 wt.% (Fig. 3(d)). In addition, the size distribution
gradually became wider from = 7.0 to = 23.5 with increasing binder content and the maximum increase occurred when
an excessive addition of PVB 3.0 wt.% (, scale parameter of
distribution, was used to describe the dispersion degree of data
for normal distribution). The granulated particles with binder
content lower than 1.0 wt.% had similar and more standard normal distribution. This was in favor of imparting better forming
performance of granulated particles for green compact.
According to Eq. (1), the granules size is proportional to the
viscosity of suspension, and the binder could result in a significant increase in viscosity, leading to the gradual increase of
granules size. However, the excessive binder would also easily
form a flexible shell with low permeability around the droplets
at the starting stage of droplet-to-particles conversion [25]. It
decreases the evaporation rate of solvent, and the solvent begins
to evaporate directly inside, leading to the formation of central uplifts of droplet. This situation can severely destroy the
2394
Fig. 1. SEM images and size distributions of granulated particles with different solid contents. (a and b) 50 wt.%, (c and d) 40 wt.%.
Fig. 2. SEM images of granulated particles with different binder contents (a) 0 wt.%, (b) 1.0 wt.%, (c) 3.0 wt.% and their size distributions (d).
1.7
0.8
2395
(a)
Accumulation/ %
Density/ g cm
-3
TD
1.6
1.5
1.4
AD
(a) Binder
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
0.6
0.4
b
0.2
20 nm
0.0 wt.%
0.5 wt.%
1.0 wt.%
2.0 wt.%
3.0 wt.%
20 m
35 m
0.0
1.3
0.0
1.5
1.4
2.0
Content/ wt.%
3.0
0.01
0.1
40
80120
Pore size/ m
100
TD
(b)
-3
98
Density/ gcm
1.6
Density/ g cm
-3
1.7
1.0
AD
(b) Dispersant
96
60
55
50
1.3
0.25
0.50
0.75
Content/ wt.%
1.00
Fig. 3. Apparent density and tap density of granulated particles with different
contents of binder PVB (a) and dispersant DS005 (b).
45
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Binder/ wt.%
Fig. 4. (a) Pore size distributions of green compacts from granulated particles
with different binder contents and (b) the followed density change of ceramics.
2396
Fig. 5. SEM images of granulated particles with different dispersant contents (a) 0.25 wt.%, (b) 0.50 wt.%, (c) 1.0 wt.% and their size distributions (d).
60.0
(A)
(a)
Mean Size/ m
50.0
(b)
40.0
30.0
(c)
20.0
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Dispersant/ wt.%
Accumulation/ %
0.8
(B)
0.6
0.4
0.2
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
0.25 wt.%
0.50 wt.%
0.75 wt.%
1.0 wt.%
c
d
b
a
0.0
0.01
2397
Pore size/ m
0.1
Fig. 6. (A) Mean sizes of granulated particles with different atomizer speeds
and (B) the pore size distributions of green compacts with different dispersant
contents.
The crushing behavior of granulated particles during forming is a very important characteristic to evaluate their quality
and it has a significant impact on the density and microstructure
of green compact. Here, SEM images of fracture surfaces and
the density changes of green compact are used to evaluate the
strength of granules. The observation point for SEM was the center of the compact under different CIP pressures of 10100 MPa.
In Fig. 7, a carcass of spherical shape remained until 60 MPa,
but a homogeneous surface structure was completely formed
under 80 MPa. The densities of green compacts showed a gradual increase in Fig. 8(A) and two turning points. The granules
are composed of multi-levels of particles sizes. With increasing
CIP pressure, the granules firstly begin to arrange and fill the
void in 020 MPa. Then, the granules begin to crush into second
particles and filled interspace between granules in 2080 MPa.
Finally, the second particles were crushed into raw particles to
arrange and fill under above 80 MPa. Fig. 8(A) curve (b) is the
total porosity change measured by MIP. It decreased gradually
due to the expulsion of air and had already reached about 40%
after 80 MPa.
Fig. 8(B) shows the pore size distributions of green compacts under different CIP pressures. Obviously, they all exhibited
only one peak indicating the better homogeneity. When pressure was low at 10 MPa, the pore size was in a wide range
of 30 nm1 m. With increasing the pressure, the pore size
distribution gradually shifted to the smaller size. The detailed
change of mean pore size is shown in Fig. 8(B, inset) and
it decreased from 120 nm to 70 nm with gradually narrower
width of distribution, representing the smaller and more homogeneous pore in compact. In addition, an obvious turning point
of pressure was observed at 40 MPa. From 10 MPa to 40 MPa,
the pore size had a great decrease. In these compacts, there
was larger pore (>200 nm). But from 40 MPa to 80 MPa, the
total decrease of pore size was only 10 nm (from 80 nm to
70 nm). This indicated the green compacts pressured under
4080 MPa were in the same stage. Therefore, the granules finished the crush to form dense compact only pressured higher than
40 MPa.
In addition, the transmittance of sintered YAG ceramics also
gradually increased with increasing CIP pressure and the biggest
jump was found before 40 MPa and followed a slight increase
after 60 MPa. It reached 84.20% at 100 MPa, very near to the theoretical transmittance. Generally, a higher pressure, less porosity
and smaller pore size shorten the distance between the particles.
They are in favor of the diffusion and the densification during
sintering process.
These above results indicate the granulated particles have
excellent forming performance. They could form green compacts without inter-granules void only under 40 MPa and are
almost completely crushed under 80 MPa to form the dense and
homogeneous structure. The packing density under 100 MPa is
about 55.9%. Using the granulated particles with good forming
performance and suitable strength, even at low CIP pressure, it
is possible to fabricate transparent ceramics with higher optical
quality.
2398
Fig. 7. SEM images of fracture surfaces of green compacts under different CIP pressures.
Density/ gcm
(A)
50
48
2.4
46
Density
Total porosity
2.2
44
2.0
42
1.8
40
Total porosity/ %
-3
2.6
1.6
38
0
20
40
60
80
100
Pressure/ MPa
(B)
120
70 nm
Mean size/ m
Accumulation/ %
0.8
100
0.6
0.4
(a) 10 MPa
(b) 20 MPa
(c) 40 MPa
(d) 60 MPa
(e) 80 MPa
(f) 100 MPa
0.2
0.0
0.01
b
c
80
20
40
60
80
100
Pressure/ MPa
e
f
0.1
10
Pore size/ m
Fig. 8. (A) Densities and total porosities of green compacts under different CIP
pressure, (B) their pore size distributions and the change of mean pore size
(inset).
Fig. 9(A) shows the typical sphere (A1) and its surface (A2)
of one granulated particle with the optimized suspension. Every
granulated particle had very smooth and entirely spherical surface, Fig. 9(A1). Its magnification (20,000 times) of local surface
was Fig. 9(A2), it showed the dense structure with little and
small pore, and different particle morphologies corresponded to
different kinds of raw material, i.e., Al2 O3 and Y2 O3 for small
particle and big sheet, respectively. The micro-region EDS analysis is shown in Fig. 9(A3). The surface showed homogenous
distribution of Y/Al = 0.593, very closing to theoretical value
Y/Al = 3/5 = 0.60. The homogeneous mixing of raw materials
greatly shortens the diffusion distance and rapidly complete
the densification during sintering process. However, the typical composition deviation was observed in the granules without
binder in Fig. 9(B). Although the granulated particle still had
the better spherical shape, Fig. 9(B1), more Al2 O3 particles with
smaller size were on its surface and they seemed to cover the
bigger sheet Y2 O3 particles in Fig. 9(B2). EDS analysis showed
that in that granulated particle without binder, Y/Al = 0.562 was
deviated from the theoretical value 0.60.
In fact, this is known as the microencapsulation phenomenon
due to the big difference in particle sizes of multi-components.
Diffusion plays an important role in the solvent evaporation
and particle self-assembly stages. Different diffusion coefficient
(Dc ) affects the particle movement in the droplet [29]:
Dc = k
KB T
6c Rc
(3)
2399
Fig. 9. SEM images of one granulated particle (1) and its surface (2) and the EDS analysis (3) with the optimized suspension (A, binder content 1.0 wt.%) and
without binder (B).
where k, KB , T, c and Rc are diffusion correction factor, Boltzmanns constant, temperature, viscosity and component size,
respectively. Thus, Dc has a negative correlation to the size of
component. The component moves quickly with a decrease of
component size. In our suspension, the particle sizes of Al2 O3
and Y2 O3 were 100200 nm and 1 m, respectively, in Fig. 9.
When the suspension has no binder, Fig. 9(B), the combination
effect between particles would be weakened, comparing to the
suitable addition of binder. Smaller Al2 O3 particles could move
faster under the capillary force in the droplet, and then complete
the self-assembly of particles into close-packed arrays. It is possible for a smaller component to coat a larger component and
result in the composition deviation [30]. Although this deviation
was not big and could be compensated by the followed sintering process, it actually decreases the transmittance of sintered
ceramics. Therefore, a suitable addition of PVB binder is very
important to form homogeneous and dense granules.
The typical microstructures of surface (A1) and fracture surface (A2) of sintered ceramic with the optimized suspension
are shown in Fig. 10(A). They had a homogeneous microstructure and no pores or other defects could be observed. The grain
size was about 10 m with clear and clean grain boundary.
And a predominant transgranular fracture was observed with
little intergranular fracture. This homogeneous microstructure
2400
Fig. 10. SEM images of surface (1) and fracture surface (2) of ceramics with the dispersant content (A, 0.5 wt.%) and 1.0 wt.% (B).
100
84.74 %
80
Transmittance/ %
Transmittance/ %
80.17 %
60
40
20
80 (a)
60 (b)
20
0
0
500
(a) @ 1064 nm
(b) @ 400 nm
40
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Wavelength/ nm
Fig. 11. Transmittance of YAG ceramic from the optimized technology and its
change with different binder contents (inset).
Fig. 12. (a) SEM image of granulated particles using the optimized technology for scaled-up production of 10 kg; (b) photographs of their various transparent YAG
products.
2401
[7]. Yang H, Zhang J, Qin XP, Luo DW, Ma J, Tang DY, et al. Polycrystalline
Ho:YAG transparent ceramics for eye-safe solid state laser applications. J
Am Ceram Soc 2012;95:525.
[8]. Ikesue A, Yoshida K, Kamata K. Transparent Cr4+ -doped YAG ceramics for
tunable lasers. J Am Ceram Soc 1996;79:5079.
[9]. Sang YH, Qin HM, Liu H, Zhao LL, Wang YN, Jiang HD, et al. Partial wet
route for YAG powders synthesis leading to transparent ceramic: a coreshell
solid-state reaction process. J Eur Ceram Soc 2013;33:261723.
[10].Hostasa J, Esposito L, Piancastelli A. Influence of Yb and Si content on the
sintering and phase changes of Yb:YAG laser ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc
2012;32:294956.
[11].Ge L, Li J, Zhou ZW, Qu HY, Dong MJ, Zhu Y, et al. Fabrication of composite
YAG/Nd:YAG/YAG transparent ceramics for planar waveguide laser. Opt
Mater Express 2014;4:10429.
[12].Ba XW, Li J, Pan YB, Liu J, Guo JK. Preparation of composite YAG
transparent ceramics by aqueous tape casting route. Rare Metal Mater Eng
2013;42:2347.
[13].Pabst W, Hostasa J, Esposito L. Porosity and pore size dependence of the
real in-line transmission of YAG and alumina ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc
2014;34:274556.
[14].Suarez M, Fernandez A, Menendez JL, Nygren M, Torrecillas R, Zhao Z. Hot
isostatic pressing of optically active Nd:YAG powders doped by a colloidal
processing route. J Eur Ceram Soc 2010;30:148994.
[15].Suarez M, Rocha V, Fernandez A, Menendez JL, Torrecillas R. Synthesis and processing of spinel powders for transparent ceramics. Ceram Int
2014;40:40659.
[16].Liu YF, Qin XY, Xin HX, Song CJ. Synthesis of nanostructured Nd:Y2 O3
powders by carbonate-precipitation process for Nd:YAG ceramics. J Eur
Ceram Soc 2013;33:262531.
[17].Chen X, Zheng BC, Shen J. Morphologies of polymer grains during spray
drying. Dry Technol 2013;31:4338.
[18].Cao XQ, Vassen R, Schwartz S, Jungen W, Tietz F, Stoever D. Spraydrying of ceramics for plasma-spray coating. J Eur Ceram Soc 2000;20:
24339.
[19].Vicente J, Pinto J, Menezes J, Gaspar F. Fundamental analysis of particle
formation in spray drying. Powder Technol 2013;247:17.
[20].Tsetsekou A, Agrafiotis C, Milias A. Optimization of the rheological
properties of alumina slurries for ceramic processing applications. Part I.
Slip-casting. J Eur Ceram Soc 2001;21:36373.
[21].Liu WB, Zhang WX, Li J, Zhang D, Pan YB. Preparation of spray-dried
powders leading to Nd:YAG ceramics: the effect of PVB adhesive. Ceram
Int 2012;38:25964.
[22].Lefebvre A. Atomization and sprays. New York: CRC Press; 1988.
[23].Lukasiewicz SJ. Spray-drying ceramic powders. J Am Ceram Soc
1989;72:61724.
[24].Walker WJ, Reed JS, Verma SK. Influence of slurry parameters on the
characteristics of spray-dried granules. J Am Ceram Soc 1999;82:17119.
[25].Baklouti S, Chartier T, Baumard JF. Binder distribution in spray-dried alumina agglomerates. J Eur Ceram Soc 1998;18:211721.
[26].Elversson J, Millqvist-Fureby A. Particle size and density in spray drying
effects of carbohydrate properties. J Pharm Sci 2005;94:204960.
[27].Ashgriz N. Handbook of atomization and sprays: theory and applications.
Springer; 2011.
[28].Bertrand G, Filiatre C, Mahdjoub H, Foissy A, Coddet C. Influence of slurry
characteristics on the morphology of spray-dried alumina powders. J Eur
Ceram Soc 2003;23:26371.
[29].Wang S, Langrish T. A review of process simulations and the use of additives
in spray drying. Food Res Int 2009;42:1325.
[30].Costa AL, Matteucci F, Dondi M, Zama I, Albonetti S, Baldi G.
Heterocoagulation-spray drying process for the inclusion of ceramic pigments. J Eur Ceram Soc 2008;28:16976.